Greek lemon chicken is a dog-days delight

[rebelmouse-proxy-image https://www.theblaze.com/media-library/greek-lemon-chicken-is-a-dog-days-delight.jpg?id=53584785&width=1200&height=800&coordinates=0,36,0,36 crop_info="%7B%22image%22%3A%20%22https%3A//www.theblaze.com/media-library/greek-lemon-chicken-is-a-dog-days-delight.jpg%3Fid%3D53584785%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26coordinates%3D0%2C36%2C0%2C36%22%7D" expand=1]

Where I am, the heat still hasn’t tapered off: The dog days of summer are clinging to our forecasts like stubborn residue on your favorite steel pan.

It feels like it’s going to take a miracle for the dog days to leave. Until then, this recipe for Greek lemon chicken will have to do. It's a very nice bridge from summer to fall and reheats well for leftovers. It pairs beautifully with a cold cucumber salad (or squash, if it ever starts feeling autumnal around here).

Get our your favorite family casserole dish and prepare for a healthy meal to share. Note: Marinate the chicken overnight for best results.

Also: I've recently developed a fondness for finishing salts. Lately, I've been enjoying the many varieties Jacobsen Salt Co. makes from salt it harvests from Netarts Bay in Oregon. This Infused Black Garlic Salt would make a great topping for this particular dish; it could also make a nice housewarming or Christmas gift. Too soon to be thinking about that? Not if you’re a homemaker!

Ingredients

  • 8 bone-in chicken thighs
  • ¼ cup extra-virgin olive oil
  • ¼ cup butter
  • ¼ cup lemon juice
  • 5 garlic gloves, minced
  • 1 tablespoon dried oregano
  • 2 teaspoons dried thyme
  • 2 teaspoons rosemary
  • 2 teaspoons Dijon mustard
  • 2 teaspoons kosher salt
  • 1 teaspoon freshly ground black pepper

Instructions

  1. Make the marinade: In a small bowl, stir together the oil, lemon juice, garlic, oregano, thyme, mustard, salt, and pepper.
  2. Marinate the chicken: Add the chicken thighs to a large bowl and pour the marinade on top. Marinate for 1 to 2 hours (and up to 8 hours) in the fridge.
  3. Transfer to baking dish: Preheat the oven to 350°F. Place the chicken in a baking dish and pour the remaining marinade on top.
  4. Bake the chicken: Bake for 40 to 45 minutes, until the chicken is fully cooked and registers 175°F on an instant-read thermometer. Optionally, you can baste the chicken a few times while it cooks. And for extra crispy skin, turn on the top oven broiler in the last 2 to 3 minutes. If you're serving this dish up for a dinner party, garnish with lemon slices and fresh rosemary or thyme.

Provisions: United Record Pressing

[rebelmouse-proxy-image https://www.theblaze.com/media-library/provisions-united-record-pressing.jpg?id=53596095&width=1200&height=800&coordinates=0,0,0,1 crop_info="%7B%22image%22%3A%20%22https%3A//www.theblaze.com/media-library/provisions-united-record-pressing.jpg%3Fid%3D53596095%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26coordinates%3D0%2C0%2C0%2C1%22%7D" expand=1]

United Record Pressing

Category: Vinyl record pressing
Founders: Ozell Simpkins, John Dunn, and Joe Talbot
Founded: 1949
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
Current CEO: Mark Michaels
Representative products:Vinyl pressings, customized vinyl pressings, and reissue pressings, in a range of colors and templates

At a glance:

  • Founded as Southern Plastics in 1949, the year that the smaller 45 rpm record format first appeared, United Record Pressing is now the oldest and largest vinyl record pressing plant in America.
  • It has since grown to become one of the largest and most prominent record pressing plants in the world, churning out roughly 80,000 records a day.
  • United Record Pressing has innovated the art of making vinyl records.
  • The company has pressed some incredibly important albums and singles, from a diverse range of music legends including Elvis Presley, Johnny Cash, Taylor Swift, Hank Williams Jr., Tammy Wynette, Kanye West, Adele, Mumford & Sons, the Black Keys, Radiohead, Stevie Wonder, Kendrick Lamar, Lady Antebellum, and Dolly Parton.
  • It also pressed the Beatles’ “Please Please Me”/ “From Me to You,” the band’s first single made in America.
  • United Record Pressing is also known for its community engagement: At a time when the South was segregated, United Record Pressing welcomed black musicians and industry executives.
  • It survived the industry drought.
  • Demand for vinyl exploded during COVID-19 lockdowns.
  • In 2023, the United Record Pressing saw a $10 million expansion that added 200 jobs to the company.

In their own words: CEO Mark Michaels

Seventy-five-plus years of history gives you a lot of gas in your tank in terms of pride. You don’t make the first Beatles record in America, you don’t make all these Motown records, you don’t accumulate all this history and know-how and not have something special. And I never want to lose that.

There's a whole generation that never really got to experience music as art. They may value the portability (of downloads), but they still want to have an experience.

Never in a million years did I think it would, as a market and as an industry, become what it’s become today.

The vinyl revival has been incredible to witness. At United Record Pressing, we’re dedicated to meeting the growing demand with the highest standards of quality and precision. It’s an exciting time for both music lovers and the industry.

United Record Pressing is and always has been a Tennessee-based company with over 74 years of rich history here. We are excited to be making this investment in our expansion in Middle Tennessee and are very appreciative of the important support we have received.

I bought the company in 2007. I’ve got an enormous passion for music, so that was a happy coincidence. But that wasn’t why I bought it. I thought it was a good deal, and I wanted to build a small, niche business. I didn’t think vinyl was going to go away, but I didn’t think it was going to have the explosive growth that it has had over the past decade.

Germany's suicidal, rape-friendly immigration policy

[rebelmouse-proxy-image https://www.theblaze.com/media-library/image.jpg?id=53590102&width=1200&height=800&coordinates=0,0,0,1 crop_info="%7B%22image%22%3A%20%22https%3A//www.theblaze.com/media-library/image.jpg%3Fid%3D53590102%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26coordinates%3D0%2C0%2C0%2C1%22%7D" expand=1]

If the decline of Ireland is a tragedy, what's going on in Germany is equivalent to a piece of experimental theatre: difficult to fathom and even more difficult to explain.

It’s a darkly comic reflection of how a nation can fully embrace both the absurd and the profoundly unjust at the very same time. Once celebrated for its order and intellectual prowess, Germany now finds itself in a bizarre scenario where its responses to crime and dissent are nothing short of farcical.

'Das Land der Dichter und Denker (the land of poets and thinkers) has become das Land der Narren und Schurken (the land of clowns and criminals).

The joke, however, is on the people of Germany. And no one is laughing. Well, almost no one.

You see, foreign nationals with a penchant for robbery and assault have plenty of reason to smile.

Immigrants make up about 15% of Germany's population, yet they were responsible for a record 41% of all criminal activities last year. Government statistics show that crimes involving foreign suspects rose by 23% in 2022 and by 18% in 2023.

In the nation’s capital, Berlin, where knife crimes are a regular occurrence, the police came up with a "solution" that sounds like something straight out of a Monty Python skit. These cerebral custodians of community safety suggested that victims should sing loudly to fend off attackers. Yes, really.

In other words, if you find yourself threatened by a knife-wielding lunatic, instead of calling for help or trying to escape, you’re encouraged to belt out a bit of Whitney Houston. Naturally, this advice was immediately met with widespread ridicule, and the police quickly walked back their suggestion, admitting it was both impractical and detached from reality.

But the absolute idiocy doesn’t stop there. Consider the German government’s recent decision to hand out €1,000 to an Afghan man even as it deported him for raping an 11-year-old girl. This financial aid, intended to ease his reintegration into Afghan society, also sparked inordinate amounts of outrage and confusion. This wicked soul was one of 28 Afghan criminals expelled from Germany. The other 27, it's important to note, also received financial aid. All funded by taxpayers, of course.

To make matters worse, while dangerous delinquents are being rewarded, authors are being punished and persecuted.

This brings us to CJ Hopkins, a figure I’ve discussed elsewhere. This American-born playwright, novelist, and political satirist has lived in Berlin for nearly 20 years, using his sharp humor to critique modern politics and surveillance. His latest work, "The Rise of the New Normal Reich," highlights how authoritarian tendencies are creeping in under the guise of pandemic measures and the suppression of dissent.

Hopkins’ career, which once thrived in the city that inspired his writing, is now under attack.

This has been the case for more than two years. His troubles began in August 2022 when he criticized COVID-19 mask mandates as symbols of ideological conformity. His provocative comparisons between contemporary Germany and Nazi-era tactics ignited a firestorm, leading to an investigation by the Interior Ministry of the Federal State of Hessen and a criminal inquiry.

What followed was a coordinated attempt to silence him, extending beyond Germany to Austria and the Netherlands.

His outspoken views led to book bans, a criminal trial, and a media feeding frenzy. Although he was initially acquitted, the Berlin district prosecutor, unhappy with the outcome, appealed the ruling. This led to a retrial scheduled for September 30 at the Berlin Superior Court.

It’s possible that his nightmarish ordeal will never end. As he told me himself, the relentless, forever-increasing legal fees could lead to complete financial ruin. The physical and psychological toll he endures has become overwhelming, surpassing what most people could bear. While rapists have their bank accounts replenished, Hopkins' finances are being drained dry.

Though Hopkins' ordeal might appear to be a uniquely German issue, he believes that it mirrors a global trend. The sexagenarian argues that his case is a striking example of a broader crackdown on free speech, extending beyond Germany to many parts of the world.

This issue extends beyond the differences in free speech protections between countries like Germany and the U.S., for example. It signifies a broader and more insidious suppression of government critics. It also illustrates the troubling use of ostensibly neutral institutions to silence those who dare challenge prevailing narratives.

When compared to Hopkins' persecution, Germany's aiding and abetting of criminals reveals a concerning trend. Instead of focusing on tangible criminal activities, the state seems more interested in eliminating “thought crimes.” In the eyes of German lawmakers, the pen really is mightier than the sword — or, more accurately, the knife.

Again, though, there's very little, if anything, to laugh about here.

Both issues — the rampant crime, much of it perpetrated by immigrants, and the stifling of free speech — are part of a larger European narrative.

In Ireland, as I have shown previously, the government is actively working on a "hate speech" bill that could severely impact civil liberties. The proposed legislation would give prosecutors sweeping powers to convict individuals based on broad and vague definitions of "hate speech," regardless of intent.

Scotland’s situation is even more concerning. The Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act of 2021 introduces a new offense called “inciting hatred,” which encompasses a broad range of categories like age, disability, religion, and gender identity.

The law's vague language and severe penalties — up to seven years in prison — raise significant worries about misuse and the suppression of free speech. Prosecutors only need to show that inciting hatred was “likely” without proving any intent to offend, which makes the potential for wrongful convictions alarmingly high.

As is clear to see, these legislative changes aren’t just isolated national concerns; they’re part of a broader European trend, with Brussels playing a significant role. Earlier this year, the European Parliament backed a report suggesting that hate speech and hate crimes be classified as “Euro crimes.” If this classification goes through, derogatory speech (whatever that looks like in 2024) could face harsh penalties across the continent.

From Metz to Motherwell, Europe faces a troubling combination of rising violent crime rates and increasingly stringent restrictions, which are likely to exacerbate the problems rather than alleviate them. The goings-on in Germany, the economic powerhouse of Europe, reflects the continent's broader state — more precisely, its dire state.

Das Land der Dichter und Denker (the land of poets and thinkers) has become das Land der Narren und Schurken (the land of clowns and criminals). While Hopkins fights for his very existence, violent thugs, quite literally, prosper.

Opinion: Stop hoping for a federal abortion ban; change hearts and minds instead

[rebelmouse-proxy-image https://www.theblaze.com/media-library/opinion-stop-hoping-for-a-federal-abortion-ban-change-hearts-and-minds-instead.jpg?id=53590383&width=1245&height=700&coordinates=0,0,0,107 crop_info="%7B%22image%22%3A%20%22https%3A//www.theblaze.com/media-library/opinion-stop-hoping-for-a-federal-abortion-ban-change-hearts-and-minds-instead.jpg%3Fid%3D53590383%26width%3D1245%26height%3D700%26coordinates%3D0%2C0%2C0%2C107%22%7D" expand=1]

June 24 marked the second anniversary of the Dobbs decision, which functionally abolished federal-level abortion protections protected by Roe v. Wade for nearly half a century.

The occasion was met with the expected media fanfare, with hundreds of articles lamenting the negative effects of reduced access in 14 banned states and 27 partially banned.

Only a deep, spiritual revival can convince millions to change their minds on the importance of life in the womb. This hasn’t happened through legislation, so it must happen through the heart.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez blasted the alleged corruption of the Supreme Court and called for a Democratic majority in Congress to restore federal abortion protections. Human Rights Watch declared Dobbs an “egregious regression of women’s rights” and cited cases of rapes and medically dangerous infants being carried to term at women’s expense.

And with the court’s recent Chevron deference and limited immunity decisions, the two-year attempt to delegitimize the judicial branch continues at pace, with AOC calling for court justices to be impeached.

Mostly legal

Abortion continues to be legal in the majority of U.S. states, and vast apparatuses have emerged to help provide women with travel out of state through corporate-sponsored or charity-sponsored travel efforts, which has been called “abortion trafficking.”

The issue arose in June’s infamous debate between President Trump and President Biden. Naturally, Trump is ultimately responsible for Roe v. Wade’s overturning and was asked to defend the decision. He instead affirmed that states should have the right to decide for themselves, signaling that a second Trump administration largely wouldn’t touch the issue.

“Fifty-one years ago, we had Roe v. Wade, and everybody wanted to get it back to the states, without exception. Democrats and Republicans. Liberals and conservatives. Religious leaders. Everybody wanted it back. And what I did was put three great Supreme Court justices on the court, and they happened to vote in favor of killing Roe v. Wade and moving it back to the states. ... The states control it. The vote of the people.”

Trump has spent the past year distancing himself from the pro-life movement, which has been widely received as an insult by his conservative supporters and pro-life activists. Back in April, he directly blamed pro-life voters for the failures in the 2022 midterms, leading many of his religious supporters to feel insulted and betrayed, particularly concerning his backing away from one of his most historic accomplishments.

As Trump posted on August 23 on Truth Social, “My Administration will be great for women and their reproductive rights.”

Changing the subject

The party at large reflects this distancing. VP candidate JD Vance (R-Ohio) has repeatedly appeared in adversarial interviews with the press, defending Trump’s lukewarm pro-life stance. He told NBC’s "Meet the Press" that abortion pills should be legal and that policy should be determined at the state level. He affirmed this position again on Sunday, telling "Meet the Press" that Trump would veto any federal-level anti-abortion legislation.

Senator Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) has also appeared on CNN’s "State of the Union" affirming Trump’s position that “voters and individual states get to decide on restrictions” while still claiming Trump is the only pro-life candidate in the race. Elon Musk subsequently accused Vice President Kamala Harris of lying when she claimed that Trump would institute a total abortion ban, which itself was immediately debunked by a community note. The Republican National Convention even went so far as to walk back some of its abortion stances in the party’s official platform.

Conservatives on X have declared this shift a betrayal, with thousands of pro-life activists threatening to abstain from voting unless Trump reaffirms his commitment. His stance can’t help but feel like cowardice in the face of public pressure. And it is. The Republican Party doesn’t feel like it can make progress on the issue, and so it’s giving up.

A losing issue?

Unfortunately, Trump, Vance, and Rubio’s acquiescence on the issue is likely the best that the pro-life movement can expect at the moment. The only party in this election with an affirmative anti-abortion stance is the progressive third-party American Solidarity Party. Republicans have picked up that it is a losing issue and are doing everything in their power to avoid it.

However, in some ways, the modern Republican Party has reached the end of its capabilities at the present moment. Despite five decades of activism, the pro-life side is mostly losing in the public square. Americans overwhelmingly support moderated forms of abortion rights. Recent Pew Research data shows that only 36% of Americans support a partial or total abortion ban. Social scientist Ryan Burge also notes that Republican support for a total abortion ban has decreased from 30% to 25% in the past three years.

Thankfully, the grassroots pro-life movement remains strong. Many within the movement feared that its momentum would entirely dry up after Dobbs, that money and support for women’s care centers and crisis pregnancy centers would dry up — proving leftists right that we only care about babies in the womb and not outside. This did not occur.

A beacon of 'Hope'

My friend Kailey Cornett is the CEO of the pro-life Hope Center for Women in Nashville, Tennessee. Her clinic was nearly vandalized with a Molotov cocktail in July 2022, shortly after Dobbs. As she writes, "In the years since the Dobbs decision, here in Tennessee, we have seen a variety of responses. There are some champions who know us, love us, and understand the need is still great for our services. They have continued to support Hope Clinic, as have new donors who have learned about us in the last two years.”

Despite attempts to slander these clinics as inaccurate, unregulated, anti-abortion extremists, they’ve continued to maintain a strong momentum across the country, with many finding greater volunteer support, private donations, and federal funding in the past two years. This is despite pressure from left-wing activists, including subsequent vandalism attempts such as the one that happened near the Democratic National Convention in Chicago last month.

Encouraging as this is, it still speaks to a fundamental disconnect on the issue of abortion. The pro-life movement may be fully correct in its view and desire for a total ban on the practice, but it will not happen any time soon. Any federal attempt to impose laws against it will be met with the full force and deep pockets of the pro-choice lobby. It would almost certainly be immediately overturned. In a worst-case scenario, a Democratic supermajority could codify abortion protections in federal law and make them much stickier to undo. The cycle would start again.

Fifty-one years after Roe v. Wade, the hopes and prayers of the pro-life movement were fulfilled in Dobbs, and it has done a serviceable job moving forward despite a lack of clear leadership and direction. However, it has reached the edge of its capabilities in its current form.

A redirected effort is necessary for the future of this movement, and it cannot be won in Congress or the courts but can in the hearts and minds of Americans. We cannot simply enforce a full abortion ban on the American people if they do not want one.

Only a deep, spiritual revival can convince millions to change their minds on the importance of life in the womb. This hasn’t happened through legislation, so it must happen through the heart. This and many of America’s other problems will only go away when the hearts of the multitudes seek faith and find a greater sense of meaning and purpose through a religious ideology that teaches the importance of life.

Until such a time, there is little that can be permanently accomplished. Hopefully, the perseverance that carried the pro-life movement through half a century of doubt and uncertainty will be used to assist in that mission. If the Republican Party won’t stand for pro-life values, it falls into the movement’s hands to do the hard work.

Passport bros and Middle Eastern thugs: Tales from Thailand’s 'Sin City'

[rebelmouse-proxy-image https://www.theblaze.com/media-library/passport-bros-and-middle-eastern-thugs-tales-from-thailands-sin-city.jpg?id=53592777&width=1200&height=800&coordinates=0,16,0,70 crop_info="%7B%22image%22%3A%20%22https%3A//www.theblaze.com/media-library/passport-bros-and-middle-eastern-thugs-tales-from-thailands-sin-city.jpg%3Fid%3D53592777%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26coordinates%3D0%2C16%2C0%2C70%22%7D" expand=1]

I’m currently in Thailand, immersed in the rather brutal world of Muay Thai.

For those unfamiliar, Muay Thai is a form of martial arts that requires discipline, endurance, and lots of ice to offset the daily bruisings. Training here with seasoned Thai fighters is an experience unlike any other. These athletes, many of whom have been practicing the sport for decades, are absolute animals. They embody a relentless work ethic that can make even the most seasoned foreign fighter feel like a novice.

Beyond the usual crowds of Western tourists and expats, there has been a notable influx of visitors from the Middle East, a fact that hasn’t gone unnoticed by the locals.

However, there’s much more to Thailand than its legendary martial arts tradition. The country is often seen as a paradise of sun, sea, sand, and inordinate amounts of sin. Forgive me, Father!

Shoes, shirt, and self-respect optional

When we hear the words “Sin City,” Las Vegas automatically springs to mind. But what about Pattaya, Thailand’s own version of Las Vegas? Less than 100 miles from Bangkok, this popular beach city takes the concept of sin to an entirely different level.

In short, it has become a magnet for those seeking pleasures of a more sordid nature. While Las Vegas teases visitors with its neon-lit casinos and high-end shows, Pattaya offers something far less polished. It's a city where the temptations are brazenly out in the open, a place where anything seems possible, and often, it is. Welcome to the devil’s playground.

I spent several weeks in Pattaya while continuing my Muay Thai training. The contrast between the discipline of the gym and the chaos of the streets couldn’t have been more stark. The city is overrun with delinquents, many of whom seem to represent the worst of human nature.

Most of these individuals are foreigners, and the vast majority of them are from the U.S. and the U.K. It’s as if Pattaya attracts people who have given up on any semblance of order or moral restraint, choosing instead to wallow in the excesses that the city so freely offers.

Beer for breakfast, legalized weed for lunch, and only God knows what for dinner. The concept of wearing a shirt in public, no matter how out of shape one may be, is much like the offenders themselves: distinctly foreign.

That said, it isn’t all bad. Among the sea of lost souls, I encountered a few genuinely good people, including some elderly U.S. veterans who now make Pattaya their home. These men, who once served their country with honor, now find themselves in a city that feels worlds apart from the values they once defended.

When I inquired about their presence there, even they struggled to provide a coherent answer. After some polite pressing, they spoke kindly about the affordability, the pleasant climate, and the camaraderie they’ve found amidst the city's constant chaos.

Rising tensions

During my time in Pattaya, I saw a side of the city that has shifted dramatically in recent years. Beyond the usual crowds of Western tourists and expats, there has been a notable influx of visitors from the Middle East, a fact that hasn’t gone unnoticed by the locals.

This new wave of tourists has sparked rising tensions, and it's essential to address it without falling into oversimplified labels or accusations of prejudice. The frustration among locals is palpable, and it has little to do with race or religion. Rather, it has to do with behavior — thuggery and outright disrespect toward the people who make this country so welcoming.

Although obnoxious tourists are nothing new, the issues caused by this influx of Middle Eastern visitors are not confined to Pattaya. The nation’s capital has also been feeling the effects, with reports of criminal behavior increasing in certain districts. Scam artists, often operating in sophisticated networks, have been running riot, exploiting both tourists and locals alike. These scams range from simple cons to highly organized operations that leave many victims financially devastated.

It’s worth emphasizing that on the whole, you’d be hard-pressed to find kinder or more accommodating people than the Thai. They embody a grace and warmth that’s rare in such a tourist-heavy country. But even the most patient individuals have their limits. I personally witnessed how some of these newer visitors treated the locals — hotel staff, gym instructors, taxi drivers, and waitresses — with blatant disrespect. At times, it bordered on open contempt, as though the basic decency expected in any social interaction no longer applied.

For a country that prides itself on hospitality, such behavior is deeply unsettling, and the resentment among locals is beginning to simmer. You can sense it in the conversations among the Thai people — who, despite their calm demeanor, are growing increasingly fed up with the lack of courtesy and respect shown by certain foreign visitors. The contrast is sharp; while Thai culture places a strong emphasis on respect, politeness, and humility, the actions of some of these recent arrivals seem to openly defy those values.

The gravity of the situation becomes even more apparent when you consider the fact that these are people who have seen it all.

In a place like Pattaya, where spring break seems to be happening every single day of the year, the boundaries of acceptable behavior are constantly pushed. In many ways, the locals have become desensitized to the usual transgressions that might shock elsewhere.

They’ve witnessed or heard about every conceivable excess — drunken brawls, public indecency, streaking septuagenarians. Yet the fact that many of them are now genuinely up in arms over the behavior of this recent influx of visitors is telling.

They are also growing tired of the “Sin City” label. There were actual protests in the streets just two months ago, with many residents voicing their frustration over Pattaya’s international reputation as a hub of iniquity. This local pushback reveals a desire for change, a demand for the city to be seen as more than just the home of hedonism.

However, Pattaya is undeniably the mecca for those seeking the darker side. It’s a destination for men attracted to the city’s infamous ladyboy culture — though, personally, most definitely not my cup of tea. For those inclined, Pattaya offers an abundance of nightlife catering to every taste imaginable, from go-go bars to the infamous Walking Street, where ladies and men who want to be ladies eye every foreigner with an intensity that's nothing short of theatrical.

Final thoughts

Of course, Pattaya isn't all bad. In fact, it has its own unique charm. The beaches, for instance, remain one of its redeeming features. While not the pristine, postcard-perfect stretches of sand found in other parts of Thailand, Pattaya Beach and nearby Jomtien Beach still offer stunning views and warm waters. And most importantly, they offer a place to escape from the thousands of ladyboys who patrol the streets with a militaristic precision.

There's certainly a quieter side of Pattaya that doesn’t get nearly as much attention. Hidden within the city are pockets of authentic Thai culture — the temples, markets, and the local street food scene that thrives away from the tourist spots. Places like the Sanctuary of Truth, a massive wooden structure filled with exquisite carvings, stand as reminders of the city’s deeper cultural heritage.

The city is, on the whole, a mixed bag. Much like Amsterdam and Prague, it’s full of indecency, but it also offers more, shall we say, respectable options, if you know where to look.

It’s this juxtaposition — between vice and virtue — that makes Pattaya so fascinating yet frustrating for those who call it home. The locals want to reclaim their city from the stereotypes, but given Pattaya’s entrenched reputation, that’s easier said than done.

Iron man

[rebelmouse-proxy-image https://www.theblaze.com/media-library/iron-man.jpg?id=53580208&width=2000&height=1500&coordinates=4,0,0,0 crop_info="%7B%22image%22%3A%20%22https%3A//www.theblaze.com/media-library/iron-man.jpg%3Fid%3D53580208%26width%3D2000%26height%3D1500%26coordinates%3D4%2C0%2C0%2C0%22%7D" expand=1]

Our eyes slowly creak open. We drag ourselves out of bed, pour a cup of piping hot coffee, and try to bring ourselves back to life one more time. Every morning it’s the same. We are lost in our emails before our eyes adjust to the golden morning light. We are shocked by the digital realm.

Wake up!

Ironing is certainly not some great feat of strength, but you are altering the physical world, even if only in a very small way. You are flattening the wrinkles.

Our eyes are still foggy as we scroll through notifications. From that point on, it’s a race to the end of the day, when we finally collapse exhausted into our beds. In the ancient days, we set aside time for morning prayer. We would orient ourselves spiritually before we went out into the world. Any day could be our last, after all.

But not any more. In our age we are thrust into the gears of the great machine without any pause to enter the spiritual realm. Our minds are clogged before we even start the day. No moments of reflection. No breath of peace. No chance for quiet. We are plugged in even before we realize what day it is.

There is, however, a morning ritual that allows us some respite, a few moments that draw us away from the digital realm and back into the actual. A brief experience that forces us to focus on only that which is in front of our face. It directs us toward the small and the mundane, which, in turn, frees our mind to wander aimlessly and, sometimes, even introspectively.

For modern man, ironing is a secular rite that takes place every morning.

In our day and age, many men don’t ever iron their clothes. They don’t wear clothes that need to be ironed. Many don’t even own an iron. They take their clothes from the washer to the dryer, then from the dryer to the dresser, and that’s it. The sweatshirt and jeans aren’t ever pressed. They are tumbled. And, of course, the clothing suffers aesthetically.

But it isn’t only that. Something else is lost. It’s not just the aesthetics. It’s the ritual of ironing that’s lost.

In my daily routine, ironing comes after a shower. My eyes are still wet and my hair is freshly slicked back. I am working on my second cup of coffee at this point. I have an addiction; yes, it’s true.

I stand in front of the closet and choose my pants and my shirt. I toss them onto a chair, open the ironing board, pour some water into the iron, and wait a few minutes as it heats up. The morning light breaks through the window. The trees outside are tossed by the morning breeze. The shadows flicker across the plain fabric of the ironing board. I wait in silence.

A few minutes later the iron is warm and I begin. It’s a boring task, ironing the crease in my pants. Making sure the front, back, and sides of each leg are all tended to. Taking time to iron in between every button on my OCBD. Giving the collar copious amounts of steam. Going after the sleeve plackets even when no one really sees them.

It’s tedious. It really is. But I can’t do anything else when I am doing it. I can’t text or respond to emails. I have to be fully immersed in the process. And in this strange way, it is peaceful. It is a few moments that are only mine.

The physicality of it is important. Ironing is certainly not some great feat of strength, but you are altering the physical world, even if only in a very small way. You are flattening the wrinkles. Creasing the cotton. You are making a decision to beautify your clothing. You are taking care to do something with clear intention. You are carefully crafting your aesthetic in a way that you aren’t if you simply take the sweatshirt out of the dresser and throw it on at the last minute before you race out the door.

And, in a sense, this intention leads to a feeling of ownership. When we care about something, we take time to prepare it. And when we prepare something, we start to care about it. It’s a cycle, a chicken-or-egg situation. Ironing leads to care and care leads to ironing.

Those moments of care and intention each and every morning set our minds in a different place and direct our actions down a different path. They orient us toward the world with a certain kind of certitude and direction. We start our day making a conscious effort, and that leads to more conscious effort. We have something special in these few moments of modern meditation and conscious effort.

It’s peculiar, isn’t it? It’s so small. It’s so mundane. It’s so uninspiring. And yet we are forced out of the matrix when we iron. We have a chance to be quiet and manipulate the world with our hands.

That might sound strange to a peasant from 1400 — all he did was work with his hands — but to a modern man who is perpetually engaged in the digital world, drawing back into the actual is a brief retreat into something refreshing. It’s a breath of fresh air.

That mundane routine every morning might be small, but it gives us a chance to just be quiet. It gives us a chance to just be. And that’s something we need.

Days after RFK Jr. signaled desire to 'Make America Healthy Again,' Time issues defense of ultra-processed foods

[rebelmouse-proxy-image https://www.theblaze.com/media-library/image.jpg?id=53566523&width=1245&height=700&coordinates=0,16,0,180 crop_info="%7B%22image%22%3A%20%22https%3A//www.theblaze.com/media-library/image.jpg%3Fid%3D53566523%26width%3D1245%26height%3D700%26coordinates%3D0%2C16%2C0%2C180%22%7D" expand=1]

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. revealed Friday that a major factor behind his decision to endorse President Donald Trump was the opportunity to help "Make America Healthy Again" in a future Trump administration.

"Don't you want healthy children?" said Kennedy. "And don't you want the chemicals out of our food? And don't you want the regulatory agencies to be free from corporate corruption? And that's what President Trump told me that he wanted."

Days later, Time magazine signaled a possible narrative shift regarding American health with an article titled "What if Ultra-Processed Foods Aren't as Bad as You Think?" — having just months earlier published an article entitled "Why Ultra-Processed Foods Are So Bad for You."

Kennedy, unwilling to buy what Time appeared to be selling, tweeted, "Yeah, what if? And what if ultra-processed foods are WORSE than you think?"

The newly minted Trump ally was responding to a post from Dr. Casey Means, the co-founder of the food-health monitoring company Levels, who hammered Time for the apparent attempt in the Monday article to rehabilitate ultra-processed foods' public image.

"Mainstream media playbook," Means wrote on X. "When the culture seems to be turning TOWARDS health, rapidly spin up a BS article (like this one that was published yesterday in TIME)" in order to

  • seed confusion;
  • normalize the problem with a "meaningless anecdote";
  • distract and shut down the discourse by focusing "intensely on social justice issues and questions of food access rather than science";
  • "mention but then QUICKLY minimize the innumerable studies that say ultraprocessed foods impair hormones, metabolic health, and are associated with early death"; and
  • avoid mention of "funding sources and conflicts of interest at NIH, USDA, FDA, academia, OR THE NEWS OUTLET THAT IS PUBLISHING THE ARTICLE."
Kennedy added, "And don't talk about the conflicts at NGO's like NAACP and the Diabetes groups that get their funding from the processed food lobbyists."

A race-obsessive's fight to be unhealthy

Time's controversial article by Jamie Ducharme — the health correspondent who suggested in 2021 that debilitating vaccine side effects were "normal" — told the tale of how pro-obesity dietician Jessica Wilson took offense at the success and conclusions of an actual medical doctor's recent book concerning the consequences of ultra-processed foods.

Ducharme wrote:

Wilson, who specializes in working with clients from marginalized groups, was irked. She felt that van Tulleken's experiment was over-sensationalized and that the news coverage of it shamed people who regularly eat processed foods — in other words, the vast majority of Americans, particularly the millions who are food insecure or have limited access to fresh food; they also tend to be lower income and people of color. Wilson felt the buzz ignored this "food apartheid," as well as the massive diversity of foods that can be considered ultra-processed.

Dr. Chris van Tulleken, a practicing infectious diseases doctor who earned both his medical degree and his Ph.D. in molecular virology at Oxford University, recently penned an international best-seller titled "Ultra-Processed People: Why We Can't Stop Eating Food That Isn't Food."

As part of what appears to have been a marketing campaign for the book, Tulleken increased his intake of ultra-processed foods for a month, such that they accounted for 80% of his diet. He was left with anecdotal evidence of what he had otherwise demonstrated on the basis of hard science.

"Ultra-processed foods" are defined in the NOVA food classification system as:

industrial formulations made entirely or mostly from substances extracted from foods (oils, fats, sugar, starch, and proteins), derived from food constituents (hydrogenated fats and modified starch), or synthesized in laboratories from food substrates or other organic sources (flavor enhancers, colors, and several food additives used to make the product hyper-palatable). Manufacturing techniques include extrusion, moulding and preprocessing by frying. Beverages may be ultra-processed.

Examples of ultra-processed foods include store-bought biscuits; frozen desserts, chocolate and candies; soda and other carbonated soft drinks; prepackaged meat and vegetables; frozen pizzas; fish sticks and chicken nuggets; packaged breads; instant noodles; chocolate milk; breakfast cereals; and sweetened juices.

Tulleken told the BBC that after a month of primarily eating ultra-processed food, "I felt ten years older."

'Ultra-processed foods exposure was consistently associated with 32 adverse health outcomes.'

The doctor indicated that during the experiment, his hormones and weight destabilized; his brain underwent changes; the quality of his sleep worsened; he experienced anxiety; and he suffered heartburn, a low libido, and sluggishness.

"If it can do that in four weeks to my 42-year-old brain, what is it doing to the fragile developing brains of our children?" asked Tulleken.

Lethal groceries

Blaze News reported earlier this year that a massive peer-reviewed study published in the BMJ, the British Medical Association's esteemed journal, found evidence pointing to "direct associations between greater exposure to ultra-processed foods and higher risks of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease related mortality, common mental disorder outcomes, overweight and obesity, and type 2 diabetes."

The international team of researchers from institutions such as the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the Sydney School of Public Health found that ultra-processed foods exposure was consistently associated with 32 adverse health outcomes, including all-cause mortality; cancer-related deaths; cardiovascular disease-related deaths; heart disease-related deaths; breast cancer; central nervous system tumors; chronic lymphocytic leukemia; colorectal cancer; pancreatic cancer; prostate cancer; adverse sleep-related outcomes; anxiety; common mental disorder outcomes; depression; asthma; wheezing; Crohn's disease; ulcerative colitis; obesity; hypertension; and type 2 diabetes.

"On the basis of the random effects model, 32 (71%) distinct pooled analyses showed direct associations between greater ultra-processed food exposure and a higher risk of adverse health outcomes," said the study. "Additionally, of these combined analyses, 11 (34%) showed continued statistical significance when a more stringent threshold was applied."

Heart disease-related death, cardiovascular disease-related death, all-cause mortality, type 2 diabetes, wheezing, and depression were among the 11 adverse health outcomes that showed continued statistical significance in the face of the more stringent threshold.

Junk science

Prickled both by Tulleken's discussion of such harmful health effects and by his firsthand experience with their impact, Wilson — an activist who ran a "6 week queer exploration of the joys and terrors of having a body," touts herself as the "co-creator of the Amplify Melanated Voices challenge," and apparently believes the desire for thinness is racist — reportedly asked herself, "How can this entire category of foods be something we're supposed to avoid?"

According to Time, Wilson similarly adjusted her diet for so that 80% of what she ate for a month was highly processed foods.

After Wilson chowed down on soy chorizo, Trader Joe's ready-to-eat tamales, cashew-milk yogurt with jam, tater tots, and other highly processed foods for a month, Time reported, "A weird thing happened."

"Wilson found that she had more energy and less anxiety. She didn't need as much coffee to get through the day and felt more motivated. She felt better eating an ultra-processed diet than she had before, a change she attributes to taking in more calories by eating full meals, instead of haphazard combinations of whole-food ingredients," wrote Ducharme.

Time magazine's health correspondent posed the question: "How could two people eating the same type of foods have such different experiences? And could it be true that not all ultra-processed foods deserve their bad reputation?"

Despite citing numerous legitimate studies indicating ultra-processed foods are indeed harming and possibly even killing Americans, Ducharme hedged, writing:

Most people who care about their health have the same question about processed foods: Are they killing me? And right now — despite their looming possible inclusion in dietary guidelines — no one really knows the answer. There's limited cause-and-effect research on how processed foods affect health, and scientists and policymakers have yet to come up with a good way to, as Hess says, "meaningfully delineate between nutrient-dense foods and nutrient-poor options."

The Time article concluded with Wilson's insinuation that she would choose ultra-processed foods "every time" if it meant going to bed feeling full.

The article has been roundly ridiculed online, with many critics noting the politically expedient timing of its release.

Adam Johnston, of the Substack "Conquest Theory," responded to the article, writing, "We can't speak the truth about ultra-processed foods because it will shame marginalized groups. So we have to keep pretending our diets are healthy while obesity soars and people die. We wouldn't want to hurt the feelings of marginalized groups, now would we?"

Blaze Media CEO Tyler Cardon noted, "If you need more motivation to ditch ultra-processed foods, this headline from this publication should do the trick."

"Not a week after @RobertKennedJr raised the awareness back to the masses on the dangers of ultra-processed foods," wrote Turning Point USA spokeswoman Isabel Brown.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

The death of Ireland

[rebelmouse-proxy-image https://www.theblaze.com/media-library/the-death-of-ireland.jpg?id=53551879&width=1200&height=600&coordinates=0,128,0,128 crop_info="%7B%22image%22%3A%20%22https%3A//www.theblaze.com/media-library/the-death-of-ireland.jpg%3Fid%3D53551879%26width%3D1200%26height%3D600%26coordinates%3D0%2C128%2C0%2C128%22%7D" expand=1]

Close your eyes and picture Ireland. You’re probably imagining lush green fields, charming villages, and thatched cottages. Now, open your eyes and acknowledge reality.

Nearly one in five people living in Ireland wasn’t born there. In Galway, a city that’s a stone’s throw from where I grew up, Muhammad recently surpassed Michael and Martin as the most popular name for newborn boys. That’s right — Muhammad, a name synonymous with Islamic tradition. This is not the Ireland you know or thought you knew. It’s a country in the midst of a radical transformation.

Cases like Mohamed Mohamud Mohamed, a passport-destroying migrant who was refused asylum in multiple EU countries before coming to Ireland and sexually assaulting a woman in a Dublin toilet, only affirm totally reasonable concerns people have about mass immigration into Europe being 70% male.

Ireland is going to hell in a handbasket, and its elected leaders are complicit in its descent.

Collision of civilizations

What's happening in Ireland has become a sobering reminder of the effects of out-of-control immigration and incompetent leadership. A country that was once cohesive and orderly now struggles with overwhelmed services, strained resources, and rising tensions.

This is more than a clash of values; it’s a collision of civilizations. The issue isn’t merely the number of people entering the country; it’s the kind of people.

Immigration, when properly managed, can strengthen a nation. More doctors, dentists, and engineers would be welcome. But instead, Ireland has opened its doors to an influx of dole-drawing delinquents and rapists. Communities are being decimated, Irish women are being violated, and cultural traditions are being eroded.

Documenting the decay

The Ireland of today is unrecognizable to the Ireland of 20 years ago. To understand why, it helps to get the thoughts of someone who has studied the issue in great detail. Enter Ciarán O’Regan, an essayist intimately familiar with the decay.

Over the past few years, along with my family and childhood friends back home, O’Regan has kept me informed about the chaos consuming the country. However, unlike my family and close friends, O'Regan documents this chaos with remarkable insight and eloquence. A man so Irish he bleeds Guinness, O’Regan cares passionately about the direction in which the country is headed.

He tells Align, in no uncertain terms, that “on paper, Ireland is one of the wealthiest countries in the EU. And if you were to talk to highly educated and well-paid bourgeois with sheltered lives in leafy suburbia, things can be pretty damn good — especially if they only consume media within the establishment narrative.”

On the other hand, says O'Regan:

Ask people who have had mass immigration rammed down their throats, and things are not so good. Cases like Mohamed Mohamud Mohamed, a passport-destroying migrant who was refused asylum in multiple EU countries before coming to Ireland and sexually assaulting a woman in a Dublin toilet, only affirm totally reasonable concerns people have about mass immigration into Europe being 70% male.

An unholy alliance

O'Regan paints a damning picture of an unlikely union between the Lifestyle Left and the de-nationalized globalist right. A Catholic writer from Cork who’d rather be discussing Tolkien or Nietzsche than the downfall of this once-great nation, he argues that this unholy alliance is at the heart of the country's unraveling.

O'Regan suggests that the globalist right seeks to flood the labor market with cheap, imported workers. The goal is to undercut the indigenous working class, making life easier for the sheltered elites and big capital. This strategy is driven not by any concern for the nation but by a desire to maximize profits and maintain the status quo.

But this "penetrative assault on national interest" requires a moral veneer, and that’s where the Lifestyle Left comes in. These hyper-moralists are less interested in traditional class politics and more focused on advancing what he terms "gay race communism" — a radical ideology that insists "all white people are racist" and "transwomen are women," while dismissing dissent as far-right extremism.

This intimate association between transnational capital and virtue signaling has even earned a nickname: "Globohomo," a blend of the terms "global" (or "globalist") and "homosexual." And if this starting point holds any truth, O'Regan provocatively suggests, then reckless immigration policies might not just be about economic exploitation. Instead, it could be a deliberate strategy to import a very specific type of voting bloc — one that helps the Globohomo regime quash any indigenous political dissent.

Waiting for rock bottom

When it comes to addressing the crisis in Ireland, O'Regan is torn between cautious hope and the nagging fear that this hope might be nothing more than a delusion.

O'Regan at first viewed the coalition’s March 2024 referendum defeat as a hopeful sign — suggesting Ireland might be joining its European neighbors in a "common sense populist revolt." This landslide defeat of what he dismisses as regime nonsense seemed to suggest that Irish voters were waking up to the grim realities around them.

The referendum itself, in line with the aforementioned "Globohomo" agenda, sought to expand the definition of family to include "nontraditional" relationships outside of marriage — a move that could be viewed as a concerted effort to dismantle traditional social structures.

Since then, however, O'Regan's optimism has waned. He fears that Ireland has not yet decayed enough to jolt the necessary number of voters — and crucially, potential counter-elites — out of their "tranquilizing apathy." He likens the situation to that of an addict needing to hit rock bottom before being driven to make life-changing changes.

A telling example of this political lethargy is the June re-election of Abul Kalam Azad Talukder, a Muslim Fianna Fáil councillor in Limerick who last November openly called for anti-immigration rioters in Dublin to be "shot in the head."

Blaming the 'far right'

O'Regan draws a parallel to France, the "jihad capital of Europe," where despite nearly 100 Islamist attacks and 350 deaths, Marine Le Pen’s party — openly critical of Islamism — managed only 38% of the vote in recent elections. Such events suggest that even in the face of escalating violence, a significant portion of the electorate remains indifferent or unwilling to support meaningful change.

This indifference is further highlighted by the Irish establishment’s efforts to redirect public concern away from a suspected Islamist stabbing of a Catholic Irish army chaplain and back toward the ever-elusive "far right" specter — a term so nebulous that Justice Minister Helen McEntee herself admits there’s no clear definition for it.

Given this bleak outlook, O'Regan advocates for a broader approach, one that includes meaningful communitarian endeavors designed to enrich and strengthen the social fabric of Irish life.

As Ireland crumbles, O'Regan’s message is clear: The struggle is far from over. The people of this island must look beyond traditional politics to find the strength to endure, overcome, and, if possible, save what remains.

Man or mannequin: Dressing to live instead of living to dress

[rebelmouse-proxy-image https://www.theblaze.com/media-library/man-or-mannequin-dressing-to-live-instead-of-living-to-dress.jpg?id=53504447&width=1200&height=800&coordinates=0,0,0,44 crop_info="%7B%22image%22%3A%20%22https%3A//www.theblaze.com/media-library/man-or-mannequin-dressing-to-live-instead-of-living-to-dress.jpg%3Fid%3D53504447%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26coordinates%3D0%2C0%2C0%2C44%22%7D" expand=1]

There is man, and there is mannequin.

A mannequin is stiff and still. Motionless. Without face and without personality. Without story and without will. He stands quietly in the store window. His clothes are pressed. The tags are attached. All through the night, in the dark of the empty showroom, he remains alone.

He shouldn’t worry about wrinkles; they are natural. He should’t worry about stains; they will come out. Bumps and bruises are a sign of life lived. Rips and tears mean action.

All day, when the world comes alive again, he stands frozen. People walk by, stop and stare, and then go on their way. His clothes are perfect and without wrinkles. No stains and no blemishes. His appearance is pristine and his posture immaculate.

The people get close; they aren’t afraid. They could smack his face and he won’t retaliate. He is powerless. He’s a mannequin.

Purple noon

Man is different. He acts in the world. He exerts his will. He moves from place to place. He lives and breathes. He works and plays. He travels across the sea and writes his story for himself. He builds a world around him.

Man isn’t here just for looking. He isn’t a doll. He isn’t waiting behind the glass. He loves and fights. He creates and destroys. He is action incarnate.

Man must never become mannequin. The day he does, he becomes useless.

Avoiding the fate of the mannequin is a struggle for the man who cares about his style and personal aesthetic.

It’s easy to see how a man becomes a mannequin. One day, he decides that he wants to dress better. He starts to care about his clothes. He starts to develop his eye. He starts to stake out opinions about what he likes and what he doesn’t.

He likes jeans of a certain shade. He likes chinos with a certain rise. He likes a certain kind of balanced stripe. He doesn’t like checks. He develops his taste, and he becomes more particular. He cares more about his clothes. He spends more money on his clothes. And this all means that he takes greater care of his clothes.

La Piscine

And this is a good thing, right? Yes and no. A man should care about his clothing. He should take care to cultivate his personal aesthetic. He should appear strong in his clothes. He should dress with intention. It is good that he cares.

Yet this care can mutate into something toxic. It can turn into something unhealthy and unbecoming. Less man and more something else. He becomes like a collector. He becomes too fastidious and neurotic.

It’s possible for him to care too much about keeping his clothes perfect. He can care so much about his clothes that they become an idol that he worships. He can become so attached to his precious shirts and favorite pants that he ends up retreating from the world because he doesn’t want to put them in danger.

He can’t go lay in the grass because he is concerned about grass stains. He worships perfection. He can’t go out in the rain because he is worried about his jacket. He can’t go for a walk in the back because he doesn’t want to hurt his nice shoes. He can’t relax because he is too worried about his clothes.

He can’t. He can’t. He can’t.

He becomes less engaged with the world because he doesn’t want to damage his wonderful clothes. He no longer wears the clothes. They are now wearing him. They don’t serve him. He serves them.

He becomes stiffer in his movements. He is wearing clothes that he loves, but he doesn’t seem at home in them. He looks great, but he doesn’t look comfortable.

You know him when you see him. You can feel that something is off. He is always adjusting his sleeves, his collar, his tie, his pants. He isn’t present and living; he is always thinking about how he looks in his clothes. He secretly longs to be a mannequin. If only he could just stay still. If only he didn’t have to move about like a living and breathing man.

Le Samouraï

A man should care about his personal aesthetic. He should know what looks good and what doesn’t. He should embody an aesthetic that is natural and true. He should realize that his clothing is part of his culture and it matters a great deal.

He should put a great fit together in the morning, but then he should forget all about it. He should never forgo some activity out of fear of hurting some precious garment. His clothing should never hold him back. It should accompany him on his journey through life.

He shouldn’t worry about wrinkles; they are natural. He should’t worry about stains; they will come out. Bumps and bruises are a sign of life lived. Rips and tears mean action. He should live naturally and aesthetically.

Men must dress well, but not as mannequins. Men are not dolls. Men are meant to act in the world. A man dressed with intention exerting his will on the world is living aesthetics. It is vitalistic.

It is man, not mannequin.

How to survive international travel with 3 kids under 3

[rebelmouse-proxy-image https://www.theblaze.com/media-library/how-to-survive-international-travel-with-three-kids-under-3.jpg?id=53509080&width=1200&height=800&coordinates=0,129,0,0 crop_info="%7B%22image%22%3A%20%22https%3A//www.theblaze.com/media-library/how-to-survive-international-travel-with-three-kids-under-3.jpg%3Fid%3D53509080%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26coordinates%3D0%2C129%2C0%2C0%22%7D" expand=1]

Richard Hanania recently posted a frank and excellent essay called The Opportunity Costs of Having Kids, where he quoted Otto von Bismarck, sympathizing with one of the world’s great statesman’s disdain for traveling with young ones. Bismarck wrote:

The nearer it comes the more I see this as a ticket to the madhouse or to the Upper Chamber of parliament for life. I see myself with children on the platform at Genthin station, then in the compartment where both satisfy their needs ruthlessly and emit an evil stink, the surrounding society holding its nose. Johanna too embarrassed to give the baby the breast so he screams himself blue, the battle with the crowd, the inn, screaming children on Stettin station and in Angermünde 1 hour waiting for horses, packing up, and how do we get from Kröchlendorf to Külz? If we had to spend the night in Stettin, that would be terrible. I went through that last year with Marie and her screaming … I am, I feel, somebody to whom a dreadful injustice has been done. Next year I shall have to travel with three cradles, three nurses, nappies for three, bed clothes; I wake at 6 in the morning in a gentle rage and cannot sleep at night because I am haunted by all sorts of travel pictures, which my fantasy paints in the blackest hues, right to the picnics in the dune of Stolpmünde. And if there were only daily payments for this but instead it causes the ruin of a once flourishing fortune by traveling with infants — I am very unhappy.

Oh, dear. I’m sorry to say the truth of the matter is indeed as brutal as Bismarck describes, and like so many things about kids, there’s really no way around the brutality other than through with your chin held high, despite it all.

Peace — at least the kind you once enjoyed as a single person — is one of the casualties of parenthood, and no quantity of ethereal tradwife reels on Instagram are likely to change that.

My expectations were low, and they were met! Clementine screamed at the top of her lungs the entire way through security! Fortunately, I'd had the foresight to prepare for the worst; or, as I like to call it: front loading grace.

Before I get into the nitty gritty details, let me also recommend cultivating patience — both with your children and with yourself. It takes time to adjust.

As for my family, now that we’re adjusting to a sleep schedule, things are improving, and I’m confident that once we get our sea legs, we will enjoy ourselves more than we don’t. We are learning how to be in a new place, while the kids are simply learning to be civilized human beings. It takes time.

The following are some items that really helped. If there’s anything notable here, it’s that we don’t have iPads. That said, we relied on the provided screens, and yes, my 3-year-old watched three movies.

Wonderfold Wagon

I hope I can meme a sponsorship into existence here, because I could sing the praises of the Wonderfold Wagon all day long.

Americans have been some of the greatest innovators in the field of child transportation, partially of necessity. The Wonderfold, designed and manufactured in California, lives up to the hype.

This wagon is heavy, but it holds our kids and, in the airport, much of our luggage. We checked a bag for each person, had carry-ons, and personal bags. The wagon held the carry-ons and the kids comfortably. At the airport, you can request to check the bag at the gate. If your flight is especially full, you can also check carry-ons for free, so be sure to ask about that and make sure you keep your necessities in the personal bags if so.

Since we’ve been here, the wagon has been amazing for keeping the children contained. Because it’s so big with a flat bottom, they can even nap inside. It truly doubles as a pack-and-play for the baby.

We have the W4 Luxe model. It comes with all sorts of accoutrements, and some are sold separately: removable seats with seatbelts, a cupholder, a tray, a canopy. I bought this wagon cover for checking it, and it was not even remotely damaged (I saw two other families with broken strollers at the end of the day).

You will check the wagon at the gate and can request if you have layovers (as we did, one in Munich) to receive it again at each stop.

If you are a reasonable person who spaced their children in a more reasonable manner, then this might not be necessary, but none of ours are yet capable of self-government, so this portable jailhouse is just perfect for us!

Annie's Homegrown snacks

Snacks are a time-honored way of keeping toddlers on an even keel. My requirements are that they be relatively healthy and leave a minimal mess — the latter especially important within the confines of a typical airplane seat. As usual, my go-to purveyor was Annie’s Homegrown, founded by Connecticut farmer and entrepreneur Annie Withey in 1989.

I bought variety packs of cheddar bunnies, bunny grahams, fruit leather, and fruit snacks. These were excellent ways to curb meltdowns at various junctures and were small enough to fit into their surprise backpacks (see section three).

Surprise backpacks

Novelty is also an efficient way to stave off restlessness. So I packed each child a backpack with new toys that they could use on the plane. They included:

This worked really well! The Bluey camera proved to be an especially good investment. My mother-in-law recently got me a camera, and my eldest, who is my shadow, is especially excited to learn photography in her own way, too. Plus, I’ll enjoy seeing life through her eyes on the camera roll when all is said and done.

First aid kit

My baby has allergies, and I was worried about being able to find his OTC Zyrtec overseas. Also, the prospect of pouring liquid medicine on a cramped plane while they were crawling all over me was daunting. So I found some single-use, premeasured vials of various medications: Diphenhydramine for allergy relief (and to induce drowsiness ...) as well as acetaminophen for fevers and guaifenesin for cough and congestion. The brand, DrKids, is a subsidiary of the Calm Company, out of Sarasota, Floridaa.

I randomly grabbed Band-Aids and antibiotic ointment to go with the rest of George’s eczema kit, and I’m glad I did, because not three minutes into the trip, he bumped his eyebrow on the stroller and broke skin. Welly bandages are my favorite. Cute and, most importantly, effective.

Lollipops

Lollipops help with the air-pressure changes. 10/10. And these taste great with no artificial nonsense.

Honorable mentions because the European lack of air conditioning feels like hell: a 100% cotton change of clothes, a portable fan, and cooling wipes.

I plan on publishing a guide every week on whatever I learn along the way, because I’m learning a lot. The hard way, most times.