Trump’s culture war offensive won the election



Donald Trump has made an impressive political career of proving the D.C. consultant class wrong. In 2016, he won the presidency by running a campaign nearly the opposite of what the infamous RNC “autopsy” report had prescribed four years earlier. In 2020, he came just 42,000 votes short of winning again, despite facing unprecedented obstacles from a global pandemic and its aftermath.

And now, Trump has once again shown his instincts are far better than those who claim to be “professionals.” In an election where most pundits were urging Republicans to hyper-focus on standard issues such as the economy and immigration, Trump instead went on offense on one of Democrats’ greatest vulnerabilities: their far-left stance on transgender issues. That decision has propelled him back to the White House.

If you don’t trust the polling, then you should at least trust the results.

In the final few weeks, exposing Kamala Harris’ transgender radicalism became the closing message of the Trump campaign. According to AdImpact, Republicans spent at least $215 million total on ads highlighting the radical consequences of the Harris-Walz agenda: male athletes in women’s sports, sex-change surgeries and puberty blockers for minor children, ideological indoctrination in public schools, and, most visibly, taxpayer-funded sex-change operations for prisoners and illegal immigrants. One reportsuggests Trump focused his ads more on these issues than on the economy, housing, and immigration combined.

This strategy flew directly in the face of conventional wisdom. In the run-up to the election, politicos from both parties argued that the transgender issue only catered to the GOP base and wouldn’t resonate with the wider electorate. Yet outside their D.C. bubble, the issue was indeed resonating. For anyone with a pulse on the average American voter, this shouldn’t have come as a surprise.

For years, polling has shown that Democrats’ transgender stances are extremely unpopular. For example, a 2023 NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll found voters opposed to allowing minors to receive “gender transition-related health care” by 37 points, even if a parent or guardian consents. A Yahoo News survey this month showed Americans believe that the left’s gender-ideology agenda has gone too far by a 24-point margin. And a YouGov poll found voters in swing states agree with the Republican position on gender and bathrooms by margins of 16 points or more.

Such lopsided numbers aren’t just driven by Republican respondents, either. Large numbers of independents, young people, suburban women, black voters, and Latinos all side with conservatives on these issues.

But if you don’t trust the polling, then you should at least trust the results. The first general election cycle focused this heavily and forthrightly on transgender issues was in 2021. There, the transgender debate helped propel Gov. Glenn Youngkin in the final weeks to his shocking upset in Virginia. Meanwhile around the country, dozens of states were beginning to pass laws to prohibit males in girls’ sports and restrict gender transition procedures for minors. When South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem (R) decided to veto a transgender sports bill early in the year, a massive backlash followed. To Noem’s credit, she changed course and signed a similar bill in the following legislative session.

In 2022, opposition to the transgender agenda continued to gain momentum. Yet more states took action, including in Texas, where Gov. Greg Abbott declared gender transitioning children to be child abuse. In Florida, Gov. Ron DeSantis won a resounding re-election after a first term defined in large part by his embrace of cultural conservatism. This set him apart from many other GOP candidates nationwide, most of whom barely used gender issues in ads — to their detriment. In a midterm where Republicans largely underperformed, failing to take advantage of one of the Democrats’ biggest vulnerabilities turned out to be a significant mistake.

Of course, that was not the case this year. Beyond Trump’s own campaign, numerous other candidates went on offense on gender issues, spending hundreds of millions of dollars in Senate and House races nationwide. This was a smart strategy, not only to energize the Republican base but also to appeal to persuadable voters. According to data collected by my organization’s political arm, American Principles Project PAC, our own ads on transgender issues we have run in campaigns since 2019 have consistently moved tens of thousands of swing voters from Democratic to GOP candidates.

In this year’s election, one can also trace the potential effect these ads had through polling. For example, in Ohio’s U.S. Senate race, the Senate Leadership Fund began running ads highlighting Democrat Sherrod Brown’s record on transgender issues in early September. Around the same time, Republican Bernie Moreno began to rise in the polls, eventually pulling even with Brown after trailing by six points when the ads first started, according to the FiveThirtyEight average. Similar movement can be seen in many other races where such ads were aired.

In short, there can be little doubt that Republicans’ culture war offensive was a decisive element of their victory. And with Democrats now on the back foot, the GOP should press its advantage. Force Democrats to take votes in Congress on keeping men out of women’s sports and protecting kids from dangerous transgender medical procedures. Take executive action on these issues and dare Democratic leaders in blue states to sue. As long as the left continues to stick to these unpopular positions, they will continue to be a liability for them.

Twice now, Donald Trump has bucked D.C. elites and been rewarded for doing so. Perhaps it’s time for those elites to finally start taking notes.

National Women’s Law Center Sides Against The Female Athletes Suing NCAA For Trans Insanity

[rebelmouse-proxy-image https://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Screenshot-2024-05-21-at-12.54.09 PM-1200x675.png crop_info="%7B%22image%22%3A%20%22https%3A//thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Screenshot-2024-05-21-at-12.54.09%5Cu202fPM-1200x675.png%22%7D" expand=1]The future of NCAA women’s sports is on the line in a lawsuit brought by the athletes at the forefront of the battle to protect females.

Do Women’s Rights Matter? Democrats Can’t Decide

You can’t pick and choose which rights go along with being a woman. You either believe in the truth of biology or you don’t.

Trans Activists Prioritize Predators Over Women’s Safety

Corporate America seems more interested in protecting the feelings of a few trans-identified men than keeping women safe in public spaces.

Dem lawmaker is brutally mocked for suggesting 'barriers' to separate women from trans athletes in locker rooms



Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.) is an unashamed supporter of "gender-affirming care" and trans rights.

But on Thursday, the Democrat inadvertently made an argument supporting a division between locker rooms for biological women and trans women (i.e., biological men who identify as women).

What did Cohen say?

Paula Scanlan, a former swimmer for the University of Pennsylvania, told lawmakers on the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution and Limited Government on Thursday that she and her female teammates were forced to share a locker room with Lia Thomas, a biological male who identifies as transgender.

According to Scanlan, it happened "18 times per week," and when concerns were raised, school officials said it was "non-negotiable."

When it was Cohen's turn to speak in the hearing, he agreed that Penn mishandled the situation, and then he offered a solution: "barriers" between biological men and biological women.

"I read Ms. Scanlan's testimony, I wasn’t here to hear it, and I think Penn didn’t deal with your situation like they could've and should've," he said, "like putting up some type of different barriers in the women's area of the locker room. But that's another issue. Things should be dealt with in a different way."

— (@)

What was the response?

Cohen's suggestion received a flurry of attention because his proposed solution already exists in a sane world: one locker room for biological women and a separate locker room for biological men.

  • "Could I suggest walls and doors with locks," one person mocked.
  • "Like, a wall? Making a separate room? We could call it the 'Men's' locker room," another person mocked.
  • "OR - have MEN change in the MEN'S locker room? That would probably be the easier fix..." one person suggested.
  • "Wow, rather than spending all this money to make individual locker rooms in the women’s locker room why don’t we just have the guys with penises dress in the malelocker room oh my God genius genius!!" one person sarcastically applauded.
  • "Like an entirely separate room perhaps?" another person suggested.
  • "I’m thinking the best barrier is to have a wall, with separate doors, and a sign on one for women and a sign on the other for men. Simple!" another person responded.
  • "If only there were some kind of barrier we could make out of, like, cement walls, and a maybe a separate door… it’s a huge undertaking but I think we could make it work on a large scale," another person mocked.
  • "Democrat rep solves problem of transgenderism by proposing the novel concept of separate spaces for people with penises and people with vaginas," Allie Beth Stuckey mocked.

The irony of Cohen's suggestion, according to the Washington Examiner's Zachary Faria, is that it was an inadvertent admission that "he recognizes that transgenderism is based on the lie that men can be women and vice versa."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Title IX Complaint Rips Wisconsin School District’s ‘Dismissive’ Response To Transgender Locker Room Incident

A law firm is demanding the Education Department investigate a WI school's alleged failure to address a transgender locker room incident.

Law Group Demands Answers From Wisconsin School District After Trans-Identifying Male Student Showered In Front Of Four Girls

The incident allegedly occurred on March 3, when a trans-identifying male high school student showered naked in front of four female freshmen.

Volleyball Girls Banned From Locker Room For Refusing To Change In Front Of Boy Masquerading As Girl

A high school in Vermont banned girls on its volleyball team from their own locker room after they expressed discomfort with changing in front of a male who pretends to be a female. Teen girls on the Randolph Union High School volleyball team said a male student claiming to be transgender reportedly “made an inappropriate […]

14-year-old girl accuses Virginia school district of putting her in danger by allowing boys in girls' locker rooms



A Virginia teen went viral after she blasted the board of Virginia's Loudoun County Public Schools for allowing transgender students to use girls' locker rooms.

What's a brief history here?

The district's newly proposed 8350 policy states that "students should be allowed to use the facility that corresponds to their gender identity" — and not their biological sex.

According to Fox News, the new policy follows policy 1040, which stated that the county was committed to "providing an equitable, safe and inclusive working environment regardless of 'sexual orientation, gender identity' and other individual characteristics."

What are the details?

Fourteen-year-old Jolene Grover delivered her rousing remarks in front of the school board while wearing a "Woman is female" T-shirt.

Standing before the board on Tuesday, Jolene said, "Two years ago, I was told policy 1040 was just an umbrella philosophy and you weren't going to allow boys into the girls' locker rooms. But here you are doing just that."

"Everyone knows what a boy is — even you," she told the board members. "Your proposed policies are dangerous and rooted in sexism. When woke kids ask me if I was a lesbian or a trans boy because I cut my hair short, it should tell you these modern identities are superficial."

Jolene, who is now homeschooled after being withdrawn over the district's continued onslaught of what her family says are controversial policies, also said that she is concerned over what the new policy would lead to behind locker room doors.

"Now boys are reading erotica in the classroom next to girls and you want to give them access to girls' locker rooms and you want to force girls to call those boys 'she,'" the teen added. "You do this in the name of inclusivity while ignoring the girls who will pay the price. Your policies choose boys' wants over girls' needs."

The Equality Act Would Make Protecting Your Child An Act Of Bigotry

Protecting children from confusion or from harmful experimental 'treatments' is neither abuse nor neglect, but under the Equality Act, it would be treated as such.