Marianne Williamson predicts 'eating cats issue' will hurt Dems in election: 'Haitian voodoo is real'



Former presidential candidate Marianne Williamson warned Democrats that their dismissing a concern about migrants eating cats will hurt them in the election.

Residents in Springfield, Ohio, have reported in social media posts that Haitian migrants are capturing and eating pets, but local law enforcement have said they have no such confirmed reports. The issue has gone viral on social media and was used by Vice President Kamala Harris to try to paint former President Donald Trump as unhinged during the debate.

'Smug elite jerks who think they’re too smart to listen to anyone outside their own silo.'

"Continuing to dump on Trump because of the 'eating cats' issue will create blowback on Nov. 5," said Williamson on social media.

"Haitian voodoo is in fact real," she added, "and to dismiss the story out-of-hand rather than listen to the citizens of Springfield, Ohio confirms in the minds of many voters the stereotype of Democrats as smug elite jerks who think they’re too smart to listen to anyone outside their own silo."

Regardless of the pet-eating issue, residents have demanded that local officials do something to mitigate the effects of a large influx of migrants into their community.

"Let me be clear: This is not about race. This is about people being given the privilege of coming here from another country and having no respect for our people, our land, or our life's work. People living their life here the way they did in Haiti," said one resident to the Springfield commission.

Anti-Trump critics and media members have claimed the pet-eating narrative is driven by racism and xenophobia.

Despite the criticism, Trump has signaled that he's not abandoning the issue by posting political cat memes on Truth Social.

Williamson ran for president in the Democratic primary in 2024 but suspended her campaign after lack of support.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

The Left’s Abandonment Of Personal Health Drove RFK Jr. From The Democrat Party

The left's politicization of health and fitness drove would-be leftist voters into a dissident ecosystem receptive to Kennedy's message.

Marianne Williamson drops out, says 'the level of our failure is obvious to all' but 'a level of success is real nonetheless'



Marianne Williamson, who launched a bid for the 2024 Democratic presidential nomination last year, has announced that she is suspending her campaign.

Williamson, whose campaign website describes her as "a bestselling author, political activist, and spiritual thought leader," failed to gain traction against incumbent President Joe Biden, who appears poised to easily lock up the party's 2024 presidential nod.

— (@)

"First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you don’t win:)…" she wrote in a Substack post. "I appreciate greatly all the incredible people who accompanied me on our political journey over the last ten months. While the level of our failure is obvious to all, a level of success is real nonetheless. We articulated deeper, more authentic truths than those regularly acknowledged by the political establishment."

"Although as of today we are suspending our campaign, our platform - with its deep dive into so many issues - will remain on Marianne2024.com. I hope future candidates will take what works for them, drinking from the well of information that we prepared. My team and I brought to the table some great ideas, and I will take pleasure when I see them live on in campaigns and candidates yet to be created," she wrote.

Williamson previously mounted a White House bid during the last presidential election cycle but ultimately dropped out in early 2020.

Democratic Rep. Dean Phillips of Minnesota, who has also been running against Biden for the 2024 Democratic presidential nomination, has highlighted Biden's apparent decline over time. "I'm not seeing cognitive decline," Phillips told Sean Hannity, according to reports. "Of course, we're seeing physical and communication decline."

"I'm attacked for being honest and saying the quiet part out loud - the part DC insiders only do in private," Phillips tweeted on Tuesday when sharing two video clips of Biden speaking. "I admire our President. I voted for him and campaigned for him. He has visited my home and been gracious to my family and our country. But shame on all of you pretending everything is ok. You are leading us - and him - into a disaster, and you damn well know it."

— (@)

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

​A threat to democracy? Only Biden will appear on North Carolina primary ballot — a luxury not afforded to Trump in 2020



When North Carolina Democrats head to the polls on March 5 to cast their primary votes, President Joe Biden's name will be the only Democrat on the ticket.

On Tuesday, the North Carolina State Board of Elections unanimously voted to approve the North Carolina Democratic Party's request that Biden be the only Democrat listed on the primary ballot.

Under North Carolina law, state political parties must submit a list of candidates for their primary ballot within three months of the primary election.

"The list must be comprised of candidates whose candidacy is generally advocated and recognized in the news media throughout the United States or in North Carolina," the law states.

But last month, the North Carolina Democratic Party submitted only Biden's name, despite Rep. Dean Phillips (D-Minn.) and Marianne Williamson being nationally recognized candidates. Both Phillips and Williamson, in addition to progressive media personality Cenk Uygur, had petitioned to be added to the primary ballot. Uygur is constitutionally ineligible because he is not a natural-born citizen.

The decision to keep those candidates off the Democratic primary ballot — which limits the choice of North Carolina Democrats to Biden only — did not go over well.

  • Phillips said: "This year the Democratic Party decided an election wasn't desirable — so they shafted voters by placing only Biden's name on the ballot. The destruction of democracy by the people entrusted with protecting it."
  • Williamson said: "Their decision to protect political parties instead of voters is a failure to protect democracy itself. The North Carolina State Board of Elections has disgraced themselves and disgraced the voters of North Carolina. The crisis of Democracy in our nation is institutional."
  • Uygur said: "It’s remarkable that no one in media, including right-wing media, has noticed that the Biden team has now tried to remove opponents from the ballots in the primary and general election. Is anyone allowed to run against him?"

The North Carolina Democratic Party justified its request by claiming that Phillips and Williamson are not actively campaigning in the state.

The irony of the decision is that the key campaign message from Biden and Democrats is that Donald Trump and the Republican Party represent an existential threat to democracy because they want to subvert elections.

And yet: Colorado and Maine have ruled Trump ineligible for their ballots, while state Democratic Party officials — first in Florida and now North Carolina — are denying Democratic voters the opportunity to choose a Democrat other than Biden in their state primary election.

Even worse: The North Carolina State Board of Elections exercised its statuary power in 2020 to override the state Republican Party's submission of only Trump's name for the 2020 Republican primary.

The News & Observer explained:

In 2020, the board decided differently, voting unanimously to allow two other Republican candidates to be added to the presidential primary ballot list, which until then only featured then-President Trump’s name.

During that 2020 board meeting, Bob Orr, a former N.C. Supreme Court justice who’s been one of Trump’s most prominent Republican critics in the state, spoke on behalf of the two Republican candidates seeking to be added, former Massachusetts Gov. Bill Weld and former U.S. Rep. Joe Walsh. Nobody spoke on behalf of more obscure candidates also seeking addition.

A decision regarding Trump's constitutional eligibility, meanwhile, is also being considered in North Carolina courts after the BOE rejected an attempt to remove Trump from the ballot.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Tim Pool breaks Democratic activist's brain with question about Derek Chauvin trial



Failed Democratic presidential candidate Marianne Williamson recently found herself stopped by her own reasoning concerning the right to a fair trial after podcast host Tim Pool applied it to the case of former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin.

On the Dec. 21 episode of the "Timcast IRL" podcast, Pool and Williamson discussed various sensitive topics, including the surge of illegal immigration under President Joe Biden's watch, critical race theory, late-term abortions, and Democratic efforts to prevent the electorate from casting votes for former President Donald Trump.

Late in the conversation, they broached the subject of fair trials and judicial bias, particularly as it concerns those Jan. 6 protesters given relatively extreme sentences.

Pool, who noted both a dearth of "far-left extremists" similarly rotting in jail and concerted efforts by the "corporate media" to pre-emptively convict rightists in the court of public opinion, focused in particular on the treatment of Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio, who was not at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, but was nevertheless sentenced to 22 years in prison. The host suggested the lengthy sentence was not the result necessarily of something Tarrio had done but rather due to who he is.

"I think they are sending him to jail because he's a prominent Trump supporter and the chair of the Proud Boys," said Pool.

Williamson questioned whether there was indeed a "massive conspiracy" among the jury members in Tarrio's trial and in others like his, prompting the host to question whether Washington, D.C., where 93% of the electorate voted Democrat in the last presidential election, could ever produce a jury free of substantial partisan bias.

"I think we are, in essence, a purple nation in our hearts," replied Williamson. "And I think people are interrogated before they are allowed to sit on a jury, and if they say things that are clearly prejudicial, then they are not allowed to sit on that jury."

The Democratic activist added, "We can agree that people should be ... held fairly accountable and that the legal system should be fair to everyone."

Drawing upon an audience question, Pool asked Williamson, "Would you agree with black people people being sentenced to long prison sentences if the jury determines that's what should happen?"

Despite her stated faith in the jury system, Williamson acknowledged that it's not always perfect, as some jury decisions "are fair, some of them are obviously unfair, but it's the best that we have."

Pool pressed the issue further, asking, "Do you think like a jury of white people from a wealthy suburb are going to be fair ... to like a black man accused of selling drugs?"

"That's why often it is, you know, there's a movement for a case to be tried elsewhere for that reason," responded Williamson. "I mean, that's part of the system that one can argue that this person could not get a fair trial in this area."

Pool then asked whether it would be acceptable if a judge indicated that "a fair trial would not be possible, so we're going to do it here anyway."

"I don't think that would be right. And somebody would be petitioning somebody," said Williamson. "I mean, even in those cases, there is such a thing as judicial prejudice. Someone would be arguing for judicial prejudice. ... I would be the first to say, 'This is wrong.'"

The host then put it to Williamson: "So will you stand up in defense of Derek Chauvin?"

Williamson was visibly stunned by the question, muttering, "Uh, wow."

After repeating Chauvin's name, Williamson fell silent, held her head, and looked off blankly to the side with mouth agape.

Chauvin's defense attorney attempted to change the location of his murder trial in March 2021, arguing that a jury pool would be greatly influenced by the then-recent news of Minneapolis' settlement with George Floyd's family, reported NPR.

"You have elected officials — the governor, the mayor — making incredibly prejudicial statements about my client, this case," said defense attorney Eric Nelson, reported the MinnPost. "You have the city settling a civil lawsuit for a record amount of money. And the pretrial publicity is just so concerning."

"I do not think that that would give the defendant any kind of a fair trial beyond what we are doing here today," responded Hennepin County Judge Peter Cahill. "I don't think there's any place in the state of Minnesota that has not been subjected to extreme amounts of publicity on this case."

Cahill previously admitted he was "a little shocked" when two jurors admitted the Floyd-Minneapolis settlement "did move them off being fair and impartial."

"I was surprised that it had such an effect," said the judge.

One of the jurors was seen in photos taken before the trial wearing a BLM baseball cap and a T-shirt that said, "Get your knee off our necks."

According to the U.S. and Minnesota constitutions, individuals facing criminal prosecution have right to trial by an impartial jury.

After puzzling over Pool's question for a moment, Williamson attempted to defend Judge Cahill's decision, suggesting it was an "overriding circumstance."

"Wasn't there some legitimacy to that given the fact that everybody saw the video?" said the Democrat. "So how could there be a lack of prejudice anywhere?"

"So the question is about the Constitution and what is fair in the court of law, not what we want to have happen because of our feelings," said Pool. "So if the issue is the issue is a judge says, 'There will be no fair trial for you,' my argument is that there's no trial at all and the man should be released because that's a limitation of our democratic system."

Williamson, who tried her hand at becoming the president of the U.S. in 2020, ultimately disagreed with the host's suggestion that a fair trial is necessary for a court to imprison an American citizen.

Chauvin was found guilty of second-degree unintentional murder, third-degree murder, and second-degree manslaughter in spring 2021 and sentenced to 22.5 years in prison.

He was stabbed 22 times last month at the Federal Correctional Institution in Tucson, Arizona, by a former FBI informant.

— (@)

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Marianne Williamson Agrees With RFK Jr On Vaccines

Williamson spoke with Breaking Points hosts Krystal Ball and Saagar Enjeti about the issue of vaccinations and Big Pharma's influence on the political landscape