BLM Traded Dr. King’s Christianity For Kendi’s Critical Race Theory

Critical race theory is destroying the traditional Christian legacy of abolition and the civil rights movement.

New J. Edgar Hoover Biography Tacitly Urges Purging The FBI Of Christians And Conservatives

Lerone Martin reveals his principal goals of 'The Gospel of J. Edgar Hoover': 'canceling' Hoover and a radical reform of the FBI.

What The New Right Can Learn From The New Left

The New Right celebrates health — strong men and beautiful women — as part of a broader vitalist movement that has taken hold of young men and women across the West.

Squires: Have black churches abandoned biblical teachings for political treasure?



A recent Washington Post story entitled “Why some Black churches aren’t elated about the possible end of Roe” is a sobering reminder that institutions die when they abandon their purpose and lose their identity.

Multiple clergymen talked about being personally pro-life in theological terms, but not political terms. One was Rev. Cheryl Sanders, senior pastor of a church in Washington, D.C. Leaving aside the fact that the Bible reserves the pastoral office – marked by the responsibility to teach and exercise authority over the church – for qualified men, Rev. Sanders’ perspective on abortion is a sign of deep distress for many black churches.

Why?

The article noted she “doesn’t want to align herself with far-right conservative activists she disagrees with on many social issues.”

In an era when diverse identities — not common values — lie at the heart of our politics and culture, faith leaders and churches with this worldview have made their priorities clear. They see their identity as Christians as secondary to their skin color and political affiliation: “While Black churchgoers share religious values with White Christians, their racial identity, along with historical distrust over issues such as civil rights, has made it more difficult to come together.”

The story also cites an opinion from Justice Thomas, in which he claims states have in interest in preventing abortion from becoming a form of modern-day eugenics. The response from another black minister in D.C. was, “They don’t care about Black babies. You can’t care about Black babies and gut pre-clearance in the Voting Rights Act.” Other ministers cited fatal police incidents and HBCU funding as more pressing concerns than abortion.

The story also noted that many black churches are led by men who disagree with abortion but feel ill-equipped to speak on the issue. In a final display of spiritual decline, the Post included comments from Pastor Earle J. Fisher of Abyssinian Missionary Baptist Church in Memphis, who is also a member of Planned Parenthood’s Clergy Advocacy Board.

There is nothing more useless than a church that has abandoned the Bible’s treasures for the world’s trinkets. The church is where people go to learn that the worst type of bondage is slavery to sin. A biblically faithful church will be honest about God’s judgment of sin as well as the salvation that is found in repentance and faith in Jesus Christ. That is the Good News, not that Ketanji Brown Jackson made it to the Supreme Court or that Roe may be overturned.

A church that draws moral parallels between the sanctity of life and government funding for colleges has lost its way. The future that awaits black churches that subscribe to this worldview can be seen in mainline Protestant denominations or liberal Catholic churches that fly BLM and rainbow flags outside their ornate buildings and have worship services dedicated to Beyoncé.

It is only a matter of time before black churches that abandon the Gospel are hosting “Drag Queen Story Hour” on Sunday mornings, like one Lutheran church in Chicago.

The rise and fall of Black Lives Matter over the past two years have demonstrated the danger of the race-over-faith mindset. The founders of BLM were self-described radical feminist Marxists. In theory they should have very little in common with Bible-believing black churches other than skin tone.

Unfortunately, many black churches jumped on the BLM bandwagon because they thought the organization was fighting for racial justice. The truth is that BLM is an LGBT organization that listed the disruption of the nuclear family as one of its thirteen original principles.

Like BLM-supporting clergy, the ministers featured in the Washington Post story need to repent of idolatry that expresses itself in elevating their racial identity over their Christian identity for the sake of politics. Abortion isn’t the only issue that reveals this problem.

One reason YouTuber Kevin Samuels was so popular was that he filled a void left by political black pastors. Some, including Jamal Bryant and Michael Eric Dyson, talk more about increasing government spending for low-income women than the biblical model of marriage and family. Like the leaders of BLM, the only model of family they promote publicly is the left’s vision of a woman, her children, and the government.

The black church has a long history of social activism, epitomized by the work of Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. The truth is that the same Dr. King who led the civil rights movement to end legal discrimination also partnered with Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood to promote birth control in black communities. I am not sure if King explicitly endorsed abortion, but it is easy to see how ministers like Rev. William Barber and Sen. Raphael Warnock – who now leads King’s former church – see their abortion advocacy as continuing King’s work on behalf of the poor. Like Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, these men see abortion as a tool to help impoverished black women stay in the labor market.

I pray that these ministers and churches don’t represent the larger body of black churches across the country. If they do, black Christians are in deep trouble. The problem isn’t just that they won’t stand boldly for the unborn. It’s the fact that their equivocation is driven by naked political calculus. For these clergy, being connected to conservatives — specifically Trump voters — is a punishment akin to hell (on Earth).

Christians are often told to beware of wolves in sheep’s clothing. That is wise counsel, but what’s even more dangerous is a wolf in shepherd’s clothing. The former can devour a few sheep before the others scatter, but the latter can lead an entire flock over a cliff.

Whitlock: Self-aggrandizement defines the culture that replaced Martin Luther King Jr.’s dream



One of my most vivid memories of childhood is walking down my neighborhood street telling my best friend, Butch, that I wanted to be the next Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.

It was the mid-1970s. I was 8 or 9 years old. Me, my older brother and mom lived at 3920 Grand Ave, in a 2-bedroom flat on the east side of inner-city Indianapolis. The 650-square foot apartment cost $75 a month. My parents had divorced four years prior. My mom worked as an hourly employee at Western Electric, earning roughly $6 an hour as a factory worker. We were poor. I fit the profile for trouble. Big and athletic, I had a penchant for shoplifting, mischief, and fighting.

Luckily, I was tugged by the culture. Dr. King's legacy and shadow ruled the culture. I wanted to be him. I wanted to wear a suit and tie and command the attention and respect of the world. From my all-black, ghetto setting, I dreamed of furthering his dream of creating a society that reflected the kingdom promised by an allegiance to God and America's founding documents. That was the culture that influenced me. That culture blinded me to my impoverished circumstances, inspired me to see a world of limitless possibilities, and demanded that I capitalize on my parents' and their generation's sacrifice.

Today's culture baffles me. All of it, but most especially the culture corporate media frame as "black."

Yesterday, I wrote about celebrity entertainer Nick Cannon's appearance on the popular urban radio/TV show "The Breakfast Club." During the interview, Cannon justified his irresponsible, seven-kids-with-four-women family life by insinuating the nuclear, traditional family is a racist Eurocentric approach to life. He placed all responsibility for family structure on women.

Cannon's interview helped me understand how distant I am from modern "black" culture, an outgrowth of liberal political manipulation through the adoption of Critical Race Theory as a guiding worldview. The culture is secular. It attributes the behavior and outcomes of black people solely to white people. In modern culture, men are weak, women are leaders, black people are not responsible for our destiny, the n-word is a term of endearment, and, most importantly, blackness is defined by political affiliation.

"You ain't black, if you ain't a Democrat."

I reject it all. I'm not weak. I believe in the patriarchy. I'm responsible for my destiny and outcomes. The n-word — regardless of the speaker's color or pronunciation — is disrespectful and harmful. I'm a lifelong non-voter and refuse a political identity.

This new culture assigned to black people by Hollywood, academic, political, athletic, and literary elites has demonized the tactics Dr. King used to expand freedom to African-Americans. The strategic, nonviolent, dignified approach of the civil rights movement is now ridiculed as "respectability politics." George Floyd, a career criminal and drug addict, has been substituted for Rosa Parks. Skinny jeans worn lower than boxers and wife-beaters have replaced suits and ties.

I'm an old man struggling to deal with change. But you will never convince me that respect, a dignified appearance, and a reputation free of criminality will go out of style or lose their effectiveness.

Rather than capitalize on the sacrifices of its American ancestors — from Thomas Jefferson to Frederick Douglass to Abraham Lincoln to Booker T. Washington to Dr. King — modern culture looks to exploit and/or diminish those sacrifices with a fraudulent, self-aggrandizing imitation.

Self-aggrandizement means to aggressively increase one's power and wealth by any means necessary. Modern culture perfectly reflects the selfie generation, the generation mimicking Dr. King, Malcolm X, Rosa Parks, Medgar Evars, John and Bobby Kennedy for power and wealth.

LeBron James poses as an activist to enrich his primary employer, Nike.

Shaun King poses as a black man and activist to enrich himself.

The NFL and NBA embraced Black Lives Matter to secure sponsorship from major global corporations.

Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters, Stacey Abrams, President Joe Biden, and Vice President Kamala Harris pretend that requiring government-issued identification to vote is Jim Crow 2.0 as a means to maintain their power.

Nick Cannon blames racism for his dysfunctional family structure as a means to protect his reputation and rationalize his irresponsibility.

Colin Kaepernick took a knee and quit football because he wasn't man enough to accept his uncanny athleticism could no longer mask his immature approach to preparation and leadership.

Maria Taylor couldn't get the contract she wanted from ESPN, so she claimed Drew Brees, Dave Lamont, Rachel Nichols, and the bosses who fast-tracked her career were all racist.

I'm all for power and wealth. There's nothing wrong with pursuing it.

But when your tactics mirror Confederate President Jefferson Davis' race-based strategy, I find it offensive when you cast yourself as the woke Martin Luther King Jr.

Naw, you're just a bigot promoting a culture that leads to a separate and unequal country.

Whitlock: Hollywood, 1619 Project want The Messiah to disappear



This weekend, I watched the movie "One Night in Miami." I know I'm late. It's been out since January. I'm reluctant to watch any movie made in the last decade. I can't take the woke narratives.

Anyway, friends, including Uncle Jimmy, promised me I'd like "One Night."

I didn't.

"One Night" fictionalizes boxer Muhammad Ali's activities after he beat heavyweight champion Sonny Liston on February 25, 1964. Ali, along with NFL great Jim Brown and legendary singer Sam Cooke, is summoned to the hotel room of then-Nation of Islam spokesman Malcolm X. The four men engage in a robust and provocative conversation about race, America, their responsibility to bring about cultural change and their future plans.

It's a terrific premise that fails because the script ignores the elephant in every American room in 1964 — Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.

Six months after King led his historic March on Washington and unveiled his "dream," Muhammad Ali, Malcolm X, Jim Brown, and Sam Cooke spent hours confined in a hotel room combatively debating race and no one mentioned MLK. Really? I'm supposed to believe that?

This is not a small slight. It's yet another reimagining of history, a depiction of history that downplays the role of Christianity. The intent of the New York Times' 1619 Project is to demonize this country's Judeo-Christian roots and ethos. Judeo-Christian signifies America's Old Testament and New Testament biblical principles.

You didn't talk about race in 1964 without mentioning Martin Luther King. It's the equivalent of debating national-anthem protests without mentioning Colin Kaepernick. Christians, led by MLK, forced America to change for the better.

"One Night" cleverly taps into a theme that all movies directed at black audiences now seemingly require — angry black radicals forced America to change for the better.

"One Night" is the kindred spirit of Netflix's "Judas and the Black Messiah," a movie that celebrated Chicago Black Panther leader Fred Hampton. A movie painting Hampton, an unapologetic Marxist and atheist, as the messiah is both ironic and sacrilegious.

Hampton was called the "chairman" in honor of Chairman Mao Tse-tun, the founder of the People's Republic of China, an authoritarian ruler credited with killing millions through mass executions, starvation, and political persecution.

Hollywood movies subtly and overtly entice black Americans to abandon our Christian beliefs. Malcolm X is the protagonist of "One Night." Sam Cooke is the antagonist. Cooke is the godless, money-hungry proxy for Martin Luther King. Cooke represents hope and faith in the American dream. X and Cooke verbally spar throughout the movie. X chides Cooke for failing to make protest music the equal of Bob Dylan's classic "Blowin' in the Wind."

The movie concludes with Cooke performing "A Change Is Gonna Come" on "The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson" and Malcolm X seated on a couch at home nodding approval.

Here's my problem. In real life, Martin Luther King's "I Have a Dream" speech, delivered on August 28, 1963, inspired Cooke to write "A Change Is Gonna Come." Cooke said so. Cooke performed the song on Carson's show on February 7, 1964 — 18 days before Ali fought Liston in Miami.

I like Malcolm X. I've read the Autobiography of Malcolm X several times. It's my favorite book. But Malcolm X had nothing to do with Cooke writing "Change." X and the Nation of Islam did not cause America to erase its Jim Crow laws. The Nation should be celebrated for rehabilitating incarcerated men such as Malcolm Little (X). I'm all for that celebration.

But let's be clear on who were the primary drivers of the eradication of slavery and other forms of legalized discrimination.

Christians did that. They're rewriting history, making movies glorifying angry bigots and atheists, so they can convince you that you don't need the real messiah, and neither does America.

Hollywood wants to make Jesus and all his disciples disappear.

CNN's Chris Cuomo uses MLK to rip Democrats for not getting tough with GOP on voting rights — and botches US history in the process



CNN's Chris Cuomo was not happy with Democrats on Tuesday's "Prime Time" — and the left-wing host let it all hang out in a decidedly exasperated tone in regard to Senate Republicans squashing the left's beloved voting rights law.

What are the details?

"How about now, Democrats? Are you ready to play to win now? Have you had enough?" Cuomo growled as if he was looking to invite some left-wing politicians outside to settle things man to man.

"McConnell and Co. did exactly what we knew and you knew they would do," he continued. "They tanked even the suggestion to debate the need to curtail state efforts to send voting rights back 50 years. They won't even allow debate."

Cuomo added, "You're playing the game, and it is ugly and obvious."

Sadly — for Cuomo — he made the mistake of including a July 1963 video of Martin Luther King Jr. complaining about the Senate filibuster in relation to civil rights to drive home his point that Republicans are racists. Here's what King said:

"I think the tragedy is that we have a Congress with a Senate that has a minority of misguided senators who will use the filibuster to keep the majority of people from even voting. They won't let the majority senators vote. And suddenly they wouldn't want the majority of people to vote because they know they do not represent the majority of American people. In fact, they represent, in their own states, a very small minority."

"Dr. King a half a century ago," Cuomo intoned dramatically and ruefully as the camera trained back upon him. "You know, we thought this battle was over, but it wasn't. The stakes are once again the same as then."

Earth to Chris

The glaring problem for Cuomo is that it was racist Democrats who fought against the passage of civil rights in King's day. NewsBusters' Nicholas Fondacaro took note of this glaring omission in Cuomo's self-righteous soliloquy.

"It was Democrats who waged a war to keep slaves, fought for segregation and Jim Crow, and refused to extend civil and voting rights to blacks," Fondacaro countered. "And let's not forget that MLK was a Republican."

Cuomo, however, kept pushing: "But here we are again today, talking about a minority party using the filibuster to allow them to keep suppressing the votes of minorities and others. It is an existential battle. This is not about left and right; it is about right and wrong." Wow.

Plenty of criticism to go around

But the ridiculousness isn't all on Cuomo. As we've also seen, Senate Democrats themselves aren't short on weak points of view — and one of Cuomo's esteemed colleagues pointed it out.

CNN host Jake Tapper on Tuesday called out Democratic U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut over his party's hypocrisy on the Senate filibuster.

Tapper asked Blumenthal why Democrats pushed the "For The People Act" knowing Republicans don't support it, and the senator replied by complaining about the filibuster, which he said he wants to abolish. That's when Tapper got him.

"Senator, haven't you voted in favor of filibustering Republican legislation, not allowing them to even proceed to a discussion, an amendment process and debate on a bill?" Tapper asked.

Blumenthal acknowledged the truth of the statement — but predictably argued that it was only Republicans who abused the filibuster.