Leftists Hate The Minutemen Mascot Because They Love Tyranny
Radicals will never be content to tear down just the 'Redskins' and 'Chiefs' mascots. They'll always come for the proverbial Minutemen.
Having apparently run out of professional sports icons to smash, woke iconoclasts have settled on their next target: a Bay Area high school mascot.
Educators and administrators in the Mount Diablo Unified School District determined that Concord High School's Minutemen mascot needs to go.
The Minuteman mascot figures prominently on the school's website, appearing in its logo, its sporting scoreboards, and in its outgoing communications.
The image summons the memory of the militiamen who were among the first to fight in the American Revolution. They received the moniker "minutemen" on account of the requirement that they be ready for action "at a minute's warning."
Their readiness and the minutes, hours, and years they committed to the cause of securing American independence helped guarantee the success of a nation that would enjoy the luxury of debating whether to pay them a modicum of respect some 250 years later.
Concord High School, founded in the late 1960s, first decided to embrace the image and name to honor the men who formed the Minutemen militia in Concord, Massachusetts, in 1775, reported the Pioneer, a local Concord paper.
However, now the school's principal, Julene MacKinnon, wants to "make sure that we have a mascot that represents everyone," reported KNTV-TV.
MacKinnon, like others in the district, is uncomfortable with the male mascot, particularly when he appears armed. She reckons the image is tied to "some of the brutality, them being a militia."
The Pioneer reported that late in the pandemic, MDUSD superintendent Adam Clark and the governing board began discussing changing mascots at the Concord and Ygnacio Valley high schools. The latter have already followed through with their replacement.
A teacher at Ygnacio Valley took issue with her school's mascot, which at the time was a proud indigenous warrior wearing a headdress. It is now a wolf.
Similarly, the previous principal at Concord High reportedly complained that "Minutemen" referred only to one gender and that the symbol of a rifle was problematic.
In response to these pet grievances, Clark said, "The mascot conversation is long overdue, and it is time to ensure that all students, staff and community members feel comfortable with images at our schools."
Then-board president Cherise Khaund, now a trustee, concurred, citing the 2015 California Racial Mascots Act, which says, "The use of racially derogatory or discriminatory school or athletic team names, mascots, or nicknames in California public schools is antithetical to the California school mission of providing an equal education to all."
In justifying the change, Khaund also cited the district's policy that states, "District programs and activities shall also be free of any racially derogatory or discriminatory school or athletic team names, mascots, or nicknames."
Some parents, alumni, and students in the community, unclear about how precisely an American minuteman could be misconstrued as derogatory or discriminatory, spoke out at a Mount Diablo Unified School board meeting Wednesday, reported KRON.
"I have relatives that were in the Revolutionary War. They would be appalled at the fact that we are losing our heritage," said community member Wes Anderson.
Mark Lloyd, another supporter of the Minutemen mascot, told the board, "You have whole families that identify as Minutemen. You have families who buy a house to continue their legacy there."
Julie Lyster, a Concord High parent, proposed a supposedly inclusive half-measure: "Remove the musket. Add a woman beside the minuteman. There were women minutemen, and African American minutemen."
According to the Daily Mail, this option — of adding a "minutewoman" or changing the mascot's complexion — is being taken seriously.
Concord is 55% white, 30% Hispanic, 13% Asian, and roughly 4% black.
As for students, they appear to be less than enthused about swapping out their patriot mascot for an animal devoid of greater significance.
Students were surveyed earlier this year on a possible replacement. Keeping the minutemen was not an option. Instead, "the bears" and "crocodiles" have been entertained as possibilities.
500 out of 1,100 students reportedly participated. Although "the bears" received the plurality of votes (190), one parent stressed, "I don't think the students are excited about either" option.
Concord High is not the first educational institution in recent memory to drop its mascot to accommodate woke sensibilities.
Here are just a few:
Debate Over Concord High School Mascot Continues youtu.be
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Last July, the team formerly known as the Washington Redskins bowed to woke pressure to jettison the "offensive" moniker and adopt a new name that would not violate the sensibilities of any select group.
They landed on a name that was unlikely to make anyone upset.
In fact, the new name was so bland it was certain to avoid engendering any sort of passion at all — among foes or fans.
They would henceforth — at least for the 2020 season — be known as the Washington Football Team.
Analysts, fans, spectators, and even the most uninterested observers believed the name to be nothing more than an inoffensive placeholder, what with the impending season only weeks away.
But it just might be here to stay.
Now, according to ESPN, Washington football fans could be stuck with the flaccid nickname permanently.
Team President Jason Wright claimed the organization and its fans have warmed to the name, the outlet reported Tuesday afternoon.
Wright said the club is considering Football Team as a permanent name because of alleged fan sentimentality and that the name somehow offers what ESPN said is "a strong connection to the past."
Regardless of whether fans like it or not, they better be ready for it for 2021, because the Washington Football Team will be the only NFL franchise inside the Beltway. Any permanent name change won't take effect until the 2022 season.
Wright emphasized that there is not a leading contender for a new name, ESPN reported, but noted that the Football Team handle has some sort of deep tie to the team's history.
"There are a set of folks that have warmed to the Washington Football Team," he said. "Some of the things that are emerging from that are the Washington Football Team has something that ties deeply to our history. It feels like that isn't jettisoning all the things we have been in the past, whereas something that's completely new might feel that way."
Claiming that Football Team is not a "complete reset," Dan Snyder's top man alleged that a "substantial part" of the D.C. fan base feels the generic name "is a continuation of something" instead of being "something brand new."
The club is taking suggestions for a new name and logo through April 5 and has received 15,000 submissions so far.
Wright said he is communicating with alumni, international fans, young fans, longtime fans, and members of the military, as well as using focus groups in order to "understand deeply held beliefs."
Critics of the name change likely have questions as to whether the team ever actually discussed "deeply held beliefs" with, say, Native American groups before they changed their name. The Washington Post actually did — and got results that would likely shock most woke activists demanding "offensive" team mascots be erased.