‘Mama’s boy’ Caleb Williams leaps into the stands to redefine masculinity



Caleb Williams and the “Lambeau Weep” perfectly illustrate the emasculation of football and American culture.

Over the weekend, after a disappointing loss to Washington, the Heisman Trophy-winning USC quarterback climbed into the stands and the arms of his mother to convulse and cry.

Fellow Heisman winner turned ESPN broadcaster Robert Griffin III celebrated Williams’ public show of emotion.

“This young man pours his heart out for his team EVERY TIME he plays. Any NFL team would be lucky to have him as their QB and his emotion shows how much this game means to him,” Griffin posted on X (formerly Twitter).

Damien Woody, a two-time Super Bowl champion turned ESPN broadcaster, also endorsed the “Lambeau Weep,” posting a rebuke of former Colts linebacker Robert Mathis, who criticized Williams.

“I’m sorry but showing emotion [because] it means that much to you isn’t soft. Some men need to become more emotionally mature and not shame someone who shared a moment with a loved one,” Woody wrote.

We can’t be ruled by emotion. It invites chaos, cowardice, and conquest.

I get it. There’s no shame in disappointment reducing a man to tears. I’ve been there. We’ve all been there. But there are appropriate expectations we place on men and leaders on how they deal with their emotions and how they conduct themselves in public.

America did not become the leader of the free world, and football did not become America’s national pastime, because men exhibited the emotional control of 12-year-old girls.

Caleb Williams is soft. He’s not a leader. He’s another victim of the matriarchal culture embraced throughout modern society. He’s been programmed to allow his emotions to dictate his behavior. That programming is at the foundation of the quick-trigger, resort-to-violence mentality pervasive throughout communities devoid of fathers.

Caleb Williams has a dad and a supportive family. That does not make him immune to getting swept up in the matriarchal culture promoted in academia, corporate media, and popular culture.

The spirit of the age forces everyone to conform to the lowered expectations of men.

Thirty-seven years ago, the emasculation movement had not invaded football to the degree it has today. In 1986, the No. 1 football recruit in the nation, Jeff George, suffered a concussion in the first quarter of a game against the University of Minnesota. His mother, Judy, came out of the stands to tend to her son. She rode the golf cart with her son to the locker room.

Sports Illustrated ran a story and picture about it. The media lampooned Jeff George over the incident for the next decade. His mother’s actions violated the man code.

Here we are nearly four decades later, and there’s seemingly no such thing as a man code.

That’s not good. That’s not progress. In the words of Omar Little, the iconic character from my favorite TV show, “The Wire,” a man’s gotta have a code. We can’t be ruled by emotion. It invites chaos, cowardice, and conquest.

Men have abandoned code. We value surrendering to emotion over exercising self-control. When things don’t go our way, we think it authorizes us to give in to emotion.

Feelings have become our god. Our desire to avoid hurting someone’s feelings has empowered the transgender movement, child-friendly drag shows, same-sex marriage, and the prioritization of diversity, equity, and inclusion over merit.

It’s easy and comforting to wag a finger of blame at smash-and-grab looters and gangbangers. That’s a black people problem. The average American has normalized the acceptance of lower standards for fatherless black kids. The average American has yet to fully grasp that his child exists in a hyper-sexualized, perverted environment because of the exact same emasculated mentality wrecking the black community.

The Bloods and the Crips make black neighborhoods unsafe for kids. Disney and academia make white neighborhoods unsafe for kids. The cowardice and emasculation of men allows all of it.

A society built on servicing, protecting, and emoting feelings is doomed to fail. It’s too weak.

Caleb Williams, Robert Griffin, and Damien Woody have bought the lie that we must radically redefine the concept of manhood. Williams paints his fingernails. Griffin spends every waking moment working with a stylist on his latest look. Woody says whatever is necessary to stay in the good graces of his Disney overlords.

All three advocate the same message: Healthy men share their emotions the same as women. It’s not true. It’s not what we’re called to do. It’s not our role in a properly functioning society. As the so-called leader of the USC football team, Williams should share his game-day, in-stadium emotions with the young men engaged in the battle with him. He can be a mama’s boy in the privacy of his home.

Proponents of the matriarchy are using football and black men to reshape masculinity. It’s a clever tactic. It lulls white men into the false belief that it’s not their concern. The fear of being labeled racist or a sellout quiets criticism of the ploy.

Feminists want us to abandon football and let them use the strongest force in popular culture to promote their Marxist agenda. The “Lambeau Weep” is more important than you realize.

Here's why Jason Whitlock is Team Trump


Former President Donald Trump officially announced he’s entering the 2024 presidential race. While early polling has Trump and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis in a battle for the Republican nomination, BlazeTV's Jason Whitlock explains why he is Team Trump on this episode of "Fearless."

Download the podcast here. Watch the full episode below.


Download the podcast here.

Want more from Jason Whitlock?

To enjoy more fearless conversations at the crossroads of culture, faith, sports, and comedy with Jason Whitlock, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Whitlock: Viola Davis and ‘The Woman King’ preach the false gospel of the matriarchy and #BlackGrandmaMagic



Hollywood has abandoned new ideas in favor of prequels that repackage and reinforce China-approved themes.

It’s a technique employed by ministers and coaches. Effective leaders find new and compelling ways to say the same thing day after day. A Christian minister uses the Bible’s 66 books and 31,000 verses to convey a simple message: We need Jesus.

Right now, Hollywood is hyper-focused on a simple message selling a different savior: Woman.

The Viola Davis-fronted “The Woman King” purports to be a based-on-true-events drama about a group of amazing female warriors in Africa. The truth is, “The Woman King” is the first prequel to the “Black Panther” superhero fantasy.

“Panther” sold its woman-as-savior message subtly. The blockbuster let unsuspecting moviegoers leave theaters believing T’Challa was the hero. The reality is T’Challa did exactly what his mother, sister, and a group of amazing female warriors told him to do. T’Challa was a robot, a system quarterback programmed by a female coaching staff.

The prequel, “The Woman King,” is far less subtle. Fifty-seven-year-old Viola Davis is the Black Panther of Dahomey, Africa. After watching the movie Thursday, I wanted to hashtag #BlackGrandmaMagic.

Why not call it "The Memaw King"?

That’s the point. The matriarch is the ruler of the patriarch. General Nanisca, the fictional leader Davis played, is an 1823 version of 52-year-old Queen Latifah’s “The Equalizer.”

General Nanisca is wiser, braver, and more charismatic than Dahomey’s King Ghezo, played by 30-year-old actor John Boyega. Casting Davis opposite Boyega is not an accident. It’s a message that young black men should submit to and serve their mothers. It’s a wildly popular message.

The same message was in "Black Panther," a movie that grossed more than $1.3 billion worldwide. That’s why I consider “The Woman King” a prequel. Hollywood is hoping to ride the emasculated-black-man narrative to box-office glory. It worked in "Black Panther."

"The Memaw King" is doubling down on the narrative. King Ghezo’s top servant is a gay man who makes RuPaul look masculine. General Nanisca and her troops outsmart and trounce their male rivals.

Factual history tells a story much different from the fantasy spun in "The Woman King." In the movie, General Nanisca convinces King Ghezo to abandon the slave trade and the female warriors thwart the white colonizers.

It’s all fantasy. The French routed the Amazon warriors, and the British forced Dahomey to give up the slave trade in the 1850s.

History isn’t the point of "The Woman King." Message is. The movie is on message. Men are evil. Men raped and tortured Nanisca when she was young. The father of teenage warrior Nawi gave her away to the king when she rejected an older abusive husband.

The climactic point of the movie is that women should rule. After an all-female, postwar circle twerk, King Ghezo named Nanisca a king to rule alongside him.

Hollywood is preaching that message over and over again.

A month ago, HBO launched its “Game of Thrones” prequel, “House of the Dragon.” The Dragon pretends to be the backstory of the Targaryen family. It’s really the backstory of Arya Stark, the female child who would grow up to slay the wicked Night King in “Game of Thrones.”

Arya wanted to be a boy and go off to war. The patriarchy wouldn’t allow it. Rhaenyra Targaryen, the star of “House of the Dragon,” wants to be a boy and go off and fight in wars. The patriarchy won’t allow it.

The point is that girls would be boys if not for sexism, and sexism is ruining the world.

The truth is the world needs better men, not women pretending to be men.

All art emanating from Hollywood has a secular, anti-male theme. It rejects a Christian worldview. "The Woman King" is a farce. It’s satanic propaganda promoting the worship of women. It’s not remotely subtle in its messaging. In the post-movie credits, during an extra scene, the Amazon warrior Amenza shouts out "Breonna Taylor" in a ritual celebrating warriors killed in 1823.

Can’t you see? Breonna Taylor, the woman killed in a shootout with Louisville police, is an extension of the African warriors who captured and sold her ancestors into slavery.

Yep. The people who sold black people into slavery are the real heroes. Anyone who disagrees is a misogynist and a racist.

Whitlock: Chris Paul epitomizes NBA’s weak, black matriarchal culture



We can stop calling Chris Paul a leader. He’s not.

We can quit comparing the Phoenix point guard to Isiah Thomas. It’s an insult to the all-time Pistons great.

We can move on from feeling sorry for Paul because David Stern blocked his trade to the Kobe Bryant-led Lakers in 2011. Kobe couldn’t fix what’s wrong with the perennial locker-room cancer.

Chris Paul is a problem disguised as a solution.

We know that now after his latest postseason collapse. His NBA-leading, 64-win Phoenix Suns exited the playoffs Sunday night in the most embarrassing fashion possible. The Dallas Mavericks routed Phoenix 123-90 in Game 7 of the Western Conference semifinals. Phoenix trailed by 30 at halftime, by 46 in the third quarter. Paul didn’t make a bucket until the third quarter of an elimination game. I can’t remember an alleged all-time great coming up much smaller in an elimination game, especially on a team that was favored to win the title.

Phoenix led this series 2-0 before losing four of the last five games, marking the fifth time a Paul-led team blew a 2-0 playoff advantage. It’s a record-setting standard. Paul is the first NBA player to blow five different playoff series after leading 2-0. He broke his own record. He was the first to blow four.

I was once one of the people arguing that Paul is the modern-day Isiah Thomas. I fell for his polished image and regular-season act. I ignored Paul’s numerous critics inside the NBA who swore that Paul’s State Farm-crafted good-guy image was fraudulent.

CP2-oh is not Zeke. Paul is Charlie Brown, the cartoon character who can’t kick a football. The playoffs are Lucy, the girl who repeatedly clowns Charlie Brown by pulling the football at the last second.

This Dallas series snapped me out of my Chris Paul fantasy. He’s no leader. At age 37, in his 17th season, he’s one of the most immature players in the league. He symbolizes my discomfort with modern NBA players and culture. Both are filled with feminine energy and emotion. The NBA perfectly reflects the emasculation of black men and our cultural embrace of matriarchal leadership.

As bad as Sunday’s Game 7 was for Paul, he really exposed himself in Game 4.

With his mother and wife seated directly behind the Suns' bench, Paul fouled out in just 23 minutes of action. He scored just five points in a 10-point loss. Shortly after departing the game with his sixth foul, Paul erupted on a young Mavericks fan who tapped Paul’s mother’s back to get her attention. Paul’s overreaction caused security to remove the fan from the arena. The Mavericks subsequently banned the fan from attending any more Dallas games this season.

After the game, Paul profanely complained that the fan “laid hands on” his mother. Video showed the young boy lightly tapping her shoulder. Paul said his mother and wife felt unsafe in the arena. It was later revealed that the young fan jokingly offered Paul’s mother a hug.

Of course, corporate media and blue-check Twitter defended Paul’s irrational and emotional response. He was defending and protecting his wife and mother.

No, he wasn’t. He was deflecting from his embarrassing performance. He was smearing a young white fan. He was summoning a social media lynch mob to punish a child for allegedly acting inappropriately toward his mother and wife.

Chris Paul exhibited the kind of racist behavior and mindset that led to Emmett Till’s death in 1955. A white woman and white men exaggerated the behavior of Till, summoned a lynch mob, and punished Till.

The NBA and its players do not want to combat racism. The black players – from Chris Paul to Russell Westbrook to LeBron James – want to benefit from racism. They want to establish themselves as a protected class of people above others who do not look like them.

Why would Chris Paul seat his mother and wife directly behind the Suns' bench during a road playoff game? It’s arguably the most hostile environment in professional sports. Opposing fans can directly communicate with the visiting team.

Chris Paul knows this. But, again, Paul isn’t a leader. He’s a spoiled, entitled jock. He’s a beta male afraid to tell his wife and mother no. He’s a believer in the matriarchy.

Let me make another provocative analogy. Paul’s thinking mirrors the mindset of Kenneth Walker, Breonna Taylor’s boyfriend. Taylor was the young woman killed when police tried to serve a drug warrant at her apartment in Louisville. Claiming the police never identified themselves, Walker fired his gun and shot a police officer. The police returned fire, killing Taylor.

Let’s think this through. Walker claimed he believed intruders were trying to break into the apartment. He and Taylor arose from bed. He grabbed his gun. He and Taylor walked into the living room of the apartment to see who was at the door.

What man doesn’t tell his woman to fall back and seek safety when he believes trouble is trying to enter their home? A beta male. A believer in the matriarchy. Someone devoid of masculine leadership qualities.

What man places his woman in harm’s way?

Chris Paul is Kenneth Walker. Paul dropped his mother and wife into a fire. And when things got hot, Paul melted down. We shouldn’t be surprised. The NBA is filled with beta black males who are led by their emotions. They spend their free time getting their hair braided, placed in buns, and color-coded. When they’re not at the beauty shop, they’re walking down arena runways in whatever outfit their LGBTQ+ stylists instructed them to wear.

The matriarchy rules black culture. You can see it in the NBA. You can see it in Chris Paul. Our leadership model is completely broken. Our highest level of accomplishment is victimhood. Paul achieved his goal in Game 4 when a little white kid tapped his mama’s shoulder.

Paul cast himself as a victim. The Suns followed his lead.

Whitlock: Black men need to channel Will Smith, pimp-slap Democratic Party for tying us to abortion, LGBTQIA+, the matriarchy



My only problem with Will Smith is he chose the wrong target to express his frustration over years of public emasculation. His wife, Jada Pinkett, is the source of his pain. She emasculated him, not Chris Rock or any other comedian.

But Will Smith deserves credit for recognizing his emasculation and mustering the courage to try to do something about it.

Have the rest of us? And by “us” I mean black men.

The Democratic Party has stripped us of our manhood, dignity, and spirituality. Our allegiance to Democratic politics has made us advocates for the abortion of our seeds, proponents of same-sex marriage, worshippers of the matriarchy, and disavowers of the faith-based tactics that led to our American freedom.

If we had an ounce of Will Smith’s self-awareness, we would slap the entire Democratic Party, including Barack Obama, and tell Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Nancy Pelosi, and Maxine Waters to keep our names out of their mouths.

I say this in reaction to the abortion debate raging across our country. The leak of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito’s rough draft of a decision to overturn Roe v. Wade lays bare the emasculation and secularization of black men. We’re willing lambs sacrificed in honor of agendas that do not serve us.

No matter what Joy Reid and her parade of idiots say on MSNBC, abortion does not serve the cause of black men or people. Abortion is not a racial justice issue. It’s a racial injustice issue.

“I’m heartbroken because so many do not know life without Roe,” California Congresswoman Barbara Lee whined on the “ReidOut” Tuesday night. “Secondly it’s going to be low-income women, black and brown women who are going to be impacted the most. Women with money will be able to travel to states and afford to have an abortion. So this is an issue of racial justice.”

No, it’s an issue of racial injustice.

In the 50 years of Roe, estimates are that 30 million black babies have been aborted. There are approximately 42 million black people in America. Our percentage of the American population has been stagnant for 50 years because we’ve murdered 30 million black babies inside the womb.

This is not an accident. Margret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, supported eugenics, the Nazi plan to create a super-race of white people through selective reproduction. Selective reproduction requires selective destruction. The people arguing that abortion is racial justice for black people have selected black people for destruction.

Joy Reid, aka Racial Maddow, hosts MSNBC’s version of Jada Pinkett’s "Red Table Talk." Reid and her guests emasculate black men daily.

They’re pawns for the LGBTQIA+ movement. They allow the Alphabet Mafia to connect gay rights to the rights of black people. They tell black people that our American freedom is dependent on a woman’s right to abort her baby, gay people’s right to marry, and transgender people’s right to reclassify to the gender of their choice.

When courageous, God-fearing black men led the civil rights movement in the 1960s, did they attach the freedom and full citizenship of black people to abortion rights, gay marriage, or gender dysphoria? I don’t remember any of that being part of Martin Luther King’s dream.

It appears to be the dream of the Democratic Party. Democrats removed God from King’s dream and married black people to Planned Parenthood, same-sex marriage, and Caitlyn Jenner.

Barack Obama, the president Newsweek hailed as “the first gay president,” officiated the wedding ceremony. Jesse Jackson walked black people down the aisle and gave away the bride. Al Sharpton was the best man. Michelle Obama was maid of honor. Don Lemon was the ring-bearer. And, after deleting her homophobic blog history, Joy Reid served as the flower girl.

We’re the bed wench of the Democratic Party, Alphabet Mafia, and the matriarchy until death do us part.

Would we be better off married to the Republican Party? No.

We would be best served by remarrying God and opening our political dating pool to include Republicans. Our current, abusive spouse has convinced us that Republicans want to return us to slavery and/or Jim Crow. It’s an incredibly odd accusation given the fact that Republicans, especially evangelical Republicans, ended slavery and Jim Crow.

Think it through. The party that fought Democrats to abolish slavery in the 1800s, led the fight against Democrats for civil rights in the 1950s and ‘60s, and is currently trying to slow abortion, which disproportionately kills black babies, is the party we’ve been led to believe is controlled by anti-black racism.

Does that make sense? Or does it sound like the kind of nonsense a pimp would spew to keep his “bottom b***h” loyal? I apologize for the profane reference. But it’s the only analogy that properly fits. We’re being pimped by Democrats. We’re bottom b****es, the most loyal demographic in the history of American politics. We’re more loyal to Democrats than gay people.

A prostitute who hands her money, affection, and loyalty to a pimp hates herself more than anyone else. She’ll lie down with anything and anyone in service to her pimp. That’s our relationship with Democrats.

Kill our babies. No problem. Make gay the new black. Fine. Tie our freedom to the rights of drag queens. Sure. Whatever you need, Daddy.

In our right minds, we’d slap Barack Obama and everyone else who talked us into this toxic relationship.