Mark Cuban confidently flubs another defense of DEI — this time tripping over 'equity'



Mark Cuban's attempts to defend the organizational discrimination scheme known as DEI have not been going well.

Last week, an EEOC commissioner hit the race-obsessive billionaire with a reality check, noting he was "dead wrong" in thinking race-factored hiring decisions could fly under Title VII of the Civil Rights of 1964.

Undaunted by this public humiliation, Cuban took up the mantle of DEI defender once again, intimating in a Sunday debate on X that critics of the discrimination regime have long misrepresented or at the very least misunderstood what is meant by "equity."

Cuban's apparent effort at moving the goalposts in the debate was thwarted with the unexpected help of Vice President Kamala Harris and corporate giants like Disney.

Total confidence

Billy Markus, the software engineer behind Dogecoin, wrote to Cuban toward the end of a lengthy exchange on X, "I would consider a good diversity program just a diversity program, and a bad one a 'DEI' program with 'equity' as its main goal."

Markus implored Cuban to "look into 'equity' as part of DEI - 'What is equity? Equity is about everyone achieving equal outcomes. We all have the same value and deserve a good life, but we all start from a different place.'"

The software engineer suggested that a proper understanding of the redistributive nature of "equity" would aid the billionaire in "understanding the more rational arguments against 'DEI' as opposed to the more hyperbolic ones. ... If taken more dogmatically, it is not actually about the best for the job or business but about providing equal outcomes for different races regardless of merit."

Cuban responded, "I can say with 100 pct confidence that anyone who believes 'Equity' is 'about providing equal outcomes' does not understand what the Equity in DEI is."

"'Equal Outcomes' is the disclaimer the Anti DEI movement uses to try to scapegoat DEI as unusuable and unsuitable," continued Cuban. "You will not find that in any corporate DEI program. Ever. (Feel free to provide a company website that says equality of outcomes to prove me wrong."

Cuban was so confident of the supposedly universal understanding of "equity" that he attacked the version of DEI that would embrace the alternate understanding.

"How would that even work?" wrote the Mavericks owner. "Have everyone who started the same day at comparable jobs all have the exact same career progression?"

The outcome

Cuban asked for examples and the internet obliged him. Community notes also slapped his declaration of confidence with a few examples for good measure.

The Rabbit Hole, a user who has repeatedly sparred with Cuban over the discriminatory nature of DEI, highlighted that critics' understanding comports with Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris' own understanding of equity.

In a Nov. 1, 2020, video post on X, Harris noted, "So there's a big difference between equality and equity. Equality suggests, 'Oh, everyone should get the same amount.' The problem with that, not everybody's starting out from the same place. So if we're all getting the same amount, but you started out back there and I started out over here, we could get the same amount, but you're still going to be that far back behind me."

According to Harris, "Equitable treatment means we all end up at the same place."

— (@)

Since Cuban did specifically ask for corporate examples, critics found the billionaire a handful in short order, including examples from Disney and Microsoft, which New College of Florida board member Christopher Rufo previously highlighted.

— (@)

According to the global management consulting firm McKinsey & Company, equity "takes into consideration a person's unique circumstances, adjusting treatment accordingly so that the end result is equal."

Deloitte has similarly made clear that "equity is not an initiative or a program — it is an outcome."

The accounting firm acknowledges in its equity imperative document that equity is an engineered outcome that factors in race.

The DEI peddlers at Diversio also suggest that equity "refers to fairness and equality in outcomes and not just support and resources."

The staffing and recruitment company HIRE Strategies readily admits that "equity is characterized by 'equality of outcome.' Equity recognizes that individuals may have different starting points and, therefore, tailors opportunities to align with each person's specific needs and perceptions of fairness."

A 2021 paper published in the American Journal of Law and Equality acknowledged that in "some current usages, 'equity' implies something more focused on results and on accommodation of individual differences. It is often used to call for systemic changes."

The paper noted, however, that another concept of "equity" — that ostensibly echoed by Microsoft, Disney, and the vice president — "calls for changing systems to produce something approximately equality of outcomes for groups defined along certain dimensions — chiefly race."

When prompted to explain the difference, Elon Musk's AI tool Grok answered, "Equality means treating everyone the same, while equity means providing people with what they need to reach an equal outcome."

Cuban took issue with various examples that were introduced into the debate as evidence, noting that many came from non-profit organizations or schools contra businesses.

He stressed that he doesn't "think DEI has anything to do with equal outcomes. ... And tbh as I have mentioned before, I don't follow how schools apply DEI."

"DEI is not an 'ideology'. It is a set of business processes that when done well makes a company more profitable," added Cuban. "When done poorly, like any other business process, hurts financial results and that company either resolves the problem or finds itself in a difficult position."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

EEOC commissioner humiliates Mark Cuban over his failure to comprehend the Civil Rights Act: 'Dead wrong'



Race-obsessive billionaire Mark Cuban continues to publicly defend the organizational discrimination scheme known as DEI — a numbers game in which human beings' immutable characteristics and sexual preferences are factored into hiring and advancement decisions.

In his continued attack Sunday on color-blind meritocracy and what he previously termed "DEI-Phobi[a]," Cuban outed himself for apparently engaging in discriminatory practices. Although he may not have seen it that way, a commissioner from the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission intervened to inform him the matter was clean-cut — and he was on the wrong side of it.

Cuban was arguing on X with the Rabbit Hole, a user who has previously hammered the billionaire for his "DEI Denialism."

In a Substack piece earlier this month, the Rabbit Hole discussed the mental gymnastics Cuban and other corporate bigwigs perform in their efforts to defend DEI. The critic suggested their routine comes down to a lack of familiarity with the issue, an inability to digest arguments, and apathy in the face of facts.

Cuban afforded the Rabbit Hole an opportunity to test this theory, engaging the critic in a debate Sunday on the question: "Should candidate selection, at any level, consider non-merit based criteria like race and sex?"

The debate began when Cuban shared a link on X to an NBC News article entitled, "How right-wing influencers turned airplanes and airports into culture war battlegrounds."

The Rabbit Hole wrote in reply, "When shown proof of how DEI discriminates, you wrote it off by stating private entities can do whatever they want. Since then the goalposts have repeatedly been shifted. Given the weak nature of your defenses of DEI, I suspect there is no real rebuttal to the criticisms myself and others have raised."

Cuban jumped into the fray, pushing back against the notion that "seeking out members of a certain demographic to fill [a] role" was reprehensible.

"You are a CEO of a successful company that has 30 employees that are all black women, and you think a different perspective will help you grow the firm," wrote Cuban. "So you decide you want to hire a white man? You would be against that right?"

The Rabbit Hole held firm and answered in the affirmative, stressing, "I believe in a colorblind meritocracy; this means I am against forms of hiring which undercut merit including forms of hiring which cut out merited individuals over their group association(s)."

Turning the tables, the Rabbit Hole asked the billionaire whether he has "hired people on the basis of demographics on the belief that doing so better positioned your companies to succeed?"

Cuban claimed that while he has "never hired anyone based exclusively on race, gender, religion," "race and gender can be part of the equation" if that would put his business in the best position to succeed.

In response to Cuban's damning answer and apparent admission of a race-factored hiring approach, the Rabbit Hole responded, "Thank you for your transparency."

@mcuban \u201cAnd yes, race and gender can be part of the equation.\u201d\n\nThank you for your transparency.\n\nTitle VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin.
— (@)

EEOC Commissioner Andrea L. Lucas ultimately weighed in, lending her expert insight on discrimination law and humiliating Cuban in front of millions of users.

"EEOC Commissioner here. Unfortunately you're dead wrong on black-letter Title VII law," wrote Lucas. "As a general rule, race/sex can't even be a 'motivating factor' — nor a plus factor, tie-breaker, or tipping point. It's important employers understand the ground rules here."

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 notes that "an unlawful employment practice is established when the complaining party demonstrates that race, color, religion, sex, or national origin was a motivating factor for any employment practice, even though other factors also motivated the practice."

— (@)

Lucas provided Cuban with a link to "further information about the relevant legal standards, and corresponding potential risks" pertaining to DEI practices should he "need a primer on the law."

Missouri Sen. Eric Schmitt subsequently told Cuban, "Call your lawyer."

America First Legal noted, "This is the beauty of @X --here you have [Mark Cuban] openly admitting to violating black-letter employment law, and getting admonished/corrected in real-time by an EEOC Commissioner. ... For the entire world to see."

Cuban doubled down on his remarks Monday, stating, "Race is part of the equation never the deciding factor. As is diversity of background."

@FutureConfirmed Race is part of the equation never the deciding factor. As is diversity of background
— (@)

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

WATCH: Dallas Mavs CEO openly admits she fires anyone who doesn’t support woke protocols



Rather than focusing on being the best basketball team in the NBA, the Dallas Mavericks are more focused on implementing DEI and other woke practices.

The team’s CEO, Cynt Marshall, says so herself. Dave Rubin plays the video of her boldly stating she will not hesitate to get rid of anyone who opposes DEI protocols.

“We wanted to also focus on emotional safety, and I told the team these values would be on the walls, but more importantly, they would operate in the halls,” Marshall explained, “so then we went through a series of sessions to really dig into those values and what it meant to have values-based employment at the Dallas Mavericks.”

Marshall then implemented a “100 days plan” designed to “model zero tolerance.” Part of this plan included a “hotline” and a “complaint process” that would allow her to “purge what [she] needed to purge,” insinuating that she fires anyone who isn’t on board with her woke protocols.

Another part of the plan was to implement a “Mav’s women’s agenda” that revolved around “elevating, empowering, and educating women,” as well as emphasize “cultural transformation, which is all the things around diversity and inclusion.”

According to Marshall, her “200 initiatives” were necessary to “institutionalize an inclusive culture.”

“This is the CEO of the Dallas Mavericks,” sighs Dave. “Her job is to make the Dallas Mavericks basketball team as functional as possible, to win as much as possible, to make as much money as possible, to bring in the proper coach, proper GM ... so they have the best freaking basketball team.”

And yet, “everything she talked about there had nothing to do with that.”


Want more from Dave Rubin?

To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.