NPR CEO, Who Called Trump 'Deranged Racist Sociopath,' Tells Congress There's No 'Political Bias' at Taxpayer-Funded Broadcaster

NPR CEO Katherine Maher, who once called President Donald Trump a "deranged racist sociopath," testified Wednesday to Congress that she's "never seen … political bias" at the taxpayer-funded outlet, a comment that provoked laughter.

The post NPR CEO, Who Called Trump 'Deranged Racist Sociopath,' Tells Congress There's No 'Political Bias' at Taxpayer-Funded Broadcaster appeared first on .

Florida Judge Rejects Pulitzer Prize Board's Attempt To Delay Trump Russiagate Lawsuit

A Florida judge sided with President Donald Trump this week in his defamation lawsuit against members of the Pulitzer Prize Board, who sought to delay the lawsuit until Trump leaves office. The lawsuit centers on the board's awards to the New York Times and Washington Post for their Russiagate coverage. Last week, Pulitzer board members argued […]

The post Florida Judge Rejects Pulitzer Prize Board's Attempt To Delay Trump Russiagate Lawsuit appeared first on .

The Democrats aren’t really crazy — they just act like they are



During his speech to Congress on Tuesday, President Donald Trump faced an unexpected disruption when security removed U.S. Rep. Al Green, a Democrat from Texas, for causing a disturbance. The incident raised a question: Are Green and his fellow Democrats taking their opposition to Trump too far?

Democratic mayors and governors are increasingly pushing to shield illegal immigrants, including those convicted of serious crimes, from deportation. Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, along with the mayors of Chicago, Denver, Boston, and Houston, have publicly defended allowing convicted rapists and drug smugglers to remain in their communities. They frame this stance as a defense against what they view as a hostile federal administration.

Should the likes of Jasmine Crockett, Jamie Raskin, JB Pritzker, Al Green, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez define the Democratic message, or should Democrats aim to sound more like mainstream Americans rather than woke wackos?

Senate Democrats are also supporting policies that permit biological men to compete in women’s sports and use girls’ locker rooms. This position contradicts their claims of supporting “women’s rights.” About 80% of Americans oppose these policies, seeing them as threats to women’s privacy and fairness in sports.

A similar majority rejects another key Democratic position: allowing minors diagnosed with gender dysphoria to undergo surgical procedures. Additionally, most Americans disagree with the Democratic assertion that there are more than two sexes. This stance has sparked conflicts, particularly when people are pressured to use pronouns or language that they believe contradicts biological reality.

Democrats’ defense of an already bloated public workforce, especially that based in Washington, is equally puzzling. Do most Americans really support spending billions of dollars each year to keep the Department of Education handing out taxpayer money to woke educational projects nationwide? And after seeing the massive funding from USAID to Africa, Asia, and Eastern Europe for LGBTQ indoctrination disguised as foreign aid, it’s fair to ask how many Americans actually see this Democratic spending as a “hill to die on.”

These questions naturally arise for non-leftists watching the direction the Democratic Party has taken since Trump’s victory on November 5. Some Democratic advisers have questioned the party’s current path and have urged a shift toward more moderate positions on social issues.

The party faces a choice: Should the likes of Jasmine Crockett, Jamie Raskin, JB Pritzker, Al Green, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez define the Democratic message, or should Democrats aim to sound more like mainstream Americans rather than woke wackos?

Like Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.), I believe congressional Democrats “embarrassed themselves” by refusing to applaud a young boy introduced during Trump’s speech as a brain cancer survivor. Throughout the address, Democratic lawmakers waved signs and made faces to display their opposition. It’s doubtful they took issue with Rep. Green’s rude behavior, which may have been encouraged by his party’s leaders.

The real question is whether these antics damage the Democratic brand. They might have swayed some independents, but they likely had little impact on the polarized ideological camps in the country. Neither Senator Schmitt nor I would vote Democratic, even if the Democrats at Trump’s speech had shown perfect courtesy. We find the party’s cultural politics so repellent that supporting most Democratic politicians is unthinkable. By the same token, I can't imagine any feminist, government worker, or college professor I know voting for a MAGA Republican.

It seems unlikely that Democratic opposition to Trump, no matter how distasteful it appears, will drive a mass shift to the GOP. Democratic voters genuinely dislike Trump. According to a Hill poll from the end of his first month in office, Trump held a 52% approval rating, but 43% disapproved, with most of them expressing strong disapproval. A recent Pew poll also showed that 44% of Americans believe Trump has gone too far in deporting illegal immigrants. It’s not hard to imagine that this large minority aligns with the Democratic Party on other issues and likely shares Democratic politicians' intense disdain for Trump.

The Democrats still have a large core constituency that remains loyal to the party. This base is unlikely to be alienated by the party's resistance tactics or its recent, baffling positions. I see no reason to believe that the American left is outraged by the Democrats' behavior.

In fact, a glance at the legacy media online suggests otherwise. The focus has returned to portraying Trump as an ally of Vladimir Putin, dominating left-leaning news coverage. Issues like allowing biological men into women's locker rooms, Al Green's outburst, or the party’s willingness to shield this lout from congressional censure seem to have taken a back seat. So be it. The Democrats will reap what they sow.

Black conservatives are the ‘tragic mulattos’ of American politics



Ben Shapiro’s recent video arguing President Trump should pardon Derek Chauvin elicited passionate responses on social media. Some conservative commentators thought it was a bad idea that would cost the president precious political capital. Others believed Trump should do it despite the guaranteed outrage it would incite on the left.

For black conservatism to survive, it must aspire to more than just policing the excesses of the progressive left or the fringe right.

The response from Xaviaer DuRousseau, in particular, caught my attention because the popular influencer and commentator jokingly raised an issue that a particular subset of conservatives rarely expresses openly.

Being a black conservative and maintaining your cookout credentials is getting soooo hard.

He ended his post with four crying emojis that made his point crystal clear: Issues that are racially coded and politically charged are hard for black conservatives to navigate.

A unique challenge

Many black conservatives experience this identity crisis — one characterized far more by the “tragic mulatto” trope from 19th- and 20th-century literature than the “Uncle Tom” epithet that is synonymous with racial self-hatred. The tragic mulatto stereotype arose in a culture governed by racial hierarchy. It was associated with mixed-race people who struggled with feelings of alienation in a world that did not accept them as either wholly black or white.

Black liberals are quick to label their conservative brethren “sellouts” for rejecting progressive politics. White liberals, likewise, have no problem questioning the racial bona fides of blacks who don’t vote for Democrats. A growing chorus of white conservatives also blame Martin Luther King Jr. and the civil rights movement for diversity, equity, and inclusion, as well as Black Lives Matter, critical race theory, and LGBT radicalism.

Black conservatism, in many ways, faces a unique challenge. It exists as a racial subgenre within a broader political movement that has traditionally emphasized color blindness and minimized the impact of racism on the current outcomes of black Americans. The only notable exceptions occur when accusations of bias and discrimination are directed at white liberals or at failed progressive policies.

Anyone paying attention to conservative public discourse in the age of social media, however, can see that the right’s approach to race is rapidly evolving. Conservative commentators are increasingly vocal about what they view as anti-white bias in criminal prosecutions, professional sports, media representation, and the job market. This emerging race consciousness is evident in heated online debates about American identity and culture. It also serves as an underlying theme in policy fights over immigration.

A new generation of ‘reconstructionists’

Race is the most visible source of the black conservative identity crisis, but the movement’s mission is equally important to its long-term survival. Today, the most visible black conservatives in America seem focused on increasing Republican representation in politics and growing their brands as right-wing commentators.

The conservative ecosystem certainly makes room for political operatives and culture warriors. But when black conservatism focuses primarily on boosting voter turnout and participation in elections, it fails to fulfill its core mission.

Donald Trump maintained roughly the same support from black voters as in 2020 — about 13% overall and 20% of men. In fact, he lost black conservatives to Kamala Harris by an 11-point margin. Investing financial, political, and social capital to attract black voters has yielded poor returns. But this does not spell the death of black conservatism.

The movement needs a new generation of “reconstructionists” focused on strengthening local institutions and individuals rather than politicos and media personalities fixated on national elections. The most crucial task ahead is restoring the traditional family structure that prevailed from the end of the Civil War through the Civil Rights movement.

From 1890 to 1950, black men and women were more likely than their white counterparts to be married by age 35. In the 1930s, 65% of black women were married before having their first child. The 1960 Census showed that two-thirds of black children lived in two-parent households. Today, only 33% of black adults are married, 70% of black children are born to unmarried parents, and 45% live with a single mother. These outcomes are worse for blacks than for any other group.

The most valuable contribution

Although the family is the most important institution, it is not the only one. The poor educational outcomes in many urban districts should motivate a new generation of black conservative scholars, educators, and activists to take action.

Many have already risen to the occasion.

Ian Rowe, an educator who has spent his career teaching children in the Bronx, opened Vertex Partnership Academies in 2022. This high school’s mission is guided by the four cardinal virtues: courage, justice, temperance, and wisdom. Denisha Allen founded Black Minds Matter, an organization that promotes school choice and empowers black educators working to improve outcomes in their communities.

These leaders demonstrate that black conservatives need not feel conflicted between their ethnic identity and political ideology, especially when both are grounded in a Christian worldview of human dignity.

For black conservatism to survive, it must aspire to more than just policing the excesses of the progressive left or the fringe right.

The movement should also avoid the trap of believing that electoral politics alone can drive social progress. The most valuable contribution black conservatives can make today is to leverage their cultural competency, experience, relationships, and expertise to build institutions that can radically improve social and economic outcomes in the cities and communities they care about most.

MSNBC host makes repulsive remarks about child with brain cancer honored during Trump's congressional address



MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace made a tone-deaf statement about DJ Daniel, a 13-year-old child with brain cancer who was made an honorary member of the United States Secret Service during President Donald Trump's congressional address Tuesday night.

Daniel received a standing ovation from Republicans in the chamber, while Democrats remained seated.

Despite the heartfelt exchange many Americans witnessed, Wallace couldn't help but politicize the touching moment Daniel's dreams came true.

"Joining us in the gallery tonight is a young man who truly loves our police," Trump said during the address. "His name is DJ Daniel, he is 13 years old, and he has always dreamed of becoming a police officer. But in 2018, DJ was diagnosed with brain cancer. The doctors gave him five months at most to live. That was more than six years ago."

Democrats REFUSE to stand and clap for a little kid fighting brain cancer: pic.twitter.com/0RdZfqDpTX
— TheBlaze (@theblaze) March 5, 2025

"Tonight, DJ, we're going to do you the biggest honor of them all," Trump said. "I am asking our new Secret Service director, Sean Curran, to officially make you an agent of the United States Secret Service."

Despite the heartfelt exchange many Americans witnessed, Wallace couldn't help but politicize the touching moment when Daniel's dreams came true.

“I hope he has a long life as a law enforcement officer, but I hope he never has to defend the United States Capitol against Donald Trump's supporters," Wallace said. “And if he does, I hope he isn't one of the six who loses his life to suicide. And I hope he isn't one who has to testify against the people who carried out acts of seditious conspiracy."

Leave it up to the left to somehow turn a sincere moment honoring a child cancer patient into a political talking point about January 6.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

FLASHBACK: Media Reaction to Biden SOTU Just a Little Off

When former president Joe Biden delivered his State of the Union address last year, media pundits quickly lauded his "fiery" and "passionate" speech.

MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell took aim at the "punditocracy" for suggesting Biden was not "quick enough," saying, "It turns out he's the quickest we've ever had at that microphone." Political strategist Sarah Longwell went as far as to say, "Look, if that's what dementia is, I hope that's how I have dementia when I'm older because he was on his game."

Just months later, Biden ended his re-election bid, the octogenarian's obvious mental decline too much to overcome.

The post FLASHBACK: Media Reaction to Biden SOTU Just a Little Off appeared first on .

3 Times the Media Waited Until After an Election To Expose Democratic Scandals

CNN host Jake Tapper is preparing to sell a book he wrote about Joe Biden's cognitive decline and the "desperate efforts to hide the extent of that deterioration." Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again comes out in May. That's 6 months after the election, 11 months after […]

The post 3 Times the Media Waited Until After an Election To Expose Democratic Scandals appeared first on .

Journalists Outraged After WaPo Owner Endorses Freedom

Many journalists and other liberal activists freaked out on Wednesday after Jeff Bezos, the Amazon founder and compassionate steward of the failing Washington Post, expressed his support for "personal liberties" and "free markets." The billionaire's remarks came in a bland memo to Post staff announcing changes to the paper's opinion section, as well as the departure of opinion editor David Shipley, who evidently did not share Bezos's view that freedom is good.

The post Journalists Outraged After WaPo Owner Endorses Freedom appeared first on .

Exclusive: Republicans huddle with FCC chair in closed-door meeting to dismantle DEI, liberal media machine



House Republicans met with FCC Chair Brendan Carr and Republican Study Committee Chair Rep. August Pfluger (Texas) on Wednesday to discuss the evolving media landscape under President Donald Trump's administration.

During the closed-door meeting that Blaze News was given exclusive access to, both Pfluger and Carr addressed concerns about the liberal bias in publicly funded platforms like NPR, as well as the importance of empowering local media.

Carr, who has been an FCC commissioner since 2017, homed in on the importance of free speech and the First Amendment and also of applying existing regulations evenly rather than to advance a political agenda.

'The RSC is committed to working alongside Chairman Carr to dismantle the censorship cartel, strengthen America's digital infrastructure through free-market principles, and restore free-speech rights for everyday Americans.'

"For too long in this government, particularly the last couple of years, your last name dictated how the government treated you," Carr said. "If your last name was Soros, the commission bent over backwards and gave you a special, unprecedented commission-level shortcut to buy 200 radio stations. If your last name was Musk, then you lost $800 million contracts that you lawfully got."

"Everybody now is going to get a fair shake going forward," Carr added.

In the meeting, Carr laid out a four-step plan to reduce media bias and restore the FCC's core principles, which include reining in Big Tech censorship, reinvigorating trust in national and local media, putting forward both economic and permitting reforms, and bolstering aspects of our national security.

With the support of Pfluger and RSC members, Carr is confident that he can accomplish these directives.

"We thank Chairman Carr for his bold leadership in confronting malign influences like George Soros that corrupt our media and silence conservative voices, and the committee fully supports his efforts to restore truth to our public disclosure while expanding broadband access to rural communities," Pfluger said.

"The RSC is committed to working alongside Chairman Carr to dismantle the censorship cartel, strengthen America's digital infrastructure through free-market principles, and restore free-speech rights for everyday Americans," Pfluger added.

Carr also spoke about some of the reforms he has already enacted. Prior to his becoming chair, Carr noted, DEI was the second-most highly prioritized core value of the FCC. Since then, Trump has issued an executive order uprooting DEI from all federal entities, and the FCC has followed suit.

"We've ended the FCC promotion of DEI," Carr said. "You would be outraged if you realized how much promoting DEI had been embedded in FCC work. ... We were spending millions and millions of dollars promoting DEI. Meanwhile, what fell by the wayside was the FCC's actual core work — and doing it competently — of connecting Americans."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!