Jen Psaki heckled for ignoring questions 'across the room' during her last White House press briefing



White House press secretary Jen Psaki’s final briefing with the White House press pool was rather chaotic on Friday as one reporter took the opportunity to heckle the resigning press secretary.

As Paski emotionally began to thank members of the Biden administration and to take questions from the crowd, Simon Ateba, the chief White House correspondent for Today News Africa, could be heard yelling from the back of the press briefing room, the New York Post reported.

As Associated Press reporter Zeke Miller attempted to start the briefing by asking Psaki about the ongoing baby formula shortage, Ateba shouted, “Why don’t you take questions from across the room?”

After Psaki did not acknowledge his statement, Ateba shouted, “Why don’t you take questions from across the room? Because that’s not what you’ve done for the past 15 months.”

Psaki did not appear phased by Ateba’s lack of briefing room decorum, but the chaos continued as Ateba resumed shouting over his colleagues just minutes later.

He was heard repeatedly saying: “Jen, can I ask you a question from the back?”

As Ateba’s interruptions continued, his colleagues in the press briefing room grew increasingly frustrated. NPR’s Tamara Keith turned around in her seat and urged him to desist from heckling.

“Simon, please, stop,” she could be heard saying.

Nevertheless, Ateba’s crusade continued as his persistently shouted over other reporters as they asked Psaki questions.

Finally having enough, Psaki turned to him and said, “Simon, if you can respect your colleagues and other media and reporters in here, that would be greatly appreciated.”

After Ateba’s vocal protest settled down, Peter Alexander from NBC News said that he would voluntarily limit himself to only asking two questions so that his colleagues would have more time to pose inquiries to the resigning press secretary. Historically, White House reporters have adhered to an informal norm of limiting exchanges with the administration’s spokesperson to two questions.

Ateba and Psaki have come to blows multiple times before the former’s Friday outbursts.

Psaki has long been criticized for strictly taking questions from reporters in the first few rows of the briefing room, often excluding foreign media outlets like Ateba’s.

In December, Ateba shouted over his colleagues as he accused Psaki of lying to the media about coronavirus related travel restrictions.

“You are saying something that is false,” Ateba shouted at Psaki.

Ateba has also previously accused various COVID-19 travel restrictions of being “racist” and has a history of interrupting White House briefing guests.

Squires: 'Media laundering' keeps the public misinformed and advances the left's dangerous plans



The recent controversy over Florida’s so-called “Don’t Say Gay” bill demonstrates how the corporate press acts as a “media laundering” operation that “washes” unpopular ideas on behalf of activists, politicians, corporations, and entertainers on the left. On virtually every major issue, media outlets like MSNBC, the Washington Post, and the Atlantic shape and amplify the preferred narrative of the Democratic party.

The actual proposed legislation that awaits Governor Ron DeSantis’ signature is in reality called the “Parental Rights in Education” bill, but virtually no one outside his state would know that.

Media laundering is the reason.

To truly appreciate the scope of the operation, one must understand its foundation. Money laundering schemes make large amounts of money from illegal activities (e.g., drug trafficking) look like they come from a legitimate source through a three-step process of “placement,” “layering,” and “integration.”

Placement involves injecting dirty money into a bank or other legitimate financial institution. The next step, layering, involves concealing the source of the money through a series of financial transactions (e.g., large purchases, offshore transfers) to change its form and make it hard to follow. In the final step, integration, the laundered money is withdrawn from legitimate accounts to be used for whatever purpose the criminal has in mind.

Media laundering schemes work on similar principles. In the world of information, “introduction” is the insertion of a legitimate issue into discussions of politics and culture. The second step, “confusion,” involves concealing the source of an idea or the finer details of a particular issue through a series of rhetorical tricks. These range from emotional manipulation, euphemisms, and policing tone to ad hominem attacks and dodging legitimate questions. In the final step, “acceptance,” an approved position and accompanying narrative have been created for use by other journalists, politicians, entertainers, and other people who rely on the liberal media for information.

The power of media laundering is that once ideas have been “washed” and declared acceptable, the people behind the scheme can apply maximum pressure in every area of society to ensure conformity.

In Florida’s case, the most controversial part of its parental rights bill would prohibit classroom instruction on sexual orientation and gender identity for children in kindergarten through third grade or in higher grades in a way that is not developmentally appropriate according to state standards.

One reporter from the Associated Press announced the passage of the bill this way: “The Florida legislature has passed the “Don’t Say Gay” bill, which Gov. Ron DeSantis is expected to sign into law.” Headlines from other “mainstream” sources included the following.

  • Florida Just Passed The “Don’t Say Gay” Bill — Time
  • ‘Don’t Say Gay’ bill passes Florida Senate — BBC News
  • Florida lawmakers pass ‘Don’t Say Gay’ — ABC News
  • Florida House passes ‘Don’t Say Gay’ bill — NBC News
  • Florida House passes controversial “Don’t Say Gay” bill — CBS News
  • ‘Don’t Say Gay’ bill passes in the Florida House — NPR

Instead of informing the public about the actual language in the bill and the issues animating the debate about it, the media acts like the press office for the left. The Democrats who have spent the last two weeks saying “gay” in TikTok videos and at rallies would much rather do that than clearly explain why schools need to teach 5-year-old children that some boys and girls are born in the wrong body.

Another issue involving children is Texas Governor Greg Abbott’s directive to the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) to investigate medical professionals and parents who enable a child’s “gender-transition” surgery. A district judge in Texas recently blocked DFPS from implementing this policy. Gubernatorial candidate Beto O’Rourke answered a question from a teenage girl who wants to be put on testosterone by echoing her claim about the increase in suicide attempts by trans youth.

A functioning press would cover these issues honestly instead of putting its thumb on the scales of public opinion. People need to hear real questions and answers about such important matters of policy and social life.

If journalists and politicians on the left were forced to acknowledge that men can’t become women and vice versa, they would have to explain why medical treatments that sterilize adolescents and young adults should be seen as compassionate. They would never respond to a spike in adolescent anorexia by calling for medical professionals to prescribe appetite suppressants and gastric bypass surgery to teens.

When it comes to the issue of gender identity, however, they have made the public accept the idea that conflicts between perceptions of the mind and the reality of the body require the body to change. The net impact is that Americans are less informed about the substance of our most important political debates even though we have access to more information than at any other point in history.

Issues related to sexuality and gender identity are the clearest examples of media laundering, but the practice is much more common than most people realize.

The video of ESPN personality Michael Wilbon chastising Brooklyn Nets star Kevin Durant for his recent comments about COVID vaccine mandates in New York City perfectly captures the media’s role throughout the pandemic. The veteran journalist rebuked Durant for not telling his teammate Kyrie Irving to “put a shot in your arm” and claimed mayor Eric Adams doesn’t have time to attend to the needs of a basketball team.

What he didn’t do was inform the public that the vaccine does not prevent either infection nor transmission, unlike the vaccines he said Irving needed to take to attend school. He also didn’t say that given Irving’s age and occupation, he is at extremely low risk for serious injury or death from COVID. Wilbon also knows that the Nets reached out to Irving after several of their vaccinated players caught COVID in December and that New York’s current COVID policy allows Irving to attend home games but not play in them.

All of these are facts the public would expect trained journalists to raise in order to have a more informed discussion. Instead, Wilbon appealed to emotions by noting the COVID death toll.

ESPN, like most corporate media, has laundered the left’s preferred narratives on COVID for two years. This is why journalists have mocked people who said they wanted to do their own research on masks and vaccines. The attempt to get Joe Rogan kicked off Spotify demonstrates media laundering only works when the public is restricted to sources of information that have been approved by the ruling class.

The purpose of laundering, whether ideas or capital, is to avoid accountability. Criminals know that having to explain their source of income in a court of law could lead to a lifetime in prison. Ideologues know that their ideas – from destroying the nuclear family to Drag Queen Story Hour – would be extremely unpopular in the court of public opinion.

Subjecting people to unrelenting narratives untethered from the truth, whether about their risk of being killed by police or dying from a respiratory virus, is a form of cruel and unusual punishment. The people behind the media laundering schemes do it to create a fearful, docile, and obedient class of citizens who support whatever the people in power are promoting at any given minute. That is why the national press would never refer to a ban on abortions after six weeks as a “Don’t Kill Babies” bill.

We must be persistent in demanding answers to the most important questions of the day, especially when our children are involved. Media outlets like to paint themselves as a moral compass, but their schemes show they are just a cultural weathervane.

Politifact gets buried online after its 'fact-check' on Rittenhouse trial is completely contradicted



A fact-check claim from Politifact on the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse got brutal blowback online after the judge in the case sunk a central charge in the case.

Rittenhouse is on trial for the fatal shooting of two people and injury of a third during a Black Lives Matter protest in Kenosha, Wisconsin. Prosecutors allege that the 18-year-old is guilty of murder, but his attorney is arguing that he acted in self-defense.

Politifact's attempt at fact-checking from Aug. 2020 didn't stand the test of time after Kenosha County Circuit Judge Bruce Schroeder dismissed the charge of possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18 against Rittenhouse on Monday.

Schroeder ruled that Rittenhouse was legally allowed to possess a rifle because of Wisconsin's open carry law, as long as it met certain minimum length requirements.

The fact-check claimed it was not legal for Rittenhouse, who was seventeen at the time of the shooting, to possess the rifle without parental supervision.

The article noted that there was an exception for some teenagers in cases where they were hunting, but added, "Rittenhouse wasn't in Kenosha to hunt."

A Facebook post says, \u201cAt 17 years old Kyle (Rittenhouse) was perfectly legal to be able to possess that rifle without parental supervision.\u201d That's False.https://bit.ly/2YHRf2X
— PolitiFact Wisconsin (@PolitiFactWisc) 1598649214

Many on social media took the news organization to task for levying up the claims clearly contradicted by the ruling of the judge in Rittenhouse's case.

"This fact check was always wrong, but now that the weapons charge has been dropped it's officially PANTS ON FIRE," replied Mark Hemingway.

"You guys really should look for another line of work," read one popular tweet.

"Are you going to factcheck yourself now?" asked another critic.

"Issue an immediate retraction," demanded another popular tweet.

Politifact also noted that their finding had been used as a basis for Facebook to censor claims on their social media platform.

Here's the latest on the Rittenhouse trial:

Rittenhouse Prosecutor Gets MOCKED When He BOTCHES Facts on Gunswww.youtube.com

Whitlock: The absurd coverage of Kyle Rittenhouse’s murder trial will likely lead to another Kenosha atrocity



This weekend, while appearing on "Life, Liberty & Levin," I butchered a famous quote by Voltaire, the 18th-century French philosopher and culture critic.

I was using Voltaire to explain 21st-century America. The prolific writer said, "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."

I applied the quote to the overreaction to the Capitol riot on Jan. 6. Corporate media, social media, and many of our lawmakers have absurdly defined the mostly peaceful riot as an "insurrection" or the most dangerous attack on American democracy since Pearl Harbor. The absurd analogy has justified the atrocity of treating the rioters as domestic terrorists.

On Saturday, I gave a speech in West Palm Beach, Florida. I used Voltaire again. I talked about the 1965 Moynihan Report. It was written by sociologist Daniel Patrick Moynihan, assistant secretary of labor in the Johnson administration. The Moynihan Report called for investment in the black family in general and investment in black men in particular. Corporate media framed Moynihan and the report as racist. President Lyndon Johnson pulled his support of Moynihan's suggested initiatives and implemented his Great Society welfare agenda.

It was absurd to frame Moynihan's call for investment in the black family as racist. I told my Florida audience that 56 years later, as 75% of black children are born into fatherless homes, we are living with the atrocity of the absurd smearing of Moynihan.

Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.

This week, Kenosha, Wisconsin, for the second time in 15 months, may be living with the consequences of the selling of absurdities as truth. Today a jury heard closing arguments in the Kyle Rittenhouse murder trial. If the jury justifiably acquits Rittenhouse of all the serious charges, it is expected that mostly peaceful rioters, looters, and arsonists will peacefully riot, loot, and burn certain areas of Kenosha. Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers has already summoned 500 National Guardsmen to help police Kenosha and surrounding areas.

Corporate media have greatly exaggerated Kyle Rittenhouse's importance to American culture. He is on trial for murder because of that exaggeration. There is ample video evidence and eyewitness testimony to substantiate that Rittenhouse fired his rifle in self-defense a year ago.

The first victim, Joseph Rosenbaum, suffered from bipolar disorder. He'd previously served a long stint in prison for molesting a minor. Hours before being shot by Rittenhouse, Rosenbaum had been released from a mental hospital. He was in a psych ward for an attempted suicide. Rosenbaum had a death wish. That's why he attacked Rittenhouse and tried to wrestle away his AR-15 rifle.

The second victim, Anthony Huber, clubbed Rittenhouse with a skateboard. It's all on video. Huber had a criminal record for domestic assault. The third victim, Gage Grosskreutz, admitted walking up to Rittenhouse and pointing a gun at Rittenhouse's head.

Rittenhouse acted in self-defense. He should not be on trial for murder.

There's no proof that Rittenhouse is a white supremacist, as has been insinuated by our president, Joe Biden, and many people in the media. Rittenhouse is white. All three of his victims were white.

Rittenhouse lived in Illinois with his mother. His father lived in Kenosha. It's not difficult to understand how and why he felt compelled to go to Kenosha and attempt to protect businesses and citizens there. You can argue whether a 17-year-old should have involved himself in a situation as volatile as Kenosha. But he's not on trial for visiting Kenosha. He's on trial for murder. He's on trial for whether he acted in self-defense.

The Rittenhouse trial is an atrocity. The riots that ravaged Kenosha in the aftermath of Jacob Blake being shot by cops were an atrocity. Corporate media framed the shooting of Blake as an unarmed, innocent black man being shot by racist white cops. Blake was armed with a knife, had wrestled with police, and had an arrest warrant for sexual assault.

The media keep stacking absurdities on top of absurdities, and no one wants to take responsibility for the inevitable atrocities.

If the jury follows the law and common sense, Rittenhouse will be acquitted this week and violence will erupt in Wisconsin and perhaps in other parts of America.

Much of Voltaire's critique of France was accurate. He died a decade before the French Revolution.

The death of America will be the final atrocity caused by the American media's love of absurdity.

Horowitz: Move over, ivermectin: The media is now attacking effective nasal sprays used against COVID



Imagine reducing your viral load of COVID and decreasing your chance of hospitalization 19-fold with a $15 solution. Well, the corporate media have gotten wind of it too, which is why they are now attacking the nasal irrigation concoctions, proving once again that they will slander every and any treatment that actually works – no matter how safe and effective.

It is now becoming clear that not only do the vaccines not stop transmission, but they seem to have spawned even more transmission in the most vaccinated countries. Studies have shown that the vaccinated might also carry higher viral loads. Either way, it is clear that the current iteration of the virus is spreading a higher viral load for everyone, which makes people sicker on a shorter timeline. We are truly all in this together in the sense that anyone who has not had prior infection – whether vaccinated or not – needs to take precautions. One of the best forms of preventive and very early treatment recommended by COVID doctors and academic literature is nasal and oral irrigation with betadine solution and mouthwash respectively. This is designed to cut down on the viral load, which is critical to avoiding serious illness.

Here is the protocol from the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) on how to use the mouth rinse and nasal irrigation with betadine.

Here is a good video demonstrating its use:

Nasal Irrigation: How to Reduce Risk Against COVID-19 youtu.be

Not surprisingly, the media hasn't taken kindly to this. "Some anti-vaxxers are gargling the common antiseptic Betadine in an attempt to treat and prevent the coronavirus," states Newsweek in a snarky hit piece on this tried and tested tactic. Mind you, the media are the ones framing every treatment as being pitted against vaccination, when in fact, the vaccinated are carrying a greater viral load and are now getting sick from the virus as well. Everyone needs treatment, yet the media are allowing their obsession with the vaccine to dissuade people from pursuing lifesaving treatment.

Just how good is pre- and post-exposure nasal and oral irrigation? A randomized controlled trial in Bangladesh of 606 people, half of whom took the nasal and oral iodine sprays, netted an 84% reduction in COVID hospitalizations and an 88% reduction in mortality. The problem is that much like with ivermectin, it poses a major threat to the system because it empowers people to control their own health and safety without making any of the cronies rich.

Newsweek goes on to insinuate once again that no therapeutic under the sun is allowed to be used for COVID, but only for its original purpose:

"Betadine® Antiseptic First Aid products have not been approved to treat coronavirus," reads an official statement on the Betadine website. "Products should only be used to help prevent infection in minor cuts, scrapes and burns. Betadine Antiseptic products have not been demonstrated to be effective for the treatment or prevention of COVID-19 or any other viruses."

Well, knock me over with a feather! Everything we have existed prior to COVID and was made for a different purpose. But povidone-iodine has been described in academic literature as "the most potent antiseptic." There is a reason why surgeons use it before every procedure. Notice how the media is enforcing the government's agenda that no treatment can ever be used unless it is created by the "right sort of people" specifically for COVID for a large sum of money. Meanwhile, everyone must die of the virus in the meantime waiting for their supposed miracle drugs to come out.

"Iodine is established as having a broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against bacterial, viral, fungal, and protozoal pathogens and has been used as an antiseptic for the prevention of infection and the treatment of wounds for decades," said Dr. Eric Hensen, a board-certified ear, nose and throat doctor in Texas in an interview with TheBlaze. Hensen, who has been treating hundreds of COVID patients for free at his east Texas office and via telemedicine, never got meaningfully sick from COVID and credits, in part, his use of nasal and oral irrigation for reducing dangerous viral loads.

"PVP-I (nasal and oral spray) has the ability for destruction of SARS-CoV-2; transmission of SARS- CoV-2 from patient will also be reduced," said the specialist. "Thus PVP-I oro-nasal spray can act as an effective shield for COVID-19 protection for health care workers, for all."

Dr. Hensen believes it's nonsense to suggest that somehow such an effective antiseptic cannot be used against a virus. He has also used 3% food-grade hydrogen peroxide with a great deal of success in the early stages of the viral replication period. "Utilizing nebulized hydrogen peroxide with iodine, one can get the medication in the areas that normally would not be reached. These areas include the entire nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses, nasal pharynx, and oral pharynx. Also included would be the lower respiratory system including lungs and bronchial tubes."

Every day, we learn new solutions to treating this virus, and one by one they are ridiculed by the corporate media, which is fully invested in perpetuating this virus without any effective solution.

Whitlock: Bill Maher is traveling the slippery slope to a godly awakening about corporate media



Bearded conservative talk show host Bill Maher did it again. He turned his Friday-night HBO platform, "Real Time with Bill Maher," into a smorgasbord of left-wing ridicule.

He ended his show trashing the woke, arguing that the events in Afghanistan are an example of what real systemic oppression looks like. Earlier in the broadcast, he lamented the success of Fox News host Greg Gutfield's comedic late-night show, suggesting the left had opened itself to satire by adopting talking points that sound like Onion headlines.

"Three-year-olds pick their own gender is an Onion headline," Maher quipped.

In a fascinating moment of unintended irony, Maher griped that politics is becoming a new religion and that America would be better off if we talked less about politics. Maher is an atheist. In 2008, he released a documentary, "Religulous," that mocked religious faith. He's unwittingly becoming aware that the removal of religion from American culture creates a void that is filled by the idolatry of partisan politics. I'd love to be in the room when Maher finally realizes that unity among disparate humans can only be achieved through faith in God. I believe he'll have that epiphany within the next 12 months. He's too honest to remain in denial.

An honest man can only pretend to be a liberal Democrat for so long. And television is an uncomfortable platform for the last honest man. Each week, Maher sounds more and more like a short-time HBO employee. Nothing breeds honesty more than an expiration date. And honest people can't work forever within modern corporate media. The restraints are too tight.

Bill Maher is his generation's George Carlin, the pot-smoking culture critic who performed regular stand-up specials for HBO during the 1970s and 1980s. Like Carlin, Maher is as smart as he is funny. Unlike Carlin, Maher is too smart for the current iteration of HBO, a subsidiary of globalist telecommunications company AT&T since 2016. When Maher arrived at HBO in 2003, the network was at its creative and risk-taking zenith. At the time of Maher's arrival, "The Sopranos" and "The Wire" made HBO the envy of television.

AT&T's acquisition of HBO dulled the network's edge. HBO is safe and corporate. It supports the social engineering the establishment is orchestrating. Maher is doing the best that he can, but you can't tell the truth on HBO. Not the whole truth. Friday night was a prime example.

While complaining about the Biden administration's catastrophic withdrawal from Afghanistan, Maher expressed disappointment that the adults (Democrats) handled the pullout as poorly as he theorized the children (Republicans) would. This is becoming a regular theme for Maher. He argues that Democrats are mature, rational, and thinking adults and Republicans are immature, emotional, and unsophisticated children. Maher is too wise to believe this.

Thomas Jefferson and the nation's founders identified America's children at the outset. Politicians are kids. Whether Federalists or Anti-Federalists, Jefferson, George Washington, and the rest recognized the childishness of politics and politicians. The founders devised a system designed for the people to supervise the children elected to public office.

The adults assigned the primary task of babysitting politicians are called journalists, reporters, pundits, the media, and the press. When the adults act like children, chaos and tyranny take root. When there is no credible supervision of politicians, the whole idea of self-government falls apart.

In 1787, Jefferson wrote a letter to Edward Carrington, a confidant of George Washington, stating the importance of journalism.

The people are the only censors of their governors, and even their errors will tend to keep these to the true principles of their institution.... The way to prevent these irregular interpositions of the people is to give them full information of their affairs through the channel of public papers, and to contrive that those papers should penetrate the whole mass of people. The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter.

The media has failed America. The mainstream media merged with global corporations, the Democratic Party, and government intelligence agencies. It no longer acts as an independent fourth estate in charge of supervising the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government. Corporate media supervises Donald Trump and anyone else classified as an impediment to the Great Reset and the reshaping of America into an authoritarian regime similar to China.

From his $10-million-a-year HBO/AT&T perch, Maher cannot comfortably attack corporate media, the real children selling out America. He can insinuate the stupidity and dishonesty of the New York Times' 1619 Project, but a full-on assault of the woke's Pravda would be a suicide mission. It would bait #MeToo allegations.

The woke culture that Maher constantly rails against would not exist if the alleged adults did their job. The Times, CNN, MSNBC, Politico, ESPN, CBS News, the Washington Post all serve woke trickbait for breakfast, lunch, and dinner.

Maher thinks American oppression pales in comparison to Afghanistan oppression. He's right. But for how long? We're trending in the oppressive direction of all nations that govern without proper supervision of their elected officials. Power corrupts. There are no good guys in politics, only children in need of spankings by the press.

When the media refuses to discipline, politicians oppress and revoke freedoms. You must wear a mask. You must take a vaccine. You must tolerate violations of privacy for your own safety. It's a slippery slope. Things change quickly.

One day, the people shouting "I'm with her" and "believe all women" and "Sharia law is misogynistic" turn into the same people defending the execution of an unarmed, 5'2", 135-pound woman for posing a threat to the House of Representatives.

Levin: How the Soleimani strike once again exposed the immorality of the media — and Democrats

Tuesday night on the radio, LevinTV host Mark Levin explained how President Donald Trump's recent airstrike killing Iranian general and terrorist mastermind Qassem Soleimani exposed the American media's and Democrats' immorality.

"What's come to the fore here is a complete lack of morality in the media and in the Democrat party," Levin said.

"These are not people, for the most part, who care about humanity," Levin went on. "They care about power, they care about self-aggrandizement, but they really don't care about humanity."

"They don't love this country; they don't even comprehend this country," the host continued. "They have no understanding of this country, so they trash it and they attack it."

Levin reminded readers of the American media's downplay of the Holocaust during World War II, which is outlined in his book "Unfreedom of the Press," saying that "these are the same forces at work today."

"Our media lacks morality; it lacks virtue," Levin said. "This is why it stands up for a mass murdering terrorist like Soleimani and tries to destroy a patriotic commander in chief like Donald Trump."

"They have no morality," the host concluded. "They do not like this country -- and they never have."

Listen:

Keep reading...Show less

Clinton's 2016 campaign directly colluded with Ukraine, but the media just doesn't care, GOP senator tells Levin

On Sunday night's episode of Life, Liberty & Levin on Fox News, Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wisc., told LevinTV host Mark Levin that despite all of the focus on President Trump's discussions with Ukrainian officials, the media just doesn't seem to care that the Hillary Clinton campaign directly colluded with the country during the last election, or what might have resulted from that arrangement.

"The only campaign that was literally campaigning and colluding with a foreign government wasn't the Trump campaign; it was the Hillary Clinton campaign," Johnson explained.

During the discussion, Johnson pointed to a story from January 2017 at Politico that outlines the Ukrainian government’s efforts to boost Hillary Clinton during the 2016 election. “Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office,” the story reads. “They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election.”

But more than just working to undermine Trump and his associates, Johnson explained, there was also the possibility that Clinton-Kiev campaign collusion may have been about then-Vice President Joe Biden.

"It's also very possible — and people don't really realize this as well — you know, Hillary Clinton had a primary; there was one Joe Biden potentially getting into that race as well," the senator explained. "Is it just possible or plausible that maybe the DNC, maybe the Hillary Clinton campaign, was also trying to dig up dirt on Joe Biden back then in the Ukraine?"

Johnson also cautioned that he wasn't making allegations or accusations, but "just saying there's so many questions that remain unanswered." They remain unanswered, he added, "because — by and large — the press has no curiosity about trying to get the answers to these things."

"I've always known the bias in the media, but what I have really, what's really been reinforced to me, is that the bias in the media is revealed far more in what they don't report, what they're not curious about, versus the very overt and real bias in what they do report," Johnson said. "If they're not curious about something, if they're not reporting it, it's not a news story."

WATCH:

Keep reading...Show less

Republicans call out 'sad and embarrassing' attacks on Brett Kavanaugh

The following is an excerpt from Blaze Media’s daily Capitol Hill Brief email newsletter:

The fight over uncorroborated, third-party allegations against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh described in a now-corrected New York Times article continues. AOC joined the chorus of Democrats calling for the justice’s impeachment. House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler publicly pumped the brakes on the impeachment hype, saying that the panel is focused on the president.

Meanwhile, others on the Right have pushed back against the newest iteration of the Kavanaugh circus. LevinTV host Mark Levin called the story and the response to it an effort “to try and intimidate and threaten a Supreme Court justice.” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell accused Democrats of "reopening the sad and embarrassing chapter they wrote last September."

Senate Judiciary member Thom Tillis called the story a "factually compromised opinion piece" and said that "the latest attempt by Democrats to smear the reputation of Justice Kavanaugh and call for his impeachment is an absolute disgrace." Tom Cotton said, "This is what happens when partisans become obsessive and when reporters spend a year digging for dirt and find nothing, but don’t want to return their fat book advance.”

President Trump went so far as to “call for the Resignation of everybody at The New York Times involved in the Kavanaugh SMEAR story” and added that the newspaper “will never return to Greatness, under current Management.”

The story may have given far-left politicians yet another tool to rile up their base, but it’s given everyone on the Right and anyone who can see the flimsiness of the allegation yet another reason to distrust the Democrat-media complex.

Keep reading...Show less