‘Raw courage’: Megyn Kelly remembers Charlie Kirk



Glenn Beck and Megyn Kelly were holding on to hope that the shooting of Charlie Kirk was not fatal while in the middle of recording an episode of “The Megyn Kelly Show.”

But it was during that episode that they got the horrific news: Their friend was assassinated at just 31 years old.

Days later, the news is no less shocking.

“I still don’t feel like I have my arms around it,” Megyn tells Glenn. “I don’t feel like I’ve totally digested the fact that he’s gone and the way in which he was taken. You know, Charlie truly was such a larger-than-life figure.”


“We say that term, but it was true about him. At 6’5”, he truly seemed larger than most of us. And he was, in his gifts and his tirelessness and just knowing exactly where the seam in every story was. And his raw courage,” she continues.

“You'd look at Charlie and you’d think, ‘Now that’s true courage,’” she adds.

Charlie said what others were afraid to say, and he said it with a kindness that softened even some of the more radical leftists on college campuses.

However, he was also widely misunderstood.

“He took a lot of slings and arrows for it and was demonized for being all the terrible things as opposed to people taking him on and saying, ‘Does he have a point?’” Megyn says.

“Megyn, how do we process this? How do we surface from this?” Glenn interjects.

“I think, as with any loss, we all have to go through the denial and the bargaining, you know, like I’m still refreshing my X account like hoping somehow there’s a reversal, you know, like somehow it was all wrong. Somehow we got it all wrong,” she answers.

“That’s a natural reaction when you’ve had a sudden loss in particular. And anger’s completely appropriate now, too,” she says, adding, “It’s completely appropriate.”

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Conservatives rally to Trump’s defense



On Thursday the Wall Street Journal released a story which purports to show that Donald Trump wrote Jeffrey Epstein a raunchy 50th birthday greeting for a book Ghislaine Maxwell put together. Trump has strongly denied the reporting and has threatened to sue the outlet.

Conservatives are rallying to Trump’s defense, calling the reporting into question. Vice President JD Vance laid into the Journal, saying, “Forgive my language but this story is complete and utter bulls**t. The WSJ should be ashamed for publishing it,” in a post on X.

'This is not how Trump talks at all. I don’t believe it.'

— (@)

Vance further called on the Journal to provide the actual proof: “Where is this letter? Would you be shocked to learn they never showed it to us before publishing it? Does anyone honestly believe this sounds like Donald Trump?”

Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk also called the report into question. In a post on X, Kirk said, “This is not how Trump talks at all. I don’t believe it.”

— (@)

After the Journal’s report was published, Human Events senior editor Jack Posobiec cast doubt on any link between Trump and Epstein’s sordid schemes. Posobiec said in a post on X, “If Trump was in the Epstein files it would have been released a decade ago and there wouldn't have been any need to make up a fake Russian hooker dossier.”

In a different X post Posobiec also questioned the Journal’s reporting: “Trump doesn’t talk like this at all. And this was several years before Epstein was originally arrested.”

— (@)

Former Fox News host Megyn Kelly also doubted the voracity of the reporting, stating on X, “This is the dumbest attempted hit piece I’ve ever read.”

While mainstream media outlets are continuing to find ways to try and tie Trump to Jeffrey Epstein, conservatives are not buying it. After the Russia collusion hoax, baseless impeachments, and more from Trump’s initial run for president, conservatives are openly calling “bulls**t” on the media’s reporting as they rally to Trump's defense.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

HIGHLIGHTS from Megyn Kelly’s brutal roast of Jake Tapper and ‘Original Sin’



Jake Tapper is getting raked over the coals for his pseudo-bombshell book “Original Sin” that he co-authored with Axios’ Alex Thompson. It’s obvious to everyone that the book is an attempt to capitalize on the very narrative he played an active role in suppressing — the narrative we all saw playing out every time Biden was near a camera.

But nobody has excoriated Tapper quite like Megyn Kelly. His recent appearance on “The Megyn Kelly Show” is going viral after the blonde firebrand forced him to look his hypocrisy straight in the face.

“He got his feet held to the fire with her,” says Pat Gray, host of “Pat Gray Unleashed.”

“I did ask Joe Biden to be transparent about his health records in an interview in 2020. I did ask him about the fact that voters thought that he ...” Tapper began before Kelly cut him off with a blunt, “Then, he wasn’t.”

“He promised you that he would be transparent about his health records, and then, he wasn't, and when you sat with him again, including one month after the Jackie Walorski thing, you didn't ask him about it,” she lambasted, referencing Biden’s September 2022 gaffe when he looked for Rep. Jackie Walorski (R-Ind.) at a press conference, even though she had died the previous month in a car crash.

“You didn't follow up on the fact that he was falling up the stairs, that he was losing his train of thought regularly, that he was slurring, that he was incomprehensible, that he was getting lost on the White House lawn. You sat right across from him, and you asked none of that,” Kelly continued, accusing Tapper of “running cover for the president.”

She then moved on to the CNN anchor's interview with Lara Trump in 2020, during which he accused her of mocking Biden's stutter, challenged her lack of medical credentials, and abruptly ended the interview after she pointed out Biden’s obvious cognitive decline.

“I feel angry because [Lara] was right, and not only did you not allow her to make her comments, but you seemed to try to humiliate her ... and then you lectured her on how she was in no position to diagnose cognitive decline, which you guys do at length, including on page four of your book,” Kelly condemned, calling Tapper’s exposé only possible because the left-wing media, including CNN, was complicit in the cover-up.

“He was carried out of that interview on a stretcher, and I don't know that he'll ever recover from that,” laughs Pat.

To watch the highlights from Kelly and Tapper’s interview and hear more of Pat’s commentary, watch the episode above.

Want more from Pat Gray?

To enjoy more of Pat's biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Bill Maher Shouldn’t Be Applauded For Taking 10 Years To Realize Trump Isn’t ‘Literally Hitler’

[rebelmouse-proxy-image https://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Screenshot-2025-04-14-at-4.51.32 PM-e1744664149492-1200x675.png crop_info="%7B%22image%22%3A%20%22https%3A//thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Screenshot-2025-04-14-at-4.51.32%5Cu202fPM-e1744664149492-1200x675.png%22%7D" expand=1]It only took ten years, endless smug commentary, and a private dinner for comedian Bill Maher to finally discover the obvious: President Donald Trump is not the cartoon villain the left-wing media — and Maher himself — have breathlessly painted him as. Maher revealed his big epiphany during his April 11 monologue, raving about a […]

Women won the ‘war on marriage’ — now they miss the spoils



If feminists were honest revolutionaries, they would change their slogan from “Smash the Patriarchy” to “Mission Accomplished.” The numbers don’t lie. Single women own more homes than single men. More women are primary breadwinners than ever before. The gender balance on college campuses has completely changed over the past six decades. Women earned 35% of Bachelor’s degrees in 1960. Today, they earn close to 60%. Even the norms on sex have changed. Magazines like Teen Vogueand sex-positive feminist outlets will write in defense of “sex work” but would never publish a modesty manifesto urging women to be more “ladylike.”

Despite the “pay inequality” propaganda the left weaponizes to make women see themselves as victims, the truth is that the sisterhood has been victorious. The problem is that women's triumph has come at the cost of the one thing they want most: a family.

Plenty of men aren’t hostile to working women — they’re just not interested in marrying women who act like the job comes first.

Megyn Kelly recently highlighted a growing tension on the right: Young conservative women struggle to find marriage-minded men. The former Fox News anchor said many right-wing men avoid marrying women with careers. According to Kelly, these men see professional ambition as a threat to traditional family life. She warned this mindset could marginalize outspoken conservative women in high-profile jobs.

This debate cuts to the core of the right’s broader conversation about rebuilding the family. I’ve spent years researching marriage trends, and the concerns these women voice reflect real dilemmas. But the men aren't speaking nonsense, either. Many believe that career-driven women will inevitably choose ambition over family. They want wives who share their priorities — not women chasing a different future.

Recent data from the Pew Research Center backs this up. Just 43% of Republican women say society benefits when people prioritize marriage and children. That’s nearly 10 points lower than Republican men. Meanwhile, women are more likely than men to say careers make life fulfilling — 74% compared to 69%.

Men put more weight on family. Twenty-eight percent of Republican men say marriage is extremely or very important to a fulfilling life, compared to only 18% of women. When asked about children, 29% of men agreed, seven points higher than their female counterparts.

Some men may oppose working women on principle, but most simply want wives who put family ahead of career — especially during their children’s early years. Yes, many households need two incomes to get by. But the right’s current debates over gender, marriage, and fertility go far beyond money.

The word “economics” comes from the Greek "oikonomia," meaning household management. The home was never meant to be a holding cell. It was supposed to serve as the engine of spiritual, social, educational, and economic life.

Feminists like Gloria Steinem and Betty Friedan rejected that idea. They framed the home as a prison, a place where women played “hostess” and “housekeeper” under the thumb of domineering husbands.

That mindset reshaped the culture. The most successful front in the gender wars wasn’t about breaking glass ceilings — it was about “liberating” women from any perceived duty to their husbands, children, or homes.

This obviously isn’t to say women don’t contribute at home. In most families, they’re the ones making sure meals get made, appointments get kept, and the kids show up to practice. But these actions aren’t framed as public obligations. No one shames a woman who misses the mark. There is no social penalty for opting out.

Meanwhile, the standards for men remain clear and unforgiving. For all the upheaval American families have seen in the past 50 years, society still expects men to provide and protect. A man who fails to support his family financially gets branded a “deadbeat.” A man who ducks behind his wife during a street altercation becomes a viral punchline.

Nothing comparable exists for women. Some suggest nurturing and supporting the family are equal expectations, but society rarely defines what those look like. Why? Because the feminist movement made it taboo to speak as if women must do anything in particular to be considered a good wife and mother.

That silence creates an imbalance in the home — an asymmetry that underlies not just policy debates on maternity leave but cultural arguments over “trad” lifestyles and modern family roles.

Society lectures men about duty and responsibility. It tells women about rights and freedom. When a father sacrifices for his family, he earns praise. When a mother does the same, she gets told to prioritize self-care — because a “whole” woman supposedly makes a better parent.

Even when women abandon their families, the media often wraps the story in the language of empowerment. A woman who leaves a decent husband and young kids to drink Chardonnay on Wednesdays and sweat through Bikram yoga on Thursdays won’t be condemned. She’ll be celebrated. Outlets will rush to reframe the desertion as a stunning and brave act of self-discovery. We can’t fix the American family without confronting sex differences. The political right burns energy on gender identity while ignoring a more urgent problem: how men and women function differently at home.

Plenty of successful men marry high-earning women. But no culture teaches that women should support both a grown man and their children. That’s why women tend to seek partners who earn more. U.S. Census data backs this up: Female physicians often marry within their profession. Male doctors, on the other hand, marry nurses and teachers.

Conservative women misunderstand the men they complain about. Most aren’t hostile to women in the workforce. They’re just not interested in marrying women who treat the job as their top priority. They want a wife who puts family first — because they do.

Even those who claim women can “have it all” admit they can’t have it all at once. You can’t spend 70 hours a week at the office and be as present for your children as a stay-at-home mother.

Men make that trade-off because we’re expected to provide. That’s why we don’t gripe when mom gets the first hug at graduation. But every career-driven woman who outsources her maternal role needs to answer one hard question: Is she comfortable with the nanny getting that moment instead?

Stephen A. Smith: Prophet of Biden’s demise or political fraud?



When ESPN's Stephen A. Smith was on “The Megyn Kelly Show” this past Monday, he was quick to point out that he was the first person on the left to call out Joe Biden.

“When I called out President Biden at the time, it was a year before the debate – a year. I said, ‘Yo, something's missing, he's not there; he's not going to make it to the Democratic National Convention,”’ he said. “I was excoriated; I was raked through the coals ... but look at you now because I was right.”

Smith went on to list all the things he called the left out on: Kamala Harris, woke culture, cancel culture, transgender nonsense, and the border.

Megyn Kelly may have been impressed with Smith’s criticism of the Democrat Party, but Jason Whitlock says he’s “a fraud.”

He argues that the idea that Smith was “so ahead of the curve” and was “super insightful and courageous” is just ridiculous.

“Stephen A. Smith is beating his chest” by claiming that he was the first to say “Joe Biden is cooked,” he says. “Anybody with a brain had already said that months and months and years ago.”

This calling out Joe Biden and the Democrat Party is all part of his plan to run for president, Whitlock speculates.

Long before Smith publicly floated the idea of running for president, Whitlock knew that his 2023 book “Straight Shooter: A Memoir of Second Chances and First Takes” was “written to launch his presidential career.”

How did he know Smith was gearing up to run for president?

“There's a pattern to these planted imbeciles that the Democrats use. ... His book read just like Obama’s book – a book of fiction written to cover all the talking points necessary to be a Democrat candidate for president,” he says.

If Stephen A. Smith was a true leader, he wouldn’t have been up there “preaching about the [COVID] vaccine and shaming people that wouldn't take the vaccine.”

“I need something more authentic than Stephen A. Smith,” says Whitlock.

To hear more of his commentary, watch the clip above.

Want more from Jason Whitlock?

To enjoy more fearless conversations at the crossroads of culture, faith, sports, and comedy with Jason Whitlock, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.