How leftists think — and how you can change their minds



Doesn’t it seem like Donald Trump has been president for longer than seven weeks?

The administration has accomplished so much in such a short time that it’s easy to forget “we’ve only just begun.” So far, most of the changes that are de-wokifying American life are coming in the form of executive orders.

I never believed a man in a dress was a woman, and really, no one else does either. ... [But] I was afraid that not believing it would make me a morally bad person.

The most consequential moves — for example, protecting children from chemical and surgical abuse in the form of “sex changes” — need to be codified in laws passed by Congress.

Conservatives are celebrating the death of woke; I’m one of them. But if woke is on the wane, it is not dead. It may be in the process of dying, but actual death has not occurred. And its death may be much farther off than it looks.

Right now, less than two months into the Trump presidency, we’re seeing what I call an unveiling. Some call it an “extinction burst,” the idea that people act out their behaviors even more flagrantly just before the social environment changes enough to make their behaviors “go extinct.”

Whatever you call it, we’re seeing the depth of derangement in the woke minds of Democrats and leftists even more starkly than before.

The media is hyperventilating that free speech leads to Nazi pogroms. Leftists are gnashing their teeth over the deportation of noncitizen Mahmoud Khalil, acting as though he has a fundamental right to agitate against U.S. interests while he’s here as our guest (no concern at all for the effect of his agitation on their own countrymen, of course).

Democrat lawmakers shocked by the new reality that people are not going to call mentally ill men “women” any more just because they say they’re women are melting down in emotional tantrums in House committee hearings.

Inside the leftist mind

Here you are, a conservative, wondering just what these people are thinking. Why do they believe what they believe? Do they, in fact, actually believe what they say they believe?

I have these same questions, but I think I also have some of the answers.

Before a years-long process of changing my mind about politics and culture, I was one of them. The backstory that got me to being a leftist Democrat is a backstory shared by millions of people like me. It won’t describe everyone, but the generalizations I’m going to make are drawn from my own experience, and they do describe a large number of leftists and the woke-minded.

The first and most important generalization? Look into the past of any given leftist, and chances are you'll find some variation of ...

Fatherlessness

This is the single biggest factor that predisposes a child to mental troubles and leftist “people are victims of societal forces” ideology.

Not only is fatherlessness damaging to a kid’s normal ability to relate to the sexes, to regulate his emotions, and more, but it tends to coincide with single mothers with feminist attitudes. I never met my father, and my mother married a violent child molester by whom she had two more children.

She kicked him out after he tried to kill her, and the die was cast. To my mother, and by osmosis to me, all men were lazy deadbeats and scum. All the men in her life had victimized my poor, innocent mother, and nothing could be laid at the feet of her own choices.

Thus, the male feminist version of me was born, nurtured by those two companions of fatherlessness ...

Single motherhood and welfare dependency

One day in 1983, a college student stopped my mother on her way into the grocery store asking for her signature on a petition to end welfare fraud. My mother haughtily raised her nose, pointed at us three children, and said, “Do you see any welfare fraud here?”

At home, she’d scream at the television when Ronald Reagan spoke of “welfare queens,” saying there was no such thing and that Reagan was an abusive scum for trying to reform welfare. We were taught that our poverty was the fault of the government and that the government was cruel to give so little to single mothers like mine.

Thus was born my anti-capitalist sentiment that would flower into protesting against “greedy corporations,” my support for absurdly high minimum wages, and more.

As I discussed in my recent review of Adam Coleman's forthcoming book "The Children We Left Behind," modern America gives single moms the “you go girl/slay kween” treatment. We’ve made them heroines who cannot be criticized.

Of course, spending your whole life feeling like a victim of "the system" lets you justify all sorts of ...

Bad adult choices

Children who grow up in neglect and abuse as I did are far more likely to gravitate toward the left because the left embraces victimhood, hedonistic behavior, and self-centered, narcissistic choices dressed up as “self-care” and “self-love.”

As a young adult, I took up the stereotyped behaviors of abused children, living a promiscuous party life, becoming an alcoholic, and blaming all of this on anything but my own choices. Naturally, I surrounded myself with similarly damaged people. Every single one of them, to a man or a woman, was a leftist, socialist, or proud Marxist.

Once you realize the emotional disorder that leads people to adopt these beliefs, you might ask yourself ...

Do they really believe what they’re saying?

Democrat/leftist beliefs are so extreme and absurd in the 21st century that it baffles non-leftists. It’s been eight years since I started changing my mind to what it is today (conservative, anti-woke).

Even though I can remember when I was one of them, today’s leftists have gone farther than I ever did. For example, take the beliefs surrounding ...

Transgenderism

Do they actually, literally believe that a man claiming to be a woman makes him a woman?

Yes and no.

No, not in a literal sense, even though they claim very loudly that they do. The emotional urgency of their claims is used to cover up the fact that deep down, they know it’s insane.

I know this because it used to be me. I never believed a man in a dress was a woman, and really, no one else does either. So why did I say I believed it? Because I was afraid that not believing it would make me a morally bad person.

You see, children from abusive homes are forced into an adult role when they’re still little, trained to become emotional surrogate spouses to their damaged parent. So we grow up believing we are morally obligated to fuss and coo over any person who presents herself as a victim.

No, I didn’t believe these men were literally women. But I did believe I had a moral duty (it works as a religion because it is one) to say that I believed it and to act as if it were true. Fortunately for me, this cognitive dissonance was so severe that I didn’t keep this stance for long.

“Trans” was the first chink in the armor of my leftism. But rejecting it didn't mean letting of my conviction that ...

America is an exploitative, racist, misogynist hell

I’m afraid I did believe this in the literal sense. Looking back, I laugh at myself. How was it possible to believe that blacks in America were just as bad off after the civil rights era as they were during slavery? Given the reality that women in the U.S. can do anything they want for a career and enjoy absurdly generous legal protections and quotas, how could I believe we lived in a “misogynistic patriarchy”?

I'll tell you how: because the crowd around me believed these things.

Who made up this crowd? A disproportionate number of people with personality disorders. Pathological levels of narcissism, extreme emotional instability, and a victim stance toward the world.

Feminism and leftism preferentially attract the personality-disordered because they give mean, lazy, self-centered people excuses to act the way they do and blame their bad actions on outside boogeymen. Capitalism. Men. Colonialism. Heteronormativity. White people.

The point I’m trying to get across is that the beliefs held by people captured in a leftist frame of mind don’t, and don’t have to, have any relationship to reality.

You can’t break these beliefs by presenting objective facts, because these people don’t believe that objective facts exist. Or they do so only when those facts are convenient for their emotional goals.

This is why they get angry or tearful, or scream at you when you offer an article that questions their belief in vaccines, or in "the patriarchy," or in the idea that black people are systematically killed by police.

A deep part of their mind knows that what you’re saying is true, but that is intolerable. Therefore, they punish you with tantrums and reputational smears that get you kicked out of social groups or cost you your job.

Once you understand it as a social contagion, it's only natural to ask ...

Is there a cure for leftism?

The answer is also yes and no. Frustratingly, there’s no technique you can use on your leftist son, or wife, or best friend that will snap them out of it. Human mentation and emotion do not work that way.

We’re not dealing with ordinary political disagreements that we remember from a more collegial past. These leftists are in an actual cult. The same rules apply as do for any cult. They’re not tethered to facts, their commitment is entirely emotionally driven, and no presentation of facts will make any difference.

No one could have “changed” me from a leftist lunatic into a (I hope) saner conservative. I had to face the wall on my own, so to speak. I had to hit rock bottom, as we say of alcoholics.

For me, that came from a confrontation with the reality of how disturbed and morally depraved my own mother was, a confrontation that happened in 2016. A lifetime of abuse I’d rationalized away could no longer be excused. I saw my mother for what she really was — an unstable, vicious narcissist who exploited her loved ones — and my false but well-constructed view of the world started to crumble.

It kept crumbling. After I saw the truth about my family, I saw the truth about my chosen friends and political circle. Surprise! The same resentments, exploitation of others, false claims of being a victim when one is actually the perpetrator — all of these that I saw in my mother, I now saw in the social and political world I’d lived in all my adult life.

Becoming a small business owner dependent only on myself for my livelihood, and moving to the country, cured the last bits of anti-capitalism I had left.

As someone who made it out, I want the same for every poor brainwashed member of the leftist cult — especially people I care about. But experience has taught me that they have to want to be helped first.

In other words, when it comes to your leftist loved ones, the best practice is to ...

Be available, but don't tolerate abuse

Make it clear that you'll be there when and if they’re ready to talk. Be willing to explain your point of view, and offer them articles or videos that demonstrate why you believe as you do.

This may seem rather passive; unfortunately, it's really all you can do. You can’t make them have that final confrontation with reality. That either happens for them or it doesn’t.

At the same time, I urge you not to tolerate their abusive behavior. Expect the same level of respect and civility from them that you expect of anyone and that they demand from you (while giving you no respect in return).

If they won’t do it, stop talking to them. Tell them, “I will not be spoken to this way. We’re not going to talk until you’re willing to behave like a reasonable adult.” Then stop answering the texts, block their numbers, do not respond to attempts they make to engage you or provoke you.

They may be misguided, and many of them are indeed at least temporarily psychologically disturbed. But that is not an excuse for their bad behavior.

If we are to get society back on track, we conservatives have to be the adults who hold boundaries. Narcissistic, awful behavior needs to be objected to in front of others. We need to chastise those who take advantage of our loving feelings in order to treat us badly. We must dis-incentivize the greedy, grasping, histrionic emotional distortions of leftists if want this bulls**t to stop.

Good luck.

Her daughter was called ‘brave’ for wanting to cut her breasts off — before Trump restored sanity



After President Trump’s congressional address this week, it’s been made clear that parents like mother January Littlejohn are no longer alone in their fight for their children. Littlejohn's daughter was socially transitioned by her school without parental consent.

“Her 13-year-old daughter was captured by the idea that she was born in the wrong body,” Glenn Beck of “The Glenn Beck Program” explains. “Instead of helping her learn to love who she was, her school decided to affirm her self-hate and said, ‘You know what? You hate being a girl; you’re a boy.’”

The school helped Littlejohn’s daughter change her pronouns, pick a new bathroom to use, and even decide whether or not she wanted to sleep with the boys on overnight trips — all without parental consent.


“It’s evil, it’s predatory, and Mom, January, took them to court to fight it. Until now, moms like her were alone in the fight, and most of us, if you had a problem like this, you didn't know what to do. Not any more. America is finally coming to her senses,” Glenn says.

Littlejohn, who is a mental health counselor herself, was shocked that those in her profession just blindly adopted transgender ideology.

“I was volunteer of the year at the middle school where they socially transitioned my daughter, and so I had no idea that not only had my field, the school system, the medical field, even our judicial branch, I had no idea had been infiltrated by this radical ideology,” Littlejohn tells Glenn.

Her daughter was identifying as nonbinary, and her identity changed four times over the course of two years.

“These kids, like my daughter, they are confused, and they are looking to the adults in their life to tell them the truth and help make sense of their confusion,” Littlejohn says. “This is a mental health issue, Glenn, that has been normalized, promoted, and even celebrated.”

“My daughter was told she was brave, Glenn, and she wanted to cut her breasts off at age 13. That is unfathomable what they were doing. And to be fair, it was very similar to when I used to treat clients with anorexia. There are so many parallels to the dissociation these girls feel and go through, and the same type of disassociation with an eating disorder. It was heartbreaking,” she explains.

“It felt like we were in the Twilight Zone, because my husband and I were the only ones in our daughter’s life trying to protect her from this irreversible medical pathway that the school put her on,” she adds.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Man who allegedly ate victim’s brain freed under supervision after only 12 years



In 2011, Tyree Smith, known as the “Bridgeport Cannibal Killer,” allegedly killed a homeless man with a hatchet and ate his brain and one of his eyeballs. Today, Smith is being reintroduced back into the community.

How on earth is such a scenario possible?

Pat Gray and the “Unleashed” panel dive into the scandal.

According to reports, Connecticut’s Psychiatric Security Review Board declared Smith stabilized enough for conditional release from Whiting Forensic Hospital, the maximum-security institution where he’s been since 2013 after he was found not guilty by reason of insanity due to schizophrenia. He will slowly be reintroduced back into society with supervision and continued treatment.

The victim’s family and state lawmakers have expressed concerns. The judge in Smith’s trial ordered him to psychiatric confinement for 60 years. Cutting his confinement short by nearly five decades seems a little premature.

But according to the director of the hospital, Smith is “a joy.”

“He is considered a support to the other people there. Once he was stable he was a really calming presence for other patients,” Pat says, quoting Dr. Caren Teitelbaum, a forensic psychiatrist who participated in the hearing that culminated in Smith’s conditional release.

Pat’s jaw is nearly on the floor.

“‘I just bludgeoned my neighbor to death and was snacking on his frontal lobe, but can I offer you a slice?’ and I'll be like, ‘I mean, that's really delightful. You are a joy to offer me that piece of brain,’” he mocks.

“Are you ever confident that they're pretty well rehabilitated?” he then asks in earnest.

“Why can’t you have guilty and insane?” asks co-host Keith Malinak. “Congratulations, we've now advanced as a society to the point where we're releasing Hannibal Lecter into the wild.”

To hear more of the panel’s commentary, watch the clip above.

Want more from Pat Gray?

To enjoy more of Pat's biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Dwyane Wade, Stephen A. Smith, and Jasmine Crockett PROMOTE black buffoonery



Pawns of the black community are loud — which is why Jason Whitlock of “Fearless” is calling them out.

First up is Stephen A. Smith, who’s thrown himself into the political news cycle by openly entertaining the idea of running for president on the Democrat ticket in 2028. Most recently, he liked a clip of an anti-Semitic rant by Nick Fuentes.

“Let’s just be open and honest about the stats: 17 of the top 25 hedge funds are run by Jews; 17 of the top 27 donors in the 2020 presidential election were Jews; seven out of eight Ivy League universities have Jewish presidents; three out of three of the major recording companies and major record labels — run by Jews,” Fuentes said in his rant.

“As soon as I saw that clip and saw Stephen A. Smith liked it,” Whitlock begins, “I was like, oh, look at Stephen A. Smith. This is a game. He’s putting himself in the political news cycle. This is intentional. This is just Stephen A. Smith continuing to try to put himself in the political news cycle.”


And it’s working, as after he liked the post, Smith posted on X that he had no idea who Nick Fuentes was.

“I do not know who this is or what that video is. If it was ‘liked,’ it was unintentional,” Smith wrote in his post.

“This is an intentional mistake,” Whitlock says, noting that Smith isn’t the only one jumping into the political news cycle.

“Jasmine Crockett,” Whitlock says. “Someone asked her a question about Elon Musk, and she had one of the most unprofessional and just undignified responses you could possibly have.”

When Rep. Crockett (D-Texas) was asked by a reporter what she would say to Elon Musk if given the chance, Crockett replied, “F**k off.”

“She is running for president as well,” Whitlock says, before noting that Dwyane Wade is also jumping into the news cycle — though this is not quite political and is at the expense of his son.

“Dwyane Wade’s son, who they’re calling a girl on the cover of Seventeen magazine,” Whitlock says. “This is a little boy on a girls' magazine cover.”

“The young man has a mental issue, and instead we’re trying to correct the mental issue by confirming his mental issue,” he adds.

Want more from Jason Whitlock?

To enjoy more fearless conversations at the crossroads of culture, faith, sports, and comedy with Jason Whitlock, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Zizians: The vegan trans cult behind a Border Patrol agent’s murder?



The world of transgender news has taken an even darker turn than drag queen story hours, as a radical trans vegan activist cult led by Jack LaSota has been launched into the national spotlight after the killing of a Border Patrol agent in Vermont.

LaSota, who goes by the nickname “Ziz,” identifies as a trans woman, goes by female pronouns, and created the group — which he aptly named the Zizians — of vegan activists.

The Border Patrol agent, David Maland, was reportedly killed in a shoot-out with cult members Teresa Youngblut and Felix “Ophelia” Bauckholt on January 20. Federal prosecutors said in court records that the guns used in the shoot-out are also connected to a person of interest in a double homicide in Pennsylvania.

The murders are reportedly part of a web of violence allegedly tied to the Zizians. Law enforcement officials are now investigating six deaths linked to associates of LaSota.

- YouTube


LaSota has also apparently been forcing members of his group to become transgender themselves.

And according to Dar Dixon, an actor with some “cult expertise,” this group has all the major markings of a cult.

“You’ve got transgender human beings, you’re dealing with sexuality, you’re dealing with sexual identity, and you’re dealing with sex. You do all those things, you’ve already got someone, as they say, ‘by the tight and curlies,'" Dixon said in an interview with Fox.

“This is nuts,” Dave Landau of “Normal World” comments.

However, it gets even stranger, as LaSota reportedly faked his own death in 2022.

That September, a brief obituary was published in LaSota’s hometown paper, the Daily News-Miner, in Fairbanks, Alaska. The obituary claimed LaSota was killed in a “boating accident” on August 19, 2022.

"Loving adventure, friends and family, music, blueberries, biking, computer games and animals, you are missed," the obituary said. LaSota was then found alive and well.

All the hosts of “Normal World” are, to say the least, shocked — though they do find the entire situation a little funny.

“You have to be trans, you have to be vegan, and we also murder people,” Angela jokes.

“If you’re not okay with murdering people, problematic, and you have to go,” 1/4 Black Garrett adds.

Want more 'Normal World'?

To enjoy more whimsical satire, topical sketches, and comedic discussions from comedians Dave Landau and 1/4 Black Garrett, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Daniel Penny is the right’s George Floyd



Daniel Penny, a 26-year-old Marine Corps veteran, was found not guilty Monday of criminally negligent homicide by a jury in the 2023 death of Jordan Neely. While millions of people were invested in the outcome of Penny’s trial, the primary driver of public interest was only partially about the jury’s eventual verdict.

Verdicts in the court of law are influenced by facts, evidence, and legal arguments. Unlike legal proceedings, however, the court of public opinion is driven by narratives that often elevate people from individuals to political symbols who represent something far more important in the cultural zeitgeist. I reached a verdict I didn’t expect after reading the conservative commentary surrounding this case.

It is possible to act nobly and bravely and still be held liable by the legal system.

Daniel Penny is the conservative right’s George Floyd.

This comparison is not about personal biography. The two men couldn’t be farther apart in that regard. They do, however, share a great deal as symbols of injustice and racial persecution to their most passionate defenders.

To the left, Floyd was the living embodiment of the historical oppression black men have faced in America at the hands of racist police. They saw his death as a modern-day lynching, a dynamic that cast Officer Derek Chauvin as the callous, indifferent hangman.

Progressives weren’t interested in any discussion about the impact of drugs on Floyd’s health or how his behavior influenced the response from law enforcement. George Floyd represented everything they believed about the racism baked into the criminal justice system. To them, his life and death embodied the struggles of an oppressed minority.

Daniel Penny has been hailed as a hero by conservatives for stepping in to keep Jordan Neely from harming passengers on their train. To them, Penny is the embodiment of the currentpersecution of white males in American society. While commentary about anti-white bias is typically confined to stories about human resources managers rejecting white applicants and racial preference schemes at selective universities, many of Penny’s supporters see him as a victim of the systemic racism being practiced today by overzealous progressive prosecutors. To them, his arrest and prosecution by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg embodied the plight of an oppressed majority.

While it is tempting to view both men through color-coded lenses, the narratives constructed around them have been built with the tools of politics and race — in that order. Blue and black on one side. Red and white on the other. Politics lights the fire. Race fans the flames.

The tribal nature of American society also makes both sides resistant to anything that challenges the preferred narrative. The idea that there could never be a “white George Floyd” was blown up once people learned about the death of Tony Timpa.

Likewise, the people quickest to invoke race as the driving force in Penny’s arrest likely don’t know self-defense claims didn’t keep Jordan Williams — a black man — from being arrested and charged with manslaughter after the fatal stabbing of Devictor Ouedraogo on a New York City subway train in June 2023. Williams had charges against him dropped after witnesses claimed Ouedraogo physically assaulted passengers, including Williams' girlfriend.

No one should be surprised by either side’s blind spots. Politics and race influence not only media attention but also the intensity of reaction to stories.

Some progressives tried to paint Penny as a white supremacist vigilante even though no evidence suggested racial animus motivated his actions. But the narrative that emerged on the right that Penny was only charged because of systemic racism against white men is evidence that conservatives are just as susceptible to confirmation bias as their liberal counterparts.

Addressing the depths of the human condition is never easy, especially in a city of over 8 million people. New York City subways serve as informal homeless camps and mental health facilities for far too many people. Many of the trains reek of human waste. I’m sure many New Yorkers of every color appreciate men like Daniel Penny willing to defend other people from danger.

That doesn’t change the fact that part of the government’s job is to determine the circumstances under which one person can take the life of another. Murder is a different charge with different penalties from homicide. Self-defense protects people who take a life because their own is in danger. The notion that you can choke a loud, belligerent person — even one who’s mentally ill — from behind and not face any legal consequence is influenced far more by politics than a careful reading of the law.

I don’t view Daniel Penny as a hero. Neither do I see him as a villain. I look at Penny as a man who believed he was acting with good intentions in trying to defend a train full of people from a mentally ill man. But it is possible to act nobly and bravely and still be held liable by the legal system.

The left blames “anti-black racism” when black men die at the hands of a white person. The right blames “anti-white racism” when white men face trial during fatal interracial encounters. Both sides resist anything that challenges their narratives because being an aggrieved victim today comes with social, cultural, and political benefits.

The biggest loser in this cultural tug-of-war is the American people. Police misconduct, political prosecutions, homelessness, and mental illness are all serious matters that deserve rational, objective policy responses. Unfortunately, political tribalism continues to make it difficult to address any of these problems on a bipartisan basis.

Tucker Carlson shocked by journalist’s prediction of what comes after Trump’s victory — 'Are you being serious?'



When American journalist Mark Halperin told Tucker Carlson what he thinks is destined to happen following a Trump victory, Tucker was so shocked, he legitimately thought Halperin was joking.

However, Halperin was being “100% serious.”

Although their conversation occurred three weeks prior to Election Day, Dave Rubin shares Halperin’s warning now that Trump has been declared the victor in his race against Democratic candidate Kamala Harris.

“Let's say Trump wins three weeks from today. What happens? ... A lot of Democrats, maybe the majority, believe that Trump becoming president again is the worst thing that ever could happen, so how do they respond to that?” Tucker asked.

“I think it will be the greatest mental health crisis in the history of the country. I think tens of millions of people will question their connection to the nation, their connection to other human beings,” and “their vision of what their future for them and their children could be like,” Halperin predicted.

“I think that will require an enormous amount of access to mental health professionals; I think it'll lead to trauma in the workplace. I think there'll be some degree of ...” he continued before Tucker cut him off.

“Are you being serious?” Tucker asked, visibly shocked.

“100% serious,” Halperin pledged, before finishing his thought that we’ll also see an uptick in “alcoholism” and “broken marriages.”

“What?!” Tucker exclaimed.

“Yeah, they think he’s the worst person possible to be president,” Halperin said, adding that many liberals will not be able to cope with “the fact that under a fair election, America chose ... Donald Trump again.”

“I don't think it will be kind of a passing thing that by the inauguration will be fine. I think it will be sustained and unprecedented and hideous, and I don't think the country's ready for it,” he added.

When Tucker brought up the fact that “mental health crises often manifest in violence,” Halperin agreed and predicted that there will indeed be “some violence,” from “workplace fights” and “fights at kids’ birthday parties” all the way to “protests that will turn violent.”

“I think that's what's going to happen for tens of millions of people because they think that their fellow citizens supporting Trump is a sign of fundamental evil at the heart of their fellow citizens and of the nation. That's how they view it,” Halperin explained.

Dave agrees with Halperin’s prediction.

“Look what we have done to young people — ‘You live in a country that was founded on evil, on slavery and racism. Now a man who wants to bring all of that back using white supremacist magic, using evil language ... now he’s back, and he’s taking away women’s rights, and he’s going after those people, and he’s gonna jail these people,”’ says Dave, regurgitating the left’s phony Trump narrative.

“They used all of the most evil tools, and not only did it not get them what they wanted — meaning the installation of Kamala Harris as president, who was just a cog in the machine — it now has broken the brains of millions and millions of Americans, and we better start thinking about this because we all know them,” Dave warns.

To hear more on Halperin’s warning and Dave’s analysis, watch the clip above.

Want more from Dave Rubin?

To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

How To Combat The Censorship-Industrial Complex No Matter Who Wins The Election

We must keep talking and throwing wrenches into the machinery of loneliness. We must keep coming together in love for our neighbor.

Is California’s Narrow Homelessness Vote The Beginning Of The End Of ‘Housing First’?

Proposition One garnered a nail-bitingly close victory, but the slim margin signals the tide is turning against a failed housing policy.