Satan has a mix tape — and Taylor Swift is on the playlist



Taylor Swift is back with a new record, and with her return come the old accusations.

For years, people have suggested that she hides strange symbols in her songs and videos. Even other pop stars have said the same thing — and they’re not wrong. From the serpent motif that slithered through her "Reputation" era to the witchy forest rituals of "Willow" and the tarot-like imagery of "Midnights," Swift has long played with the language of mysticism.

What faith once offered in family and devotion, the industry now mimics through sexualization and self-display.

It’s seductive, deliberate, and deeply disturbing.

Rock once wore its rebellion openly. Ozzy Osbourne feasted on bats. Led Zeppelin flirted with the occult. Alice Cooper strutted across stages like the devil in drag. But pop is subtler, sweeter — and far more dangerous. Rock shouted “Hell!” for the shock of it. Pop smiles, takes your hand, and leads you there.

Billie Eilish, the Beetlejuice of pop, floats through a fog of depression, her music drowning in melancholy: songs about mutilation, numbness, and detachment from reality. Lil Nas X, a raving homosexual who seems to revel in depravity, enjoys grinding on Satan. Doja Cat smears herself in blood and calls it expression.

None of this is random. The industry has learned that darkness sells because emptiness is a vacuum that needs to be filled. Rhythm reaches where reason can’t, and belief can be rewritten one beat at a time.

Unfortunately, no audience is more vulnerable than young girls.

They listen on repeat, absorbing lyrics like liturgy. Pop has always known how to reach them. In the 1960s, the Beatles sang of love as liberation. By the 1980s, Madonna turned it into a marketing campaign. Britney Spears wore innocence like a costume, then tore it off — literally and figuratively — knives in hand. There is something unmistakably demonic in her descent, a possession of the spirit that fame so often brings.

The same story repeats itself across the pop pantheon.

Once the cherubic choirboy of global pop, Justin Bieber now fluctuates between repentance and relapse, his body scarred by tattoos and abuse. There’s also Miley Cyrus, Demi Lovato, Katy Perry, and Ariana Grande, each one a pathetic version of their former selves.

The pop idol is no longer a musician but a model for imitation. The results are visible: depression, anxiety, disordered eating, and a generation that sings about love but cannot define it or identify it. Young people are raised on a rotation of heartbreak and hedonism, told to celebrate the very things that destroy them.

Pop today preaches a gospel of transaction. Every desire is for sale. Love is no longer a covenant but a contract. Sex is not intimacy but advertisement. Artists sing about bodies the way brokers talk about stocks — measured in clicks, hype, and fleeting returns.

The message is clear: Everything is currency, even the body.

RELATED: Taylor Swift's 'Life of a Showgirl': The same sad sound and fury

Frazer Harrison/Getty Images

What began as entertainment has evolved into indoctrination. The language of romance has been replaced by the “logic” of the marketplace. Pleasure is product, people are platforms, and purity is just another brand to discard once it stops selling. The line between pop music and OnlyFans is straighter than most want to admit. Both peddle illusion — connection without commitment, desire without depth.

What faith once offered in family and devotion, the industry now mimics through sexualization and self-display. The result is a culture fluent in indulgence, obsessed with pleasure but ignorant of purity. What once pointed upward now drags us down. The language of heaven has been rewritten in the dialect of hell.

Even the visuals echo it. Neon crosses. Angel wings stitched from latex. Horns hidden beneath halos. The symbolism, evident to anyone with functioning vision, is always dismissed as “art.” But art without virtue stops telling the truth and starts selling the lie. And history reminds us that deception has always been the devil’s favorite instrument.

Pop’s greatest trick is pretending it’s harmless. Rock scared parents into vigilance. Pop lulls them into complacency. It sounds innocent enough, but beneath the cute choruses lies the same poison. When every song preaches self-worship, when every lyric mocks modesty, when every beat celebrates bondage, the playlist becomes a pilgrimage into perdition.

The industry calls it entertainment. But look closer and you’ll see a darker design: music that numbs, not nourishes, and beats that bind, not liberate.

It’s no accident that the idols of this age are called “idols.”

Tens of millions stream them, worship them, and defend them with evangelical ecstasy. They shape the moral mood of the young more than any preacher ever could. And yet while they sell songs about love and light, the world they create grows darker by the day. Broken homes. Hookup culture. Teenage pregnancies. Gender confusion. Isolation and self-harm. Faith mocked. Fatherhood maligned. Motherhood treated as an outdated inconvenience.

The irony is that Swift and several other artists were raised in the church. They know the cadence of a hymn, the thrill of a crowd, the longing for transcendence. They just redirected it. The altar became a stage, and the worship didn’t stop but changed direction.

But here's the truth: Mocking religion is a poor substitute for meaning. You can dance in devil horns for only so long before realizing there’s nothing on the other side of derision and disdain. No culture that mocks the sacred can remain strong.

The industry calls it entertainment. But look closer and you’ll see a darker design: music that numbs, not nourishes, and beats that bind, not liberate. The melodies are catchy because the message must be smuggled in softly. That’s the genius — and the evil — of pop music.

And so we arrive where we began. Taylor Swift has released another record. Millions have listened. But few have stopped to wonder what’s being worshipped.

Satan no longer hides in the dark. He performs under a spotlight.

Trump's victory sparks FEAR among the ELITES — but will they actually leave this time?



As expected, the left has gone into full-on meltdown mode as Donald Trump prepares to return to the White House — and celebrities across the nation are threatening to leave the country for greener pastures.

The hysteria began to ramp up about a year ago when Barbra Streisand told Stephen Colbert in an interview on “The Late Show” that she couldn’t live in the United States should Trump be successful in his bid for the presidency, and would likely move to England.

Cher joined Streisand on the list of celebrities afraid of a Trump presidency, telling the Guardian in an interview that she “almost got an ulcer the last time he was in office.”

“If he gets in, who knows. This time, I will leave,” Cher continued, adding, “I was with two trans girls the other night and my own child. I was saying we’ve got to stand together. I don’t know what their eventual plan is for trans people, I don’t put anything past them.”


Pat Gray of “Pat Gray Unleashed” believes they should make good on their promises, saying, “Good, don’t let the door hit you in the butt on the way out.”

Sharon Stone has also reportedly been considering a move to Europe if Trump wins, explaining she was “certainly considering a house in Italy” as this is one of the first times in her life that she’s “actually seen anyone running for office on a platform of hate.”

However, Gray doesn’t believe they mean it — as many celebrities said the exact same thing in 2016.

“Among those was Miley Cyrus, who declared in an Instagram post back in 2016, ‘Honestly f*** this. I’m moving if this is my president. I don’t say things I don’t mean,’” Gray says, adding, “Yet, she’s still here.”

Lena Dunham made the same promise, telling fans she planned to move to Canada after Trump’s election.

“Unfortunately, she didn’t,” Gray says.

Want more from Pat Gray?

To enjoy more of Pat's biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Grammys conspiracy theory: Was Miley Cyrus in DANGER?



Last night, the 66th annual Grammy Awards was hosted by Trevor Noah at Los Angeles' Crypto.com Arena.

Some of the biggest awards were given to Taylor Swift for best album of the year, Billie Eilish for song of the year, and Miley Cyrus for record of the year.

And speaking of the first-time Grammy-winner, there’s apparently two conspiracy theories circulating around Cyrus’ mysteriously stiff-armed bodyguard who accompanied her at the event.

“During the red carpet event, Miley Cyrus was with her bodyguard, and his left arm did not move as a normal left arm moves,” reports producer Kris Cruz.

One theory is that “the umbrella that he was holding was a hidden gun inside of it to protect her,” and the second theory is that “the guy had a left fake arm.”

After watching the footage, Pat thinks “it didn't seem extraordinary at all,” but others beg to differ.

Watch the clip below and check it out for yourself.


Want more from Pat Gray?

To enjoy more of Pat's biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

New ‘Elvis’ Film Shows How Social Media Killed Celebrity Talent

The film reminds us that not long ago, characters could be larger than life, it paid to have style, and celebrities were worth celebrating.

Miley Cyrus, Ariana Grande, and others join  Planned Parenthood in ad campaign promoting the right to kill unborn children



Dozens of entertainers and musical artists — including big names like Ariana Grande, Billie Eilish, Megan Thee Stallion, and more — have signed on to an ad from Planned Parenthood declaring they are being "robbed of our power" by losing the right to kill their unborn children.

The full-page ad ran in the New York Times Friday days after a leaked Supreme Court draft majority opinion for Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health Organization indicated the court will uphold Mississippi's 15-week abortion ban and overrule its landmark Roe v. Wade decision. This action by the court would end the constitutional right to kill unwanted children before they are born and activate so-called trigger laws in 26 states that would ban or restrict abortion access.

In response, Planned Parenthood, the nation's number one abortion provider, has launched a "Bans Off Our Bodies" campaign to oppose the Supreme Court's expected decision and pro-life laws. The New York Times ad is part of that campaign.

"Our power to plan our own futures and control our own bodies depends on our ability to access sexual and reproductive health care, including abortion," the ad states.

"We are Artists. Creators. Storytellers. We are the new generation stepping into our power. Now we are being robbed of our power. We will not go back — and we will not back down," the signatories declare.

In addition to those mentioned, the ad was signed by numerous celebrities including Kendall Jenner, Selena Gomez, Olivia Rodrigo, Shawn Mendes, Camila Cabello, Demi Lovato, Halsey, Hailey Bieber, Camila Mendes, Lili Reinhart, Madelaine Petsch, Karlie Kloss, Ariana DeBose, Madelyn Cline, Hailee Steinfeld, Dove Cameron, FINNEAS, Hayley Kiyoko, Madison Beer, Phoebe Bridgers, Joey King, Peyton List, Lauren Jauregui, Jenna Ortega, Storm Reid, Tinashe, Meghan Trainor, Tommy Dorfman, Melanie Martinez, Liza Koshy, and Maia Mitchell.

"These young artists are encouraging their fans to join them in speaking out in support of the right to access sexual and reproductive health care, including abortion," Planned Parenthood said in a statement.

"Should the Supreme Court take away the constitutional right to safe, legal abortion, young people stand to lose the most. So many of us — who grew up with the understanding that Roe was settled law — could have never imagined that our own children would have fewer rights and less freedom over their own bodies and futures," said Planned Parenthood President Alexis McGill Johnson.

"What we see in young people from all walks of life is that they aren’t backing down — not today, not ever. Like the artists who signed on to this ad, their resolve to keep bans off their bodies is a source of hope during a dark time, and we are determined to keep fighting alongside them, for them," she added.

After posting, then deleting, cynical messages, 'SNL' cast members given safe space if they don't want to appear with Elon Musk



Some "Saturday Night Live" cast members and a writer don't appear to be welcoming Elon Musk, who is an upcoming host of the NBC sketch TV show. Two "SNL" cast members posted and then deleted seemingly standoffish messages toward the Tesla CEO on social media shortly after Musk was announced as the host for the May 8 episode.

Last month, it was announced that Musk would host "SNL."

"Weekend Update" host Michael Che did what comedians are supposed to do: make jokes. During an interview with former "SNL" star Jimmy Fallon, Che joked about Musk hosting, "I am excited to meet him, but I don't know if he knows, usually, we have this tradition at 'Saturday Night Live,' it's customary for the hosts to give like a couple million dollars to the cast members."

But not everyone was excited to see the billionaire on "Saturday Night Live."

Let’s find out just how live Saturday Night Live really is 😈

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) 1619320846.0

The SpaceX founder tweeted, "Let's find out just how live Saturday Night Live really is," which received over 215,000 Likes on Twitter.

"SNL" cast member Bowen Yang took a screen capture of Musk's tweet and replied, "What the f*** does this even mean?"

"SNL" writer Andrew Dismukes reacted on Instagram by saying, "Only CEO I want to do a sketch with is Cher-E Oteri," a reference to "Saturday Night Live" alum Cheri Oteri.

After the news of one of the richest people on the planet set to host the comedy show, longtime "SNL" cast member Aidy Bryant reposted a tweet by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) that said, "The 50 wealthiest people in America today own more wealth than the bottom half of our people. Let me repeat that, because it is almost too absurd to believe: the 50 wealthiest people in this country own more wealth than some 165 MILLION Americans. That is a moral obscenity."

Sanders, an avowed socialist, has butted heads with the billionaire Musk in the past. Sanders called out Musk, who has a net worth of $173 billion.

"We are in a moment in American history where two guys — Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos — own more wealth than the bottom 40% of people in this country," Sanders said in March. "That level of greed and inequality is not only immoral. It is unsustainable."

the absolute shade from Aidy Bryant after announcing that @nbcsnl will have Elon Musk as host. good for her https://t.co/G1K4R0sNEq

— abby (@abbymorr11) 1619295601.0

NBC revealed that any "SNL" cast members offended by Elon Musk will be provided a safe space.

"Speaking historically, if a cast member has been that unhappy, they don't have to do it," a source told Page Six. "['SNL' boss Lorne Michaels] won't ever make them do anything they don't want to do."

The DogefatherSNL May 8

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) 1619590847.0

While Musk hosts the May 8 episode, Miley Cyrus will be the musical guest on the comedy skit show, and she received blowback for participating in a teaser clip with the billionaire. When announcing her appearance on "SNL" with Musk, the pop singer was met with some criticism from dozens of her diehard fans.

A fan tweeted, "I like you, Miley. But there is no way in hell that I'll be watching Elon Musk do anything. Honestly, folks should boycott this."

Another stated, "Girl you have the power to stop this."

One Twitter user wrote, "Don't show. Not worth it. He's not worth it."

Noah Cyrus appears to call Candace Owens a racist slur, then instantly regrets it



Noah Cyrus, the little sister of Miley Cyrus, is in hot water after seemingly lashing out at Candace Owens and calling her a racist slur.

The hullabaloo started last week when Owens critiqued a Vogue photoshoot featuring pop star Harry Styles wearing a dress.

"There is no society that can survive without strong men. The East knows this. In the west, the steady feminization of our men at the same time that Marxism is being taught to our children is not a coincidence. It is an outright attack," Owens wrote on Twitter. "Bring back manly men."

That prompted a response from Styles, who shared a photo of him wearing effeminate clothing and eating a banana with the caption: "Bring back manly men."

Noah Cyrus jumped into the social media fray and defended Styles by seemingly besmirching Owens with a racial slur. Conservative commentator Rob Smith posted a screencap of the Instagram Story post from Cyrus, which featured Styles wearing a dress and she wrote, "He wears this dress better than any of u nappy ass heauxz."

Any one of woke liberals care to explain to me how @noahcyrus calling me a “nappy ass hoe” is not racist? I’m all… https://t.co/mJlxciI8Kq
— Candace Owens (@Candace Owens)1607031441.0

Cyrus quickly deleted the post and then issued an apology, claiming that she didn't know that the word "nappy" was racially insensitive and that she was "mortified" by the words she wrote only hours earlier.

"I am mortified that I used a term without knowing the context and history, but I know now and I am horrified and truly sorry," she posted on an Instagram Story. "I will never use it again. Thank you for educating me. I in no way meant to offend anyone. I am so so sorry."

The apology by Cyrus did not mention Candace Owens by name.

Owens shared a video on her Instagram addressing the contretemps with Cyrus. The conservative firebrand told Cyrus, "Please do not ever in your over-privileged life think that I will allow that statement to go by, unchecked. Also, who knew Hannah Montana had a sister?"

On Twitter, hundreds of people lambasted Cyrus over using the racial slur. Many of them were also not huge fans of Candace Owens.

The word "nappy" has historically been used as a derogatory term to describe the hair of black people.

In 2007, radio host Don Imus was fired by CBS Radio and his show was pulled by MSNBC for comments made while talking about the NCAA Women's Basketball Championship. The shock jock described the Rutgers University women's basketball team, which had nine black players, as "nappy-headed hoes."

Before he died on Dec. 27, 2019, the "Imus in the Morning" host said he had few regrets in his iconic, yet controversy-laden radio career. He determined that calling the Rutgers basketball players "nappy-headed hoes" was one of his biggest regrets.

During a March 2018 CBS "Sunday Morning" interview, Imus said he regretted the Rutgers incident "cause I knew better."

Prince Harry: Mother Nature Is Punishing Humanity With COVID

Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, claimed this week that the pandemic from the novel Wuhan coronavirus was punishment from "Mother Nature."

Miley Cyrus And Demi Lovato Care More About UFO News Than Our Media Gatekeepers Do

Our spacey celebrities are not the only ones making extraterrestrial discoveries, they're just the only ones making the alien headlines.