China is arming itself with minerals America refuses to mine



The global energy system is buckling under the weight of its own contradictions. Electricity demand keeps rising, yet policymakers insist that renewables alone can carry the load. Artificial intelligence, electric vehicles, and a wave of reindustrialization are driving consumption far faster than today’s grid can support. Nowhere is that tension more visible than in the United States, where soaring demand collides with aging infrastructure and unrealistic clean-energy mandates.

America stands at a crossroads. One path deepens dependence on foreign supply chains dominated by China. The other rebuilds domestic energy strength, restores industrial capacity, and creates high-wage jobs. The question isn’t whether a green transition will happen — it is who will own the minerals, the infrastructure, and the economic power behind it.

Energy dominance is not a slogan. It is the practical foundation of American greatness.

Electricity demand jumped nearly 4% in 2024, almost double the decade’s average. Data centers, electrified transport, and manufacturing growth are reshaping the energy landscape. The International Energy Agency projects global data-center power use will more than double by 2030, approaching 1,000 terawatt-hours. In the U.S., these facilities alone could soon account for 10% of national consumption.

Without major investment in reliable, affordable energy, this surge will strain the grid and weaken American competitiveness.

We have already seen the danger of relying on foreign suppliers. While Western governments debated climate rhetoric, China quietly secured control over the minerals the modern economy runs on — lithium, nickel, cobalt, graphite, and rare-earths. Beijing now refines more than 70% of the global supply.

These materials aren’t optional. They are the foundation of EV batteries, grid storage, wind turbines, solar panels, and the defense systems that protect U.S. interests. Allowing China to dominate them puts both the economy and national security in a vulnerable position.

President Trump recognized that threat early. His energy-dominance agenda expanded domestic production, cut regulatory barriers, and revived investment in mining and industrial infrastructure. That legacy now forms the basis for a renewed push to bring extraction, processing, and refining back to U.S. soil.

The economic impact is substantial. Every new lithium mine, copper refinery, or processing plant means high-wage jobs, stronger rural communities, and a revived manufacturing base.

Private enterprise is already moving faster than any government program. BGN International — one of the world’s most dynamic energy and commodities firms — has expanded its American operations in liquefied natural gas and liquefied petroleum gas, the fuels that underpin grid reliability. BGN is also moving aggressively into critical minerals, supplying copper, aluminum, and rare-earth elements essential for the grid, clean-energy systems, and the emerging AI economy.

By linking American producers to global demand, BGN strengthens domestic supply chains and ensures that the value stays in the United States.

Meanwhile, Energy Transfer continues to expand its network of pipelines and terminals that move oil, natural gas, and the feedstocks needed for mineral processing and clean-tech manufacturing. Together, companies like Energy Transfer and BGN form the quiet engine of America’s comeback — building the infrastructure that powers the future, from LNG terminals to mineral-supply hubs in the Midwest.

This is what a real energy transition looks like: not offshoring, not dependence, but American innovation paired with American resources and American workers. The shift to cleaner energy can either hollow out the country or rebuild it. The difference lies in where we source, refine, and transport the materials that make it possible.

RELATED: ‘Reminiscent of the Manhattan Project’: Trump administration launches massive next-gen AI program

Nelson Ching/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Every ton of copper or rare-earth minerals refined at home is another step toward energy security — and another paycheck for an American worker.

America’s shale reserves, its underdeveloped mineral deposits, and its unmatched private-sector capacity give it every advantage in this new industrial age. What the country needs is leadership that understands the link between energy independence, manufacturing strength, and national power.

By investing in the fuels, minerals, and infrastructure that keep the lights on and the factories running, the United States can secure both its prosperity and its freedom.

Energy dominance is not a slogan. It is the practical foundation of American greatness. The world is entering an era in which whoever controls energy and critical-mineral supply chains controls the global economy. By unleashing its entrepreneurs and trusting its workers, America can lead that era on its own terms.

The next American century will not be powered by dependence or bureaucratic mandates but by free enterprise, industrial competence, and the spirit of self-reliance. Critical minerals and energy independence are not merely economic issues. They are matters of national pride, national security, and American leadership.

Cory Booker slams phantom job cuts within State Department, pushes for more government employees



Senator Cory Booker (D-N.J.) repeatedly advocated for the expansion of the U.S. State Department and aid to African nations, but did not get the answers he was looking for.

During a Senate subcommittee hearing called "Critical Minerals: Finding Opportunities for U.S.-Africa Partnerships" on Wednesday, Republicans like Senator Ted Cruz (Texas) warned about the growing control China has over rare-earth minerals in Africa.

While Senator Booker agreed that Chinese expansion is a top issue, his solution was mainly to suggest that the State Department needs more government workers.

'I'm pleased to report that in the Africa bureau we've had zero RIFs.'

Booker's opening remarks thanked Republicans for their bipartisan efforts, noting that China consistently "rushes to fill" any gaps in the market related to minerals. However, the senator quickly shifted to complaints about the Trump administration cutting jobs at the State Department that he said were integral to surveying and exploring African nations for minerals.

He also claimed that aid supporting "labor, environmental, and peace-building programs" had been cut by the Trump administration. Booker argued that regional aid protected vulnerable African communities that have been exploited.

The Democrat then sought confirmation from witness Jonathan Pratt, a senior official from the Bureau of African Affairs, asking him, "Couldn't we use more staff [and] more people focused on this?"

While Pratt said he is always concerned with staffing, he calmly reported to the senator that no one from his department had actually been fired and that in fact, it has actually expanded.

"I'm pleased to report that in the Africa bureau we've had zero RIFs," Pratt explained.

"I'm pleased to say we got a result we were pleased with in terms of the staffing we were able to retain," Pratt continued, informing Booker that the African bureau had actually "added an office" under the Trump administration, as well.

RELATED: Trump’s mining plan is smart — but China remains in the room

President Joe Biden meets with African leaders at the Lobito Corridor Trans-Africa Summit in Angola on December 4, 2024. Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP

Much of the hearing focused on China's child- and forced-labor practices, which include trapping African countries into infrastructure loans to keep mineral prices low and undercut American companies.

Senator Steve Daines (R-Mont.) pointed out that Russian dumps of palladium have driven a mine in Montana out of business, while Minnesota's mining industry was handcuffed by President Biden's administration canceling lease renewals over environmental concerns in 2022.

Scott Woodard, acting deputy assistant secretary for economic growth, energy, and environment, added that due to Chinese monopolies that overproduce products to lower prices, mines in Idaho cannot compete.

According to Cruz, China is pouring billions into securing mining routes to gain control over cobalt, copper, lithium, and other rare-earth minerals in countries like the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Tanzania, and Zimbabwe.

The alternative, according to Cruz and the committee, is to shift control of the Lobito Corridor to Western allies such as the United States and the European Union.

RELATED: Akon's African 'Wakanda' city gets crushed: 'I take full responsibility'

Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The economic route connects a port in Angola to DR Congo and the "Copperbelt in Zambia," providing access to minerals and mines.

Investing in the region has been part of the American strategy in Africa for years and was actually the main topic of discussion in 2024 when President Biden infamously fell asleep during a meeting in Angola.

Senator Cruz summarized the U.S. efforts by saying that while shifting the United States' supply chain away from China is complex and difficult, it is also an "opportunity to reshape U.S.-Africa based relations from aid-based to investment-led engagement."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Trump’s mining plan is smart — but China remains in the room



The Trump administration, to its credit, is prioritizing the development of mining and critical minerals to protect U.S. economic and defense interests and secure a reliable domestic supply.

At the center of this effort is President Trump’s recent executive order “Immediate Measures to Increase American Mineral Production.” The Federal Permitting Improvement Steering Council, now known as the Permitting Council, spearheads these administration efforts.

America needs to get real about sourcing its domestic critical mineral supply and supporting reliable mining partners in their operations abroad.

Thankfully, it’s now increasing “transparency, accountability, and predictability for the permitting review process for ... critical mineral production projects.”

Abroad, the administration is also pursuing strategic deals, particularly by supporting mining operators in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. A newly signed minerals agreement between the Congo and Rwanda — brokered as part of the U.S.-backed peace treatymarks “a success for Trump against the backdrop of U.S.-China competition over critical minerals.”

With all this activity in the global mining sector, it’s essential that the U.S. government adhere to the following principle: Support and partner with real — and reliable — mining operators.

America can’t afford to gamble with startups backed by tech billionaires with no mining experience nor mining companies that are backed by China. We need to be realistic about supporting the mineral needs of “USA Inc.” Moreover, policymakers must not fall for the slick PR and flashy AI claims currently inundating the industry.

It’s time to stop the madness.

Flashy ‘mining’ startups

So who are the culprits driving this frenzy? The first is KoBold Metals, a California-based startup backed by Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, and Michael Bloomberg. The company’s trio of green activist billionaire backers should raise significant concerns within the administration. Gates, for instance, was in Singapore recently touting the ill-advised return of support for “climate reform.”

A deeper problem lies in KoBold’s misleading image. The company calls itself a mining firm, but it has never run a mine.

Its strength lies in artificial intelligence and data harvesting, not excavation, logistics, or engineering. KoBold claims to lead “the world’s largest exploration R&D effort” using AI and novel hardware. The language sounds impressive. The reality is far less so.

KoBold lacks the infrastructure, operational know-how, and supply chain muscle needed for serious mineral exploration and production. At its core, it’s an AI platform masquerading as a mining company.

RELATED: Graham says Ukraine has trillions of dollars of 'critical mineral assets' and could be 'the best business partner'

Temizyurek via iStock/Getty Images

Even more troubling, the administration appears to be assisting KoBold in advancing a lithium mine in the DRC. According to Bloomberg, the announcement came after the DRC’s President Felix Tshisekedi met with Massad Boulos, Trump’s senior adviser for African affairs, to discuss potential American investment and security assistance in the DRC's fight against a rebel group in the east, which is backed by neighboring Rwanda.

I am confident Boulos, who also happens to be the father-in-law of President Trump’s youngest daughter, will soon come around and realize what’s real and what’s not.

Lining China’s pockets

Given the stakes, the administration must weigh reliability when deciding which mining companies to back. Rio Tinto doesn’t make the cut.

Yes, Rio Tinto is a real mining company. It’s been around since 1873 and operates on a global scale. But it doesn’t serve U.S. interests.

The Aluminum Corporation of China Ltd., or Chinalco, holds a 14.56% stake in Rio Tinto. Chinalco is a Chinese state-owned enterprise. That makes Beijing the company’s largest shareholder — and that alone should disqualify Rio Tinto as a potential partner.

Propping up Rio Tinto would only tighten China’s grip on the world’s critical minerals supply — at America’s expense. As international policy and trade analyst Dewardric McNeal recently wrote:

The United States must now treat critical minerals not as commodities but as instruments of geopolitical power. China already does. Escaping its grip will require more than mine permits and short-term funding. It demands a coherent, long-term strategy to build a complete supply chain that includes not only domestic capabilities but also reliable allies and partners.

Exactly right. The U.S. needs a strategic, grounded approach — not one riddled with internal contradictions.

America needs to get real about sourcing its domestic critical mineral supply and supporting reliable mining partners in their operations abroad. The clock is ticking, and neither flashy startups nor Chinese-backed companies are the keys to solving this puzzle.

Trump Is Right — America Needs Greenland And Access To Its Critical Resources

Greenland isn’t just an Arctic landmass — it’s a North American strategic economic and military asset that America cannot afford to ignore. The time to secure it is now.

Will America Heed The Warnings Of Panama’s Violent Riots?

How long will police protect those who view them as expendable — and even as a politically expedient scapegoat?

‘You’re Telling Me We Have Too Many Jobs?’: Josh Hawley Rips Interior Secretary’s Rationale For Shutting Down US Mines

Republican Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri berated Biden-appointed Interior Secretary Deb Haaland for insinuating that workers should not be concerned about her department’s decision to block a major mining project because there were other blue collar jobs available. The exchange occurred as the two discussed the Interior Department’s decision to impose a moratorium on mining in the […]

How Democrats’ Push For Electric Cars Endangers National Security

Democrats’ highly expensive environmental policies have been developed without any meaningful strategic thinking or analyses about raw materials and geopolitics.

EXCLUSIVE: Biden Admin Is Funding Overseas Lithium Projects While Shutting Down American Mines

American taxpayers are funding critical mineral projects abroad while their government blocks new mines at home.