SCOTUS temporarily blocks Texas immigration bill. Here’s what COULD happen after the final ruling on March 13.



Just as Texas reached its limit with Biden’s open border policies and proposed Texas Senate Bill 4, which would allow the state to arrest illegal immigrants, the Supreme Court stepped in and halted progression.

Now, Texas once again has its hands tied with the invasion at the border — at least until March 13, when SCOTUS will make a final ruling.

“We can't enforce our laws; we can't keep our border sovereign,” sighs Sara Gonzales.

To make matters worse, “We're finding out there was a FOIA lawsuit from the Center of Immigration Studies that revealed that the Biden administration has been coordinating flights for approximately 320,000 illegal immigrants to 43 different cities across the country.”

“You don't even have to walk these days,” says Sara. “You can just get a free flight, free money, free debit card, free phone — free everything, but if you're an American citizen, no. If you’re a homeless veteran, stay on the streets.”

“It's so blatant, and you may see the Supreme Court end up taking the position of the Federal Government because I do not think that they want freer states,” adds Eric July of Rippaverse Comics.

How Texas would respond to such an unfavorable ruling poses some serious implications.

According to Eric, if SCOTUS blocks SB4 and prevents Texas from protecting its borders, the state must take the position of “we don’t care” and decide to protect the border anyway, regardless of what that means on a national level.

Sara agrees — “What are they going to do? You already have Border Patrol who is calling out Joe Biden and saying he is doing a horrible job ... and they have already come out and said we respect the Texas National Guard.”

“Maybe violence breaks out, but maybe that’s what it has to come to.”


Want more from Sara Gonzales?

To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred take to news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Bet you can't guess what detail the mainstream media keeps omitting in the Laken Riley case



A 22-year-old student was murdered on her University of Georgia campus by a 26-year-old illegal immigrant, and the mainstream media is showing its true colors.

The student, Laken Riley, was going for a morning jog when Jose Antonio Ibarra allegedly kidnapped and killed her.

However, in stories published on the tragedy from publications like the Associated Press, the reporters neglect to add in a very important detail: the alleged murderer is an illegal immigrant, and he already had a criminal history here in the United States.

According to ICE, Ibarra was caught crossing illegally into El Paso in September 2022 and was released into the United States via parole.

Nearly a year later, New York police arrested him for acting in a manner to injure a child less than age 17, and, yet again, he was released.

“I’m sure that it was just, you know, an oversight,” Sara Gonzales mocks, “just a little oopsy. Surely, they wrote a follow-up that highlighted the glaring omission that this man should not have even been in this country in the first place.”

“You have to imagine — surely, it’s incompetence rather than a deliberate act of deception,” she adds sarcastically.

The Associated Press did write a follow-up on the story in which it blamed toxic masculinity for her death rather than the allowance of a criminal into the United States.

The author then used the death of Mollie Tibbetts as another example of toxic masculinity but neglected to mention Tibbetts was also brutally murdered by an illegal immigrant.

“Both women were murdered by illegal immigrants, but that doesn’t fit the narrative. That’s not good for optics,” Gonzales says.


Want more from Sara Gonzales?

To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred take to news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Illegal immigrant accused of killing Iowa student Mollie Tibbetts goes on trial this week



Jury selection began Monday for the trial of Cristhian Bahena Rivera, an illegal immigrant who is accused of murdering 20-year-old University of Iowa student Mollie Tibbetts.

The high-profile trial is scheduled to begin Wednesday at the Scott County Courthouse in Davenport, Iowa. WQAD-TV reported that the proceedings will be streamed online at WeAreIowa.com, the We Are Iowa app or the We Are Iowa YouTube channel.

Tibbetts went missing on July 18, 2018, after she went for a jog in her hometown of Brooklyn, Iowa, and never came back. The efforts of her family, friends, and law enforcement to find her captured national media attention, including that of the White House after then-Vice President Mike Pence commented on the case during an event in Iowa.

"I just want Mollie's family to know: You're on the hearts of every American," Pence said during an event on Aug. 15, 2018.

A month after she disappeared, her body was found in a cornfield outside Brooklyn. Surveillance footage showed a car police connected to 24-year-old Mexican immigrant Bahena Rivera near the area Tibbetts took her jog. Police interrogated Bahena Rivera and then charged him with first-degree murder after he led investigators to her body.

Police say that after interrogation Bahena Rivera told them he followed Tibbetts in his car while she was jogging in town on July 18 and then got out of his car and started running behind her. He allegedly said that he became angry when she threatened to call the police and "blocked his memory" of what happened next.

The criminal complaint filed by police stated that Bahena Rivera confessed to blacking out during an altercation with Tibbetts and that he later woke up at an intersection in Poweshiek County, realizing that he had put Tibbetts into the trunk of his car.

From the criminal complaint:

Rivera stated he then made a u-turn, drove back to an entrance to a field and then drove into a driveway to a cornfield. He noticed there was an earpiece from headphones in his lap and that is how he realized he put her in the trunk. He went to get her out of the trunk and he noticed blood on the side of her head. The Defendant Rivera described the female's clothing, that she was wearing an ear phone or headphone set. The defendant further described during the interview that he dragged Tibbetts on foot from his vehicle to a secluded location in a cornfield. Rivera described he put her over his shoulder and took her about 20 meters into the cornfield and he left her covered in some corn leaves and that he left her there, face up. The Defendant was able to use his phone to determine the route he traveled from Brooklyn. Rivera then later guided law enforcement to her location from memory. Law enforcement located the remains of a deceased female in the area Rivera took them to. The physical surroundings of her location and other factors at the scene matched his earlier physical description of the area as that where he placed her body.

Bahena Rivera pleaded not guilty to Tibbetts' murder.

Federal authorities say Bahena Rivera was in the U.S. illegally and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement filed a detainer to prevent his release after he was arrested.

In the lead up to the 2018 midterm elections, former President Donald Trump and other Republicans frequently cited Bahena Rivera's immigration status and Tibbetts' murder in making arguments for border security and tough-on-crime policies.