‘Anti-Parent Ticket’: Moms For Liberty Plans To Emphasize Harris-Walz’ Socialism, ‘Gender Madness’ To Drive Vote
'Hold people's feet to the fire'
A Pennsylvania high school plans to suspend and start the process of expelling the 15-year-old daughter of a Moms for Liberty member more than a year after the teenager reported a threatening message she found written on her desk, according to the Federalist.
The decision to punish the teen, whose name was withheld by the publication because she is a minor, coincided with a tense school board meeting, according to the child's mother, Tricia Plank. The meeting, at least in part, related to an ongoing Moms for Liberty lawsuit that is attempting to block the Biden-Harris administration's proposed rule changes to Title IX, which would allow men to compete in women's sports.
The Plank family is mentioned in the Moms for Liberty complaint.
'If the powers-that-be genuinely thought that these kids were threats, they shouldn't have waited fifteen months to file charges.'
The May court filing states, "Presently, Ms. Plank's children express views about gender identity and transgenderism while in school. To date, they have received scrutiny from teachers and administration but have not received any reprimands or been disciplined for their speech."
In February 2023, the then-13-year-old discovered writing on her desk in pencil that read, "I will bomb this school." Also written on the desk was the word "Gun," with an arrow pointing to the word "Dead," the Federalist reported.
The teen, the last of three students who used the desk during the school day, reported the threatening graffiti seven minutes after arriving in the classroom, according to a police timeline based on the surveillance footage.
She told the Federalist, "I didn't realize that it was on my desk until the teacher was done talking, and she told us to clear our desks. And then once I moved my binders and stuff, then I saw it, and then I raised my hand and I told her."
She further noted that she could not have written the message because it was in cursive, and her class was never given the option to learn cursive writing.
The school principal and vice principal questioned the two other students who also used the desk, and both stated they had not observed any writing earlier in the day. The teen who reported the graffiti was never questioned, according to the Planks.
The police concluded the Planks' daughter was the one who jotted down the threatening message and then made the decision to report her own wrongdoing, the Federalist reported. However, the incident and the looming threat of any repercussions for the alleged crime seemed to ultimately blow over for the remainder of her eighth-grade year.
The teen then entered high school, where she participated in tennis and track and field. Phillip Plank, the teen's father, has coached her in tennis since she was young. She has previously earned a county champion title.
However, a week after Moms for Liberty filed the lawsuit to stop changes to Title IX, the school suddenly revived the threatening graffiti case.
The Planks' daughter is now facing pending charges of terroristic threats and institutional vandalism in the juvenile justice system after a handwriting analysis found that she was "capable of having produced this text."
In the middle of summer vacation leading up to the teen's sophomore year of high school and 72 weeks after the reported incident, the principal called the Planks to notify them that the school would move forward with the plans to suspend and expel their daughter.
Tricia Plank, who joined the school board in December 2023, asked to meet with the superintendent to request that her daughter's suspension wait until after the tennis season so as not to hurt her college prospects. The superintendent agreed to pause the suspension to allow the teen to participate in tennis.
In August, the school board held a meeting that turned contentious over a discussion about sexualized literature in the school library. Both Tricia Plank and the superintendent attended the meeting but held opposing views on the issue.
The following day, the school's attorney contacted the Planks' lawyer, Paul B. Royer, informing him that the school would be moving forward with their daughter's suspension and expulsion, preventing her from playing tennis.
The Planks called it "coincidental timing."
Several days before the teen found the graffiti on her desk, her younger sister was accused of a similar, unrelated incident. The then-11-year-old girl was reportedly in the school bathroom with several other students. A bomb threat was written on the wall, but no one saw who transcribed it. The girl faces similar charges from police and the school for the incident.
Royer told the Federalist, "My clients look forward to defending themselves and letting both the juvenile justice system and school disciplinary procedure play out."
"The evidence will show that these kids never threatened anyone, were never a threat, are not currently threats, and if the powers-that-be genuinely thought that these kids were threats, they shouldn't have waited fifteen months to file charges," he added.
The superintendent did not reply to a request for comment from the Federalist.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Three elected parent leaders are suing radical New York City education officials for allegedly "weaponizing their disdain" against those who refuse to embrace leftist beliefs and speech codes.
The Institute of Free Speech filed a complaint in federal court last week on behalf of Deborah Alexander, Maud Maron, and Noah Harlan, stressing that the "First Amendment does not allow New York City's Department of Education to function as a Department of Conformity."
The suit alleges that Community Educational Council for District 14 President Tajh Sutton and Vice President Marissa Manzanares have brought their political prejudices to bear in their official roles, adopting tyrannical tactics that adversely impact the plaintiffs' liberties. The leftist duo's campaign against dissenters has allegedly been helped along by New York Public Schools Chancellor David Banks and NYPS equity compliance offier Nina Mickens, also named as defendants.
Sutton is a radical leftist and identitarian who has called for police to be defunded, has championed COVID-19 vaccines and masking for children, and serves as a steering committee member of Black Lives Matter at School NY. Manzanares is a fellow traveler, similarly censorious and hostile to dissenting views. Both have apparently turned CEC 14 into a vehicle for their respective ideological agendas.
"Sutton and Manzanares exclude people affiliated with disfavored advocacy groups from the Council's public meetings, block critics from accessing the Council's social media pages, and impose a far-reaching political speech code on public debate," the complaint alleges. "And while New York City's Department of Education leaves Sutton and Manzanares free to impose their viewpoints on everyone else, it subjects Community Education Council and Citywide Council members who dissent from official orthodoxy to investigation and removal."
Alexander and Harlan have apparently been ousted from CEC 14 meetings "owing to their political views." Maron refrains from attending meetings because she is both a co-founder of Parent Leaders for Accelerated Curriculum and Education NYC and a member of Moms for Liberty, both of "which are evidently the prime targets of CEC 14's discriminatory exclusion policy."
"Even if they could gain admission, anything that Plaintiffs might say at CEC 14 meetings would likely be prohibited under CEC 14's speech code," adds the complaint.
The New York Post reported last year that CEC 14, under Sutton and Manzanares' lead, promoted a Nov. 9 student walkout and corresponding anti-Israel rally where kids yelled "f**k the Jews!"
At a meeting concerning the CEC 14 promotion of the protest, a concerned father questioned the radical groups CEC 14 had partnered with, including Youth for Palestine. Manzanares reportedly told him, "Redirect yourself or you will be removed."
A Jewish father expressed concerns over the safety of his children in light of the council's anti-Israel posts and accusations of "apartheid," but he too was apparently silenced and castigated.
Raving anti-Semites were, alternatively, permitted to speak their minds.
"After the CEC D14 meeting on Wednesday night, it feels clear to me: The inmates are running the asylum," Brooklyn mother Lisa Liss, who pulled her kids out of District 14, told the Post. "The unchecked, outrageous anti-Semitic abuse hurled at D14 community members can only be described as insane."
The CEC 14 Instagram page is loaded with identitarian, anti-Israel, and other leftist content.
Weeks after Hamas terrorists slaughtered thousands of Israelis and scores of Americans, the council under Sutton stated, "We condemn settler colonialism, militarized violence in furtherance of the continued occupation of Palestinians, and always condemn innocent people being murdered. We condemn any acts by the U.S. government to escalate the current situation by further militarizing Israel and we reject the statements of various leaders describing the ongoing human rights violations in Gaza as 'self defense.'"
The council further demanded a ceasefire and the "liberation of the Palestinian people."
The mothers' lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, makes clear that Sutton and Manzanares are not alone in clamping down on the elected parent leaders' rights. The New York City Department of Education, named as a defendant in the suit, apparently also bears blame for its regulation D-210, "a vague, overbroad, and viewpoint-discriminatory speech code."
D-210 has apparently been used to great effect by DOE ideologues.
For instance, Maron faces multiple D-210 investigations over private speech at odds with the favored viewpoints of the powers that be. Maron's offending speech appears to have been her condemnation of Hamas propaganda, her suggestion that the "anti-racists are so racist," and her concerns over the subjection of children to mutilating sex-change procedures.
When some of the messages under investigation were brought to Banks' attention, he allegedy threatened her position.
The suit underscores that the regulation used to clamp down on the speech of Maron and others is "unconstitutionally vague. No reasonably intelligent person can guess at what speech Defendants might find to constitute 'frequent verbal abuse' or unnecessary aggresive speech.'"
"Regulation D-210's prohibition of 'disrespect' is likewise unconstitutionally vague, as is its prohibtion of speech that is 'derogatory' or 'offensive.' These are all subjective values," continued the suit.
The enforcement of the regulation allegedly "deprive[s] Plaintiffs of the rights to free speech and due process in violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendmends to the United States Constitution."
The mothers are not looking for a payday as a result of their legal action. Rather they only want nominal damages of $17.91 each. Their ultimate aim is the neutralizing of D-210 and an end to the discriminatory practices they've become familiar with in District 14.
"The First Amendment guarantees the right to criticize public officials and speak freely on matters of public concern. Yet, CEC 14 leaders have used school resources to promote their own extreme political views while excluding critics from public meetings and blocking them on social media," said Alan Gura, vice president for litigation at the Institute for Free Speech.
"Meanwhile, the DOE’s Regulation D-210 subjects elected parent leaders to inquisitorial investigations and threats of removal from office for 'wrongthink,'" continued Gura. "We're asking the court to put a stop to these unconstitutional actions and protect the free speech rights of all New Yorkers."
The New York Post indicated that CEC 14 had yet to respond to its request for comment.
"We Are Not Your Props" May Day Rally in Harlem, Parent, CEC 14 President Tajh Sutton Speaks!youtu.be
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
The co-founders of Moms for Liberty, former Florida school board members Tiffany Justice and Tina Descovich, spoke to "60 Minutes" host Scott Pelley in October 2023 about their organization and its work reinforcing parental rights, protecting children from being subjected to pornography at school, and combating grooming efforts in the classroom.
The interview was ultimately packaged as a hit piece and released Sunday. When it went air, the MFL duo noticed something was missing.
The parental rights group noted that critical details and comments they allegedly shared with Pelley and his producers — insights that may have vindicated their efforts in the court of public opinion — were omitted from the final product.
According to the parental rights group, its co-founders provided "60 Minutes" with an extensive list of books that have been reported at schools, "[n]ot just local libraries or retailers," containing lewd, obscene, or pornographic material.
Among the titles they allegedly brought to the attention of Pelley and his producers was Juno Dawson's "This Book is Gay," which contains the following entry: "Blowies: Oral sex is popping another dude's peen in your mouth or, indeed, popping yours in his. There is only one hard and fast rule when it comes to blow jobs—WATCH THE TEETH. Lips and tongue, yes; teeth, NO."
The parental rights group cited several other damning books they had previously flagged in American schools that "60 Minutes" did not bother to mention, including Erika Moen and Matthew Nolan's "Let's Talk About It," which contains detailed graphics on how to self-stimulate in a section entitled, "Things to Try!"
MFL wrote on X, "Would exposing minor children to these sexual images & texts by someone who is not their parent be grooming? It certainly is not educational. So, why did @60minutes censor this material from tonight's piece?"
Justice wrote, "We read graphic sexual content on camera to @ScottPelley from books found in public school libraries all over the country. Do you think that @60minutes will air that footage? We've got the transcript and a video of the interview."
We read graphic sexual content on camera to @ScottPelley from books found in public school libraries all over the country. \n\nDo you think that @60minutes will air that footage? We\u2019ve got the transcript and a video of the interview. \n\nRight @TinaDescovich?— (@)
While "60 Minutes" neglected to detail these titles and MFL's specific concerns with them, the program singled out a supposedly "banned" title dealing with anti-Semitism in Tsarist Russia. However, by CBS News' own admission, this title hadn't actually been banned but rather held for review on account of parental concerns over mature subject matter.
Critics suggested that the special was misleading from the start. When introducing the topic, Pelley stated, "Moms was founded as a reaction against COVID mandates."
Referencing her transcript of the conversation, Descovich indicated she had made clear to the the "60 Minutes" host that was not the case.
Moms for Liberty, a conservative group, seeks to limit teaching on race, sexual orientation, and gender. 60 Minutes spoke with two of the founders, who also say teacher\u2019s unions have too much influence on education \u201cand that has to change.\u201d https://t.co/0jZpmwGi6V— (@)
"Moms began as a, let me see. Yeah, [M]oms began as a movement to protest mask restrictions in schools with regard to COVID. And I wonder how you got to books?" said Pelley, according to the transcript shared online by the interviewee.
Descovich apparently responded, "Well, I'd like to say, first of all, we didn't start to protest masks. Mom for Liberty's mission is to unify, educate, and empower parents to defend their parental rights at all levels of government."
According to the transcript, Descovich underscored that during the pandemic, she and her co-founder began observing parents "coming to school board meetings, more than they ever had in our terms, and speaking up. But they didn't really know what they were doing. They were getting flustered, they were saying they were gonna report the school board to the County Commission which has no authority in Florida. They didn't understand the process or the polices or how to change a policy or how to be effective."
"And so we formed Moms for Liberty when we came off our terms to help parents in any circumstance be effective in impacting the government when it came to their children," added Descovich.
Extra to apparently providing an alternate history for the group, "60 Minutes" appears to have misrepresented the facts around book bans both in its special and in its corresponding social media communications.
In the lead-up to its special, "60 Minutes" tweeted, "There were over 3,000 book bans in U.S. schools last year. That rise is inspired, in part, by the conservative group Moms for Liberty."
Dr. Jay Greene, senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation's Center for Education Policy, suggested this claim was "simply false, even if one accepts the loose definition of ban as 'no longer available in a school library.'"
"60 Minutes" appears to have been regurgitating a debunked narrative advanced by the organization PEN America.
Greene, Max Eden, and Madison Marino noted in a report last year that they had gone through PEN's 2022 list of 2,532 banned books. After determining that 1,868 books were actually in districts with public card catalogs, the researchers confirmed that 1,378 books, "or 74 percent, are listed as available in the school district libraries from which PEN said they had been banned. Of the 1,261 books PEN labeled as 'Banned -- Pending Investigation,' 1,015, or 80 percent, were present in school libraries."
With the exception to 203 books in Texas and 174 books in Florida, the report revealed that only 113 books had been "successfully challenged in a calendar year amongst more than 10,000 school districts."
The 10 most "actually banned" books were found to "contain sexually explicit, if not outright pornographic, passages that few reasonable people would insist belong in a school library," according to the report.
Blaze News reached out to "60 Minutes" for comment but did not immediately receive a response.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
“All Boys Aren’t Blue” is a series of personal essays written by LGBTQIA+ activist George M. Johnson that has made its way into school curriculums.
The book is marketed as a young adult nonfiction “memoir-manifesto” and focuses on Johnson’s experience growing up queer and black. Some of the essays included are incredibly sexual and graphic.
Mom’s for Liberty’s Tiffany Justice is appalled that the book is in the school curriculum and even went on Joy Reid’s show to discuss the book.
“What a tragic story of a young man’s who’s anally raped by his adult family members. So, you have incest, rape, pedophilia,” Justice explained to Reid, adding, “in what context is a strap-on dildo acceptable for public school?”
When Reid tweeted out the segment to her followers, she quoted Justice’s question, but replaced “strap-on dildo” with “xxxxx xx xxxxx.”
Stu Burguiere finds this fascinating.
“She won’t even tweet these words to her adult followers. Yet somehow, this is supposed to be appropriate for school children,” Burguiere says to Justice.
Justice is grateful that Reid actually had her on the show and believes “this is such an important conversation to have with America and Americans.”
“The truth is, most people have no idea what’s in these books,” she adds.
To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
A social media account for MSNBC host Joy Reid proved why sexually explicit materials are not acceptable in any environment at any time.
On Friday, Reid debated Moms for Liberty co-founder Tiffany Justice over what Reid called "book bans," referring to the movement of parents demanding that sexually explicit and woke books be removed from school libraries.
At one point during the frustrating interview — in which Reid repeatedly interrupted Justice and barely allowed her to answer questions or make rebuttals — Reid invoked "All Boys Aren't Blue," a controversial book replete with abusive and sexually explicit material. Reid claimed that parents are taking "out-of-context" passages from the book to make their removal demands and asserted that such parents do not hold sufficient "expertise" to make clams about the book.
"What is the expertise that you have and other Moms for Liberty advocates have to decide that a book, an award-winning book like 'All Boys Aren't Blue,' isn't appropriate for students read?" Reid asked.
"What a tragic story of a young man who is anally raped by his adult family members. So you have incest, rape, pedophilia," Justice responded. "In what context is a strap-on dildo acceptable for public school? That's my question to you.
"Tell me what context around a strap-on dildo or the rape of a minor child by a teacher —" she continued when Reid interrupted her.
The MSNBC host tried to discredit Justice by asking her what the main character's name is in "All Boy's Aren't Blue," a question Justice answered correctly.
Reid, however, never answered Justice's question but expressed offense that Justice would dare make an inquiry of her.
"What I am saying to you is you are not an expert in this book," Reid later said.
"I don't have to be an expert to know that dildos are not appropriate for public school, I mean, come on. Let's get real," Justice shot back.
The X account for Reid's show, "The ReidOut," later posted the exchange about "All Boy's Aren't Blue."
Ironically, the post censored the phrase "strap-on dildo" — instead writing "XXXXX-XX-XXXXX" — thus proving Justice's argument that groups of people, organizations, and society make concerted decisions that some words and content are not appropriate for any and every circumstance.
— (@)
"If Joy Reid isn't comfortable writing "strap-on dildo" on X, why does she demand that it be made available to children in public schools?" activist Christopher Rufo noted.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!