It’s time to join the fight and expose Ticketmaster



Concerts are supposed to be fun. Unfortunately, the typical excitement and anticipation of attending a show or sporting event has been overshadowed by panic and stress. Nearly 50% of concertgoers recently admitted they’ve considered taking a second job just to afford tickets.

In addition to shelling out a small fortune for concert tickets, fans now have to worry if their tickets will vanish into thin air, thanks to one company’s epic data breach earlier this year. With the data from about 560 million people up for grabs, your ticket might just be the hottest item on a hacker’s wish list.

We find ourselves in this situation because Live Nation-Ticketmaster manages the artists, runs the venues, and sells the tickets — virtually every piece of the ecosystem.

Why is this all happening? The ticketing industry’s self-made monopolist, Ticketmaster, changed the game, and it’s time we as fans do something about it.

The merger of Ticketmaster with its parent company, Live Nation Entertainment, back in 2010 has brought turmoil and frustration for artists, concert venues, and consumers alike. But while many affected by Ticketmaster’s monopoly in the live event and ticket ecosystem have spoken out, not much has happened.

Thankfully, the lawsuit from the Department of Justice and a bipartisan group of more than 40 state and district attorneys general compiles over a decade’s worth of evidence that true competition in live events and the ticketing industry is absent — leading to increased costs and fewer event opportunities for fans.

Ticketmaster's latest blunder with Oasis’ highly anticipated 2025 comeback tour underscores the company’s ongoing failure to put fans first. At the outset, overwhelming traffic caused Ticketmaster’s system to crash, leaving thousands of U.K. fans stuck in queues without ever getting a chance to purchase tickets, while others paid considerably more than they anticipated.

Sound familiar, Swifties?

We find ourselves in this situation because Live Nation-Ticketmaster manages the artists, runs the venues, and sells the tickets — virtually every piece of this ecosystem. Its overwhelming control over ticketing, touring, and promotions has led to restricted consumer choices and inflated ticket prices, all while Live Nation-Ticketmaster becomes ever more profitable.

The lack of real competition between Ticketmaster and other ticket sellers is evident. Live Nation owns or manages 60% of the highest-grossing venues in the United States, granting Ticketmaster exclusive rights for initial ticket sales at those venues. Additionally, Live Nation directly manages more than 350 musical artists and their tours. Guess which venues they use?

Then there are the concerns around its business tactics that box out other market participants. Its network of exclusive contracts eliminates choice, forcing venues and artists into the hands of a single corporate player.

And of course, as we just saw with Oasis and many other high-demand sales, the lack of competition results in poor execution and poor customer service.

In some instances, Live Nation even exclusively sells its own canned water — Liquid Death — at its venues. The list goes on.

The federal government must take decisive action to dismantle this monopoly and introduce real competition in the live event industry. With former President Donald Trump decidedly winning the election, we can only hope his new team at the Justice Department will continue to keep antitrust enforcement at the forefront.

Transparency in primary ticketing is nonexistent, while venues, artists, and promoters remain under the control of a single entity. Restrictive terms and conditions limit what people can do with a ticket.

Now is the time for fans to say, enough is enough — especially if you are one of the 145 million Americans who plan to attend a live event in the next year and don’t want to see the tickets you spent a small fortune on disappear.

Judge rules Google's Play store is an illegal monopoly, orders sweeping changes



A district judge declared Google's Android app store an illegal monopoly, and the company must now make a bevy of changes to comply with the law.

Judge James Donato issued a ruling in Epic v. Google. Epic operates its own app store, the Epic Games Store, which has been cordoned off from Google's Play Store on Android devices.

The judge ruled that Google will be required to distribute other third-party app stores within its own app store and allow the other app stores to access its catalogue of programs. Developers can still opt out of any store they please, of course.

Perhaps the biggest portion of the ruling is that developers will no longer have to pay Google the 30% app tax. Gone is the requirement for developers to solely use Google Play Billing, which saw a 30% commission on the sale of paid apps and in-app purchases, including subscriptions.

For a term of three years from November 2024 to 2027, Google will also be required to let Android developers tell users about alternative payment methods, provide download links outside of the Play Store, and set their own prices for apps.

'The provisions are designed to level the playing field.'

At the same time, Google will be restricted from influencing phone carriers, developers, and other distributors through monetary compensation or perks.

According to the Verge, Google will be prohibited from sharing app revenue "with any person or entity that distributes Android apps" or with any entity that plans to launch an app store or platform.

Google also must not offer developers money or perks to launch their apps exclusively (or first) on the Play Store, and they also cannot offer money or perks to developers to not launch their apps on rival stores.

Device makers and carriers cannot receive money or perks for preinstalling the Google Play Store on their devices or purposely not preinstalling rival stores on devices.

The judge agreed that Google had developed so many deals with developers, carriers, and device manufacturers that it was nearly impossible for another store to flourish. Therefore, it is fair to assume that the aforementioned restrictions are in place to prevent the deals Google engaged in.

The three-year term was decided based on plaintiff Epic's request for six years, along with other unmet demands, such as sideloading apps in the store.

The judge justified his three-year term as a window for other stores to grow:

"The provisions are designed to level the playing field for the entry and growth of rivals, without burdening Google excessively," Judge Donato wrote. "As competition comes into play and the network effects that Google Play unfairly enjoys are abated, Google should not be unduly constrained as a competitor."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Why Free-Market Conservatives Should Cheer The Amazon Antitrust Suit

By taking Amazon’s anti-competitive behavior head-on, the FTC has an opportunity to give small businesses a fighting chance.

'Monopolistic' Live Nation accused of canceling Tucker Carlson event despite a 'final confirmation,' prompting conservatives to scramble for alternative



Tucker Carlson is the featured speaker at the fourth annual "America Safety First" event honoring first responders on Sept. 10. While the event is now scheduled to take place at Jimmy John's Field in Utica, Michigan, the original plan was for Carlson, a pair of major comedians, and esteemed musical guests to do what they do best before thousands of people at a covered venue in Sterling Heights.

According to the organizers, following weeks of discussions, permission granted by the Macomb County executive, a ready down payment, and a tentative arrangement to hold the festivities at the Freedom Hill Amphitheater, the venue's new corporate owner, Live Nation Entertainment — recognized by some lawmakers and watchdog groups as a monopoly that should be broken up — allegedly pulled the carpet out from under them at the last minute.

As a result, the conservatives who arranged to have Tucker Carlson speak before Michiganders indicated that they found themselves weeks behind in ticket sales and at risk of potentially losing millions of dollars.

While they have persevered and are now holding the event at a venue free from Live Nation, the organizers are nevertheless considering the possibility of taking legal action.

The chairman of the political action group sponsoring the event and the event co-chair both stressed to the TheBlaze the gravity of this apparent cancellation, noting that Live Nation Entertainment's stranglehold over the event venues in the United States will enable it to continue to largely control who speaks, when, and where.

Event co-chair Kevin Rinke underscored, "People have a right to be heard and to attend to educate themselves. And you can't have businesses directly or indirectly restricting those rights. That's not how our country works."

So close, but forever far away

Eric Castiglia, the chairman of the Brighter Michigan PAC, and Rinke told TheBlaze they had been in talks with the former owner of Freedom Hill Amphitheater, still in a position to book events at the venue. The former owner, in turn, had reportedly patched in Live Nation Michigan president Dave Clark and others in the talks.

After figuring out a date that worked, the event organizers indicated they started jumping through various hoops to secure the venue and make sure the show would go smoothly. This involved, for instance, securing county parking for the venue via the county executive.

Once the hoops had been cleared, Rinke indicated, "We call them and say, 'Look, we've got a non-refundable deposit that is due to Tucker. Are we good?' He said, 'Yes.'"

The former owner of the venue told the Midwesterner that prior to the apparent about-face, he received a phone call from Clark's office, indicating that "everything is a go."

"Understand that when they said 'yes,' we submitted a $100,000 non-refundable deposit to Tucker," said Rinke. "Live Nation absolutely knew that we gave a deposit, absolutely told us the date was okay, absolutely worked with us on catering, on sound. They gave us pricing. And as soon as we said, 'We've sent in the deposit, we need a contract,' they said, 'Oh, we changed our minds. Too bad.'"

The Midwesterner reported that emails show the organizers sought in late July to pay a $25,000 deposit for the venue and secure an agreement.

"Eric and Kevin were informed that it was good to go, and a few days later they tell me that, 'No, we've changed our policy at Live Nation and we're not allowing anybody to use the facility,'" said the former owner. "We said, 'Well, we've already had it in the books. I understand if in 2024 you want to change the policy, that's great, but we've already paid a deposit to Carlson."

Ultimately, Castiglia said the organization "just said they didn't want to do the event. And David Clark made a comment to the old owner that he was not interested in taking our money. I don't know if that was due to the political undertone, but they knew who our speaker was. They knew we're honoring first responders. They knew everything."

The former owner told the Midwesterner, "I just think honestly we were done wrong. We had the day, he gave us the date, and then he took the date away from us after dragging this out for weeks. ... Well, I mean, we had the date; we were just waiting for the final confirmation. We got the final confirmation, and then it was less than a week later he called Eric and then told us that we couldn't do the show."

TheBlaze reached out to Live Nation Entertainment and Live Nation Michigan president Dave Clark, but did not receive a response.

As a result of the apparent change of heart, the organizers indicated they lost four weeks of ticket sales, money partly in the form of advertising spend, and a venue where the audience would be protected from possible rain.

Castiglia told TheBlaze that in such a circumstance as this, where you're dealing with "an organization that has basically a monopoly" and left with few alternatives, it's problematic "if they start picking and choosing who they want, who they don't."

"The biggest message we can send in Michigan is we're not going to stand for those types of actions," added Rinke. "Both sides of the aisle deserve a right to express themselves."

Tickets for the relocated Sept. 10 event are presently on sale.

'The 800-pound gorilla'

Since Live Nation merged with Ticketmaster in 2010, the resulting behemoth has grown to control an estimated 70% of the ticketing and live event venues market, reported CNBC.

When addressing the Senate Judiciary Committee in January, Joe Berchtold, president and CFO of Live Nation Entertainment, suggested the company had more than 60% of market share on the ticketing side and indicated further that Live Nation operates roughly 200 of the 4,000 venues active in the U.S..

Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) told Berchtold at the hearing, "The fact of the matter is that Live Nation/Ticketmaster is the 800-pound gorilla here. ... You have clear dominance, monopolistic control."

While routinely hounded by lawmakers in Washington, it appears that Live Nation might have bought some deference on the Hill with the millions it pours into lobbying efforts, including the $1,230,000 it has spent to that effect so far this year, according to Open Secrets.

Criticism of the behemoth has been bipartisan, yet the organization's corresponding PAC, formed in October 2021, appears to be funneling money in just one direction.

Forbes reported that much of the Live Nation PAC's money has gone to Democrats in recent years.

Krista Brown, a senior policy analyst at the American Economic Liberties Project, told Vox, "They are not held accountable on a competitive landscape, and thus far, regulators have allowed for almost all abuses to go through with extremely minor ramifications."

The New York Times reported that the Department of Justice has been investigating the company for well over a year, "looking at whether the company maintains a monopoly over the industry" despite the organization's claims to the contrary.

Late last month, Politico indicated that the DOJ was possibly looking to file an antitrust lawsuit against Live Nation as soon as this fall over its alleged abuse of power regarding the live music industry.

That has yet to occur. In the meantime, it appears the company is free to throw around its weight, leaving some aspirations crushed in the process.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

In New Anti-Capitalism Documentary, PBS Gets Monopoly All Wrong

While Monopoly has a lot to do with competition, it has very little to do with capitalism.

Senators Torch Ticketmaster For Taylor Swift Debacle

'The way your company handled the ticket sales with Ms. Swift was a debacle'

Last Week Marked The First Step Against Big Tech (And A Win For The Realignment)

The right must stop rushing like a battered wife to bail out the corporations that continue to wield their massive private power against ordinary Americans.

Democrats Hate Every Second Amendment Victory Because It Challenges Their Monopoly On Power

Democrats hate the Second Amendment for the same reasons they hate free speech and fair elections: They want a monopoly on violence, words, and power.

Biden Administration Admits To Helping Control What You’re Allowed To Know

White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki made a startling revelation: major social media platforms take direction from the government in deciding what content to suppress, amplify, or remove.