Trump tells Glenn Beck the cold reality about tariff talks: 'I don't have to negotiate'



Blaze Media co-founder Glenn Beck sat down Wednesday with President Donald Trump to discuss the first 100 days of his second term. They broached a variety of topics in the interview, including artificial intelligence, American energy, cost-saving deregulation, potential military action in Mexico, and Democrats' efforts to protect a foreign MS-13 associate with human trafficking ties.

While forthcoming on these and other issues, Trump certainly minced no words on the matter of tariffs and trade, telling Beck that he negotiates with other countries out of respect, not necessity — that at the end of the day, the U.S. is still calling the shots and will not suffer abuse at the hands of lesser nations.

Trump declared April 2 "Liberation Day," indicating in advance that sweeping reciprocal tariffs were inbound. Sure enough, when the day came, the president held a ceremony at the White House where he displayed the new rates of tariffs for the European Union and for numerous countries including China, Japan, and Ukraine.

'People don't talk about that. Even I don't mention it enough.'

After announcing a baseline 10% tariff against nearly 90 countries and higher reciprocal tariffs for the European Union and other regions, Trump told the audience at the Rose Garden, "From this day on, we're not going to let anyone tell us American workers and families cannot have the future that they deserve."

Beck suggested to the president Wednesday that while his "Liberation Day" evoked the end of World War II, it was perhaps less a historical appeal and more a historic repeal.

"I'm wondering, because of all of the moves you've made — NATO, the endless wars, everything else that goes along with this — are you signaling to the world that this is not just tariffs — this is an end to the order that we built after World War II?" said Beck. "Because it might have been good after World War II for everybody, but we're not the suckers any more. That's long past. It's time to transform."

The president was receptive to the idea that April 2 marked an end to the postwar consensus.

"You've said it so well, because people don't talk about that. Even I don't mention it enough. We helped countries after World War II. We helped them rebuild," responded Trump. "... And we never stopped. And they became very successful. And they stole our businesses."

Trump emphasized that the U.S. — thanks to the complicity of his predecessors and the opportunism of friends abroad — has been "ripped off by every country" on trade as well as in terms of nonreciprocal military relationships such as NATO.

The president noted, for instance, that after the U.S. long guaranteed Europe's safety, continentals were prickled by his suggestion that they might have to front more of the cost of their security.

'They all want to come in and they want to take our product.'

The U.S. has been the leading payer of NATO's bills. As of December, its cost share of the alliance's civil budget, military budget, and NATO Security Investment Program was nearly 16%. In addition to pouring cash into the alliance, the U.S. also has over 100,000 troops deployed across Europe and routinely sinks cash into related defense initiatives.

"And they said, 'Well, does he really mean that?'" Trump told Beck. "And they said, 'You mean, if we don't pay the bill, you're not going to be here?' 'Nope, I'll be gone.'"

"We were defending them, and they were killing us with the European Union, which was formed for the sole purpose of taking advantage of the United States," said Trump. "And I said, 'This isn't going to go on.'"

The conversation turned back to the matter of tariffs, which Trump evidently figures are a means to settle scores where perceived trading imbalances are concerned.

"How do you negotiate with a group of elites who were for the World Economic Forum's 'Great Reset'?" asked Beck.

Trump responded with a dose of cold reality: "I don't have to negotiate. I don't have to negotiate. I'm talking to people out of respect, but I don't have to."

"We're this giant store that people want to come in and buy from. We're the United States. We have the richest consumers, etc., right?" said Trump.

While acknowledging that the financial health of this "giant store" is far from guaranteed, Trump indicated that for the time being, "they all want to come in and they want to take our product."

"To take our product, they're going to have to pay, and we'll either make a deal with them or we'll just set a price," continued Trump. "We're negotiating with 70 different countries. We're negotiating; we're showing great respect. But in the end, we may make deals — but either that or I just set a price. I said, 'Here's what you're going to pay for the privilege of servicing the United States of America.'"

"They don't have to shop at this big store, or they can shop. But in any event, they're going to have to pay," added the president.

— (@)

Scores of countries have approached the U.S. to rectify trade imbalances. Citing this interest to make a deal and select countries' lack of retaliation, Trump announced a 90-day delay on reciprocal tariffs on April 9. He raised the tariff charged to China, one of the customers apparently contemplating their patronage of the American store.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

3 Lessons Trump Can Learn From His Last Trade War With China To Win This One

In Trump’s second term, he aims to leave a lasting legacy. To do this, he should draw from the lessons learned during the previous trade war.

WSJ distorts Vance's comments on Ukraine, Russia — but social media users quickly correct the record



Social media users quickly corrected the record after the Wall Street Journal appeared to grossly distort comments Vice President JD Vance made regarding Ukraine and Russia during a recent interview.

On Friday, Bojan Pancevski and Alexander Ward of the WSJ published an article based on an exclusive interview with Vance. The headline for the article — "Vance Wields Threat of Sanctions, Military Action to Push Putin Into Ukraine Deal" — has drawn severe criticism online.

'As we've always said, American troops should never be put into harm's way where it doesn’t advance American interests and security.'

William Martin, the communications director for the vice president, immediately tweeted out screenshots of a transcript of the interview, revealing that the headline did not accurately reflect Vance's statements.

According to the screenshots, Vance admitted that President Donald Trump has an array of "instruments of pressure" he can use to convince President Vladimir Putin to abide by any agreement reached with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Among them are "economic" and "military tools of leverage."

Vance also reiterated that whenever President Donald Trump walks into a negotiation, "everything is on the table."

However, the vice president did not threaten sanctions or military action. Instead, he simply declined to eliminate any possible leverage Trump could use as he works to bring peace to the region.

There is also little chance that the interviewer misunderstood Vance's point. A screenshot of the transcript showed that the interviewer asked a follow-up question to "make sure": "So just want to make sure I understand you correctly. You're saying that even though the possibility of a Ukraine NATO accession at the end of this process, or even the presence of U.S. troops in Ukraine is not officially off the table?"

Trump "wants to have a productive negotiation, both with Putin and with [Zelenskyy]," Vance told the WSJ, even as he "doesn't like the idea of moving Ukraine into NATO."

Martin claimed that the framing from the WSJ was "fake news."

"This is pure fake news. Compare the transcript of @JDVance's conversation with WSJ to the headline being run here. The Vice President didn’t make any threats. He simply stated the fact that no one is going to take options away from President Trump as these negotiations begin," he wrote.

According to a post from Libs of TikTok, the WSJ article was even slapped with a community note denying the accuracy of the headline, but as of early Friday afternoon, no such community note is currently attached to the WSJ post.

'Such liars. That’s not at all what VP Vance said.'

Vance reacted to the WSJ headline by quote-tweeting Republican strategist Andrew Surabian, who called the headline "one of the most intentionally dishonest things I've seen in a long time" and likened the WSJ to the Huffington Post.

Vance did not mention anything about the headline or the WSJ in his message. Rather, he reiterated the administration's stance on the Ukraine-Russia war:

President Trump is the ultimate deal maker and will bring peace to the region by ending the war in Ukraine. As we've always said, American troops should never be put into harm's way where it doesn’t advance American interests and security. This war is between Russia and Ukraine.

Other social media users have also excoriated the WSJ for the misleading headline:

  • "Who wrote this headline?Whoever it was didn't read the article because J.D. said nothing like that," said Brick Suit, an eccentric figure frequently spotted wearing a brick-patterned ensemble at Trump campaign rallies.
  • "Such liars. That’s not at all what VP Vance said," said a user called Queen Isabel.
  • "No one takes you seriously anymore. You’ve lied, yet again. You are just a bunch of partisan hacks, and the people who buy your bs are just as bad. Keep it up, you’re sending yourselves into an irrelevant oblivion," came another popular response.

In an era in which news is regularly aggregated by other outlets, such a specious headline can have far-reaching implications. For instance, the New York Post similarly adopted the WSJ framing, writing up an article entitled "JD Vance threatens Russia with sanctions, possible military action if Putin doesn’t agree to end Ukraine war."

Pancevski, Ward, and Victor Nava, author of the Post article, did not respond to a request for comment from Blaze News.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

The Israel-Hamas Hostage Deal Gives Too Much To Terrorists

The cost of the cease-fire to Israel for freeing only some of the hostages is handing Hamas and Iran an undeserved victory.

GOP Sen. Markwayne Mullin Decries Social Media For Giving Americans Insight Into Congress’s Backdoor Dealmaking

The Sooner State Republican decried how social media has hampered lawmakers' ability to negotiate on legislation behind closed doors.

The U.S. Money Trail With Iran Is Worse Than You Think

It all becomes even more egregious when inspected within the context of the Biden administration’s foreign and domestic policies.

Pharma Lawsuit Shows The Extent Of Biden’s Health Care Stranglehold

Merck calls 'negotiation' provisions in Biden's Inflation Reduction Act 'unconstitutional,' but there may be no way out.

Biden, McCarthy fail to reach agreement 10 days away from default

McCarthy said he and Biden had a "productive" meeting