Neil deGrasse Tyson FURIOUS as host destroys his pro-transgender athlete narrative



Neil deGrasse Tyson may be a 65-year-old famous astrophysicist, but that isn’t stopping him from behaving like a child when someone points out obvious facts about the difference between men and women.

“It is a little weird that we split people by male and female in this way. I’m imagining a hundred years from now, looking back and saying, ‘Do you know, back a hundred years ago they split boys and girls and they couldn’t compete?'” Tyson said on a podcast with Michael Shermer.

“I could imagine that too,” Shermer said, clearly trying to be nice before blowing up Tyson’s argument. “But the differences are so massive on average.”

Tyson then threw his arms up in the air and attempted to interrupt Shermer, while Shermer continued, “The average woman wrestler is not going to be able to take down you when you were in your peak.”

“You’re an old man on the porch in a rocking chair,” Tyson said. “You are criticizing something that is in need of modification.”

Dave Rubin can’t believe he’s seeing Tyson go “woke.”

“The only way in a hundred years we would look back and think it’s archaic to have boys and girls competing separately is if we’ve drugged all of the girls,” Rubin says.

“At this point, I’m fearful that somebody might think that’s a good idea,” Sage Steele adds.


Want more from Dave Rubin?

To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

‘South Park’ mocks Lizzo and body positivity movement; Lizzo takes it as a compliment



While most television shows now cater to the “woke” community, "South Park" is one of the few that have remained strong.

In its just-released “The End of Obesity'' episode, the creators mocked the new Ozempic weight-loss craze, as well as the face of the body positivity movement: Lizzo.

In one scene, Stan’s mother, Sharon Marsh, tells her friend that she had been feeling ashamed of herself because she’d been unable to secure Ozempic in order to lose weight.

“I’m telling you Sheila, these new drugs are pretty amazing. I was feeling so ashamed of myself, watching Randy go out and exercise all the time and not eating as much, but I just don’t have the same kind of willpower he has,” Sharon told her friend Sheila.

“There’s a whole new obesity drug for those of us who can’t afford Ozempic and Monjaro. I’ve controlled all my cravings to be thinner with Lizzo!” Sharon exclaims, before a pharmaceutical commercial for “Lizzo” begins.

“FDA approved ‘Lizzo’ makes you feel good about your weight, and it costs 90% less than Ozempic,” the commercial begins. “I've lowered my standards and my expectations,” Sharon exclaims happily.

“In case studies, 70% of patients on ‘Lizzo’ no longer cared how much they weigh. ‘Lizzo’ helps you eat everything you want and keep physical activity to a minimum. Some patients report constipation while listening to ‘Lizzo.’ Stop listening to ‘Lizzo’ if you experience suicidal thoughts,’” the commercial continues.

Lizzo responded to the show in a livestream. “I just feel like damn, I’m really that b*tch. I’m really that b*tch. I really showed the world how to love yourself and not give a f*** to the point where these men in Colorado know who I am and put it on their cartoon that’s been around for 25 years.”

Dave Rubin is thrilled, noting that "South Park" has been ahead on pretty much everything.

“Now, we have something going on with this body positivity movement and that somehow being fit is white supremacist or something like that,” Rubin says, telling athlete Riley Gaines that her generation now connects to the idea that “big is beautiful.”

“I think she took it as a compliment,” Gaines tells Rubin. “But yeah, we see the glorification daily of anything that is immoral, anything that is evil, anything that is unhealthy. We have seen this the past few years, but the mask is off now.”


Want more from Dave Rubin?

To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

D.C. Cherry Blossoms Aren’t Safe Around Climate Activists — And Neither Are We

The Borg is determined to control our lives through fear. This is why, in the eyes of the elites, beauty itself is too dangerous.
Host Stunned by Rashida Tlaib's Pathetic Defense of This Extremist Chant

Host Stunned by Rashida Tlaib's Pathetic Defense of This Extremist Chant

Watch Bill Maher's face when Neil deGrasse Tyson refuses to define a 'man'



Bill Maher’s “Club Random” podcast has certainly stayed true to its name by hosting an array of random characters.

One of the latest is Neil deGrasse Tyson, who believes so much in science that he can’t define what a man is.

“What is it that makes the man the man? Is it the hormones? OK, if it’s the hormones, and you decide to give yourself a different cocktail of hormones,” Tyson tells a laughing and then stunned Maher, “... maybe the track meets have hormone categories.”

Maher notes that giving yourself hormones can be harmful to your health, but Tyson has another “scientific answer.”

“You’re so deeply concerned about the health of the people who are trying to find their place on the gender spectrum? You care about their health so much that you don’t want them to go through that?” Tyson rants.

Maher admits, “It’s not something that keeps me up at night, but when the subject comes up, I care about them like I care about all people.”

Dave Rubin is impressed with Maher’s way of handling the conversation. When Tyson attempts to keep the fight going without making a point, Maher shuts it down.

“At that moment, he’s proving that the good liberal can still exist,” Rubin says. “Tyson is trying to dismiss him like you don’t really care about these gender-confused people.”


Want more from Dave Rubin?

To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Neil deGrasse Tyson Gets Mad After Bill Maher Tells Him He's the Problem

Neil deGrasse Tyson Gets Mad After Bill Maher Tells Him He's the Problem

'You should be calling them out!' Bill Maher blames Neil deGrasse Tyson for placating anti-free-speech 'spoiled kids'

'You should be calling them out!' Bill Maher blames Neil deGrasse Tyson for placating anti-free-speech 'spoiled kids'



Comedian Bill Maher accused astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson of being too soft on colleges and college students by not calling out "spoiled kids" enough when it comes to being woke or equating speech to violence.

On his "Club Random Podcast," Maher and Tyson debated whether or not the comedian should be tweaking his content in order to relate to college students, who are generally offended by his jokes.

Tyson attempted to claim that Maher developed many of his viewpoints in the 1970s and that times have changed and different jokes could still work on college campuses.

"Am I not woke enough for you?" Maher asked.

"What I meant was jokes that would work on a college campus. Surely there's a portfolio of jokes that would still work on a college campus, surely."

"I would hope not. Maybe some college campuses. The ones you read about are f**king insane!" Maher decried.

"You've given up on an entire generation and you don't know how to make them laugh?" Tyson then posited.

"I have given up on any place that doesn't even remotely attempt to believe in free speech and thinks that anything that they hear that they don't like, that they don't agree with, is violence. These people are f**king nuts, and you should be calling them out! Somebody like you, who has standing with kids, should be not joining them," Maher said, as he became increasingly animated.

"I do it when there's a science objectivity to it, yes," deGrasse Tyson claimed.

"You're doing what parents do. You're taking the path of least resistance and therefore hurting the kids and yourself. Parents ruin both their lives. They ruin their f**king spoiled kids' lives, and they ruin their own lives, 'cause the kids rule the roost. So that's what you're doing on a national level," he told Tyson.

\u201cTHESE PEOPLE ARE FUCKING NUTS AND YOU SHOULD BE CALLING THEM OUT.\u201d\n\nBill Maher blasts Neil deGrasse Tyson for placating to the Woke ideology instead of challenging it.
— (@)

"I see what pisses people off, what they react to, and I say, 'All right, these are the land mines I'm gonna navigate,'" Tyson said, explaining his logic.

"It's not good enough to be right; you also have to be effective, and if you reject the college campus, then you have no influence on them. They're not going to say, 'Oh, we're not going to get Bill; maybe we should change.' Then you have no influence on them."

The scientist had previously been criticized for his views on similar issues like transgenderism, particularly the topic of men in women's sports. On the show "TRIGGERnometry," he was challenged on his claim that genetics are insufficient to determine a person's gender.

On "The Michael Shermer Show," deGrasse Tyson argued against men and women competing in different categories. He suggested that it is strange that differentiations exist for sex and not for other genetic differences such as height.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

'D*** it!' Neil deGrasse Tyson loses it when his far-left views on trans women in sports are refuted



Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson recently debated transgender ideology and lost it when his views were refuted.

Tyson made headlines last month over a TikTok video in which he claimed genetics are insufficient to determine a person's gender. That view was challenged in a recent episode of the YouTube show "TRIGGERnometry," hosted by British comedian Konstantin Kisin.

In their debate, Tyson claimed his TikTok video referred to gender "expression" and thus he was standing against bigotry. But Kisin said the issue is not about bigotry per se, but about radical gender ideologists allowing biological men to encroach on spaces reserved for women, such as in their bathrooms and on their sports teams.

Throughout the debate, Tyson argued that transgender inclusion is a "solvable problem," and Kisin maintained his position that because men and woman are biologically different, not every space should be "inclusive."

But the tone of the debate took a turn when Kisin rejected Tyson's argument that transgender inclusion is akin to historical exclusion of women and people of different races.

"There are women whose opportunities are being curtailed today because they are being forced to compete, whether in sports or elsewhere, against people who have some kind of advantage over them," Kisin argued.

"We're in a transitional period. So we have to figure that out. But the way to figure out things that require solutions to progressive change is not to regress it to how things once were. If that were the case, I would still be drinking from a segregated water fountain," Tyson responded.

Konstantin Kisin & Neil deGrasse Tyson CLASH Over Trans Debate www.youtube.com

That's when Kisin's co-host interjected and registered a problem with Tyson's argument.

"I think a lot of people would have an issue with what you're saying because they see women being denied opportunities, they see an unfair playing field, metaphorically and literally speaking," the co-host said.

Tyson clearly did not like the point.

"So fix the playing field, damn it!" Tyson screamed. "Don't say it's an unfair playing field, so, all of a sudden, the big issue is trans women taking the slot of a woman in an unfair playing field. Fix the playing field!

"And you know something? The day you fix that playing field, this conversation will look completely ridiculous," Tyson claimed. "That's what I'm trying to tell you."

The problem with Tyson's level-the-playing-field response is that the playing field in athletics will never be equal between biological men and biological women. If you take the best male athletes and the best female athletes in any sport where athletic ability is necessary, men will win every time.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Neil deGrasse Tyson Gets Pissed After Hosts Ask Him for Proof | Direct Message | Rubin Report

Neil deGrasse Tyson Gets Pissed After Hosts Ask Him for Proof | Direct Message | Rubin Report

De-transitioner Chloe Cole demolishes Neil deGrasse Tyson for claiming genetics are 'insufficient' to explain gender



Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson is catching heat after he claimed that genetics cannot sufficiently determine a person's gender.

In an interview with sports commentator Stephen A. Smith in May, Tyson said that sex chromosomes are "insufficient" for determining a person's gender, lending credence to gender theory.

In the clip, Tyson said:

Apparently, the XX/XY chromosomes are insufficient because when we wake up in the morning, we exaggerate whatever feature we want to portray the gender of our choice. Either the one you're assigned, the one you choose to be — whatever it is!

Now, just to tie a bow on this, I say to you, somewhere I read — somewhere, I think I read — that the United States was a land where we have the pursuit of happiness. Suppose no matter my chromosomes today, "I feel 80% female, 20% male. I'm gonna put on makeup." Tomorrow, I might feel 80% male. I'll remove the makeup and I'll wear a muscle shirt. Why do you care?! What businesses is it of yours to require that I fulfill your inability to think of gender on a spectrum?
— (@)

Chloe Cole — a former transgender person who de-transitioned and now advocates against trans ideology — rebuked Tyson in a response video for amateurishly comparing biology and makeup.

"How about we stop confusing basic human biology with cosmetics?" Cole said on Tuesday. "Like what a weird jump. I don't wear makeup most days. If I leave the house without makeup on, does that make me like 70% male?"

The real danger of Tyson's remarks, Cole argued, is that he confused "1950s gender stereotypes" as justification for "an ideology that leads to the sterilization and mastectomies of 15-year-old girls who just don't fit in — girls like me."

Moreover, the irony of Tyson's argument, Cole added, is that he reinforced the fact that biological sex is binary.

"The idea that people can be percentages of either male or female just further reinforces that fact that biological sex is a binary. There's only two," she said. "There may only be two sexes, but there are an infinite number of personalities. I mean, it really doesn't take a degree in astrophysics to know that."

— (@)

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!