How did a terrorist in a tailored suit get Trump’s stamp of approval?



While the Trump-Putin summit in Anchorage has dominated headlines, another danger has quietly re-emerged — one far more dangerous to American lives than a frozen conflict in Eastern Europe. Donald Trump has legitimized a man who once led an al-Qaeda/ISIS faction, lifting U.S. terrorist designations and sanctions to recognize him as Syria’s leader.

For millions of Trump voters, ending America’s involvement in endless wars and repudiating the neocons who started them was a central promise. Trump’s campaign video “Preventing World War III” called out warmongers and globalist elites like no other candidate before him. He vowed to replace them with patriots and pursue an expressly America First foreign policy.

Trump’s instincts on war and peace can be right — if he listens to MAGA voices.

But instead of draining the neocon swamp, Trump has given it fresh water. His recognition of Abu Mohammed al-Jolani — the protégé of ISIS founder Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi — has kept us on the endless war track.

This isn’t what MAGA voted for.

How we got here

In December, Bashar al-Assad’s government in Syria collapsed after 14 years of civil war. Into the vacuum stepped al-Jolani and his terrorist army, Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham — the latest iteration of al-Qaeda and ISIS. This is the same Islamist movement that murdered 3,000 Americans on 9/11, beheaded Americans, and committed atrocities across the globe.

Yet the United States — first under Joe Biden and now Trump — recognized HTS as a legitimate government. Trump went farther, praising al-Jolani as “a young, attractive guy” with “a strong past” and removing HTS from the U.S. government’s list of designated terrorist groups.

The ISIS record

Trump still celebrates the 2019 mission that killed ISIS founder al-Baghdadi. But Baghdadi's deputy, al-Jolani, was an equally ruthless figure — a homicidal psychopath once targeted by the State Department with a $10 million bounty and a spot on its most-wanted list.

ISIS, originally known as al-Qaeda in Iraq, became notorious for public beheadings, bombings, rape, sexual slavery, torture, and genocide — including the murder of Americans.

In 2011, al-Baghdadi sent al-Jolani to Syria to establish an ISIS foothold. Al-Jolani formed the Al-Nusra Front, Syria’s largest jihadist militia, which later evolved into HTS.

Interventionist fingerprints

ISIS didn’t appear from nowhere. U.S. foreign policy paved the way, under the influence of neoconservatives who believe that the purpose of American military might is to bend the world to their political will, regardless of who is in the White House. They’ve engineered endless wars in service of the military-industrial-congressional complex and globalist elites.

Just a month after 9/11, General Wesley Clark learned of a neocon plan within the Pentagon to topple seven Middle Eastern governments in five years: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran.

Six are down. Only Iran remains.

The 2003 invasion of Iraq was predicated on nonexistent “weapons of mass destruction.” The result? 4,492 dead Americans, at least 655,000 dead Iraqis, trillions of tax dollars squandered, the ascent of ISIS, and a far more dangerous Iran.

Barack Obama’s decision in 2011 to oust Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi was another interventionist catastrophe. Spearheaded by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (Democrat by party, neoconservative interventionist by worldview), Libya was left a barbaric, failed state.

RELATED: The terrorists run Syria now — and Christians, religious minorities are paying the price

Photo by OMAR ALBAW/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images

After Gaddafi was sodomized to death by a mob of savages, Clinton perversely gloated: “We came, we saw — he died.” Now Libya is a human trafficking hub with open-air slave markets.

Then came Syria. Obama secretly authorized the CIA’s Operation Timber Sycamore to arm “moderate” rebels. Billions’ worth of weapons ended up on the black market or with al-Qaeda affiliates, including al-Jolani’s forces.

Syria has been shattered — 530,000 dead, 13 million displaced, with 6 million fleeing abroad.

Immigration jihad

Since 2001, U.S.-led wars have displaced 38 million people, destabilizing Europe and swelling its Muslim population to 44 million. Many have no interest in assimilating. Globalist elites and EU leaders have encouraged this migration to weaken national sovereignty and culture.

Clothes make the man?

When Assad fell, al-Jolani rebranded. Out went the mujahedeen garb; in came tailored European suits. Trump praised him and lifted sanctions, granting his regime international legitimacy.

Predictably, HTS continues slaughtering Christians, Druze, Alawites, and other Shia Muslims.

The choice ahead

When it comes to foreign affairs, Trump’s presidency is faltering. Badly. Caving to neocon interventionists has escalated war and betrayed his base. Embracing an al-Qaeda/ISIS warlord desecrates the memory of every victim of jihadist terror.

I still believe Trump’s instincts on war and peace can be right — if he listens to MAGA voices. Patriots inside and outside his administration must push him to break with the neocons, reject al-Jolani, and put America First again.

‘Complete And Total Ceasefire’: Trump Announces Roadmap To Ending War Between Israel, Iran, U.S.

‘This is a War that could have gone on for years, and destroyed the entire Middle East, but it didn't, and never will!’ Trump declared.

State Department No. 3 Victoria Nuland Resigns After Failing Upward For Decades

Nuland's career in American diplomacy is a case study in Beltway bureaucrats failing upward over their decades in Washington.

A Haley Win In New Hampshire Will Not Be The Victory She Thinks

A Haley win among Democrats in New Hampshire will not make her the Republican frontrunner.

Washington Post: Killing Foreigners Is Good For American Business

Neocon supporters of endemic aid to Ukraine are justifying the war with debunked claims of economic significance.

Trump critic John Bolton concedes Manhattan DA Bragg's case against Trump is weak, compares the Democratic prosecutor to Stalin's henchman



There is no love lost between former national security adviser John Bolton and former President Donald Trump, yet Bolton still cannot bring himself to pretend that Democratic Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has a strong case on his hands.

Bolton went on CNN Tuesday to discuss the indictment within hours of fellow Trump critic and U.S. Senator for Utah Mitt Romney stating, "The New York prosecutor has stretched to reach felony criminal charges in order to fit a political agenda."

Having previously claimed that Trump "does not represent the Republican cause that I want to back," Bolton indicated he was vexed by the toothlessness of the indictment.

"Speaking as someone who very strongly does not want Donald Trump to get the Republican presidential nomination, I'm extraordinarily distressed by this document," Bolton told CNN host Jake Tapper. "I think this is even weaker than I feared it would be. And I think it's easily subject to being dismissed or a quick acquittal for Trump."

Trump pleaded not guilty Tuesday to 34 counts of falsifying business records after noting online that the judge in the then-upcoming arraignment was "highly partisan" and hailed from a family of "Trump haters."

"Going back to the days when I represented Jim Buckley and [Eugene] McCarthy and the constitutional challenge to the underlying federal statute here, passed in 1974, I can say there is no basis in the statutory language to say that Trump's behavior forms either a contribution or an expenditure under federal law: the two key definitions at issue here," said Bolton.

Bolton was referencing his work on the lawsuit Buckley v. Valeo in the 1970s, which resulted in a 1976 Supreme Court decision that struck down limits on campaign finance expenditures and self-funding by affluent candidates, reported the Intercept.

In his memoir, "Surrender Is Not an Option," Bolton wrote, "Everyone knew the decision in Buckley v. Valeo could determine the election in 1976, not to mention the future shape of American politics."

It is that shape he reckons Bragg is now trying to redefine.
"If it did," Bolton told Tapper, "it would mean that every single expenditure a candidate made could be taken to have something to do with his campaign."

Accordingly, something as innocuous as a candidate's purchase of a comb could be treated as problematic.

"If you can construe the statute to cover this behavior, then I think it violates the First Amendment because you're deeply in the territory that makes this ... federal statute too vague for enforcement," Bolton added.

As for suggestions that New York election law may be at issue, Bolton said it doesn't matter: "The Federal Election Campaign Act absolutely pre-empts any state or local law to the contrary."

Bolton suggested that compounding Bragg's difficulty of securing a conviction is the fact that Trump's defense need only show "reasonable doubt that the intent was to affect federal election. And I can come up with a very plausible reason why a person would have the intent of paying these hush-money payments: He doesn't want his wife to find out about it."

While Bolton did not appear to see a real crime among all the charges, he noted that the prosecutor pressing the case first campaigned "to get Donald Trump."

Upon learning of Bragg's expressed intention of pursuing a political persecution of Trump long before allegedly finding evidence of guilt, Bolton said, "My first thought was Lavrenty Beria, the former head of the NKVD in Soviet times, who once said to Joe Stalin, 'You show me the man, I'll show you the crime.'"

Beria served as director of the Soviet secret police force that evolved to become the KGB. Historian Nikita Petrov told the Daily Beast that "Beria should be remembered for his crimes, for ordering mass deportations of peoples from the Northern Caucasus, executions of Polish prisoners. He was a mini-Stalin in the Caucasus, gave orders to beat people before executions."

Reiterating that he opposes Trump's ambition to resume power, Bolton stressed that Bragg's effort feeds into the former president's narrative to such an extent that the prosecutor may ultimately be remembered as "Donald Trump's greatest political supporter."

\u201c\u201cI\u2019m extraordinarily distressed by this document," former Trump official John Bolton weighs in on former President Trump's indictment with CNN's @jaketapper.\u00a0Watch:\u201d
— CNN (@CNN) 1680649671

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Everything Liz Cheney Touches Turns To Garbage, A Retrospective

Throughout her entire tenure in the lower chamber, Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney has yet to lead a winning effort in a defining moment.