Do the Epstein files confirm this Pizzagate theory? NY Mag contributor makes stunning admission.



WikiLeaks published tens of thousands of leaked emails from the personal account of John Podesta, former President Bill Clinton's chief of staff, in late 2016.

The decentralized army of sleuths that subsequently combed over the leaked emails found not only damning insights into Hillary Clinton and her doomed presidential campaign but odd messages about pizza, hot dogs, ice cream, and other foods.

'842 occurrences of the word pizza, which seems like a lot.'

The recurring references to food in non-culinary contexts prompted some to theorize that they were code words related to pedophilia and human trafficking — a theory that the mainstream media and so-called fact-checkers emphasized was "dangerous," "fake news," and, in essence, a "moral panic."

New York Magazine, one of the publications that strenuously criticized the so-called Pizzagate theory nine years ago, suggested in the wake of the new Jeffrey Epstein documents' release that "pizza" might be a code word, after all.

Dan Brooks, writing for New York Magazine, noted that the latest trove of Epstein files published by the Department of Justice "contains 842 occurrences of the word pizza, which seems like a lot. By comparison, the word hamburger appears only 190 times, while the phrase 'sex with children' appears 20 times."

Brooks admitted that "some of the pizza-related material seems pretty weird."

RELATED: Gov. Pritzker's cousin steps down at Hyatt over Epstein relationship

Photo by Joe Schildhorn/Patrick McMullan via Getty Images

Not only did Epstein appear to have automated alerts reminding him to deliver a certain individual pizza, but he was asked on more than one occasion if individuals could have a "quick pizza" together in his absence.

One email said, "I wanted to let you know that the crew really enjoyed the pizza today. Thank you for letting us do that."

Another message from a redacted sender stated, “This is better than a Chinese cookie! Let's go for pizza and grape soda again. No one else can understand."

Additional emails carry subject lines such as “The Pizza Monster!” and include more peculiar uses of the word.

“You mean radiating a soft glow with the look of bliss and excitement. Yeah, that's the pizza...” one message reads.

"These recent Epstein materials do make the financier seem strangely interested in pizza and unusually committed to having it delivered to other people," added Brooks.

There are also recurring references to "pizza and grape soda" in the child sex offender's texts and emails.

Despite the strangeness of the exchanges, a photograph in a text conversation between Epstein and his urologist appears to indicate that on at least one occasion, they were actually discussing pizza and grape soda.

While there has been plenty of speculation in recent weeks about the pizza references, particularly because they appear in both the Epstein and Podesta files, the term "cream cheese," which appears 196 times throughout the Epstein messages, has also raised eyebrows.

In one exchange, a participant wrote, "Lol, I don’t know if cream cheese and baby are on the same level," alongside discussions of scheduling activities that some observers say raise further concern. The phrase also appears in other unsettling contexts, including "cream cheese baby."

The use of cheese and pizza imagery in reference to pedophilia and child abuse is not limited to so-called Pizzagate conspiracy theorists.

In 2020, the Telegraph, a U.K.-based newspaper, reported that a parents' group working to curb the dissemination of child sex abuse material online allegedly found that cheese and pizza emojis were being used as stand-ins for "CP," meaning "child porn."

The founder of the group, a London woman identified only as India, indicated that in some cases, individuals using the emojis shared images of children scraped from parents' social media accounts.

"There are pictures of little boys aged 5 or 6 on the beach in their swimming trunks and chances are that picture was taken by their parents on their holiday," said India. "Somehow that picture has gotten into their hands."

Brooks, prickled by recent declarations by Redditors and others that at least one core Pizzagate claim might have been accurate all along, stated, "If Epstein and his friends did use pizza as a code word for sex, that wouldn’t mean that the original Pizzagate conspiracy theory was correct — even if it was also the case that pizza was a sexual code word in the Podesta emails."

After spending the bulk of his article entertaining the possibility that "a syndicate of pedophiliac celebrities, financiers, and their urologists," equipped with code words, committed "unimaginable acts of cruelty," Brooks spends his final paragraphs attacking those who made similar claims nearly a decade ago.

The NY Mag contributor suggested that such "conspiracists" — not the allegedly vampiric cosmopolitan elites who might refer to their preferred victim types with fast-food references — are "one of the most terrifying forces in 21st-century America."

Having turned his ire away from the dead pedophile and his associates to those Americans searching for justice and accountability, Brooks concluded his article by smearing American democracy as a "well-documented conspiracy of morons."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

What's so 'cruel' about dressing up and having a good time?



New York magazine recently published a story called “The Cruel Kids’ Table.” The article was primarily about young right-wingers and their cultural impact as we head into Trump’s second term in 2025.

But the content of the story isn’t what interests me. Or at least not right now. It’s the cover photo that accompanies the story.

In 2005, it wasn’t difficult to pick out a young, educated conservative from a young, educated liberal based on their clothing and their grooming. It isn’t terribly difficult in 2025 either.

A group of young, attractive, well-dressed men and women. Smiling. Laughing. Drinking. Talking. Stark light exaggerating every detail. It feels like some kind of paparazzi photo. It’s an evocative shot, and there has been no shortage of commentary on it.

Online left-wingers claim the photo is ugly. The bright flash, blown-out faces, high contrast, and excited laughter are unflattering and make the individuals look menacing. If conservatives don't realize this, it's because they don't understand aesthetics.

Conservatives, on the other hand, just see a bunch of well-dressed young people having fun.

Anti-aesthetics

For the left, the best kind of aesthetics are those that make people look vulnerable or fatalistically defiant. And if vulnerable or fatalistically defiant isn’t possible because the individual is just too attractive and confident, wonky will have to do.

Weirdly slouching posture. Slightly depressed face. A rough, brutalist scene will be fine. Or a cutesy one can work too. Something that feels jarring and disorienting, weird and wacky. If pity is impossible, hidden irony is the next best thing. These are some aesthetic values of left-wingers today.

Confident happiness, without any ironic subtext, is just not something in their aesthetic lexicon.

Terminally online

The claim that the photo makes the subjects look nefarious presupposes that you think these types of people — young, attractive men and women wearing dresses and jackets — are the bad guys.

Of course terminally online left-wingers think this demographic are the bad guys. But it doesn’t mean you do. And you probably don’t, because you are not a terminally online, bitter left-winger.

Still, they might argue that all that set aside, the photography is still intended to make the subjects appear less attractive by an objective measure and conservatives don’t get that the joke is on them.

They don’t realize that no one cares about their silly games any more. We just don’t. Gritty photo, smoothed photo, blown-out with flash photo, underexposed photo, overexposed photo, digital camera, Instagram, Polaroid, Photoshop. Who cares? The people in the photo are living rent-free in the heads of hysterical left-wingers. Who’s winning?

A new ethos?

Some claim that the photo is an example of a new right ethos. Well dressed, young, confident, attractive, etc. The claim is that these things are markers of a new era. I like all these things. They are very good things. But they are not new things on the right.

I know that much of society has devolved into pajama-pant world, and the problem of perpetual flip-flop-wearing street urchins is a social disease that impacts both left-wingers and right-wingers alike.

But there has always been a bloc of young, well-dressed, confident, and attractive right-wingers. This cohort has been a conservative breeding ground for generations. 1985, 1995, 2005, 2015, and 2025. Take your pick. It’s not new.

Dressing well in a traditional sense of the word has been a cultural value among young, successful right-wingers for generations. In 2005, it wasn’t difficult to pick out a young, educated conservative from a young, educated liberal based on their clothing and their grooming. It isn’t terribly difficult in 2025 either.

It’s true that amid our cultural degeneration, there has been much neglect in terms of personal aesthetics. Some on the right have tried to distance themselves from, or downgrade the importance of, dressing well, instead joining left-wingers in a race to the bottom.

Exit slop world

But the truth is that dressing well never really went away.

Maybe you were asleep at the wheel and didn’t want to look like a “frat guy” or a “sorority girl,” a “bro” or a “bimbo.” Maybe you decided to cut off your nose to spite your face, forgetting that aesthetics matter. That’s okay. We all make mistakes. But that doesn’t mean everyone else was right there with you.

Angry left-wingers will always hate young right-wingers. Their screeching can be ignored. Those who are just now discovering the importance of personal aesthetics are very welcome. It’s a great sign, and I sincerely hope that we see a turn away from slop world and a return to positive aesthetic values.

The young, attractive, well-dressed right-wingers on New York magazine’s cover are not a new phenomenon. The photo is a restatement of an important truth. Clothes matter, beauty matters. Happiness and success are winners. It was true yesterday, it’s true today, and it will be true tomorrow.

To Create Good Aesthetics, The Right Must Believe In What They Represent

Aesthetically, what do you make of a crypto ball in a neoclassical building where glamorous outfits are topped off with red MAGA hats?

Black MAGA influencer: New York mag intentionally cropped black people out of photo of my Trump event



In a recent story titled “The Cruel Kids’ Table,” New York magazine writer Brock Colyar claimed that a new generation of young Republicans — “casually cruel Trumpers," he labeled them — are "conquering Washington."

The story’s feature photo exhibits a group of poshly dressed, mostly Caucasian young adults celebrating the first night of Donald Trump’s presidency at a swanky party thrown in honor of 30 influencers who played a pivotal role in Trump’s election. In the article, Colyar, who attended the event, corroborated the story’s feature image with a quote from an unnamed attendee: “Almost everyone is white.”

Except that was a lie.

Conservative black influencer and RNC Youth Advisory Council co-chairman CJ Pearson, who hosted the event, was intentionally left out of the story, as were other minorities in attendance, some of whom are big-name celebrities, like American rapper Waka Flocka Flame and American professional boxer Gervonta Davis.

Further, black party attendees were purposely cropped out of the article's feature photo.

In response to the story, Pearson tweeted: “I hosted this event and @NYMag intentionally left me out of their story because it would have undermined their narrative that MAGA is some racist cult.”

Now Pearson meets with Glenn Beck to shed light on what is clearly another attempt by the mainstream media to perpetuate lies about Donald Trump and his supporters.

— (@)

“I knew that America was getting woke under Biden, but I didn’t know that even the KKK had a DEI program, because apparently, I can now be a white supremacist!” he tells Glenn.

“I guess there weren’t enough women with penises in the crowd” for Colyar, who “identifies as nonbinary,” he laughs.

“But what’s terrible about this story is how flagrant it was. They truly believe the American people are stupid. They take that photo to insinuate that this was some KKK kumbaya,” Pearson says, noting that New York magazine did not reach out to him for comment, excluded him from the story, and intentionally “cropped out the black people” in the photo.

Pearson tells Glenn that when he looked at New York magazine’s Instagram post of the photo, many of the comments ignorantly labeled the partygoers as “Hitler’s youth” — “a group of which I was not aware that I was even eligible for membership,” he jokes.

“I think that the reason that they’re so upset is because they cannot stand to see people that believe what we believe happy in this country.”

To hear more of the interview, watch the clip above.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

New York Magazine Crops Out Truth With Young Conservative Hit Piece

'They had an agenda and that was to slander the MAGA movement as some white supremacist cult,' CJ Pearson said of the magazine.

New York Mag’s Whitewashing Of The Olivia Nuzzi Scandal Is As Corrupt As You’d Expect

[rebelmouse-proxy-image https://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Screenshot-2024-10-28-at-11.22.59 AM-1200x675.png crop_info="%7B%22image%22%3A%20%22https%3A//thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Screenshot-2024-10-28-at-11.22.59%5Cu202fAM-1200x675.png%22%7D" expand=1]The problem isn’t the words Nuzzi did write, but the words she didn't.

Corrupt ‘Reporters’ Like Olivia Nuzzi Are Destroying Democracy

[rebelmouse-proxy-image https://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Screenshot-2024-09-23-at-2.41.59 PM-1200x675.png crop_info="%7B%22image%22%3A%20%22https%3A//thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Screenshot-2024-09-23-at-2.41.59%5Cu202fPM-1200x675.png%22%7D" expand=1]No respectable journalistic outlet should employ Olivia Nuzzi ever again.

‘Yikes’: New York Magazine Mixes Up Black Dems In Feature Photo

'A photo-illustration in a previous version of this story incorrectly included Antonio Delgado'