WATCH: Canadian journalist ARRESTED for assault despite not touching a single person



Canada tends to lead the charge when it comes to woke nonsense. Apparently, the country deems asking questions a form of assault, even when the person making the inquiries is a reporter.

Last week, Rebel News reporter David Menzies was arrested by an RCMP officer after he attempted to ask Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland questions regarding why Canada has opted to omit the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps from its terrorist list.

“She could’ve ignored them, but instead, a bunch of her bodyguards jumped him and charged him with assault,” Rebel News founder Ezra Levant tells Alex Stein.

In the video footage, one can clearly see Menzies approaching Freeland with a microphone. However, he never touches her or even blocks her path. Menzies manages to ask two questions, both of which go unanswered, before a group of officers forcefully grab him and push him against the wall claiming he’s under arrest for assault.

“How am I under arrest? You bumped into me,” Menzies said to one officer as handcuffs were placed on his wrists.

“You pushed into me, sir,” the officer responded — a textbook example of gaslighting.

“He never touched her!” says Alex in disbelief. “Is verbal assault a charge?”

“In the end, they dropped the charge,” says Levant. However, “the weirdest part is [the cops] drive away but they don't take him to the police station; they just dump him off in some school parking lot and say find your own way back.”

"I was a super pro-back the blue guy," but after "what I've seen...they are testing my pro-cop ideology," he sighs.

Clearly, many share Levant's sentiments, as the video has now garnered several million views. Check it out for yourself below.


Want more from Alex Stein?

To enjoy more of Alex's culture jamming, comedic monologues, skits, and street segments, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Whoopi Goldberg’s latest Trump tirade is, well, embarrassing



“The View’s” Whoopi Goldberg should’ve stuck to acting and left the political commentary to those with common sense.

“Play a scene from ‘Sister Act,’” Jaco Booyens tells Sara Gonzales. “That was her best moment, and then it went downhill from there.”

But Sara thinks Goldberg’s latest Trump tirade is worth watching (even if only for giggles).

On a recent episode of “The View,” which Jaco says was “written by the Democratic Party,” Goldberg went on an embarrassing tirade about all the horrible things Donald Trump — “the dictator” — would inevitably do should he win the 2024 election.

“People's faith in the country is waning; that's the thing that's pissing me off,” she began, ignorantly adding that Joe Biden is “running for democracy,” which is “really what's at stake.”

However, “if the other guy becomes president,” she continued in reference to Donald Trump, people will have to worry about being put in “some camp somewhere.”

“That's his promise to us — he's going to force people to do his bidding. That’s what he said; ‘I’m gonna be good on day one, and then I’m gonna turn into some other person.”’

Of course, her words are ludicrous, as Trump has never uttered such a ridiculous statement.

But Goldberg wasn’t finished. She also had some things to say about our immigration problem.

Illegal immigrants are “coming here for a reason because they're living in a place that's not good for their families. If you're okay with that and you understand that, then fight for us to find a better way to make immigration work ... Don't fight for keeping everybody out because then we all have to leave,” she ranted.

To clarify, Biden is pro-democracy, Trump is going to put people he doesn’t like in camps, and if we don’t support open borders, then we’re all going to be forced to leave America.

“She’s talking about rounding people up in camps,” laughs Sara. “Your guy is the guy who's weaponized the entire FBI and DOJ against half of the country. You've got the FBI ... putting families at gunpoint because a pro-life ...You're throwing people in prison for decades because they waved an American flag in the capital and walked out and left non-violently.”

To watch Goldberg’s cringe-worthy Trump tirade, watch the clip below.


Want more from 'The News & Why It Matters?'

To enjoy more rundowns of the top stories of the day, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Michelle Obama claims she's 'terrified' for upcoming election. Here's why



Michelle Obama is very concerned about the 2024 election, and it’s starting to sound like the former first lady might have something in store herself for 2024.

“The things that keep me up because you don’t have control over them, and you wonder where are people, where are we in this, you know, where are our hearts, what’s going to happen in this next election,” she told Jay Shetty on the "On Purpose" podcast.

“I am terrified about what could possibly happen, because our leaders matter. Who we select, who speaks for us, who holds that bully pulpit — it affects us in ways that sometimes I think people take for granted,” Michelle added.

Sara Gonzales is not amused.

“Yeah, we know, which is why it’s a problem that we have a walking vegetable that is apparently controlling the bully pulpit,” she comments.

Entrepreneur and investor Carol Roth thinks Michelle has something else up her sleeve.

“I watched this and the first thing that popped into my head is, ‘She’s running,’” Roth tells Gonzales. “All of a sudden they’re trotting out Michelle Obama, who we haven’t seen in a very long time.”

“If she keeps popping up, that’s going to terrify me,” she adds.


Want more from "The News & Why It Matters?"

To enjoy more rundowns of the top stories of the day, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Watch Vivek the Destroyer humiliate NBC news airhead, sending her into a full meltdown



The left is triggered by Vivek Ramaswamy. Liberals just can’t understand how he, especially as a person of color, could possibly refuse to denounce white supremacy – the modern version of white supremacy, that is.

Pat Gray plays a recent clip showing Ramaswamy “being pushed into a corner on race issues again,” but thankfully the candidate handled the ambush with expert articulacy.

“When you were talking to reporters last night, you called white supremacy a myth. When someone asked you about Dylann Roof, you said you didn't know who that is. Have you looked up what happened in 2015?” asked Dasha Burns, citing the mass murderer who shot and killed nine African-Americans on June 17, 2015, in South Carolina.

“Yeah,” Ramaswamy answered, confirming he knew about Roof’s crimes. “Invidious racial discrimination is wrong no matter how it happens.”

However, “it's incumbent for us to define what white supremacy is,” especially “what the popular understanding of these terms [has] come to mean,” he continued. “Do you believe punctuality is a vestige of white supremacy … or the written word … or the nuclear family? These aren't my words; these are the words of intellectual proponents from Ibram Kendi to Ayanna Pressley to BLM that have said these are vestiges of white supremacy.”

That’s all it took for Burns to lose her cool.

“This is what you do, though. You choose straw men,” she fired back, accusing him of cherry-picking his arguments.

But Ramaswamy just hit her with more facts.

“If you really care about actual crime against black Americans, let's get to the root causes of it,” he said, citing “black-on-black crime” as the main source of the problem.

“The Anti-Defamation League tracked a 38% increase in white supremacist propaganda last year,” Burns spat back.

“The ADL isn’t a particularly credible source,” Ramaswamy said, before shooting down Burns’ next set of statistics from the FBI.

“What they classify as a hate crime is itself a political judgment. I think that when you actually care about protecting life, if you want to say black lives matter, let's look at where black lives are actually being lost – it's in the cities at the heart of other black Americans and criminals.”

That only made Burns even more angry, but Ramaswamy carried on with his usual eloquence.

“My whole point is, racism has been a major problem for most of our national history, but we’re getting close to the promised land that Martin Luther King envisioned. We’re as darned close to it as we ever have been,” but now “we’re creating new waves of racism, Dasha, that we otherwise would have avoided right when we're closest to having achieved what even the proponents of the civil rights movement would have dreamed of.”

“Obviously she’s got an agenda,” sighs Pat. “She is all pissed off that she can’t get him to cower before the racial gods that are saying ‘everything is so bad in America, and white supremacy is the biggest issue we face.”’


Want more from Pat Gray?

To enjoy more of Pat's biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

The real question: Who were Jeffrey Epstein's handlers?



While some names on the Jeffrey Epstein-related court documents have been released, unsurprisingly, not all of them have been.

Over 150 names were delayed by the court.

Though one of the names we do know is incredibly disturbing — former President Bill Clinton — Glenn Beck believes we need to focus our attention elsewhere.

“We have to stop asking, ‘I wonder who’s involved,’ and start asking, ‘Who has all of the information?’” Glenn says.

One man, former Trump intelligence official Kash Patel, claims to have the answer.

“That’s under direct control of the director of the FBI, just like the manifesto from the Nashville school shooting of the [Christian] school; we still haven’t seen that,” Patel tells Glenn.

“It’s not the Nashville police or PD saying we don’t want this out. The FBI airmailed into that operation and said, ‘This is not getting out,'" he adds. "Because they do that, because this is another government gangster operation."

Patel goes on to say that those who don’t cooperate don’t get money to their local districts.

“That’s how they play the game,” Patel explains.

Glenn is disturbed by the amount of power this gives unelected officials.

“So, your FBI director is the guy who has all the information,” Glenn says. “That is way too much power in an unelected official.”

“That book should be made public,” Glenn continues. “All of it. You know why we don’t trust our government? Because they’ve proven themselves to be liars, over and over and over again.”


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Iran turned off cameras belonging to a UN nuclear watchdog in one of its uranium enrichment facilities



The Iranian government was exposed for turning off two surveillance cameras of a United Nations nuclear watchdog program that was monitoring one of the country’s atomic development sites.

The Independent reported that the development initially broke on Iranian state television. The report did not identify at which of the nuclear development sites the infraction occurred, but it did indicate that the interference was a likely a part of a new pressure technique being pushed by the Iranian government as it seeks to muscle its way out of an imminent censure from Western nations at an upcoming meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency.

The Iranian state television report described the two disabled cameras as monitoring “OLEM enrichment levels and flowmeters.” This refers to the IAEA’s Online Enrichment Monitors, which watch the enrichment of uranium gas through piping at enrichment facilities.

Reportedly, the Iranian government is enriching uranium gas at both its Fordo and Natanz underground nuclear sites.

In 2015, the Iranian government and various world powers agreed to a nuclear deal that would allow the Iranian leadership to drastically restrict the amount of uranium it could enrich in exchange for lifting economic sanctions.

In 2018, former President Donald Trump unilaterally withdrew the U.S. from the arrangement, subsequently raising tensions in various parts of the Middle East.

In the time since Trump’s withdrawal from the arrangement, Iran has broken every limit imposed on it by the 2015 deal and now enriches uranium at a 60% purity — weapons-grade enrichment is 90%. Despite the Iranian government’s disregard for the restrictions placed upon it, the IAEA has been allowed to continually visit the country’s enrichment facilities.

The Vienna-based IAEA did not immediately acknowledge the Iranian regime’s disabling of the surveillance cameras.

This past February, a senior official in the U.S. State Department said that Iran was “weeks, not months” away from being able to power an atomic.

The statement came after a series of indirect discussions with Iran and other world powers in Vienna.

After over a year of negotiations, the State Department confirmed that diplomatic talks with Iran and other nations about the future of the country’s nuclear capabilities would come to an end whether Iran accepts the deal offered to it by U.S. officials or not.

At the time, the Biden administration believed that Iran’s nuclear program had become so advanced that there would be no benefit to proposing a return to the 2015 arrangement that restricted Iran’s nuclear enrichment capabilities while gradually lifting economic sanctions on the country.