Nicolle Wallace Is Blatantly Lying About Democrats’ Assassination Prep
Wallace's claim that no Democrat has ever suggested Trump is Hitler is demonstrably false.Wallace's claim that no Democrat has ever suggested Trump is Hitler is demonstrably false.Jeff Daniels performs cringey anti-Trump song on MSNBC after AI meme outrage
Actor Jeff Daniels, angered by Trump’s AI video response to the No Kings protests — which featured a left-wing activist being covered in feces that dropped from the sky — took out his frustration in a song he performed live on MSNBC’s “Deadline: White House” this week.
Daniels’ song is titled “Crazy World,” and he explained that it is how he copes with the current political situation.
“I’ve seen a young girl smiling at something he just said. / I watched him fall into her pretty green eyes, his cheeks turned Valentine red. / I’ve seen an old man walking with his wife by his side. / I watched him reach down, take her hand, damned if I didn’t cry,” Daniels sang as he played his guitar.
“This crazy world’s gone crazy. Who am I to judge? / It’s nice to know in a world full of hate, there's someone out there still making love,” he continued.
Before taking the stage, Daniels lamented the lack of “decency” from President Trump for the AI meme he posted where he was “spewing excrement all over the people down below.”
"Would Lincoln have done that?" Daniels asked host Nicolle Wallace.
"I don’t think Nixon would have done that," Wallace answered.
"Nixon wouldn’t have done it. Reagan wouldn’t have done it. Bush wouldn’t have done it — either Bush. I think people in the Midwest, where I am ... we value our decency and our civility," Daniels said.
BlazeTV host Pat Gray notes that former presidents like Nixon, Reagan, Bush, or Lincoln couldn’t have done what President Trump did, as artificial intelligence did not exist in their time.
“This is the ‘Dumb and Dumber’ actor who sat on a toilet and took a loud crap for two minutes. But he can’t take the potty humor of President Trump,” executive producer Keith Malinak adds.
Want more from Pat Gray?
To enjoy more of Pat's biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
Martin Sheen calls Trump the 'biggest nothing in the world' and tells him to 'start being human'
Actor Martin Sheen vehemently criticized President Donald Trump in an unhinged screed during a live taping of "The Best People" podcast with Nicolle Wallace.
The far-left actor also bashed the president's Cabinet before he said he wanted to give Trump some advice, and instead launched into his tirade.
'There's no heroes in there. There's no music. There's no laughter.'
"The big guy in the White House, if he would take some personal advice — you got to realize, sir, that you are the biggest nothing in the world. And sir, you stop there. You stop listening to all these people around you, these sycophants, who are encouraging you to be your nonhuman self," he said.
"Stop fussing with your hair, and don't worry about your tie. And stand up straight and speak clearly, not from your throat. Speak from your heart and start being human," he continued. "That's what you were made for, not golf. So there you are, Mr. President. With all due respect, sir."
He said he could imagine a meeting of Trump's cabinet members to have the smell of "ego and fear and false worship."
Sheen added, "There's no heroes in there. There's no music. There's no laughter. There's no self-effacement. There's no joy in that room."
The actor not only endorsed Kamala Harris in the 2024 election, but he turned up at a pro-Harris campaign event to sing "America the Beautiful" for the cameras.
He was also among those arrested at a climate change protest organized by Jane Fonda on Capitol Hill in 2020.
"We are called to find something in our lives worth fighting for, something that unites the will of the spirit with the work of the flesh," he said in his speech, "something that can help us lift up this nation and all its people to that place where the heart is without fear."
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
MSNBC's Nicolle Wallace holds fast to J6 'insurrection' smear — but won't tolerate term's application to LA riots
MSNBC talking head Nicolle Wallace performed, with the aid of a former Jan. 6 committee member, yet another mental gymnastics routine on Monday, framing as ludicrous the suggestion that the targeted violence against federal agents in Los Angeles over the weekend amounted to an insurrection while insisting that the Jan. 6, 2021, riot in Washington, D.C., still qualified.
By way of their acrobatics, Wallace and former Virginia Rep. Denver Riggleman accomplished little more than reveal "insurrection" to be a term used by liberals to differentiate riots on the left from riots on the right.
"Insurrection" is not explicitly defined by federal law. It is, however, prohibited and generally understood to be an organized and violent act of revolt against an established government or civil authority. Although a riot is similarly characterized by violence, it alternatively tends to be more spontaneous and localized.
Elements of the Washington establishment and the liberal media spent years hyperventilating about how the riot at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 — not the deadly 2020 Black Lives Matter riots that resulted in billions of dollars in damage, thousands of businesses ruined, and 2,037 police officers assaulted or injured — was somehow an insurrection.
This suggestion was used to great political effect.
For instance, its acceptance enabled the Democrat-appointed justices on Colorado's Supreme Court to rule in 2023 that Coloradans couldn't vote for then-candidate Donald Trump for president — a decision later echoed by a Democratic judge in Illinois but ultimately struck down by the Supreme Court.
RELATED: After Trump's decisive action, protests cooling in LA
Some of the same personalities who liberally threw around "insurrection" in recent years, when doing so meant maligning peaceful Trump supporters and the unarmed boneheads who stole into the U.S. Capitol in 2021, are now coming out of the woodwork to insist that the term's use to describe the targeted leftist revolt against governmental forces in California is inaccurate.
As always, MSNBC has been one of their go-to platforms, if not their base of operations.
Hosts, contributors, and staff at MSNBC have used the term "insurrection" without reservation when speaking of Jan. 6. MSNBC legal analyst Joyce Vance dubbed it a "mass insurrection." Former MSNBC talking head Joy Reid routinely referred to the rioters and protesters as "insurrectionists." The team over at "The Rachel Maddow Show" also adopted the term with that specific target.
Wallace continued using it in reference to Jan. 6 on her show Monday but bristled at the mention of White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller referring to the L.A. riots as an insurrection and of both Trump and Vice President JD Vance calling some of the rioters who violently attacked U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents "insurrectionists."
Wallace said that "insurrection" is an important word, not only because of its relevance regarding the invocation of the Insurrection Act but because "anyone older than 4 years old remembers an actual insurrection and the way Trump spent his first day in office the second time, pardoning all the rioters involved in January 6."
'It's about the target and purpose of it.'
Riggleman warned Wallace that the Trump administration is "trying to take the language of January 6."
A similar game was being played over at CNN, where senior reporter Aaron Blake accused Trump of using a "broad definition of 'insurrection.'"
RELATED: A president’s job is to stop the burning if governors won’t
Whereas Wallace focused on reminding her viewers that the L.A. riots didn't satisfy her criteria for insurrection, Blake identified other uses of the term that he regards as problematic, such as Stephen Miller characterizing an Obama judge's recent decision to undermine the executive branch and temporarily prevent the Trump administration from revoking status for over 500,000 illegal aliens as a "legal insurrection against democracy and the American people"; and Miller's suggestion that the radicals who marched on the Supreme Court and illegally mounted a pressure campaign at conservative justices' homes around the time of the high court's Dobbs decision were engaged in "an open insurrection."
"An insurrection isn't about the level of violence," wrote Blake. "It's about the target and purpose of it."
So long as the liberal establishment agrees with radicals' target and purpose, it appears it will refrain from calling organized revolts against governmental targets for a political purpose "insurrections."
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Success of Trump's address makes Democrats' desperate damage control all the more humiliating
Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin of Michigan delivered her party's rebuttal to President Donald Trump's congressional address. Unfortunately for Democrats, Trump's optimistic and inspiring speech eclipsed Slotkin's damage control.
To Slotkin's credit, she pulled out all the stops. She addressed the economy, recent DOGE cuts, tariffs, and foreign policy. Even still, her message was overshadowed by Trump's address, which garnered an overwhelmingly positive reception.
Democrats pouted and protested during Tuesday night's address, even during apolitical and heartwarming moments.
The vast majority of Americans approved of Trump's speech, according to a CBS poll surveying viewers. Nearly 70% of Americans also said they felt hopeful watching the speech, and over half said they felt proud.
Meanwhile, some legacy media omitted covering Slotkin's address altogether, including Politico Playbook and Punchbowl's morning newsletter. This is just further evidence that Trump's speech was another bright spot for Republicans and MAGA supporters across the country, and Democrats felt it.
Democrats REFUSE to stand and clap for a little kid fighting brain cancer: pic.twitter.com/0RdZfqDpTX
— TheBlaze (@theblaze) March 5, 2025
Democrats pouted and protested during Tuesday night's address, even during apolitical and heartwarming moments.
'They refused to clap for the families of Jocelyn Nungaray, Laken Riley, Corey Comperatore, or the capture of the terrorist mastermind behind Abbey Gate.'
In a touching exchange, Trump made DJ Daniel, a 13-year-old boy with cancer, an honorary member of the Secret Service, fulfilling Daniel's lifelong dream of working in law enforcement. Yet in true leftist fashion, Democrats like MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace politicized the moment by bringing up January 6.
“I hope he has a long life as a law enforcement officer, but I hope he never has to defend the United States Capitol against Donald Trump's supporters," Wallace said. “And if he does, I hope he isn't one of the six who loses his life to suicide. And I hope he isn't one who has to testify against the people who carried out acts of seditious conspiracy."
Democrats also refused to celebrate Americans whose lives have been lost over the last four years.
"Democrats couldn’t even stand for the incredible Americans President Trump recognized," Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said. "They refused to clap for the families of Jocelyn Nungaray, Laken Riley, Corey Comperatore, or the capture of the terrorist mastermind behind Abbey Gate. That’s the sad state of Congressional Democrats today."
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Today's top stories
www.theblaze.com