Wisconsin Poll Watcher Warns That Observers Are Being Taught To Be ‘Delicate’ On Election Integrity Issues

“This is the first time I had not heard, ‘Don’t be afraid to assert your rights...,'" a source said about GOP attorney observer training.

Supreme Court deals Biden-Harris DOJ crushing blow regarding noncitizen voter push: 'Victory for election integrity'



The Biden-Harris Department of Justice sued Virginia earlier this month in hopes of killing an initiative aimed at removing thousands of suspected noncitizens from the commonwealth's voter rolls.

The Youngkin administration fought back and won.

Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares noted, "I am pleased to announce that the US Supreme Court granted Virginia's emergency stay to keep noncitizens off our voter rolls."

In a 6-3 ruling Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court temporarily overruled Democrat-appointed 4th Circuit judges and halted a Biden-appointed judge's order, thereby allowing Virginia to resume the work of making sure that only American citizens can vote in next week's election.

Liberal Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented.

The stay means that Virginia — where the latest Quantus Insights poll indicates Kamala Harris and President Donald Trump are virtually tied — will not have to put over 1,500 suspected noncitizens back onto its voter rolls before Election Day.

'Kamala's Administration sued Virginia and is now arguing to the US Supreme Court that non-citizens must remain on the voter rolls.'

Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin said in a statement, "We are pleased by the Supreme Court's order today. This is a victory for commonsense and election fairness. I am grateful for the work of Attorney General Jason Miyares on this critical fight to protect the fundamental rights of U.S. citizens."

"Clean voter rolls are one important part of a comprehensive approach we are taking to ensure the fairness of our elections," continued Youngkin. "Virginians can cast their ballots on Election Day knowing that Virginia's elections are fair, secure, and free from politically motivated interference."

Dozens of red states backed Virginia's defense along with the Republican National Committee.

Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill tweeted, "Huge victory for election integrity! SCOTUS grants Virginia's emergency stay to keep noncitizens off its voter roles. Proud to have joined my fellow AGs in support of the American people and our most sacred right."

Murrill was among the 27 state attorneys general who filed an amicus brief asking the high court to allow Virginia to resume the work of ensuring the integrity of the election.

The amicus brief noted, "Non-citizens are not eligible voters. They were not eligible voters before Congress passed the National Voter Registration Act, they were not eligible when Congress passed the NVRA, and they are not eligible today."

Ahead of the ruling, RNC chairman Michael Whatley stated, "With only one week to our country's most important election, Democrats are now taking extraordinary measures to keep non-citizens on voter rolls. Kamala's Administration sued Virginia and is now arguing to the U.S. Supreme Court that non-citizens must remain on the voter rolls."

Blaze News previously reported that the DOJ sued the state over Youngkin's Aug. 7 executive order, which requires both the commissioner of the Virginia Department of Elections to routinely update voter lists to remove individuals identified as noncitizens and that the state Department of Motor Vehicles must expedite the interagency data-sharing with the DOE with regard to noncitizen transactions.

According to the DOJ, the election integrity initiative violated Section 8(c)(2) of the National Voter Registration Act, which requires states to complete programs intended to systematically remove the names of ineligible voters from registration lists by no later than 90 days prior to a primary election or general election for federal office.

Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia agreed with the DOJ, claiming the removals of suspected noncitizens amounted to a "clear violation" of the NVRA. Giles ordered Virginia to reinstate those individuals whose registrations were canceled under the program, including suspected noncitizens.

Virginia asked the 4th Circuit to put a hold on Giles' order, but two Obama-appointed judges and another Biden appointee denied their request Sunday, prompting the state to file for an emergency stay of the injunction hours later.

The commonwealth's emergency application stated that the injunction sought by the Biden-Harris DOJ will "irreparably injure Virginia's sovereignty, confuse her voters, overload her election machinery and administrators, and likely lead noncitizens to think they are permitted to vote, a criminal offense that will cancel the franchise of eligible voters."

According to Virginia, the program did not violate the NVRA as it was an individualized removal process. Further, the state stressed that Giles' injunction was based on a provision of the NVRA that "does not even apply to the removal of noncitizens and other voter registrations that are void ab initio."

The state told the high court that of the over 1,600 suspected noncitizens whom Giles ordered back onto the voter rolls:

About 600 of these individuals personally informed Virginia's Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) that they are not citizens, and about 1,000 presented noncitizen residency documents to DMV and were then positively identified as noncitizens through the United States' own Systematic Alerian Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) database.

The Supreme Court did not indicate which of the state's arguments ultimately prompted its decision.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Virginia punches back after Biden-Harris DOJ sues to halt purge of noncitizens from voter rolls



The Biden-Harris Department of Justice is working frantically to challenge state efforts to remove noncitizens from voter rolls in two states ahead of the election.

Just weeks after the DOJ sued Alabama and its top election official over the state's efforts to ensure that only American citizens would get to determine the fate of the state and country, the DOJ filed a lawsuit on Oct. 11 against the Commonwealth of Virginia, the Virginia State Board of Elections, and Virginia Commissioner of Elections, claiming the noncitizen voter purge was too close to Election Day.

Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin characterized the lawsuit as "politically motivated" election interference, and his lawyer, former Virginia Attorney General Richard Cullen, maintains that Virginia's efforts are entirely lawful.

Of apparent concern to the Biden-Harris DOJ is Section 8(c)(2) of the National Voter Registration Act — the Quiet Period Provision — which requires states to complete programs intended to systematically remove the names of ineligible voters from registration lists by no later than 90 days prior to a primary election or general election for federal office. It does not, however, preclude correction of a registrant's information.

The DOJ's contention is that the removal of likely noncitizens from voter rolls before the election not only violates this provision but is problematic because the removals "may be error-ridden, cause voter confusion and remove eligible voters days or weeks before Election Day who may be unable to correct the State's errors in time to vote or may be dissuaded from voting at all."

Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R) issued an executive order on Aug. 7, exactly 90 days before the general election, requiring both that the commissioner of the Virginia Department of Elections regularly update voter lists to remove individuals identified as noncitizens and that the state Department of Motor Vehicles expedite the interagency data sharing with the DOE with regards to noncitizen transactions.

Youngkin further indicated that 6,303 noncitizens who had "accidentally or maliciously attempted to register" to vote had been scrubbed from the voter rolls between January 2022 and July 2024.

"Call me crazy, but I think American elections should be decided by American citizens and Virginia elections should be decided by Virginians," Youngkin said in an interview. "That's why this executive order is so important because it does make sure that we have clean voter rolls."

Trump lauded the initiative, noting in a Truth Social post that the Virginia governor is "TAKING A STRONG LEAD IN SECURING THE ELECTION IN NOVEMBER — PROTECTING EVERY LEGAL VOTE AND KEEPING ILLEGAL ALIENS THAT HAVE BEEN LET INTO OUR COUNTRY FROM VOTING."

"EVERY STATE SHOULD FOLLOW VIRGINIA'S LEAD," added Trump.

Youngkin's EO tasked elections officials with checking the list of individuals flagged as noncitizens by the DMV with the list of existing registered voters. Voters identified as noncitizens are those who chose "No" in response to questions about their American citizenship on forms submitted to the DMV.

Local registrars were, in turn, tasked with notifying those whose names overlapped the two lists that they had two weeks to affirm their citizenship or face cancellation.

The DOJ alleges that this process was carried out into the quiet period, in violation of the NVRA — citing Commissioner Susan Beals' Sept. 19 confirmation that removals were ongoing — and has also resulted in American citizens having their voter registrations canceled.

'Virginians — and Americans — will see this for exactly what it is: a desperate attempt to attack the legitimacy of the elections in the Commonwealth.'

The DOJ is demanding not only the restoration of the "ability of impacted eligible voters to vote unimpeded on Election Day" but that Virginia halt its program removing noncitizens from voter rolls.

Virginia is not taking the DOJ's intervention lying down.

"With less than 30 days until the election, the Biden-Harris Department of Justice is filing an unprecedented lawsuit against me and the Commonwealth of Virginia, for appropriately enforcing a 2006 law signed by Democrat Tim Kaine that requires Virginia to remove noncitizens from the voter rolls — a process that starts with someone declaring themselves a non-citizen and then registering to vote," Youngkin said in an Oct. 11 statement.

"Virginians — and Americans — will see this for exactly what it is: a desperate attempt to attack the legitimacy of the elections in the Commonwealth, the very crucible of American Democracy," continued Youngkin. "With the support of our Attorney General, we will defend these commonsense steps, that we are legally required to take, with every resource available to us. Virginia's election will be secure and fair, and I will not stand idly by as this politically motivated action tries to interfere in our elections, period."

Youngkin's lawyer, Richard Cullen, outlined the state's likely defense in a memo obtained by WRIC-TV, stressing that Virginia's program does not violate federal law because it is not a systematic program but rather an individualized process that begins with "individuals themselves indicating that they are a noncitizen during a DMV transaction."

University of Richmond Law Professor Henry Chambers told WRIC, "You can have narrowly tailored specified reasons for knocking folks off the list, that essentially the argument that is being made in the memo."

Cullen's memo noted further that the state affords impacted voters ample notice and time to demonstrate their eligibility and citizenship prior to cancellation.

The Virginia Mercury reported that state Sen. Bill Stanley (R) has indicated the Biden-Harris DOJ is trying to make something out of nothing.

"There are failsafe measures to this," said Stanley. "Even if they are subsequently removed from the rolls, let's say, in error, those persons can still register to vote on Election Day under our 'same day' registration law. So I fail to see why the federal government is doing this but for no other reason but to try to upset our otherwise sound voter registration process here in Virginia for political purposes."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Don't say 'aliens': Biden admin instructs officials to use 'inclusive language' to describe people in the country illegally



The Biden administration has instructed Department of Homeland Security officials to use more "inclusive language" to describe people residing in the country illegally, such as dropping the word "alien" and replacing it with "noncitizen," according to a memo recently issued by immigration authorities.

What are the details?

The changes are reportedly part of an effort by the Biden administration to portray itself as more welcoming on immigration than the previous administration under President Trump, which would use terms such as "illegal aliens" to describe people who bypassed U.S. laws and security perimeters to enter and remain in the country.

According to Axios, an email sent Tuesday to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services officials described how the agency's acting director, Tracy Renaud, had signed a memo encouraging "more inclusive language in the agency's outreach efforts, internal documents and in overall communication with stakeholders, partners and the general public."

The memo, obtained by BuzzFeed News, instructed officials to stop referring to people as "illegal alien," "alien," or "undocumented alien" in internal and external communications, but instead use the terms "noncitizen," "undocumented noncitizen," or "undocumented individual."

It also urged USCIS officials to discontinue their use of the term "assimilation" in exchange for "integration" and begin referring to those who apply for benefits like green cards as "customers," BuzzFeed reported. USCIS is a subsidiary agency which operates within the DHS.

What else?

Interestingly, besides planned use in the agency's internal communications and any communications it has with the public, the wording changes are not set to affect forms or operational documents where using the previous terminology is deemed most appropriate.That fact indicates the changes are nothing more than a messaging makeover.

Though, by continuing to soften language associated with illegal immigration, the administration undoubtedly hopes to move public opinion on the matter toward greater acceptance of illegal entry and favor for open borders.

The words being replaced in the agency's messaging are in fact the most accurate technical terms to describe issues at hand. Even BuzzFeed acknowledges that the term "alien" is routinely found within U.S. Code and is "regularly referenced in the immigration system and in court rulings to describe everyone who is not a US citizen."

Speaking with Axios, Robert Law, a former Trump administration official who now works at the Center for Immigration Studies, noted, "By statute, 'alien' literally means a person not a U.S. citizen or national."

"That is not offensive, and neither is 'assimilation,'" he said.