Cheapskate Canada 'threatens' NORAD? Trump dangles 51st-state solution



Canada could soon be booted from NORAD, the binational aerospace defense system it has shared with the U.S. since 1958.

The reason? Once again backing away from its commitment to replace its decrepit F-18s with the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, the jet that is used by the U.S. Air Force, U.S. Navy, and Marines.

Canada has a long history of ... putting off the acquisition of military aircraft until they are nearing obsolescence when finally delivered.

Canada needs to buy the F-35 to be compatible with the U.S., as well as with the other principal allies that Canada also flies with: the U.K. and Australia.

East Alaska?

But President Donald Trump hinted at a way his penny-pinching neighbors to the north could get around the costly upgrade: Join the U.S. as its 51st state.

Who needs NORAD when you can enjoy the benefits of Trump's ambitious Golden Dome missile defense shield — free of charge?

“I told Canada, which very much wants to be part of our fabulous Golden Dome System, that it will cost $61 Billion Dollars if they remain a separate, but unequal, Nation, but will cost ZERO DOLLARS if they become our cherished 51st State,” Trump posted on Truth Social Tuesday.

“They are considering the offer!” the president couldn't resist adding.

Straight man

Canada was quick to play the straight man to Trump's trolling.

A spokesperson for Liberal Prime Minister Mark Carney said: “The prime minister has been clear at every opportunity, including in his conversations with president Trump, that Canada is an independent, sovereign nation, and it will remain one,” according to the Financial Times.

Carney ordered a review of the F-35 purchase in March, insisting that Canada could be better served with fighter jets produced by Sweden, France, or the U.K. Although Britain remains a primary military partner, Canada does virtually no military training or operations with Sweden or France.

That suggestion has prompted U.S. Ambassador to Canada Pete Hoekstra to note that any cancellation of the F-35 contract would have serious consequences for Canada — including threatening NORAD, over which the two countries have maintained joint command of operations for almost 60 years.

Plane speaking

“I think that's worked pretty well for the U.S., and it's worked well for Canada. It's, I think, one of the only, if not the only, bilateral military relationship in the world. So I think it would, but, I mean, there's criteria, OK, and some of those criteria are being questioned right now,” Hoekstra told CTV News.

Hoekstra continued:

One of the criteria for NORAD is interchangeability and interoperability. So that would mean that, you know, we're flying the same kinds of planes, we're using the parts, and, you know, it's all interchangeable. It's one system. You know, Canada is challenging that; they've made a decision to buy F-35s; that's now up for review. If Canadians are flying one airplane, we're flying another airplane, it's no longer interchangeable. And so that might even threaten NORAD, without talking about new alliances that promise even more security and safety to our people.

It’s not clear whether Hoekstra’s comments were designed for Trump to open the door on Golden Dome negotiations, but he has nonetheless exposed one of the more absurd and potentially tragic exercises in Canadian military procurement.

Jet set

Canada has a long history of either sabotaging its own aerospace industry — as with the cancellation of the famed Avro Arrow in 1958 — or by putting off the acquisition of military aircraft until they are nearing obsolescence when finally delivered.

The F-35 is another case in point. Canada has dithered so long on its decision to buy or not to buy that sixth-generation fighter jet technology is now on the horizon.

Incredibly, the government of Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien first signed on to the F-35 program in 2002. Even though that was almost 25 years ago, Canada has managed through successive governments never to see the delivery of one aircraft.

Chretien refused to make a decision on the F-35, as did his successor, Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper, who toyed with Canada’s air force for nine years over the deal. Meanwhile, the military continued to fly the F-18/A, as it had since 1982.

Today, those jets are over 45 years old.

Justin Trudeau campaigned in 2015 on a pledge never to buy the F-35, but after eight years of reviewing other aircraft, he flip-flopped on that promise in January 2023 and agreed to buy 88 of the jets at a cost of $85 million (USD) each.

Hoekstra's comments sent a clear message: fish or cut bait. Enough with using military spending as a political poker chip; upgrade to the F-35 or leave NORAD.

In response, Carney offered more dithering.

"The review of the F-35 contract is ongoing," he said at a news conference last week. "There's many factors that come into that interoperability that would relate to the NORAD element. There’s value for money, broader Canadian industrial impacts. All of those are factors that are under consideration."

2 airplanes venture too close to Trump, Mar-a-Lago for defense agency's comfort



Two aircraft flew too close to President Donald Trump's Florida estate over the weekend, prompting a stern warning from the North American Aerospace Defense Command.

On Friday, Trump left the White House to spend the weekend at Mar-a-Lago in West Palm Beach, Florida, the fifth time he has done so since his second term began in late January. Trump's presence then automatically triggered a temporary flight restriction for the area near Mar-a-Lago, but at least two pilots apparently didn't get the memo.

'Adherence to TFR procedures is essential to ensure flight safety, national security, and the security of the president.'

At approximately 8:50 a.m. on Saturday, one aircraft entered the restricted space. Then a second airplane — described as "a civilian aircraft" — violated the TFR barely 24 hours later, at 1:15 p.m. on Sunday, NORAD said in a statement.

In both instances, an F-16 fighter jet from the Continental U.S. NORAD Region was forced to intervene, and according to NORAD, the second aircraft "was safely escorted out of the area."

During these incidents, flares were also used "to draw attention from or communicate with the pilot," NORAD said. These flares, though highly visible, "burn out quickly and completely" and therefore posed "no danger to people on the ground."

Gen. Gregory Guillot, commander of NORAD and the U.S. Northern Command, expressed frustration about the apparent security breaches.

"Adherence to TFR procedures is essential to ensure flight safety, national security, and the security of the president," Guillot said in a statement. "The procedures are not optional."

According to NORAD, fully 20 aircraft have violated TFRs near Mar-a-Lago just since Trump took office a few weeks ago. Guillot placed the blame on pilots, claiming they are not doing their duty and keeping apprised of all notices to airmen, often referred to as NOTAMs, posted for the area, "as required by the FAA."

"Pilots, please check NOTAMs!" NORAD pleaded on X.

— (@)

The news of the apparent TFR violations near Mar-a-Lago comes on the heels of reports of an armed gunman shot by Secret Service agents near the White House early Sunday morning, when Trump was still in Florida. The suspect has been described as emotionally disturbed and possibly "suicidal."

Founded in 1958, NORAD is joint agency between the United States and Canada "charged with the missions of aerospace warning and aerospace control for North America," according to its website. The NORAD leadership team comprises high-ranking members of the U.S. and Royal Canadian Air Forces.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Balloon intercepted above Utah not a national security threat, NORAD reportedly says



A balloon that was intercepted above Utah does not pose a national security threat, the North American Aerospace Defense Command indicated, according to Fox News Digital.

"In close coordination with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) detected a small balloon at an altitude varying between 43,000-45,000 ft," NORAD indicated, according to the outlet. "The balloon was intercepted by NORAD fighters over Utah, who determined it was not maneuverable and did not present a threat to national security. NORAD will continue to track and monitor the balloon. The FAA also determined the balloon posed no hazard to flight safety. NORAD remains in close coordination with the FAA to ensure flight safety."

CBS News reported that a U.S. official told the outlet that it was anticipated that the balloon would be above Georgia by Friday night.

"Shoot it down. Protect our country," tweeted South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem, a Republican.

"Shoot down the Spy balloon immediately!!!" GOP Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia tweeted.

Last year, President Joe Biden came under heavy scrutiny for allowing a Chinese balloon to remain aloft in U.S. skies before finally moving to down it off the coast of South Carolina.

"Last year, the CCP sent a spy balloon to fly over Montana skies, and we still have yet to uncover the whole story. One year later, another unknown balloon is flying over American territory, and we know NOTHING," GOP Rep. Matt Rosendale of Montana tweeted.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Did Biden authorize fighter jets to use $400,000 missiles to shoot down hobby club's balloon?



It appears that one of the objects President Joe Biden authorized fighter jets to shoot down last week may have been nothing more than a hobby club's balloon.

While the government has not confirmed what pilots downed over the Yukon in northern Canada, the Northern Illinois Bottlecap Balloon Brigade said one of its balloons is "missing in action." That balloon was last seen off the coast of Alaska last Saturday morning.

The trajectory of the balloon's flight tracks with the object that a U.S. Air Force F-22 shot down on Saturday using a AIM-9X Sidewinder missile. Each missile costs more than $400,000.

\u201cAs @BalloonSciDan pointed correctly a few days ago the USAF may have shot down an amateur radio pico balloon (callsign K9YO-15) over Canada. \n\nhttps://t.co/IHzB5ffW96\u201d
— StratoCat (@StratoCat) 1676569396

More from Aviation Week:

But the circumstantial evidence is at least intriguing. The club’s silver-coated, party-style, “pico balloon” reported its last position on Feb. 10 at 38,910 ft. off the west coast of Alaska, and a popular forecasting tool—the HYSPLIT model provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)—projected the cylindrically shaped object would be floating high over the central part of the Yukon Territory on Feb. 11.

In fact, according to Aviation Week, "descriptions of all three unidentified objects shot down Feb. 10-12 match the shapes, altitudes and payloads of the small pico balloons."

President Joe Biden confirmed that intelligence officials believe the unidentified flying objects were balloons.

"The intelligence community’s current assessment is that these three objects were most likely balloons tied to private companies, recreation, or research institutions studying weather or conducting other scientific research," Biden said on Thursday.

The North American Aerospace Defense Command, meanwhile, disclosed that the FBI has spoken to the Illinois hobbyist club whose balloon was likely targeted.

"I have no information for you from NORAD on the objects," said NORAD spokesperson Air Force Col. Elizabeth Mathias. "I understand FBI spoke with that hobby group, and I expect the [National Security Council] task force to have more on the potential identification of the objects."

A top Canadian general has also said the downed object is a "suspected balloon." Recovery of its debris has been hampered by its remote crash location.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Defense Department officials: 'aliens' not ruled out as source behind flying objects shot down over US



Department of Defense officials declined to rule out the possibility that objects recently shot down over the United States could have extraterrestrial origins.

"I haven't ruled anything out," General Glen VanHerck said in an off-camera briefing after an F-16 fighter jet shot down an unidentified flying object over Lake Huron on Sunday — the third such object shot down in as many days.

Gen. VanHerck was responding to a question posed by Helene Cooper, a Pentagon correspondent with the New York Times.

"Have you ruled out aliens or extraterrestrials? And if so, why? Because that is what everyone is asking us right now," Cooper asked.

"I'll let the intel community and the counterintelligence community figure that out," the general answered. m"At this point, we continue to assess every threat or potential threats unknown that approaches North America with an attempt to identify it."

Melissa Dalton, assistant secretary of defense for Homeland Defense and Hemispheric Affairs, began the briefing by assuring listeners that U.S. officials "aim to be transparent about our military operations."

"Because we have not yet been able to definitively assess what these recent objects are, we have acted out of an abundance of caution to protect our security and interests," she said.

Dalton explained that since the military took down a Chinese balloon off the coast of South Carolina on February 4, officials had been "more closely scrutinizing our air space at these altitudes, including enhancing our radar."

She added that this radar enhancement and ramped-up scrutiny could partially explain the increase in objects detected over the past several days.

U.S. fighter jets took down the most recent object over Lake Huron on the day of the Department of Defense briefing, Super Bowl Sunday. Jets also successfully used missiles to shoot down unidentified flying objects over Alaska and Canada on Friday and Saturday, respectively.

The Federal Aviation Administration issued a temporary flight restriction Saturday at 3:20 local time over Harve, Montana, only to lift the TFR about an hour later.

Initially chalked up to a "radar anomaly," the object spotted over Montana on Saturday is reportedly the same object a U.S. F-16 shot down over Lake Huron on Sunday.

Multiple Montana and Michigan elected officials thanked the service members who acted to protect our homeland, while also emphasizing their commitment to seeking answers.

One congressman, Rep. Matt Rosendale (R-Mont.), shared more pointed comments. Rosendale suggested Biden administration officials can't be expected to "know the difference between a spy balloon and a cloud" since they "can't tell the difference between a man and a woman."

\u201cIf the Biden administration can\u2019t tell the difference between a man and a woman, how can we expect them to know the difference between a spy balloon, and a cloud?\u201d
— Matt Rosendale (@Matt Rosendale) 1676226969

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Top military commander confirms key detail that Pentagon official omitted to incite criticism against Trump



A top military commander admitted Monday there had been a "domain awareness gap" during the Trump administration, allowing three Chinese spy balloons to gather intelligence on the U.S. undetected.

"Every day as a NORAD commander, it's my responsibility to detect threats to North America. I will tell you that we did not detect those threats," said Gen. Glen VanHerck, commander of U.S. Northern Command and North American Aerospace Defense Command.

"And that's a domain awareness gap that we have to figure out, but I don’t want to go into further detail," he added.

What is the background?

The shocking disclosure comes after an unnamed senior defense official claimed on Saturday that three Chinese "government surveillance balloons transited the continental United States briefly" under former President Donald Trump's watch.

Democrats immediately used the allegation to defend President Joe Biden from criticism stemming from his response to the spy balloon recently seen in American air space and subsequently criticize Trump.

But a score of senior Trump administration officials, those who led the national security apparatus, quickly pushed back on the allegation and publicly disputed it. None of them had recollection of any such event occurring under Trump.

Gen. VanHerck confirmed what the Wall Street Journal and Fox News reported earlier — that Chinese spy balloons did cross over the U.S., but they somehow went undetected.

Unfortunately, it's not clear exactly who told the media about the Chinese spy balloon incursions under Trump only to mislead reporters by conveniently omitting the fact that the incursions were not discovered until after Trump left office. The Washington Free Beacon noted the identity of the "senior defense official" could help inform the public "whether the Pentagon is also helping Biden combat the public relations crisis over the balloon."

The Pentagon, however, refused to identify the "senior defense official" because Saturday's media briefing was conducted on "background" and thus was not officially on the record.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Canada buying 88 American F-35 stealth fighters amid rising tensions with China and Russia



Canada has finalized a deal to purchase 88 F-35 stealth fighter jets from the United States, despite a 2015 campaign promise by then-Liberal candidate Justin Trudeau to scrap the Conservatives' F-35 fighter jet program.

This deal makes America's NORAD partner and NATO ally the last of the F-35 program's original eight partners to embrace the fifth-generation fighter, reported CNN. Canada previously invested over $600 million into the aircraft's development as part of the program.

What are the details?

The Canadian government announced on Monday that it would be procuring 88 F-35 fighter jets through an agreement with the U.S. government, Lockheed Martin, and American aerospace manufacturer Pratt & Whitney.

According to the National Post, the mandatory delivery criteria agreed upon by Lockheed Martin stipulates "the 9th fully mission capable future fighter platform will be delivered no earlier than 1 December 2025 and no later than 1 December 2027."

The deal is valued at roughly $14.2 billion USD or $19 billion CAD, constituting the Canada's largest investment in its air force in thirty years. Canadian defense firms have reportedly earned over $1.4 billion in contracts to build F-35 parts.

CTV News noted that the cost of purchasing and operating the jets over the course of the aircraft's projected 40-year lifespan may run Canadian taxpayers around $52 billion.

The first four jets are expected to be delivered in 2026, followed by an additional six in 2027, six more in 2028, and the remainder by 2032, thereby phasing out the Royal Canadian Air Force's McDonnell Douglas CF-18 Hornet aircraft.

"The F-35 is a modern, reliable, and agile fighter aircraft used by our closest allies in missions across the globe. It is the most advanced fighter on the market, and it is the right aircraft for Canada," the National Defence Department said in a statement.

The RCAF indicated that this acquisition is a "positive step forward" that will enable it to "enforce Canada's sovereignty as outlined in Canada's Defence Policy and meet Canada's NORAD and NATO commitments for decades to come."

\u201cJust announced today: the F-35 will be Canada\u2019s future fighter aircraft! This positive step forward will allow us to enforce Canada\u2019s sovereignty as outlined in Canada\u2019s Defence Policy and meet Canada\u2019s NORAD and NATO commitments for decades to come.\u201d
— Royal Canadian Air Force (@Royal Canadian Air Force) 1673294292

Canada, like other American allies, has been growing increasingly wary about the threat of Chinese aggression, extra to the reality of Russian hostility.

Canada's Defence Minister Anita Anand provided geopolitical context for the purchase, writing, "As our world grows darker, with Russia’s illegal and unjustifiable attack on Ukraine, and China’s increasingly assertive behavior in the Indo-Pacific, this project has taken on heightened significance – especially given the importance of interoperability with our allies."

According to the U.S. State Department, American defense arrangements with Canada are more extensive than with any other country. Additionally, U.S. and Canadian military forces cooperate on continental defense within the framework of NORAD, the world's only binational military command.

In part due to this interoperability, Canada's aging air force and waning military capabilities have been cause for American concern in recent years. Former President Donald Trump called Canada "slightly delinquent" in 2019 for failing to live up to NATO's target for spending on defense.

The Toronto Star reported that former President Barack Obama similarly made an issue of Canadian's defense capabilities.

In 2021, the U.S. ambassador to Canada, David Cohen, underscored the need for "Canada's policies [to] reflect its words in terms of the treatment of China," adding that the northern nation and the U.S. had to improve their collaboration in taking on "the existential threat that is China."

Canada, which was not brought into AUKUS, a defense alliance composed of the U.S., the U.K., and Australia, may also have been spurred by President Joe Biden's suggestion to former Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison that the "United States has no closer or more reliable ally than Australia — our nations have been together for a long time."

Although it is unclear whether Canada will eventually join AUKUS, which Trudeau claimed was about nuclear submarines, the acquisition of the new F-35s will enable the Canadian military to more seamlessly operate alongside its allies, reported CTV News.

The purchase of the F-35s represents a significant about-face for Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who criticized the previous Conservative government for considering the acquisition back when the Canadian-U.S. exchange rate was far more favorable.

\u201cTrudeau then: The F-35 is too expensive and Stephen Harper is bad for wasting Canadians' money on this.\n\nTrudeau now: The F-35 is great, this is our new jet fighter of the future.\u201d
— Rebel News (@Rebel News) 1673288497

Trudeau castigated the Conservatives for "cling[ing] to an aircraft [the F-35] that does not work and is far from working."

He told reporters in 2015, "The Conservative government never actually justified or explained why they felt Canada needed a fifth-generation fighter. They just talked about it like it was obvious. It was obvious, as we saw through the entire process, that they were particularly, and some might say unreasonably or unhealthily, attached to the F-35 aircraft."

Conservative defense critic James Bezan said with regards to Trudeau's change of heart, "This is a situation where he originally said he would never buy the F-35 and did everything in his power to stop it from actually happening, but at the end of the day, this is the only modern fighter jet that can deliver the capabilities Canada so desperately needs."

"And so here we are today, where Justin Trudeau has to eat crow and do what's right for Canada, do what's right for the Royal Canadian Air Force, and do it right for our NORAD and NATO allies," added Bezan.