Here’s The Faint Silver Lining To SCOTUS’s Anti-Speech Rulings On Tech Censorship
Free speech online can still be saved, but Congress must act quickly.Free speech online can still be saved, but Congress must act quickly.5 Major Takeaways From Supreme Court Vindication Of NRA’s Speech Rights
The court’s analysis proves significant because currently pending before the Supreme Court is another important First Amendment case: Murthy v. Missouri.SCOTUS: New York Gun Grabbers Trampled First Amendment To Stifle National Rifle Association
'A government official cannot coerce a private party to punish or suppress disfavored speech,' the court stated in a unanimous opinion.Why Won’t Democrats Do What It Takes To Protect Kids From School Shooters?
Because it entails arming teachers, and Democrats hate that.Newsweek Dusts Off Long-Debunked Conspiracy Theory To Smear Tom Massie
Find a new story.Longtime NRA leader Wayne LaPierre announces resignation
Wayne LaPierre, who has been a fixture at the National Rifle Association for decades, will resign. He cited health reasons as the impetus for the move, according the organization.
"The National Rifle Association of America (NRA) announced today that Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre announced he is stepping down from his position as chief executive of the organization, effective January 31. Long-time NRA executive and Head of General Operations Andrew Arulanandam will become the interim CEO & EVP of the NRA," the group noted.
"With pride in all that we have accomplished, I am announcing my resignation from the NRA," LaPierre said, according to the organization. "I've been a card-carrying member of this organization for most of my adult life, and I will never stop supporting the NRA and its fight to defend Second Amendment freedom. My passion for our cause burns as deeply as ever."
The resignation announcement comes shortly before a civil trial is slated to begin regarding a lawsuit lodged by New York Attorney General Letitia James against the NRA, LaPierre, and others, alleging that NRA funds were misused for personal benefits.
"LaPierre's resignation validates our claims against him, but it will not insulate him or the NRA from accountability. All charities in New York state must adhere to the rule of law, and my office will not tolerate gross mismanagement or top executives funneling millions into their own pockets. Our case will move ahead, and we look forward to proving the facts in court," James said in a statement.
"With respect to the NYAG's allegations, the NRA Board of Directors reports it has undertaken significant efforts to perform a self-evaluation, recommended termination of disgraced 'insiders' and vendors who allegedly abused the Association, and accepted reimbursement, with interest, for alleged excess benefit transactions from LaPierre, as reported in public tax filings," the NRA said in its announcement about LaPierre's resignation.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
ACLU stands by decision to represent NRA for critical First Amendment case at Supreme Court
The American Civil Liberties Union is defending its commitment to represent the National Rifle Association in an upcoming Supreme Court case.
What is the case?
Last month, the Supreme Court agreed to decide whether Maria Vullo, the former superintendent of the New York State Department of Financial Services, violated the First Amendment by encouraging banks and insurance companies to reconsider whether they should conduct business with the NRA after the 2018 mass killing in Parkland, Florida.
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously ruled against the NRA last year, prompting the gun-rights organization to appeal to the Supreme Court.
In its petition, the NRA argued that the appeals court decision gives "state officials free rein to financially blacklist their political opponents — from gun-rights groups to abortion-rights groups to environmentalist groups and beyond."
Why is the ACLU defending the NRA?
On Saturday, the ACLU announced that its lawyers would defend the NRA when the Supreme Court hears the case sometime next year.
"The government can’t blacklist an advocacy group because of its viewpoint," the ACLU said in a statement. "We don’t support the NRA's mission or its viewpoints on gun rights, and we don’t agree with their goals, strategies, or tactics. But we both know that government officials can't punish organizations because they disapprove of their views."
"If the Supreme Court doesn't intervene, it will create a dangerous playbook for state regulatory agencies across the country to blacklist or punish any viewpoint-based organizations," the statement added.
— (@)
In an interview with the New York Times, ACLU national legal director David Cole explained why it is important for the ACLU to defend an organization it disagrees with.
"It's never easy to defend those with whom you disagree," he said. "But the ACLU has long stood for the proposition that we may disagree with what you say but will defend to the death your right to say it."
Cole said the decision is "controversial" — both inside and outside the ACLU — but added that the easy path is rarely the right one.
"In this hyper-polarized environment, where few are willing to cross the aisle on anything, the fact that the ACLU is defending the NRA here only underscores the importance of the free speech principle at stake," Cole said.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Today's top stories
www.theblaze.com
freebeacon.com