Mark Levin turns the tables on past presidents who actually surrendered US information to enemies



Leftist conspiracy theorists continue to argue that Trump should be indicted for a so-called potential information breach that could have resulted from storing classified documents at his home in Mar-a-Lago.

Mark Levin pushed back, pointing to past incidents when former presidents actually surrendered America's highest technologies to our enemies and information to our enemies. Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden are simply a few presidents investigated for lax security, compromised technical information, and terrorism-related stigmas that presented a potential danger. Watch as Mark turns the “What if?” scenario on its ear and shows precisely what the last three Democratic presidents have done to jeopardize our security and safety.


Want more from Mark Levin?

To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

'Felon of the worst kind': Judge rejects plea deals entered by couple accused of selling nuclear secrets to foreign nation



"There are lower-level drug dealers that go to prison for way longer than 36 months," said Judge Gina M. Groh of the Federal District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, who regarded the plea deals entered on behalf of Jonathan and Diana Toebbe as "strikingly deficient."

Mr. and Mrs. Toebbe, originally charged with "conspiracy to communicate restricted data" and "communication of restricted data," pled guilty in February to participating in a conspiracy to sell submarine secrets to a foreign power. In 2020, the couple attempted to sell the technology behind the nuclear reactors powering the U.S. submarine fleet (the Virginia-class attack submarines in particular) to Brazil.

Text messages shown in court revealed that the Toebbes had three primary criteria regarding the nation to which they would sell U.S. secrets. The country had to be rich enough to afford the secrets, had to be neutral or at least not hostile to the U.S., and it had to be eager to acquire the technology in question. Though the Toebbes believed Brazil met their criteria, the South American nation was not so keen.

Mr. Toebbe, a former Navy engineer, wrote to Brazil's military intelligence agency offering the nuclear secrets in April 2020: "I believe this information will be of great value to your nation. ... This is not a hoax." Extra to the offer of secret documents, Mr. Toebbe reportedly volunteered his expertise to Brazil's nuclear submarine program — experience that relied upon even more classified U.S. Navy information.

Brazilian officials passed the letter over to an FBI legal official in Brazil.

An undercover FBI agent, pretending to be a Brazilian official, subsequently engaged Mr. Toebbe, persuading him to leave the stolen nuclear submarine secrets at a series of predetermined locations.

Mr. and Mrs. Toebbe complied, transferring restricted data about nuclear submarine designs onto SD cards and leaving them at so-called dead-drop locations over the span of several months.

In their efforts to hide the SD cards, they went so far as allegedly wrapping them in a plastic-wrapped peanut butter sandwich, a packet of gum, and a sealed Band-Aid wrapper.

On one of the SD cards, Mr. Toebbe included a message that allegedly said: "I was extremely careful to gather the files I possess slowly and naturally in the routine of my job, so nobody would suspect my plan." He also noted , "We have cash and passports set aside for th[e] purpose" of having to flee the U.S.

Despite the Toebbes' attempts at stealth and subterfuge, the FBI claimed in an affidavit that the Toebbes, though careful to use encrypted communications and cryptocurrency, repeatedly slipped up by depositing information in areas where they were easily exposed.

The couple was arrested in October 2021.

Mr. Toebbe struck a deal that would land him in prison for 12 years, five years less than he was previously looking to serve and much less than the maximum penalty for the offense, which is life in jail. Mrs. Toebbe agreed to serve three years, which she probably would not have served all of.

Judge Groh forced the Toebbes to withdraw their pleas, prompting their attorneys to either reach a plea agreement agreeable to the court or otherwise continue to trial.

Groh reportedly indicated she would prefer that both Toebbes face prison time in excess of 15 years. After all, Mr. Toebbe did not act alone.

After her October indictment, Mrs. Toebbe sought to fight pretrial detention and make her case; however, the government produced several exhibits (including videos and photos) revealing that she too had left secret information for a source and acted as a lookout. She is accused of participating in all but one of the dead drops.

Mrs. Toebbe's crime, according to Groh, made her "a felon of the worst kind, that is why the 36 months troubles me."

On Tuesday, Groh claimed, "It's not in the best interest of this community or, in fact, this country to accept these plea agreements." She referred to a victim impact statement made by Vice Admiral William J. Houston, who said that what the Toebbes had sought to sell was "some of the most secure and sensitive information about our nuclear powered fleet.”

U.S. attorney for the Northern District of West Virginia William Ihlenfeld said that the prosecution is ready to proceed and that he respects Groh's decision.

Former CIA chief appears to endorse execution for Americans who spill nuclear secrets after new Trump allegations



Should execution be on the table for Americans who allegedly spill nuclear secrets?

Former CIA Director Michael Hayden appeared to endorse the idea late Thursday after new allegations accused former President Donald Trump of storing highly classified documents with nuclear information at Mar-a-Lago.

What is the background?

After Attorney General Merrick Garland admitted on Thursday that he personally approved the FBI raid on Trump's south Florida residence, the Washington Post reported, citing anonymous sources, that FBI agents raided Mar-a-Lago to retrieve documents with nuclear information.

The sources with whom the Post spoke "did not offer additional details about what type of information the agents were seeking, including whether it involved weapons belonging to the United States or some other nation. Nor did they say if such documents were recovered as part of the search," according to the newspaper.

If the sources are correct, it would explain why the Justice Department took such aggressive action against Trump by searching his private residence.

What did Hayden say?

After the Washington Post levied its allegations, NBC News presidential historian Michael Beschloss went viral with a tweet in which he reminded Americans the U.S. government has previously executed Americans for leaking nuclear secrets.

"Rosenbergs were convicted for giving U.S. nuclear secrets to Moscow, and were executed June 1953," Beschloss tweeted.

Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were executed after being convicted of leaking top-secret information to the Soviets. The information contained state secrets on nuclear weapons, jet engines, radar, sonar, and other invaluable technologies.

In response to Beschloss, Hayden, also a former four-star general, appeared to endorse execution as the appropriate punishment for those who leak nuclear secrets.

"Sounds about right," Hayden tweeted.

\u201cSounds about right.\u201d
— Gen Michael Hayden (@Gen Michael Hayden) 1660267160

Hayden also "retweeted" another person who suggested the alleged actions amount to espionage.

What did Trump say?

The former president pushed back against the allegations on Friday, denouncing them as a "hoax."

While it remains unclear whether the documents supporting the search warrant will be released publicly, one wonders why the Justice Department would have waited so long to retrieve documents from Trump if they in fact contained information on nuclear weapons.