Biden Just Invited World War 3 By Greenlighting Long-Range Missiles Against Russia

'It would substantially change the very essence, the nature of the conflict,' Putin warned in September.

'Suicidal recklessness': Biden's missile authorization against Russia prompts talk of WWIII, impeachment



Before relinquishing power in January, President Joe Biden may turn America's proxy war with Russia into a direct nuclear conflict.

Elements of the Biden administration, various lawmakers from both major parties, Ukrainian officials, and others appear convinced that attacks on Russia using American long-range missiles might put Kyiv in a better bargaining position should the Eastern nations ever sit down to negotiate an end to the war, which has lasted over 1,000 days and claimed the lives of hundreds of thousands of people.

Critics have suggested not only that the move might protract the war, which the majority of Ukrainians now want to end with immediate negotiations, but that it might trigger a nuclear holocaust or at the very least prevent — by design — President-elect Donald Trump from brokering peace upon taking office.

Missiles fired

After authorizing Ukraine's use of long-range missile systems against targets in Russia — a move long resisted by U.S. officials concerned about escalation and identified by Russian President Vladimir Putin as a trigger for war between Washington and Moscow — Kyiv launched six U.S.-made Army Tactical Missile System missiles Tuesday morning at a weapons depot in Karachev, a Russian city 70 miles inside the country, in the Bryansk region.

'We must not fear doing more now.'

According to CNN, Russian air defenses allegedly shot down five of the ATACMS supersonic missiles, and the sixth was damaged. Pieces of the damaged missile rained down near a military facility, causing a fire but resulting in neither death nor damage.

The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs confirmed the attempted missile strikes and suggested that these and subsequent long-range missile strikes would be interpreted as U.S. military actions.

Sergei Lavrov, Russia's foreign minister, said in a statement, "The [Russian] president mentioned this several times. If long-range missiles are going to be applied from Ukraine into Russian territory, it will also mean that they are operated by American experts, military experts, and we will be taking this as a qualitatively new phase of the Western war against Russia and will react accordingly."

In his Tuesday address to the European Parliament, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said, "We must not fear doing more now."

"While some European leaders think about, you know, some elections or something like this at Ukraine's expense, Putin is focused on winning this war. He will not stop on his own. The more time he has, the worse the conditions become," said Zelenskyy.

The Institute for the Study of War indicated that as of June, Putin had captured roughly one-fifth of Ukraine, with Russian forces occupying 75% of the total area of the Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhia, and Kherson oblasts.

"Today is the best moment to push Russia harder, and it's clear without certain key factors Russia will lack real motivation to engage in meaningful negotiation," added Zelenskyy.

Hours later, Russia reportedly conducted missile strikes on Kharkiv, Dnipro, Chernihiv, and Sumy, as well as drone attacks inside Ukraine.

The U.S. embassy in Kyiv announced Wednesday morning that it was shutting its doors, citing the potential of a "significant air attack."

Nuclear, mine policies updated

Russian state media indicated that Moscow revised its nuclear doctrine this week in hopes of "making conventional warfare unachievable," qualifying attacks by a non-nuclear state in conjunction with the support of a nuclear state as a joint attack, satisfying the need for for nuclear deterrence.

Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chair of the Russian Federation's security council, noted on X, "Russia's new nuclear doctrine means NATO missiles fired against our country could be deemed an attack by the bloc on Russia. Russia could retaliate with WMD against Kiev and key NATO facilities, wherever they're located. That means World War III."

Russian President Vladimir Putin signaled that he would also respond with nukes to conventional attacks on Russia or Belarus. Russia has over 5,000 nuclear warheads and boasts a supersonic missile with a range of 625 miles.

Sergey Naryshkin, director of the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service, claimed that the West realizes "the revisions Putin outlined have largely undermined the attempts by the United States and NATO to achieve a strategic defeat of our nation. Furthermore, the expanded criteria for using nuclear weapons essentially rule out the possibility of defeating the Russian Armed Forces on the battlefield."

U.S. State Department spokesman Matthew Miller told the Associated Press, "I'm unfortunately not surprised by the comments the Kremlin has made around the publication of this new, revised document," adding that Russia has routinely sought to "coerce and intimidate both Ukraine and other countries around the world through irresponsible nuclear rhetoric and behavior."

The U.K. and other NATO members condemned the "irresponsible rhetoric" and reiterated their support for Ukraine.

The Biden administration had a policy update of its own.

Citing unnamed U.S. officials, the Washington Post reported that Biden authorized the provision of antipersonnel land mines to Ukraine.

"When they're used in concert with the other munitions that we already are providing Ukraine, the intent is that they will contribute to a more effective defense," said one of the officials.

While the U.S. is not one of the 164 parties to the Ottawa Convention, also known as the Mine Ban Treaty, Biden reportedly resurrected an Obama-era policy in 2022 banning the transfer and use of American antipersonnel land minds outside Korea.

Reactions

Blaze Media co-founder Glenn Beck suggested that the Biden administration is painting Russian President Vladimir Putin "into a corner."

"A man who is a bloodthirsty killer — you don't keep backing him into a corner, or what happens? Eventually he says, 'I'll have absolutely no credibility' [with] his people who have just been bombed with U.S. missiles, which he just said two days ago will be an act of war," said Beck. "We have entered a moment of madness. What Joe Biden did is impeachable."

'Americans do not want World War III.'

A day prior to the ATACMS strikes, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) insisted that Biden had committed "an unconstitutional Act of War" that qualified as an impeachable offense.

— (@)

Texas Rep. Keith Self (R) penned a letter to Biden Tuesday, challenging his decision to authorize Ukraine's use of ATACMS against Russia.

While Self suggested the missile systems might have proved strategically useful earlier in the conflict, at this stage in the war, their use is "counter-productive to President-elect Donald J. Trump's stated goal towards a negotiated peace."

'This is the faceless power of failing experts in action.'

"If this desperate move by your administration represents an attempt by deep-state operatives to hamstring the incoming Trump presidency, it's a dangerous miscalculation," wrote Self. "I am very concerned that this miscalculation could have catastrophic results. Americans do not want World War III."

"January 20 can't get here fast enough," Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) told Fox News' Laura Ingraham. "It looks like a green light for escalation on the part of Ukraine. ... What would happen if Russia would launch and retaliate missiles into the territory of a NATO member? Then our treaty obligations would be triggered. Then we're talking about a full-scale war."

Hawley noted further that the man who authorized the use of the long-range missiles against a nuclear power was considered too decrepit by his own party to stay in the presidential race earlier this year.

Blaze News editor in chief Matthew Peterson stressed that "what is happening in regard to Russia and Ukraine while we have no functional President is one of the last, most reckless and outrageous acts from the supposed 'adults in the room' who have consistently driven our nation towards the cliff the last four disastrous years."

"This is not 'democracy,'" continued Peterson. "This is the faceless power of failing experts in action: thwarting the will of the people in the midst of the final 'lame duck' period of an aging dementia patient of a President. This is a form of masochistic, suicidal recklessness enacted by weak men."

Peterson added on "Blaze News Tonight," "There is really something that I think that is despicable about the self-assured foreign policy expert in this country. Of all the different sectors of government experts who get degrees, foreign policy people dress themselves up in the suits and in the trappings of -isms and -istics, and, 'We know all this stuff and we have domain knowledge that you don't have.' They're consistently the most evil, dangerous, and really foolish sector of the entire government complex."

— (@)

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Glenn ENRAGED at CNN’s latest lie about Trump/Musk interview: 'The media is going to do Donald Trump a favor'



The mainstream media continues its smear campaign against Donald Trump — this time by taking a segment from Trump and Musk’s wildly viral X Spaces interview out of context to suggest that the duo made light of nuclear war.

Which, of course, is an insidious lie.

Glenn Beck, who watched the entire interview and understands the full context of Trump and Musk’s statements, was infuriated when he heard how CNN tried to suggest that Trump is a proponent of nuclear war when the exact opposite is true.

- YouTubewww.youtube.com

“I want to play one exchange that was kind of classic [Donald Trump],” said CNN’s Dana Bash, who then played the following 10-second clip:

Musk: “Hiroshima and Nagasaki were bombed, but now they’re, they’re like full cities again."

Trump: “Right, well that’s great.”

Musk: “So it’s really not something that, you know —”

Trump: “That’s great.”

Musk: “So it’s, it’s not as scary as people think basically.”

After the clip, Bash accused the duo of “suggesting that what happened almost 80 years ago ... the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki,” is “okay” and that they were “trying to blow off the impact of [nuclear war].”

Lies.

So what’s the truth?

“Donald Trump is truly terrified of nuclear war,” Glenn corrects. “He understands that it’s the end of the world if we have nuclear war.”

In his interview with Musk, Trump “warned maybe seven times — ‘we cannot get into nuclear war,”’ Glenn recounts, adding that “his main point was that nuclear war is on the horizon, and it cannot be an option.”

So what were Trump and Musk actually talking about when they broached the subject of Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

They were conversing about nuclear electricity generation and how it gets a bad rap because it’s associated with nuclear war, which Musk said himself is “very bad.”

Musk compared nuclear electricity generation with mining to show that the former has far fewer deaths and injuries than the latter, making it a safer way to generate energy.

“It’s underrated as an electricity source, and I think it’s something that’s worth reconsidering,” he told Trump, who agreed and added that the practice has “a branding problem” because of the horrors it’s associated with.

This is the point when Hiroshima and Nagasaki came up.

Trump, expanding on why nuclear electricity generation leaves a bad taste in people’s mouths, said: “When you see what happened in Japan where they say, ‘You won't be able to go on the land for about 3,000 years’ and in Russia ... they say that in 2,000 years people will start to occupy the land again. You know, you realize it's pretty bad.”

To that Musk replied, “It’s actually not that bad. After Fukushima happened in Japan, like people were asking me in California, you know, are we worried about like a nuclear cloud coming from Japan. I'm like no, that's crazy. It's actually, it's not even dangerous in Fukushima. I actually flew there and ate locally grown vegetables on TV to prove it. ... You know Hiroshima and Nagasaki were bombed, but now they're like full cities again, so it's really not something that, you know, it's not — it's not as scary as people think basically.”

“So was he trying to excuse and say what happened 80 years ago was not so bad? Is that what Donald Trump was talking about? Is that what Elon Musk was talking about?” asks Glenn. “No, not at all.”

Glenn speculates that this "Goebbels-style propaganda” is going to backfire and “do Donald Trump a favor.”

To hear more of his commentary, watch the clip above.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Peter Doocy confronts KJP with easy question about 'incoming nuke' and Biden — but her answer doesn't inspire confidence



Who makes decisions after President Joe Biden goes to bed? That's the pressing question Fox News senior correspondent Peter Doocy confronted the White House with on Tuesday.

Last week, Biden told a group of Democratic governors that he plans to stop working after 8 p.m. so that he can go to bed early.

'He has a team that lets him know of any news that is pertinent and important to the American people.'

The comments raised eyebrows after Biden's debate preparation schedule was made public: He didn't begin preparations until 11 a.m., and his staff always scheduled him an afternoon nap. Biden, moreover, typically has a late start to his work day and has few evening events scheduled. He also has a history of missing evening meetings on international trips.

At the White House press briefing, Doocy asked the natural follow-up question to Biden's schedule, which is much less robust than those his predecessors maintained.

"Say that the Pentagon at some point picks up an incoming nuke; it's 11:00 p.m. Who do you call? The first lady?" Doocy asked.

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre could have answered the question any number of ways. One might have expected her to say that in such a critical situation, staffers would awaken the president so that he could carry out his constitutional duty as commander in chief.

But she didn't take that route.

"He has a team that lets him know of any news that is pertinent and important to the American people," she responded. "He has someone — or — that is decided, obviously, with his National Security Council on who gets to tell him that news."

A team.

Doocy presumably invoked first lady Jill Biden because former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R) revealed this week that he attended White House meetings at which she was present. This, of course, is highly unusual.

Later in the briefing, Doocy asked Jean-Pierre about the first lady's presence at those meetings, and she denied that Jill makes any decisions for her husband.

It is notable, however, that Jean-Pierre did not dispute McCarthy's claim that Jill attends Oval Office meetings.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Was Israel neutralizing 99% of Iran's missiles a result of its stellar military or something else?



World War III is looking closer than ever after this weekend, when Iran launched over 300 missiles and drones at Israel.

However, Israel’s defense systems neutralized 99% of the attack.

While it’s nothing short of a miracle, the world may have looked very different if more of those missiles hit their targets.

“We could have very easily been in World War III today,” Glenn Beck says, wondering if it’s the defense system to thank that we’re not, or if it’s the quality of Iran’s missiles.

Jason Buttrill believes it’s the former, telling Glenn that Israel’s defense system is “as amazing as it sounds” — but it might not just be the weaponry.

“99% success rate does not happen. So, I mean granted, there’s great technology here, but I think there’s some God work going on as well,” Buttrill tells Glenn, adding that “they threw everything but the ayatollah’s kitchen sink at Israel over the weekend.”

While Buttrill doesn’t believe they’re going to stop, he does believe this has thrown a wrench in Iran’s plans.

“This set Iran back, I’m sure, like probably several years as far as whatever their eventual goal is,” he says.

“I thank God that we are pausing at least,” Glenn says. “This will escalate into a world war, that fast. Everything in me says once the Middle East is set on fire, Russia and Ukraine and everything else, it’s just going to be dominoes.”

If their failure can hold Iran off until the presidential election, Glenn has hope.

“I just want to make it to, you know, January, in case he wins,” he says, referring to Trump. “If he doesn’t win, I mean, we’re just going to keep seeing more and more of this.”


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Trump Warns Mexico ‘Will No Longer Be Around’ If WWIII Begins

'If World War III happens, probably Mexico will no longer be around,' Trump said

Utah Sen. Mike Lee says 'We might have to invoke the War Powers Act' after Biden authorizes deployment of reservists to Europe



President Joe Biden authorized the deployment of thousands of reservists to Europe Thursday, adding to an American troop presence on the continent already totaling over 100,000.

Army Lt. Gen. Douglas Sims, the director of operations for the Joint Staff, told reporters, "This reaffirms the unwavering support and commitment to the defense of NATO's eastern flank in the wake of Russia's illegal and unprovoked war on Ukraine," reported Politico.

Critics have suggested that the move, following the recent shipment of cluster bombs to Ukraine, takes the U.S. closer to a direct shooting war with Russia, with some claiming, "America Last strikes again!"

Republican Sen. Mike Lee of Utah suggested that Congress consider invoking the War Powers Act and other measures to prevent Biden from "locking us into supporting Ukraine."

The order

Biden issued an executive order Thursday, just after recommitting to NATO at the alliance's summit in Vilnius, Lithuania, stating, "It is necessary to augment the active Armed Forces of the United States for the effective conduct of Operation Atlantic Resolve in and around the United States European Command's area of responsibility."

Accordingly, he authorized the Pentagon and the Department of Homeland Security, with respect to the Coast Guard, to "order to active duty any units, and any individual members not assigned to a unit organized to serve as a unit of the Selected Reserve, or any member in the Individual Ready Reserve mobilization category and designated as essential."

The number of troops called up is "not to exceed 3,000 total members at any one time, of whom not more than 450 may be members of the Individual Ready Reserve," which consists of former active-duty or reserve military personnel.

Politico indicated that the president's order is novel in that it designates Operation Atlantic Resolve a contingency operation for the first time, meaning the Pentagon can "call up reserve forces and implement sped-up acquisition authorities to supply those troops with equipment."

With this designation, reservists will also be paid and supported as active-duty troops.

"This new designation benefits troops and families with increases in authorities, entitlements, and access to the reserve component forces and personnel," clarified Sims.

Atlantic Resolve, an operation headquartered in Poznan, Poland, kicked off in 2014 under then-President Barack Obama in response to Russia's annexation of the Crimean Peninsula. Its purpose is to buttress NATO nations' defenses against further Russian aggression.

The Pentagon indicated last summer, "Since February 2022, DoD deployed or extended over 20,000 additional forces to Europe in response to the Ukraine crisis, adding additional air, land, maritime, cyber, and space capabilities, bringing our current total to more than 100,000 service members across Europe."

"This included extending a Carrier Strike Group, deploying additional fighter squadrons and lift/tanker aircraft, and deploying an Amphibious Readiness Group and Marine Expeditionary Force. DoD added a Corps Headquarters, Division Headquarters, Infantry Brigade Combat Team (IBCT), Armored Brigade Combat Team (ABCT), High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) battalion, and multiple enablers to the existing Corps Forward Command Post, Division Headquarters, and three BCTs already stationed in or deployed to Europe," said the Defense Department.

The response

Richard Grenell, the former acting director of national intelligence under Trump, noted, "Eight of the 31 NATO countries currently pay their obligations. Germany and Canada are two of the wealthier nations NOT paying the agreed upon percentage. Joe Biden failed to press NATO this week - but then called up American reserves to active duty."

In another tweet, Grenell, who was previously ambassador to Germany, noted that there "was no peace plan presented" at the NATO summit, "just more WAR for American men and women."

Joe Kent, a Washington state Republican running for Congress in 2024, tweeted, "Defending America is Biden's last priority."

Sean Davis, CEO of the Federalist, tweeted, "Nothing to see here. Just Biden calling up the reserves in preparation for World War 3 against Russia over a tinpot puppet kleptocrat in Eastern Europe."

William Wolfe, a former senior Trump administration official, wrote, "Biden authorizing the call for reserve troops up to active duty for operations in Europe? Does this mean Ukraine? Not good."

Turning Point USA CEO Charlie Kirk wrote, "Joe Biden is calling up reservists for active duty in Operation Atlantic Resolve, because apparently it can’t fill the ranks of its rainbow flag military as recruitment plummets. This is not to fortify our border, which remains wide open, but to increase our deployments near Ukraine. America Last strikes again!"

Restraining Biden's ambitions

Sen. Lee claimed Thursday that "President Biden is arguably walking the U.S. up to the line of war and daring Russia to shoot first."

"Since conflict with Russia and Ukraine came to blows in 2014, rotational deployments under Atlantic Resolve have been considered a backbone of deterring Russia from crossing NATO's Eastern flank," wrote Lee. "The active-duty activation and deployment of these additional forces is a dangerous provocation, knowing full well NATO's Eastern Flank is adjacent to active hostilities."

Late last year, a Ukrainian missile strayed into Poland, but was misidentified in the press as a Russian missile. Such spillover from the fighting between Ukrainians and the Russian invaders could easily and swiftly bring America directly into the conflict.

"President Biden did the same thing at the beginning of the war in Ukraine in 2022, massively increasing our active-duty force presence when we knew hostilities were imminent. But now it’s even more risky because hostilities are active," continued Lee. "Not only does this run the risk of further locking us into supporting Ukraine, now the military-industrial complex will say the US military presence is THE one thing preventing Russia from crossing NATO’s eastern border & that we have to maintain such presence indefinitely."

According to Lee, this may amount to a "long-term security guarantee. Another endless war but this time by proxy."

The Utah senator said that "this makes me really uneasy," adding that "we might have to invoke the War Powers Act."

The War Powers Act states that, unless Congress has declared war, the U.S. military and members thereof cannot be "introduced in hostilities or in situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances" unless:

  • they are repelling an armed attack on the U.S., its territories and possessions;
  • they are taking "necessary and appropriate retaliatory actions in the event of such an attack";
  • they are forestalling the direct imminent threat of such an attack;
  • they are providing protection for evacuation of American citizens; or
  • they have "specific statutory authorization," such as the 2001 "Authorization for Use of Military Force."

Lee acknowledged that a resolution passed under the War Powers Act could be vetoed by the president. To override such a veto would require a two-thirds vote from both houses of Congress, meaning it would have to be a bipartisan effort.

The Utah senator was part of a bipartisan legislative effort in 2021 to reclaim for Congress "its rightful role as co-equal branch on matters of war and national security."

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) said at the time that Congress had "acquiesced to the growing, often unchecked power of the executive to determine the outline of America's footpring in the world."

Should a War Powers resolution such as that proposed by Lee fail, the senator indicated Congress would still have the "option of defunding, but that's tricky too because spending legislation is also subject to presidential veto."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Putin is putting Russian nukes in Belarus. When will his megalomania end?



After the coup chaos in Russia over the weekend, the president of Belarus stepped in to broker a deal — offering the Wagner Group’s leader sanctuary in Belarus.

Now, Belarus — which, according to Mark Levin, is “essentially an appendage of communist, but fascistic Russia” — is taking delivery of Russian nuclear weapons.

Levin says he doesn’t “think that this means that Russia is going to fire nuclear weapons here and there” but rather that “Putin is trying to show in every way he can, certainly symbolically and especially to the weak underbelly in this country, that he can do something.”

The president of Belarus says that the weapons being moved into his country are three times more powerful than the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

This will be the first time Russia has deployed nuclear weapons beyond its borders since the collapse of the Soviet Union.

The United States is responding by sending 15 new vehicles as part of its latest 300 million dollar aid package, in order to keep Ukraine prepared throughout their counter-offensive.

“Counter offensives are tough, and particularly with the Russians,” Levin says.

Levin notes that Ukraine is lacking in one critical area.

“The Russians have air power. The Ukrainians have minimal air power. And I’m not talking about attacking Russia, I’m talking about attacking Russians in Ukraine. It’s a big problem,” he continues.

“So, Joe Biden, like usual, is a day late and a dollar short,” he adds.


Want more from Mark Levin?

To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Splitting The China-Russia Axis Starts With A Negotiated Settlement In Ukraine

The Sino-Russia alliance presents the greatest military risk the U.S. has ever faced, but there's a clear path to stopping it.