This Bad Legal Interpretation Allows Democrats To Skew Congress With Illegal Immigration

Illegal immigrants enjoy many privileges while unlawfully in the United States — but being counted for apportionment should not be one of them.

SHOCKING: DHS docs expose Biden’s release of illegal alien convicted sex offenders into US



For years, many have suspected that the Biden administration deliberately allowed criminals to enter the U.S. through lax border policies.

A breaking report has just revealed that it’s true — the Biden administration knowingly released illegal immigrant convicted sex offenders into the nation.

To get the scoop on this bombshell report, Sara Gonzales spoke with journalist Breanna Morello, host of “The Breanna Morello Show,” who just yesterday unveiled exclusive U.S. Department of Homeland Security documents obtained through a lawsuit, documenting the release of convicted sex offenders into the United States.

“What we're now learning is that the Biden regime released convicted sex offenders into the United States. We know this because the documents that the administration said didn’t exist suddenly now exist,” says Morello.

The documents Morello refers to are a series of forms that were used to process illegal alien convicted sex offenders before their release into the country.

The first form required these criminals to “[register] for a sexual deviancy counseling program within 14 days of them being released into the United States.” The second form required them “to register as a sex offender here in the United States” within “seven days” of their release.

“Also in these documents is a checklist for supervisors, who are going through each sex offender to verify that they've done what they should be doing according to the Biden administration, and it also includes contacting the victims or the witnesses of the ... crime that took place ... and making sure that they're aware that these individuals have been released into the United States,” Morello explains.

Sara’s jaw is on the floor.

“DHS knew that these people were sex offenders, and they said, ‘It's OK, because they're going to sign a document, and they're going to super duper pinky swear that they are not going to do it anymore, and they're going to sign up as a sex offender, and we're just going to take their word for it.’ Like that's actually what was happening?” she asks.

“Yeah,” is Morello’s frank answer. “They thought by making them go to sexual deviance classes ... that they were somehow going to be productive members of society.”

Even more disturbing is the fact that many of these convicted sex offenders were permitted to board domestic commercial flights in the United States using DHS documents, which included details of their sex offender status, as identification.

When Morello submitted Freedom of Information Act requests to TSA to find out if illegal immigrants had been permitted to board commercial flights without standard IDs during the Biden administration, she was ignored.

After suing TSA, she eventually obtained the DHS documents, which not only proved that convicted sex offenders were released into our country but also that TSA agents used their DHS paperwork identifying them as sex offenders to permit boardings.

Morello filed the lawsuit in 2024 but only received the documents after the Trump administration took office and a new FOIA officer complied.

“That means between DHS, ICE, and TSA, all of these agencies were completely neglecting their oath, and their oath is to protect the American people,” says Morello.

The Biden regime “purposely infiltrated our country with people who they knew would be a danger to American citizens. To me, this is the clear-cut definition of treason,” says Sara. “You have people like Laken Riley who lost their lives to these illegal sexual predators, and you have to wonder how many of those people, who killed and raped American citizens, were on that freaking list to begin with.”

To hear more of the conversation, watch the episode above.

Want more from Sara Gonzales?

To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred take to news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Illegal aliens aren’t just ‘guests’ — they’re future voters



After visiting a nearby resort filled with opulent wokesters, I couldn’t help but notice the signs proclaiming, “Love, not hate, makes America great.” I suspect the signs were meant to remind us of Donald Trump’s supposed nastiness for deporting as many as 50,000 illegal immigrants — most with criminal records. According to the left, such a policy makes Trump a fascist — maybe even the latest incarnation of Hitler.

A "nicer" leader, we’re told, would allow these illegal immigrants — including convicted rapists and other lowlifes — to remain in the country, at least until they exhausted multiple judicial appeals or committed a few more crimes. Why stop there? Let them vote in local elections, receive public assistance, education, and health care. After all, they supposedly enrich our society — or so Democrats insist, as they work tirelessly to provide all these forms of taxpayer-funded hospitality.

When virtue signalers clutch their pearls over Trump’s treatment of ‘nice illegal rapists,’ I have to wonder if they’re playing dumb.

But why did Democratic presidents we’re supposed to venerate — Bill Clinton and Barack Obama — get a free pass for far harsher deportation records? Clinton expelled close to a million illegal aliens with minimal judicial involvement, even boasting about his deportations during his re-election campaign. Obama, the left’s beloved heartthrob, threw out over four million illegal immigrants, aided by Trump’s current border czar Tom Homan, all without major interference from Democratic-appointed judges.

Compared to Clinton and Obama, Trump’s deportation numbers look paltry, especially given the legal and media warfare waged against him.

Even as recently as 2006, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) — now screaming about Trump’s “cruelty” — eagerly pushed for building a border wall. Thirty years ago, few Democratic senators would have voted against it. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), back then, warned against flooding the country with unskilled foreign labor that would hurt America’s most vulnerable workers. Obama himself praised tougher immigration controls. In 2006, Democrats still held some loyalty to their working-class base. They understood that saturating American communities with third world lumpenproletariat — not to mention foreign gangs — would devastate the working class.

That was before Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), Pete Buttigieg, Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas), and Rachel Levine became the faces of the rebranded Democratic Party.

Since then, both national parties have swapped electoral bases. Republicans moved away from country-club elites and realigned with the white — and increasingly Hispanic — working class. Democrats abandoned their traditional blue-collar support to embrace progressive white women, the LGBTQ lobby, government bureaucrats, black militants, and now, the cause of illegal immigrants.

For Democrats, the strategy is simple: expand the non-working-class base. Biden’s administration opened the border to as many as 10 million illegal aliens, and anyone with a functioning brain can see why.

Yet, when virtue signalers clutch their pearls over Trump’s treatment of “nice illegal rapists,” I have to wonder if they’re playing dumb. Do they really not know why their party flooded the country with illegal aliens? Do they honestly think slogans about "love" explain why Democrats fight tooth and nail to keep even convicted criminals from deportation?

Every illegal immigrant represents a potential future Democratic voter. If Trump’s administration was allowed to make moral distinctions among the "undocumented," Democrats might lose too many future loyalists. Better, from their view, to defend even a wife-beating, MS-13-affiliated “Maryland man” than risk losing tomorrow’s votes.

Perhaps I’m being unfair. Maybe the Democratic cheering squad doesn’t know — or care — how radically its party reversed itself on immigration. Maybe leftists assume their Democratic heroes always held the same radical social views as Tim Walz and Hakeem Jeffries.

Most live in the present, parroting whatever slogans the media and party elites hand them. If journalists and historians hide the truth, these activists show little curiosity to uncover it.

Meanwhile, the media and judicial attacks on Trump’s supposedly “Nazi-like” immigration policies continue to erode public support. Trump now polls negatively even on immigration, the very issue that propelled him into the White House.

If this delusion holds, Democrats may succeed in securing nearly all of their future voters.

Illegal Immigration’s ‘Compassionate’ Defenders Use Pro-Slavery Logic

Getting cheap nannies and lawn care comes alongside a system that perpetuates an endless stream of human suffering.

Why borders are biblical — no matter what the left says



There are many far-left (so-called) scholars who distort scripture to argue for open national borders, extrapolating the biblical concept of compassion entirely out of context.

These same pseudo-scholars mistakenly invoke the 50-year Jubilee (Leviticus 25) — a law that forgave debt and returned property to the original covenant-keeping Jewish owners — to promote state largesse and universal grants, including property rights for all, whether people reside in a nation legally or are squatting illegally.

What you wouldn’t risk in the personal space of your own household, you shouldn’t demand of a nation.

What these left-leaning scholars consistently ignore is that Yahweh established the Jubilee and other Mosaic laws in the Torah to protect the inheritance of covenant-keeping (circumcised) Jews who lived within the framework of biblical law — functioning as a nation with divinely appointed boundaries. When people take scripture out of context to prop up their worldview, we must discern their biases and reject their flawed applications to modern public policy.

We also need to distinguish between how the church ministers to people and how the civil government administers justice. As a pastor, I will welcome anyone, documented or not, offering care, food, and material help for their families. But if I were elected as a civic leader, my responsibility would be to secure the borders and uphold the law of the land.

Unfortunately, too many well-meaning but uninformed pastors conflate the role of the church with that of civil government, failing to grasp the biblical concept of separate jurisdictions — personal, family, business, civic, and church.

In this brief article, I will focus on correcting the misuse of scripture to justify open borders in the name of compassion. Here are 10 reasons why open borders are not biblically sound:

1. God established national borders.

“And he made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined allotted periods and the boundaries of their dwelling place” (Acts 17:26).

According to St. Paul, God sovereignly determines nations and their boundaries to preserve various ethnic people groups, showing His design for national distinction and order.

2. The New Heaven and New Earth have guarded boundaries. Only those whose names are in the Book of Life can enter.

I’ve heard people claim, “If Jesus were president, He would support open borders.” But what biblical foundation do they have for such a bold assertion? In reality, scripture gives us clear insight into what Jesus will do when He governs a geographical kingdom — and it’s the opposite of what many assume.

“But nothing unclean will ever enter it, nor anyone who does what is detestable or false, but only those who are written in the Lamb’s book of life” (Revelation 21:27).

Even in God’s perfect eternal kingdom, there is restricted access. "Only those who are written" in God’s membership book shows that borders and boundaries are part of God’s righteous order.

3. Foreigners in Israel had to respect Mosaic and civic laws in order to stay.

“You are to have the same law for the foreigner and the native-born. I am the Lord your God” (Leviticus 24:22).

“The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt” (Leviticus 19:34).

While Israel showed kindness to foreigners, they were expected to respect and live under the laws of the land.

4. Compassion and hospitality do not erase the need for order and boundaries.

“But if anyone does not provide for his relatives, and especially for members of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever” (1 Timothy 5:8).

This principle shows prioritized responsibility — just as families manage their homes with discernment, so too must nations guard their sovereignty and stewardship.

Most people who advocate for open borders would never apply that same logic to their homes. How many would welcome total strangers — unvetted and unknown — into their house, especially if they have small children to protect? If you lock your doors at night, you already believe in secure borders. A home is a microcosm of a nation: families living together under a shared roof, protected by clear boundaries.

What you wouldn’t risk in the personal space of your own household, you shouldn’t demand of a nation.

5. A nation without borders is not a nation but chaos.

“If a house is divided against itself, that house cannot stand” (Mark 3:25).

No unity or stability can exist without a defined identity, which includes recognized borders and laws that protect them.

Even the United Nations and key international charters — like the Montevideo Convention — recognize that clearly defined borders are essential to a nation’s legitimacy. Without recognized boundaries, there is no nation to govern or protect. The same principle applies when you buy a home: Banks require a survey to establish your property lines, ensuring your legal rights and protecting what belongs to you.

If borders matter at the individual level, how much more at the national level?

6. God condemns lawlessness, and open borders often encourage lawlessness.

“For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work” (2 Thessalonians 2:7).

Lawlessness is tied to the spirit of rebellion. Open borders without lawful vetting and due process laws regarding regulation, contrary to biblical teaching, at times foster disorder, crime, and rebellion against lawful authority.

7. Nations serve a distinct purpose in God’s redemptive plan.

“After this I looked, and behold, a great multitude that no one could number, from every nation, from all tribes and peoples and languages” (Revelation 7:9).

God honors the diversity of nations. Erasing national distinctions through borderless ideologies undermines the divine order He has set for the flourishing of different peoples.

8. Borders protect citizens from harm, which is part of a ruler’s God-given responsibility.

“For he is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God’s wrath on the wrongdoer” (Romans 13:4).

Government leaders are called to protect their people. Failing to enforce borders can expose citizens to danger and injustice, violating their God-given duty.

9. The principle of private property in scripture presumes defensible boundaries.

“You shall not move your neighbor’s boundary mark, which the ancestors have set” (Deuteronomy 19:14).

The respect for borders and property lines is deeply embedded in biblical law. National borders are an extension of this principle on a larger scale.

10. Babel was a judgment against one-worldism and globalism.

“And the Lord said, ‘Behold, they are one people, and they all have the same language. ... Come, let Us go down and there confuse their language, so that they will not understand one another’s speech’” (Genesis 11:6-7).

God divided nations at Babel to prevent global tyranny and man’s rebellion. Open-border ideology often leads toward a one-world government, contrary to God’s intention for separate nations.

This article was originally published on Joseph Mattera's website.

National, State Leaders Ask Indiana Senate To Stop Blocking Vote On Immigration Enforcement Bill

'When Hoosiers went to the polls last November, they did not vote for half-measures or vague promises,' the America First letter tells Bray.

White House highlights border wall progress as Trump shuts down benefits for illegal aliens



The White House shared a video on Thursday highlighting the Trump administration's progress in resuming the construction of the border wall.

The video showed a rig lifting a large wall panel as construction workers guided it into place along the border.

'My administration will uphold the rule of law.'

The White House's Rapid Response team captioned the video, "[Point of view]: Illegals are no longer going to be able to flood your country."

On Thursday, the administration also shared an article from the Santa Fe New Mexican, detailing the effort to continue construction in New Mexico.

"PROMISES MADE, PROMISES KEPT," the White House wrote, adding that construction is currently "underway."

The news outlet detailed the "El Paso 2 Wall Project," an effort to close a 0.2-mile and a 40-foot gap in New Mexico, according to Customs and Border Protection.

KFOX stated that razor wire was also added this week to existing border wall sections in El Paso.

CBP officials have said border construction has resumed in San Diego, California, and Yuma and Tucson, Arizona.

Over the past month, border crossings have reportedly dropped more than 90%.

In furtherance of his goal to end the illegal immigration crisis, President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Wednesday evening prohibiting illegal aliens from receiving federally funded benefits.

"My administration will uphold the rule of law, defend against the waste of hard-earned taxpayer resources, and protect benefits for American citizens in need, including individuals with disabilities and veterans," the order read.

Trump accused "numerous administrations" of undermining the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, which bans illegal aliens from receiving benefits.

"Over the last four years, in particular, the prior administration repeatedly undercut the goals of that law, resulting in the improper expenditure of significant taxpayer resources," the executive action stated.

Border czar Tom Homan responded to Trump's executive action during an interview with Fox News.

"These billions of dollars we're going to save, that illegal aliens shouldn't be getting, they're going to help rebuild North Carolina. They're going to help rebuild California. ... There's a lot of things we can do for American citizens, the homeless vets," Homan said.

He noted that the taxpayer funds are "illegally being given to people who aren't supposed to be here."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Former Refugee: The United States Should Encourage Less Migration, More Stability

If we want to help the suffering and vulnerable around the world, it must be done with an eye toward long-term stability for everyone.

Border agent accused of being cartel member who smuggled illegal aliens into the US



A United States Customs and Border Protection agent stands accused of being a Mexican drug cartel member who exploited his position to smuggle illegal aliens into the country.

CBP officer Manuel Perez Jr., 32, was terminated from the agency when he was arrested on federal human- and drug-smuggling charges on February 8, according to the El Paso Times.

'By all measures, he lives in Mexico.'

Perez, a U.S. citizen born in California, was stationed at the Paso del Norte International Bridge in El Paso, Texas.

If found guilty, he could face up to a decade in prison.

A special agent with the CBP Office of Professional Responsibility testified that Perez was a member of a drug cartel.

“Multiple witnesses said he belonged to La Linea cartel in Mexico,” the special agent stated.

The agent explained that intercepted phone calls from smugglers promised a “100% guaranteed” border crossing, claiming that they had “the officer in their pocket.”

Perez’s lawyer, Ruben Ortiz, claimed that the alleged co-conspirators could be lying about his client’s involvement. He accused them of “pointing fingers, perhaps to gain favor from the government in their own cases.”

“The cooperating witnesses are telling them (federal investigators) whatever they want to hear for now,” Ortiz stated.

The agent testified that Perez admitted to federal investigators that he received $2,500 for each illegal alien he allowed to pass through his inspection lane at the southern border. Investigators revealed that Perez permitted a gray Nissan Pathfinder carrying illegal aliens to cross the border multiple times. The exact number of illegal immigrants, including children, that Perez allegedly allowed into the U.S. remains unclear.

Federal investigators estimated that Perez could have been paid up to $400,000 since December 2023 for his involvement in the illegal smuggling operation. He is also accused of participating in a cocaine distribution scheme from November 2019 through February 5, 2025.

Perez has no prior history of criminal activity or substance abuse.

The investigation into Perez uncovered that the CBP officer allegedly spent approximately 80% of his time in Mexico despite claiming he resided in El Paso.

“By all measures, he lives in Mexico,” prosecutors argued.

The special agent testified that Perez was always armed and had an armed security detail with him while he was in Mexico.

Ortiz stated that his client spent significant time in Mexico because he had a girlfriend living there.

One witness claimed that Perez had expressed a preference to be detained in Mexico if arrested so that he could continue his illegal activities from inside the jail.

Mexican agents reportedly searched Perez’s rental property in Juárez and discovered $18,000 in cash.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Miguel Torres rejected Ortiz’s request to release Perez on bond with GPS monitoring. The judge determined there was "no question" Perez posed a flight risk, citing the extensive time he spent in Mexico. Consequently, Perez will remain in jail without bond.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Liberals lose their minds over church's sign about open borders, vilify black pastor as a 'white supremacist'



A church in Illinois has caused a stir after putting up a sign about illegal immigration and open borders. Liberals are having a meltdown over the sign, even vilifying the black pastor as a "white supremacist."

The New Hope Community Church is located in Palatine, Illinois, roughly 30 miles northwest of Chicago.

'People are getting triggered by the word "immigration."'

On Feb. 5, the church featured a new sign that read: "Heaven Has Strict Immigration Laws. Hell Has Open Borders."

Pastor James Pittman noted that there was no controversy about the sign for the first "six days it was up" until "someone got wind of it."

Local news outlets ran stories about the sign and then CNN reportedly requested an interview.

Pittman told WLS-TV, "Immigration is a topic in the communities, so what we've been doing on our sign for quite some time is take what's going on in the community and turn it towards heaven."

Pittman said he is open to having conversations about the sign's message.

"The immigration we were talking about is very clear in the sign: heaven and hell. And our message is very clear, the scriptures are clear, not everybody makes it to heaven," Pittman stated.

Pittman addressed the alleged controversy in a 14-minute video.

The New Hope Community Church issued a statement on its official Facebook page that read:

We want to be clear concerning this sign. We did not mention nor intended this sign to be about US immigration policy. We understand that immigration is a hot topic today and wanted to use that to turn people's attention heavenward. We did not mention any country or any people group. We do not believe that all go to heaven and wanted the community to examine their relationship with Almighty God. People are getting triggered by the word 'immigration.' We took a stand on 'immigration' to heaven, not to the United States. Are we not free to use the word immigration on a church post?

However, some in the Palatine community are up in arms about the church's sign.

"Part of why we moved to Palatine was the diversity being able to show our kids that, and everyone should have opportunity, and love each other, and seeing something like this is really upsetting," said Palatine resident Katharine Huddleston.

Lisa Beth Szczupaj — president of the Palatine Elementary District 15 school board — told the Daily Herald, "It is unfortunate that a couple of phrases that some adults feel to be clever are posted in the face of many innocent schoolchildren having to ask parents, friends, and adults what they mean and why. Pulling kids into the edginess and politics of the moment is absolutely inappropriate and causes real fear for our school-age children.”

Resident Theresa Greinig added, "I couldn't quite believe that that was a message going out in my community."

Greinig told WLS that she is mobilizing the community to create "signs of positivity" to place around the New Hope Community Church.

Some critics have allegedly called Pittman a "white supremacist." Pastor Pittman is black.

Comments on the church's official Yelp business page were disabled after it was inundated with likely fake negative reviews this week.

"This business recently received increased public attention, which often means people come to this page to post their views on the news," Yelp stated on the New Hope Community Church's page.

"While we don’t take a stand one way or the other when it comes to this incident, we’ve temporarily disabled the posting of content to this page as we work to investigate whether the content you see here reflects actual consumer experiences rather than the recent events," the statement continued. "Please note that we apply this same policy regardless of the business and regardless of the topic at issue."

Before the comments were turned off, several detractors slammed the church's Yelp page with one-star reviews in the past week.

A Yelp user claimed, "The church sign on display promotes so much hate. I'm sad for our diverse community of Palatine to have read such ignorant messages."

Another user wrote, "Do NOT. And I repeat, do not go here. This is not your normal warm, welcoming, compassionate church. These people are bigots and racists against Latinos. Starting from the pastor and down to all the parishioners. Look for another church and give your donations there. Do not even step foot in there if you're undocumented or LGBTQ+. You've been warned."

A commenter said, "Not a good church! Don't come here. They do not welcome immigrants or minorities. Do yourself a favor and find a better church!"

Another added, "Church that promotes hate and racism. Do yourself a favor and avoid this place."

One review read, "DO NOT RECOMMEND. Racist, discriminatory, unwelcoming church. Not sure what type of 'God' you praise ... but God stated to love thy neighbor and your message is NOT it. SHAME ON YOU."

The church had received a total of 14 negative reviews in the past decade, nine of which were posted in the past week after the church made headlines with its sensitive sign.

A majority of the recent one-star reviews were made by Yelp reviewers who were not from Illinois, including four from liberal California and one from Washington, D.C.

Despite the backlash, Pittman declared that he is sticking to his faith and doesn't plan on changing the sign anytime soon.

"We push one man and one man only here and that's Jesus Christ," Pittman proclaimed.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!