Let’s Hear It For The Straight White Boys Who Saved Us From Kamala
Kamala Harris, like Hillary Clinton, represented the face of the oppressive, suffocating girl boss regime — and boys were sick of it.
Once again, Whoopi Goldberg of "The View" is captured ranting and raving about something that isn’t even true.
Earlier this week, she lambasted Ron DeSantis and Florida’s Board of Education over not consulting African-Americans about black history curriculum standards, even though two black scholars were on the board that approved the curriculum.
Now she’s turned her fiery gaze toward Ben Shapiro over his recent commentary about the new “Barbie” movie.
Shapiro was very forthcoming with his views about the film:
“I find it upsetting when material based on children’s IP marketed to little girls actually ends up being angry feminist claptrap that alienates men from women, undermines basic human values, and promotes falsehood all at the same time.”
“It’s a movie about a doll!” Whoopi shrieks in response to Shapiro’s clip.
“When [kids are] seeing this movie, that’s not how they’re looking at it,” she continues.
Not only is “Barbie” not a kids' film (it’s rated PG-13), but it’s also unapologetically predicated on feminism and patriarchy rather than subjects that would apply to a child’s doll.
“It’s not just a doll movie,” Dave Rubin says, adding, “If you listen to any of the people who made the movie, they’re telling you that they’re putting political and cultural messages in there.”
And he’s absolutely right.
Issa Rae, who plays President Barbie, is quoted as saying, “Barbie takes on some of the greatest gender imbalances present in society today.”
Simu Liu, one of the Kens in the film, said, “I hope that [the film] really challenges gender norms and heteronormativity.”
Add to that the fact that Barbie struggles with thoughts of death and is even called a “fascist” at one point in the film, and it’s perfectly clear: “Barbie” is most certainly not just “a movie about a doll.”
But Whoopi can continue being what Rubin calls a “deeply shallow thinker” if she wants to.
To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
A top official in the Church of England has raised concerns about the wording of the prayer gifted to Christians by Jesus Christ.
In Matthew 6:9-13 and Luke 11:2-4, Jesus taught his disciples how to pray. In both accounts, he began the prescribed prayer with "Our Father."
Stephen Cottrell, the archbishop of York and the Anglican church's second-highest ranking prelate, suggested in his address to the CE's general synod Friday that references to God as "Father" can be "problematic," particularly for those who've had less-than-stellar parents during their tenure here on earth, reported the Times.
Cottrell, who previously underscored the need to "celebrate and affirm same-sex relationships," emphasized the fraternity of man, noting that all "sisters and brothers" are ultimately part of the same family with God as its head.
The archbishop then turned to the matter of the Lord's Prayer, saying, "If this God to whom we pray is 'father' — and yes, I know the word 'father' is problematic for those whose experience of earthly fathers has been destructive and abusive and for all of us who have labored rather too much from an oppressively patriarchal grip on life."
Cottrell proceeded to suggest that divisions between Christians were hazardous, adding, "At our peril do we underestimate the terrible damage our visible disunity does to our proclamation of the Gospel."
Cottrell's progressive critique of the Lord's Prayer was not well received by some fellow Anglicans who reckon Christ got it right the first time, reported the Guardian.
Canon Dr. Chris Sugden, a CE minister and chair of the conservative Anglican Mainstream group, said, "Is the archbishop of York saying Jesus was wrong, or that Jesus was not pastorally aware? It seems to be emblematic of the approach of some church leaders to take their cues from culture rather than scripture."
"If people have had a difficult relationship with their human fathers then the option open to them is to say you can rediscover the true nature of fatherhood through Christ," added Sugden.
Cottrell managed to strike a chord with revolutionaries inside the Anglican church.
Christina Rees, a minister and former synod member who advocated for female bishops, sided with Cottrell, noting that calling God "father" was "hugely problematic."
"There are multiple layers why the term 'father' is really difficult for people in the church. It's the way it's been set for so long and so we're stuck," said Rees. "Because Jesus called God 'daddy', we think we have to call God 'daddy'. And the big question is, do we really believe God believes that male human beings bear the image of God more fully and accurately than women? The answer is absolutely not."
Reuters reported earlier this year that the CE has been looking into whether to use gender-neutral terms to refer to God in prayers such as the "Our Father," ostensibly presuming an oversight on the part of Christ.
Fox News Digital indicated that Joanna Stobart, a CE vicar in Surrey, was among those who had pushed for "an update on the steps being taken to develop more inclusive language in our authorized liturgy and to provide more options for those who wish to use authorized liturgy and speak of God in a non-gendered way, particularly in authorized absolutions where many of the prayers offered for use refer to God using male pronouns?"
The Edina Community Lutheran Church in Minneapolis recently demonstrated how far the CE could go in terms of conforming Christian faith to modern designs with its "Sparkle Creed," wherein parishioners stake their belief "in the non-binary God whose pronouns are plural."
Concerning the CE's contemplation of more gender-neutral phrasings, a spokesman for the church said, "Christians have recognized since ancient times that God is neither male nor female. ... Yet the variety of ways of addressing and describing God found in scripture has not always been reflected in our worship."
Conservative Anglicans stressed that "male and female imagery is not interchangeable," reported the Telegraph.
While the archbishop of York did not explicitly recommend a change to the Lord's Prayer in his remarks Friday, his provocative critique nevertheless comes at a time of great instability for the Anglican church.
In February, the conservative heads of numerous Anglican member churches renounced the primacy of the archbishop of Canterbury, citing the "recent decision of the Church of England's General Synod to legitimise and incorporate into the Church's liturgy the blessing of same sex unions" as cause.
The Global South Fellowship of Anglican Churches said in a statement that the "Church of England has departed from the historic faith passed down from the Apostles by this innovation in the liturgies of the Church and her pastoral practice (contravening her own Canon A5), she has disqualified herself from leading the Communion as the historic 'Mother' Church,'" and "has chosen to break communion with those provinces who remain faithful to the historic biblical faith expressed in the Anglican formularies."
Despite the GSFA's renunciation earlier this year, Cottrell said in his remarks that the Anglican church was "not splitting" but does "face enormous challenges."
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Just when it seems like the left can’t be anymore cringeworthy, embarrassing, and absolutely delusional, they show us just how much worse it can get.
Dylan Mulvaney, the man who skyrocketed to stardom for posting TikToks of his journey to “girlhood” recently underwent facial feminization surgery, and his new face has earned him additional worship from the left. Literally.
In a creepy appearance on Drew Barrymore’s show, the two give a vomit-inducing performance that ends with Barrymore on her knees, staring up dreamily at the self-proclaimed “girl.”
Sara Gonzales rips into him and his latest performative appearance on "The News & Why It Matters," calling him a “mentally ill man who dresses up like a female and calls vaginas Barbie pouches.”
She continues, “He went on the Drew Barrymore show to talk all things trans, and it just somehow kept getting worse.”
The clip from the show starts with Barrymore asking Mulvaney how he deals with the negativity.
He responds, “I still read the comments, but there’s so much hatred directed to the trans community right now, it's everywhere, and I think the greatest weapon that I can contribute is trans joy and comedy and talking about hard subjects and really intricate moments of a transition and try to let everybody in to see that, you know, I’m not a monster.”
Gonzales interjects, “Speaking of things you’re not.”
The pair continue salivating over each other. Drew even gets out of her chair and falls to her knees in front of Mulvaney, where he tells her he can’t imagine anyone disliking her. She responds, “Do you want to know ironically who dislikes me the most sometimes? Myself.”
They awkwardly hug while she remains on her knees, and it might be the worst moment on television we’ve seen in a long time.
Gonzales says she would “be very happy to sacrifice [her] own vote in order to get rid of all the crazy liberal white women’s votes,” like Drew's.
She continues, “Get off the floor, Drew, your goofy ass is embarrassing the rest of us. Welcome to the program, to members of the great patriarchy that we are here to serve.”
According to the left, fighting the patriarchy is best done while worshiping men who dress up as women.
Make it make sense, because we can’t.
To enjoy more roundtable rundowns of the top stories of the day, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.