Tim Kaine trying to weasel a ban on Hegseth changing base names into the military budget



Democrat Senator Tim Kaine (Va.) has weaseled an amendment into the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2026 that would handcuff Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth when it comes to the naming of certain military bases and other Pentagon assets.

Erasure

The Department of Defense took part in the iconoclastic Biden-era sweep of American history that saw graves dug up, statues toppled, animals renamed, busts melted down, and church windows removed.

Pursuant to the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2021 — which survived a Dec. 23, 2020, veto by President Donald Trump — former Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin established a commission to identify, for the purpose of removal, "names, symbols, displays, monuments, and paraphernalia to assets of the Department of Defense that commemorate the Confederate States of America or any person who served voluntarily with the Confederate States of America."

Austin ultimately embraced all of the commission's recommendations.

As a result, nine Army installations took on new names: Fort Bragg in North Carolina became Fort Liberty; Fort Benning in Georgia became Fort Moore; Fort Gordon in Georgia became Fort Eisenhower; Fort A.P. Hill in Virginia became Fort Walker; Fort Hood in Texas became Fort Cavazos; Fort Lee in Virginia became Fort Gregg-Adams; Fort Pickett in Virginia became Fort Barfoot; Fort Polk in Louisiana became Fort Johnson; and Fort Rucker in Alabama became Fort Novosel.

Restoration

These changes delighted Democrats and other leftists.

Democratic Sens. Tim Kaine and Mark Warner (Va.), both on the Senate Armed Services Committee, were among those who celebrated the condemnation of memory, claiming in a joint statement that the name changes were "proof that progress is possible."

RELATED: Exclusive: Moses Ezekiel’s historic sculpture finally set for installation in Arlington Cemetery, by the Southern graves it once marked

Photographer: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Ahead of the 2024 presidential election, Trump signaled a desire to reverse the changes.

Months after Hegseth restored the names of Forts Bragg and Benning, the commander in chief told a North Carolina crowd that the other seven Army installations were similarly getting their proper names back.

Among the Democrats prickled by this twist of fate was Kaine, who told reporters in June that Trump lacked the authority to make the name changes, stating, "The president can't change the law on a whim, and his court jester Pete Hegseth can't do it either."

Prohibition

The U.S. Senate plans to vote this month on its version of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act.

'We learn from our triumphs and our pains, which makes our country stronger.'

The bill currently contains an amendment, section 349, which would require Hegseth to use the names of Pentagon assets in the Commonwealth of Virginia, including military bases, that were adopted by the Biden-era naming commission.

This amendment, which Kaine's office confirmed to Blaze News was the Virginia Democrat's handiwork, bars Hegseth from overriding the Virginia-specific naming recommendations of the commission.

If the NDAA 2026 is passed as is, Forts A.P. Hill, Lee, and Pickett will become Forts Walker, Gregg-Adams, and Barfoot, just as the Biden-era revisionists intended.

When pressed on whether there was a conversation about limiting this prohibition to Virginia, the office of one Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee told Blaze News, "NDAA deliberations are held at a classified level, so we cannot comment on the process involved in the inclusion of this provision."

Blaze News reached out to several Republicans on the committee to ask whether they would fight the amendment but has so far received no confirmations.

Pentagon press secretary Kingsley Wilson said in a statement to Blaze News, "Past administrations have tried to rename bases that should [never have] been changed in the first place. Here at the Pentagon, we honor our American history and traditions; we don't erase it."

"We learn from our triumphs and our pains, which makes our country stronger," added Wilson.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Congress must kill DEI before it kills our military readiness



In June, with four months left in fiscal year 2025, the Army announced that it had surpassed its goal of enlisting 61,000 recruits. Female recruitment surged in particular across every branch, a shift many credit to President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s return to a “warfighter” ethos.

Yet Republicans in Congress still haven’t done their part to cement this new direction in law.

Congressional Republicans must seek a permanent end to the regime that has so disastrously compromised the military’s lethality.

The misguided and weak leadership of the previous administration allowed the ideology of diversity, equity, and inclusion to run rampant at the Pentagon, strangling recruiting efforts and sidelining the military’s true mission.

Under Joe Biden, the Army fell nearly 30,000 recruits short. Misguided priorities drained confidence in the service and hollowed out the ranks. If the “Trump bump” holds, it could reverse those losses and begin restoring the military’s strength and credibility after years of neglect and ideological tinkering.

Lingering progressive activism

Racial and gender identity politics defined the Biden administration so deeply that simple executive orders cannot uproot them — especially in the military. Former Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin’s 2022-26 Strategic Management Plan spelled it out, imposing race-based quotas on every service member and civilian across the force.

The Trump administration must insist that Congress make it impossible to return to this decades-long embrace of race and gender essentialism. Such action is necessary for Secretary Hegseth to continue sharpening the edge of American military power with confidence.

Congress has started moving in the right direction. The Senate Armed Services Committee recently advanced the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act with two measures aimed at curbing DEI. Section 547 blocks race and identity from influencing service academy admissions. Section 920 repeals several provisions that embedded DEI in the Defense Department.

These changes, though welcome, fall short. Congress must go farther if it wants real impact. Identity politics must be banned not just in admissions, but throughout the military. And for Section 920 to matter, DEI cannot simply be buried — its presence should disqualify applicants from future government service.

Ending DEI-based admissions

Another urgent target for repeal is the 2021 DEI selection board mandate, which forces military boards to “represent the diverse population of the armed force concerned.” That order undermines their core mission: choosing the most capable leaders to win wars.

Early signals from the House and Senate Armed Services Committees show they recognize the problem, but they have yet to commit to locking in Trump-era reforms. America’s depleted readiness should be evidence enough. Lawmakers must act decisively — restore the military’s lethality and bury DEI for good.

RELATED: How DEI took a sledgehammer to the US military’s war ethos

Photo by Ivan Cholakov via Getty Images

Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) has pushed consistently to root DEI out of the military. But he works with razor-thin majorities in both chambers, where entrenched Armed Services Committee staff — Republicans in name only — resist meaningful reform.

Trump’s political resurgence leaves no excuse. Republicans in Congress must break this pattern and confront the bureaucrats blocking change.

Republicans have their chance

Lawmakers now face their moment. The current Senate and House drafts of the NDAA fall short. Republicans must seize this chance to codify President Trump and Secretary Hegseth’s reforms and restore warfighting as the military’s sole organizing principle.

To end the tyranny of DEI and race quotas, Congress cannot stop at praising executive action. It must legislate a permanent end to the ideology that has gutted readiness and crippled lethality.

AI can be used to develop biological and chemical weapons



The greatest threat to America may be something we cannot see.

Biological and chemical weapons can spread debilitating fear and wreak havoc on populations. Unfortunately, the threat of these kinds of attacks on American soil is only rising, empowered by the unique capabilities of artificial intelligence. To prevent catastrophe, we must use AI to counter the danger that this advanced technology can unleash.

We are only one misstep away from catastrophe. The most recent close call came last month, when two Chinese nationals, who received funding from their communist government to work on a noxious fungus, were caught smuggling the pathogen into the United States. The FBI arrested them just in time.

AI could spark the next pandemic and be an unparalleled tool in the hands of terrorists.

This was no ordinary fungus. It was what scientists call an “agroterrorism weapon” that would have decimated America’s grain farms, sickened the U.S. population, and disrupted our nation’s food supply.

Those who lived through the fraught days immediately after 9/11 likewise remember the anthrax scare, as toxic letters were sent through the postal service, killing five people and making everyday Americans terrified to open their mailboxes.

Every few years, some new suspect threatens our military bases, political leaders, or someone else with ricin, a deadly poison derived from the castor plant.

And just a few short years ago, millions died and the entire world was thrown into a tailspin when COVID-19 — which many experts now believe originated from questionable handling and a lab leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology — crossed borders with abandon.

AI bioweapons are already happening

The rapid rise of AI is only making this problem more prevalent. In 2022 — months before ChatGPT was released, bringing large language models to the masses — an AI designed to develop drugs invented 40,000 new chemical weapons in a mere six hours.

In 2023, AI was used to provide a recipe for poisonous chloramine gas, which it called “Aromatic Water Mix.” AI experts and government officials have been warning for years that AI could spark the next pandemic and be an unparalleled tool in the hands of terrorists.

Such events have inspired a growing number of rightfully concerned individuals to demand a pause on AI development. We have enough problems with biological espionage, terrorism by mail, and lethal lab leaks. Why would we put potential biological and chemical weapons generators in the hands of anyone with a computer?

But responding to this threat is not so simple as pulling the plug. First, while AI has the potential to be used for evil, it also has immense power for good. The same tools that could be used to make biological weapons are also being applied to cure currently untreatable diseases.

Additionally, America can’t stop others from developing AI for whatever uses they desire. COVID-19 and the recent agroterrorism fungus both came from China, and you can bet China will have no problem unleashing AI for even more destructive ends if it serves China's interests, as will every other bad actor in the world.

So what else can we do?

Achievable protections

First, the administration should continue to aggressively investigate and thwart potential acts of biological and chemical terrorism. The recent FBI arrest of the Chinese fungus-smugglers proves that America’s law enforcement is aware of this threat and still capable of preventing attacks before they happen.

Likewise, President Donald Trump acted presciently in his first administration by launching the first-ever National Biodefense Strategy in 2018, which outlined how our nation can defend against natural outbreaks and intentional biological attacks.

This strategy, coupled with the president’s swift military action against Syria for its use of biological weapons that same year, reveals that the current administration will still use the immense power of American deterrence to stop the use of these deadly weapons.

Yet with AI poised to rapidly exacerbate biological and chemical weapons proliferation, traditional tools are not enough. We must use AI to respond to AI.

The private sector is already on the case. Companies like Renovaro and OpenAI, two U.S.-based AI firms, are already applying machine learning to both prevent AI from producing recipes for weaponry and to identify and counter biological and chemical threats before they can spiral out of control.

RELATED: The AI takeover isn’t coming — it’s already here

Photo by Vertigo3d via Getty Images

New coding produced by top AI experts can be applied to any large language model to prevent it from teaching users how to make weapons of mass destruction. For those pathogens that slip through the cracks, Renovaro’s AI has the potential to develop antidotes to biological and chemical samples within five days, light-years faster than the long months it took to develop vaccines and effective treatments for COVID-19.

President Trump promised a Golden Dome to protect America from missile attacks — a worthwhile initiative. Yet the next war may be started not by a missile, but by a microbe. We need a biological Golden Dome, and AI can make it.

Editor’s note: This article was originally published by RealClearDefense and made available via RealClearWire.

Ron Johnson Presses Pentagon On Reinstatement Of Troops Fired For Not Bowing To Biden’s Covid Shot Mandate

Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., is pressing the Pentagon on its efforts to reinstate military troops fired by the Biden administration for forgoing the Covid shot, the senator revealed Thursday. In his Tuesday letter, the Wisconsin Republican asked Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to provide an update on what the Defense Department is doing to return service […]

Further Data Shows Media Wildly Overestimated Number Of Trans Troops

In the weeks surrounding Trump’s inauguration, the left-wing media insisted the administration’s effort to remove trans troops from the military would weaken the force — some outlets fearmongered that up to 15,000 service members would be booted. But numbers recently obtained by journalist Chris Bray from the Department of Defense indicate that only four “transgender servicemembers” have been “removed […]

The terrorists run Syria now — and Christians, religious minorities are paying the price



Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, up until this month recognized by the U.S. government as a terrorist organization, was formed as the result of the merger of al-Qaeda's Syria affiliate, al-Nusrah Front, and other extremist groups committed to a "popular jihad."

HTS, which in recent years tried to rehab its public image, led the Turkish-backed Islamic militants who seized the Syrian capital of Damascus in December and ultimately overthrew the Assad regime — a regime change made possible with the help of the Obama CIA and the Pentagon.

Despite the HTS' murderous history and threats to the existence of Syria's Christians, Alawites, and Druze, Western neocons celebrated the replacement of Bashar al-Assad as president with HTS leader Muhammad al-Jawlani, who now goes by Ahmed Hussein al-Sharaa.

'The current political environment in Syria remains deeply unstable and ambiguous for Christians.'

The Washington Post's foreign policy columnist Josh Rogin, for instance, wrote, "Syria is free. The rebels won. The people liberated themselves from tyranny." Trump critic Bill Kristol wrote, "The fall of a brutal dictator is rare enough that we should take the opportunity to celebrate it, and pay tribute to those who brought it about." Democratic Rep. Marcy Kaptur (Ohio) expressed hope in December that under the new terrorist leadership, Syria would "be a tolerant society accepting of people from all religious confessions."

Recent massacres, bombings, rapes, and kidnappings committed by al-Sharaa's forces, friends, and fellow travelers have provided strong indications that such celebrations were premature.

A source who routinely travels to Syria and who has been in recent contact with people in the country has shared with Blaze News insights about life for Christians and other religious minorities under the new regime.

RELATED: Syria's terrorist regime just killed an American citizen — more Christians, Druze are next

The Syrian regime's security forces roll into the Druze city of Suwayda on July 15. Photo by SAM HARIRI/AFP via Getty Image

"The current political environment in Syria remains deeply unstable and ambiguous for Christians and certainly dangerous for other religious minorities, with recent events in the governorate of Sweida tragically underscoring this reality," said the source, who asked to remain anonymous over security concerns. "On July 15, 2025, Sweida experienced a large-scale massacre resulting in the deaths of hundreds of civilians."

Between July 13 and July 20, over 1,200 people were were killed in clashes between Sunni Muslim Bedouin clans, which were aided by al-Sharaa's forces, and Druze-linked militias in Syria's southern Druze-majority Suwayda province, according to the U.K.-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.

There have reportedly been numerous religiously-motivated assassinations across the country in the days since.

The source noted that "among those killed was a prominent pastor of the local evangelical church, along with his entire family."

Khaled Mazhar, the pastor of the Good Shepherd Evangelical Church in Suwayda city "who had converted from another faith tradition, was known for his peaceful integration and for serving as a respected leader within both the church and the wider community," added the source.

The SOHR indicated that members of al-Sharaa's Ministry of Defense were responsible for the pastor's slaying.

In response to the historic bloodletting, Blaze News' source indicated that religious communities, including Orthodox and Catholic Christians, have opened their churches as a place of refuge, and "overcrowding is now common."

"This recent crisis highlights both the persistent vulnerability of religious minorities in Syria and the profound challenges they face in the current political landscape. The urgent calls for international protection reflect a widespread sense of abandonment and a desire for tangible, effective action from the global community," the source said.

Fr. Tony Boutros, a Melkite-Catholic priest in Suwayda who was among the Christian clergymen abducted by radicals in 2015, said in a recent video statement, "We ask the U.S., Europe, the Vatican, and the whole world for international protection for this region of Sweida, all of it, for us and for our Druze brothers, my dear ones. Look at the massacres that happened to us in Sweida."

'The biggest thing that gets lost is complexity.'

The source indicated that everyday life for Christians and other religious minorities in Syria can "appear relatively normal," but such appearances are deceptive, as "underlying fear and uncertainty are constant realities."

RELATED: New massacre, old problem: How Syria can protect its religious minorities

Photo by Ali Haj Suleiman/Getty Images

"Most recently, the bombing at the Mar Elias Church in Damascus on June 22, 2025, during a Sunday liturgy, resulted in at least 20 deaths and dozens injured — demonstrating how quickly violence can erupt even in seemingly safe spaces," the source said. "In Sweida, the 'Suwayda Massacre' and other attacks have deepened a sense of vulnerability. Even where no violence is occurring, minorities remain wary, practicing their faith discreetly and living with a persistent sense of fragility, knowing that the situation can deteriorate suddenly and dramatically."

While life under the terrorist regime remains precarious, the source indicated that family presently in Syria believe "the situation is much better than what it was during the previous regime," although there is disagreement on this point.

"I used to say that nothing in the universe will be worse than the Assad regime. They were absolute monsters. However, if you ask someone from Sweida now, their answer would be different," the source said.

When pressed on whether something has been neglected in other reports that readers should know about the situation in Syria, the source noted, "The biggest thing that gets lost is complexity."

"Too often, reports paint Syria in black and white, but the reality is anything but simple," the source continued. "The situation shifts from city to city, even from one household to the next. It changes every day. Any responsible reporting has to acknowledge just how nuanced things are and resist the urge to generalize. Oversimplifying only does a disservice to the real lived experiences on the ground."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Microsoft 'escort' program gave China keys to Pentagon



The absurdity is so staggering it reads like satire. Microsoft, the tech giant entrusted with America’s most sensitive defense data, has been using Chinese engineers to maintain Pentagon computer systems.

These foreign contractors work directly on classified networks, handling everything from software updates to system maintenance for the Department of Defense.

The disclosure of the arrangement led Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) to demand a list of all Department of Defense contractors and subcontractors using "Chinese personnel to provide maintenance or other services on DOD systems,” as Cybersecurity Dive reported. “While this arrangement technically meets the requirement that U.S. citizens handle sensitive data, digital escorts often do not have the technical training or expertise needed to catch malicious code or suspicious behavior.”

Faced with the specter of massive blowback, Microsoft announced it would halt the practice in a Friday news dump. "In response to concerns raised earlier this week about U.S.-supervised foreign engineers, Microsoft has made changes to our support for U.S. government customers to assure that no China-based engineering teams are providing technical assistance for DOD government cloud and related services,” Microsoft comms lead Frank X. Shaw posted on X.

Microsoft's policies eliminated the need for hacking. Why breach systems when you can simply maintain them?

Welcome to the most spectacular security failure in American history, hiding in plain sight for nearly a decade.

Now, the rest of the country is left to pick up the pieces. These “digital escorts,” earning barely above minimum wage to babysit foreign programmers with access to military secrets, are supposed to monitor the Chinese engineers’ every keystroke, ensuring no sensitive data leaves the building or gets transmitted abroad.

Even with Chinese teams snipped out of the loop, Microsoft’s escort program represents corporate negligence elevated to high art. The company recruited former military personnel with minimal coding experience, paid them $18 an hour, and expected them to supervise sophisticated Chinese engineers manipulating Pentagon networks.

These “escorts” serve as human shields against espionage, except they lack the technical expertise to recognize an attack if it materialized on their screens. The escorts themselves acknowledge they’re flying blind while potential adversaries have their hands on the controls. They’re tasked with supervising engineers whose technical skills far exceed their own, creating a security theater that satisfies bureaucratic requirements while providing no actual protection.

Years in the making

China has spent decades perfecting the art of digital infiltration. Its state-sponsored hackers have penetrated everything from the Office of Personnel Management to senior government officials’ email accounts. In 2023, Chinese operatives downloaded 60,000 emails from the State Department alone. Yet, Microsoft’s response to this documented threat was to grant Chinese engineers even greater access to American defense systems, supervised by glorified security guards earning fast-food wages.

The logic is breathtaking in its stupidity.

China’s approach to data weaponization follows a predictable pattern. It steals intellectual property, harvests personal information, and infiltrates critical infrastructure with the patience of a civilization that thinks in centuries, not quarterly earnings reports. Every breach serves multiple purposes, from immediate intelligence gathering and long-term strategic positioning to the steady erosion of American technological advantage.

Consider how China could weaponize Pentagon data accessed through Microsoft’s escort charade. Military logistics become vulnerable to disruption. Personnel records provide targets for blackmail or recruitment. Communications patterns reveal operational planning. Financial systems become entry points for broader economic warfare.

The Chinese don’t need to steal nuclear launch codes when they can gradually map America’s entire defense infrastructure from the inside. More than just access, Microsoft’s escort program offers Beijing sustained, supervised observation of America’s most sensitive digital operations.

RELATED: Chinese nationals on student visas allegedly ripped off elderly Americans in nasty scheme

Photo by Ute Grabowsky/Photothek via Getty Images

China’s theft of American technology is well documented. The Chinese have stolen everything from military aircraft designs to semiconductor manufacturing processes. The FBI estimates Chinese economic espionage costs America hundreds of billions annually. Every major American corporation has faced Chinese cyber intrusions, including Big Tech firms like Google, consumer information giants like Equifax, and even huge hotel chains like Marriott.

Microsoft's policies eliminated the need for hacking. Why breach systems when you can simply maintain them?

Slow and steady wins the war

The escort program reveals how many American corporations have abandoned national security considerations in pursuit of global profit margins. Microsoft needed foreign engineers to reduce costs and increase efficiency. The solution wasn't to invest in American talent. It was to create an elaborate theater of security that satisfies government requirements while maintaining access to cheap foreign labor.

Armed with enough Pentagon data, China can orchestrate punishments against America that would make traditional warfare obsolete. It can strike at materiel, manipulating military supply chains to create strategic shortages during international crises, or go the psyop route, orchestrating targeted disinformation campaigns to undermine military morale and public confidence. Or, of course, China can do it all, everything everywhere all at once.

But the lightest footprints are the hardest to detect or halt. Economic warfare becomes surgical when you understand your opponent’s financial systems intimately. China could time market manipulations to coincide with American military operations, creating domestic political pressure to abandon foreign commitments. It could identify and target American defense contractors, disrupting weapons production through coordinated cyber attacks.

The ultimate punishment wouldn’t be costly, chaotic destruction — it would be inexorable, predictable dependency. With enough of an upper hand, China can gradually position itself as indispensable to American digital infrastructure, creating a scenario where confronting Chinese aggression would be too economically catastrophic to consider.

China has spent a long time putting Taiwan in a position where creeping absorption, not military annexation, will draw the country forever into China’s embrace. Why not America next?

Institutional blindness

Until last week, barely anyone was familiar with Microsoft's escort program. The Pentagon's own IT agency seemed clueless about foreign access to its most sensitive systems.

This institutional blindness isn't accidental — it's the natural result of outsourcing national security to profit-driven corporations. Microsoft created the escort program not to protect America, but to win federal contracts while maintaining access to global labor markets. The company's priority was scaling up operations, not securing them.

Microsoft's misbegotten escort program represents everything wrong with American technology policy. We've prioritized corporate convenience over national security, cost savings over strategic thinking, and global integration over sovereign protection. The company has created a system where American military secrets are maintained by foreign engineers supervised by underqualified contractors earning poverty wages.

Soft power’s hard edge

The Chinese understand what we've forgotten: Information is power, and sustained access to information is ultimate power. They don't need to destroy American systems when they can simply observe, learn, and gradually assume control over our digital infrastructure.

But this catastrophe isn't irreversible. America could mandate that all defense-related cloud maintenance be performed exclusively by cleared American citizens. Yes, it would cost more. Yes, it would require massive investment in domestic technical training. Yes, it would slow Microsoft's global scaling ambitions.

The alternative is surrendering our digital sovereignty to minimize corporate labor costs.

Congress could require complete transparency about foreign access to government systems. Defense contractors could be mandated to maintain American-only technical teams for classified work. The government could invest in rebuilding its own IT capabilities rather than outsourcing national security to profit-driven corporations.

These solutions exist. They require political will, financial commitment, and the radical notion that national security should take precedence over corporate profits. Microsoft's escort program proves we've chosen the opposite path.

The revolution in warfare isn't coming — it's already here, disguised as customer service. We can either recognize this reality and act accordingly, or continue paying $18 an hour for the privilege of losing it.

Pentagon Replaces Naval Academy Leader Who Oversaw Racist Affirmative Action Policies

The leading official who presided over the U.S. Naval Academy’s use of racist affirmative action admissions policies is being replaced, the Pentagon announced on Friday. According to a Defense Department press release, Marine Corps Lt. Gen. Michael J. Borgschulte has been nominated to replace Navy Vice Adm. Yvette Davids as the superintendent of the renowned […]

Congress Broke The Military, Now It Must Fix It

Only Congress can fully undo the mess it made.

Despite All The Bluster, The Trump Admin Has Not Prosecuted a Single Media Leaker

The Trump administration has yet to produce a tangible result.