'Department of War': Trump Signs Executive Order Aimed at Restoring Defense Department's Original Name

President Donald Trump on Friday signed an executive order that allows the Department of Defense to use the name "Department of War" and directs the defense secretary to propose making the name change permanent, reviving the name that the department used for more than 150 years before it was rebranded after World War II.

The post 'Department of War': Trump Signs Executive Order Aimed at Restoring Defense Department's Original Name appeared first on .

Trump set to re-establish Defense Department's 'warrior ethos' by restoring original name



President Donald Trump intends to restore the original name of the Department of Defense.

Trump is expected to sign an executive order on Friday that will designate the Department of War as the DOD's secondary title, according to a White House fact sheet obtained by Fox News Digital. The change will also name Pete Hegseth the secretary of war.

'Call the endless WARS what they are. And maybe then, we'll finally put an end to this cycle.'

Further, the order seeks to make the alteration permanent by instructing Hegseth to propose legislative and executive actions. The Trump administration plans to update public-facing websites and the Pentagon's office signage, a White House official told Fox News Digital.

The Department of War title was used for the United States' military agency until 1949.

"We won WWI, and we won WWII, not with the Department of Defense, but with a War Department, with the Department of War," Hegseth told "Fox & Friends" on Wednesday. "As the president has said, we're not just defense, we're offense."

RELATED: Tim Kaine trying to weasel a ban on Hegseth changing base names into the military budget

Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images

"We've re-established at the Department the warrior ethos. We want warriors, folks that understand how to exact lethality on the enemy," he continued. "We don't want endless contingencies and just playing defense. We think words and names and titles matter. So we're working with the White House and the president on it. Stand by."

Trump told reporters last week that the name change was imminent.

"We're just going to do it," Trump declared. "I'm sure Congress will go along if we need that. I don't think we even need that."

RELATED: Congress must kill DEI before it kills our military readiness

Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

Blaze Media co-founder Glenn Beck reacted to Trump's plans to change the agency's name.

"Renaming the Department of Defense to the Department of War would remind both the world and OURSELVES what our tax dollars are funding: Bombs will be dropped. Our children will die. I think that's what Trump is trying to do. Call the endless WARS what they are. And maybe then, we'll finally put an end to this cycle," Beck wrote in a post on social media.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Pro-life senator announces she will not seek re-election



With the 2026 midterms looming on the horizon, one Republican senator has announced she will not be seeking re-election.

On Tuesday, Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) confirmed the rumors that have been swirling for months and officially announced that she will not seek a third term. She made the announcement in a video posted to X.

'Protecting life and the most vulnerable among us is the most important measure of any society.'

"It has been an honor to dedicate my life to the service of our great state and country. Having been raised in a family who has given me so much love and support, now as our family ages and grows, it's my time for me to give back to them," Ernst said in the video.

The Senate Leadership Fund quickly responded to the news. "We want to express our gratitude to Senator Joni Ernst for her dedicated service to our nation and the people of Iowa, both in the U.S. Senate and serving in the armed forces," executive director Alex Latcham said in a statement obtained by Blaze News. "Senator Ernst has been a steadfast conservative leader throughout her time in office, and we wish her the very best in her retirement. We are confident that Iowans will once again choose a strong fighter to represent them in the U.S. Senate next fall."

RELATED: Liberal media spins Sen. Ernst's town hall death reminder while Iowa Democrats make their play

— (@)

Ernst, 55, was first elected to the U.S. Senate in 2014, making her the first woman ever elected to federal office from the state of Iowa.

Since then, she has been a reliable Republican vote. As an Iraq War veteran, Ernst has advocated for servicemen and women. She even ruffled feathers in her own party after President Donald Trump's re-election win last fall when she initially lobbied against the nomination of Pete Hegseth as secretary of defense following allegations of sexual misconduct. However, she ultimately voted to confirm him.

She has also been a staunch supporter of the pro-life movement, voting for the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act and to defund Planned Parenthood. "Protecting life and the most vulnerable among us is the most important measure of any society," she says on her website.

While Iowa has some of the strongest restrictions on abortion in the country, a recent Des Moines Register poll indicated that a solid majority of Iowans, 64%, say abortion should be legal in all or most cases.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Tim Kaine trying to weasel a ban on Hegseth changing base names into the military budget



Democrat Senator Tim Kaine (Va.) has weaseled an amendment into the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2026 that would handcuff Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth when it comes to the naming of certain military bases and other Pentagon assets.

Erasure

The Department of Defense took part in the iconoclastic Biden-era sweep of American history that saw graves dug up, statues toppled, animals renamed, busts melted down, and church windows removed.

Pursuant to the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2021 — which survived a Dec. 23, 2020, veto by President Donald Trump — former Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin established a commission to identify, for the purpose of removal, "names, symbols, displays, monuments, and paraphernalia to assets of the Department of Defense that commemorate the Confederate States of America or any person who served voluntarily with the Confederate States of America."

Austin ultimately embraced all of the commission's recommendations.

As a result, nine Army installations took on new names: Fort Bragg in North Carolina became Fort Liberty; Fort Benning in Georgia became Fort Moore; Fort Gordon in Georgia became Fort Eisenhower; Fort A.P. Hill in Virginia became Fort Walker; Fort Hood in Texas became Fort Cavazos; Fort Lee in Virginia became Fort Gregg-Adams; Fort Pickett in Virginia became Fort Barfoot; Fort Polk in Louisiana became Fort Johnson; and Fort Rucker in Alabama became Fort Novosel.

Restoration

These changes delighted Democrats and other leftists.

Democratic Sens. Tim Kaine and Mark Warner (Va.), both on the Senate Armed Services Committee, were among those who celebrated the condemnation of memory, claiming in a joint statement that the name changes were "proof that progress is possible."

RELATED: Exclusive: Moses Ezekiel’s historic sculpture finally set for installation in Arlington Cemetery, by the Southern graves it once marked

Photographer: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Ahead of the 2024 presidential election, Trump signaled a desire to reverse the changes.

Months after Hegseth restored the names of Forts Bragg and Benning, the commander in chief told a North Carolina crowd that the other seven Army installations were similarly getting their proper names back.

Among the Democrats prickled by this twist of fate was Kaine, who told reporters in June that Trump lacked the authority to make the name changes, stating, "The president can't change the law on a whim, and his court jester Pete Hegseth can't do it either."

Prohibition

The U.S. Senate plans to vote this month on its version of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act.

'We learn from our triumphs and our pains, which makes our country stronger.'

The bill currently contains an amendment, section 349, which would require Hegseth to use the names of Pentagon assets in the Commonwealth of Virginia, including military bases, that were adopted by the Biden-era naming commission.

This amendment, which Kaine's office confirmed to Blaze News was the Virginia Democrat's handiwork, bars Hegseth from overriding the Virginia-specific naming recommendations of the commission.

If the NDAA 2026 is passed as is, Forts A.P. Hill, Lee, and Pickett will become Forts Walker, Gregg-Adams, and Barfoot, just as the Biden-era revisionists intended.

When pressed on whether there was a conversation about limiting this prohibition to Virginia, the office of one Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee told Blaze News, "NDAA deliberations are held at a classified level, so we cannot comment on the process involved in the inclusion of this provision."

Blaze News reached out to several Republicans on the committee to ask whether they would fight the amendment but has so far received no confirmations.

Pentagon press secretary Kingsley Wilson said in a statement to Blaze News, "Past administrations have tried to rename bases that should [never have] been changed in the first place. Here at the Pentagon, we honor our American history and traditions; we don't erase it."

"We learn from our triumphs and our pains, which makes our country stronger," added Wilson.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

‘I Don’t Forgive Him’: House GOP Veterans Rip Biden’s Afghanistan Withdrawal On Anniversary Of Abbey Gate Bombing

House Republican military veterans marked the fourth anniversary of the Abbey Gate bombing that killed 13 service members in August 2021 by releasing heartfelt testimonials reflecting on the tragedy. The group of GOP lawmakers, many of whom were deployed to Afghanistan before serving in Congress, honored the sacrifice of the fallen heroes in tribute videos […]

Vance unloads on safety-hating protesters in DC, punches through liberal media rhetoric



Vice President JD Vance spoke on Wednesday with National Guard soldiers stationed at D.C.'s Union Station, underscoring his gratitude and continued support for their efforts to tackle crime in the national capital.

While the troops and members of the federalized Metropolitan Police Department appeared happy to see Vance — who was accompanied by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller — liberal protesters threw fits at the sight of the vice president, whining about his presence as well as about the efforts by the Trump administration to make D.C. safer.

Vance smiled as he passed a bespectacled radical in the station screaming, "F**king Nazi," an unhinged woman yelling, "Health care, housing, and climate justice! ... Military out of our streets," and a man in a cap shouting, "Get the f**k out of my city!"

Supporters reportedly countered with, "USA! USA! USA!"

— (@)

When met with booing outside the Shake Shack at Union Station, Vance directed Hegseth's attention to the radical responsible and said, "This is the guy who thinks people don't deserve law and order in their own community."

'This should be a monument to American greatness.'

The defense secretary laughed, pointed, and then resumed his tour of the relatively safer station.

— (@)

Vance noted in his remarks to the National Guard soldiers that Union Station, like much of the district, has long endured an unacceptable level of crime.

RELATED: Trump to DC: Crime is a choice

Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

"You have vagrants, you have drug addicts, you have the chronically homeless, you have the mentally ill who harass, who threaten violence, who attack families, and they've done it for far too long," the vice president said.

It's not just addicts, hobos, and the insane who have made Union Station a dangerous place in recent months.

In February, six girls, ages 11 to 14, were reportedly arrested for allegedly assaulting a woman who was trying to leave the station. Police indicated that one of the girls filmed the savage attack. That same month, a man was gunned down inside the station's parking garage.

"This should be a monument to American greatness," Vance continued. "This should not be a place where parents of small children are afraid to bring them ... because we have empowered criminals over the people who actually need public safety in this city. So I think Union Station is a great example of what's possible when you have the political willpower to bring law and order and common decency back to the public spaces of the United States."

— (@)

After Vance stressed the importance of following through "until we make America and D.C. in particular a safe place again," a reporter asked him, "What evidence do you have or does the DOJ have — are you going to be releasing it?"

'Let's free DC from lawlessness.'

"Are you going to be releasing evidence of this?" the reporter continued.

RELATED: Exclusive video: Black DC residents tell Blaze News the reasons they support Trump's DC crime strategy

Photo by Al Drago-Pool/Getty Images

"Of what?" Vance responded. "That D.C. has a terrible crime problem? You just gotta look around. Obviously D.C. has a terrible crime problem, and the Department of Justice statistics back it up, the FBI statistics back it up. Just talk to a resident of this city — this beautiful, great American city."

Adopting the "free D.C." slogan yelled by the leftist protesters outside, Vance said, "Let's free D.C. from lawlessness. Let's free Washington, D.C., from one of the highest murder rates in the entire world. Let's free Washington, D.C., so that young families can walk around and feel safe and secure."

Vance, once again referencing the noisy rabble outside, noted that it was "kind of bizarre that we have a bunch of old, primarily white, people who are out there protesting the policies that keep people safe when they've never felt danger in their entire lives."

Blaze News has reached out to Vance's office for further comment.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Defense Department May Adopt Pro-America Test For K-12 Schools, Military Academies

This would encourage more traditional, less politicized instruction in military-run public schools and boost recruitment from the most pro-America demographics.

CNN tried to smear this pastor — but exposes the truth about the left instead



The media's newest attempt to villainize Christianity proves why such attacks rarely — if ever — succeed. And in this case, the attempted smear revealed more about the attacker than the attacked.

Enter CNN and Idaho pastor Doug Wilson.

It's an uncomfortable truth for the gatekeepers of power. In this battle, conviction, honesty, and truth win.

CNN recently profiled Wilson and spotlighted his views on gender roles, sexual morality, and politics, cherry-picking his most provocative answers and stripping them of nuance.

But how CNN framed Wilson's ideas revealed the true motive for the profile: He's a "Christian nationalist" with "controversial views," and —gasp! — his influence is growing, therefore we must tar and feather him. The profile even went to great lengths to connect Wilson to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who praises Wilson and attended a Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches in Tennessee. Wilson co-founded the CREC, which recently planted a new church in Washington, D.C.

Reaction to the profile was dramatic and predictable.

But in trying to portray Wilson — and, by extension, conservative Christians — as dangerous, CNN accidentally exposed something far more telling: the fragility of the progressive worldview.

Moral amnesia

CNN didn't profile Wilson by accident.

The network specifically targeted him because he represents so much of what it opposes. And he is perfect for the role: the unapologetic patriarch who stands against the sexual revolution, envisions a Christian world, and refuses to bend his knee to the latest secular creed. The point of the profile wasn't to better understand Wilson or his theology, but to sound a warning that his worldview is a threat to the anti-God secularism that progressivism serves.

Here's the irony: The framing and subsequent outrage assumes that Wilson's views are some bizarre novelty. But they're not.

RELATED: Doug Wilson's CNN interview exposes the left's religious

For most of history, Wilson's views would be considered unremarkable.

A Christian who desires the entire world to know Christ and to follow Him? Of course. A Christian who preaches biblical sexual ethics? Wouldn't expect anything less. A Christian who affirms a traditional view of the family? It's exactly what you expect.

Whether or not you agree with Wilson, his views are hardly alien to America or Christianity.

This interview demonstrates the collision between the moral memory of the past and the progressive sensibilities of the present. Progressivism has moved the goal posts so far in such a short amount of time that views our recent ancestors held are now treated as existential threats.

Clarity wins

But why Wilson? And why now?

You don't need to agree with him to see what's happening here: The elite view Wilson and other Christians like him as a threat, so they give him a spotlight to "expose" him.

The implied question underneath the interview is: How can someone possibly believe this stuff?!

And that's why this interview is fascinating.

On one hand, progressives, the legacy media, and those entrenched in power look down upon Wilson for having "backward" and "outdated" views, which they would describe as a "threat to democracy." But there sits CNN reporter Pamela Brown across from Wilson asking her loaded questions — precisely because Americans are no longer buying what the left is selling.

You know this is true not because of what Wilson said but how he said it.

Wilson spoke with clarity — no flinching, PR-friendly slogans, or euphemisms. He didn't try to hide his views but spoke plainly. It's proof that progressivism is lacking answers, running out of influence, and grasping at villains because it can't defend its own failing moral vision.

Utopia's lies

The progressive project isn't collapsing because Christians like Wilson are attacking it (though he is). It's collapsing because people are seeing it for what it is.

For decades, the left promised liberation, enlightenment, and progress. People were told that if they abandoned the "oppression" of Christianity, rejected the "old" moral codes, and embraced the "right side of history," life would be utopia.

RELATED: The left's new anti-Christian smear backfires

DOMINIC GWINN/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images

But the fruit of the progressive project speaks for itself. Instead of flourishing, Americans were handed confusion, division, and despair.

The evidence is everywhere.

The loneliness epidemic. The crises of mental, physical, emotional, and spiritual health. The breakdown of community. The sense that all of the "freedom" that progress promised has only left us less happy, less rooted, and less sure of who we are.

This is why Christianity is a threat to the progressive project. Christians speak with conviction about God, family, and moral order. It offers an alternative to the chaos of "progress," and the left cannot tolerate a rival vision for the good life.

Except, this one actually works — because it is true.

Progress on trial

CNN thought it was shining a spotlight on a fringe figure with alleged influence over the government. It was an attempt to fearmonger about "Christian nationalism."

But what is actually illuminated is the abject failure of the leftist worldview. The progressive narrative that dominated our culture for generations hasn't delivered on any of its promises. Instead, it has made our culture sick and eroded what is true and good. The progressive utopia, it turns out, is hell.

That's why this interview matters in a way CNN doesn't understand.

You don't have to agree with Wilson's theology, tone, or methods. But he and other Christians have something the left doesn't: a coherent moral vision that doesn't shift with the cultural winds, one that doesn't seek to uproot good in service of evil.

It's an uncomfortable truth for the gatekeepers of power. In this battle, conviction, honesty, and truth win. And in this case, it's why the attacker ends up attacked. The more they smear faithful Christians as extremists, the more obvious it becomes that progressivism has nothing good to offer — no map, no anchor, and no hope.

CNN tried to put Wilson on trial, but the real defendant was secular progressivism. And the verdict isn't just "guilty" — it's "failed beyond repair."