Google PhD fellowship discriminates against white and Asian students, but many elite universities still comply



Since at least 2009, Google has offered generous fellowships to up and coming computer science scholars seeking financial support during their final years of study. A new report from the Washington Free Beacon now reveals that Google has long included a racist criterium to prevent colleges and universities from nominating too many qualified white and Asian students for the fellowship.

Google claims that it offers the fellowship "to recognize outstanding graduate students doing exceptional and innovative research in areas relevant to computer science and related fields." And though it likewise purports that fellowships are available to "promising PhD candidates of all backgrounds," the nomination process Google has established directly limits the number of male, white, and Asian students who can be considered.

Under the fellowship FAQ section, Google states that applicants — except those from Africa, India, or southeast Asia — must be nominated by their school. It also states that American and Canadian universities may nominate up to four students total, only two of whom may be able-bodied white or Asian males.

"If a university chooses to nominate more than two students," Google states, "then in order to increase opportunities for students who are underrepresented in the field of computing the third and fourth nominees must self-identify as a woman, Black / African descent, Hispanic / Latino / Latinx, Indigenous, and/or a person with a disability."

It is unclear whether Google means to imply that applicants may "self-identify" as black, Hispanic, indigenous, or disabled.

As the Washington Free Beacon notes, many of the schools which have submitted nominees for the fellowship also have anti-discrimination policies which would prohibit them from selecting nominees based on race and gender. These include elite Ivy League schools like Harvard, Yale, and Princeton, as well as notable state schools like the University of North Carolina, the University of Michigan, and the University of California, Berkeley. MIT, NYU, Duke, Johns Hopkins, and others have also submitted nominations.

And by complying with the race and gender parameters for the fellowship, these same schools may also be violating federal law.

"The Google Fellowship program is a blatantly unlawful and immoral quota plan that pits students against one another by skin color and ethnic heritage," said Edward Blum, the founder of Students for Fair Admissions. "Our nation’s enduring civil rights laws were passed to specifically forbid this type of racial discrimination."

Despite the accusations of racial and gender discrimination, Google stands by its policy.

"Like many companies, we actively encourage a broad range of individuals to apply to our PhD Fellowship program in order to attract the widest and most representative pool of applicants possible—this follows all relevant laws and is extremely common to do," a Google spokesperson said.

Google further stated that the selection process to determine the final awardees "is not based on demographics in any way."

It is unclear how many white and Asian males have ever received a Google fellowship.

University of Manchester PhD student conducts research by masturbating to fantasy 'comics' about sexualized 'young boys'

University of Manchester PhD student conducts research by masturbating to fantasy 'comics' about sexualized 'young boys'



Warning: Graphic material

The University of Manchester has faced a deluge of complaints and social media backlash after the public learned that it had published a paper written by one of its students who conducted research by masturbating to shota, a subgenre of Japanese "comics" that portray "young boys" in sexual situations.

"I wanted to understand how my research participants experience sexual pleasure when reading shota, a Japanese genre of self-published erotic comics that features young boy characters," wrote Karl Andersson, a visual anthropology Ph.D. student at the University of Manchester. "I therefore started reading the comics in the same way as my research participants had told me that they did it: while masturbating."

Andersson said that during his Ph.D. studies, he had hit a brick wall and struggled with developing a new angle of scholarly research. Then, he said, "I realised that my body was equipped with a research tool of its own that could give me, quite literally, a first-hand understanding."

A long-term relationship had recently ended at that time, he said. So, he created a laboratory of self-examination by forgoing any kind of sexual relationship with a partner and all forms of pornography except for shota for a period of three months. He then documented and assessed his personal sexual response to shota.

The result was an article entitled "I am not alone — we are all alone: Using masturbation as an ethnographic method in research on shota subculture in Japan." In it, Andersson describes in graphic detail his masturbation processes and his assessment of their supposedly salutary benefits.

"I experienced a sense of self-care, which I also call the 'spa effect,' since I often felt so relaxed after these [shota] sessions that it reminded of going to a spa, or why not an onsen, a Japanese hot spring," Andersson wrote, adding: "While my previous masturbation habits had been rather routine, masturbating to shota became more of a ritual: carefully choosing a [comic] (what am I in the mood for today?), creating a comfortable position in the bed, dozing off a bit afterwards – it was all part of the ritual."

Because shota fantasy explicitly depicts "young boys" in various sexual encounters, many countries have outlawed it, including Canada, Australia, and the U.K., where the University of Manchester is located.

The university has received so many complaints since the article was published in April that it has issued a statement.

“The recent publication in Qualitative Research of the work of a student, now registered for a PhD, has raised significant concerns and complaints which we are taking very seriously," the statement reads.

“We are currently undertaking a detailed investigation into all aspects of their work, the processes around it and other questions raised. It is very important that we look at the issues in-depth.”

Below, Andersson describes his first month as a PhD student at the University of Manchester.


University 'cancels' author of essay who criticized references to Jill Biden as 'Dr': 'Sounds and feels fraudulent'



The author of an opinion essay that criticized references to Jill Biden, the wife of media-declared president-elect Joe Biden, as a "Dr." was summarily canceled from his associations with Northwestern University.

What happened?

Joseph Epstein, an author who was previously a lecturer at Northwestern, argued in an essay for the Wall Street Journal that Jill Biden should not receive the honorary title because her doctorate is neither in medicine nor science, but in education.

In his essay — which was titled, "Is There a Doctor in the White House? Not if You Need an M.D." — Epstein wrote:

Madame First Lady—Mrs. Biden—Jill—kiddo: a bit of advice on what may seem like a small but I think is a not unimportant matter. Any chance you might drop the "Dr." before your name? "Dr. Jill Biden" sounds and feels fraudulent, not to say a touch comic. Your degree is, I believe, an Ed.D., a doctor of education, earned at the University of Delaware through a dissertation with the unpromising title "Student Retention at the Community College Level: Meeting Students' Needs." A wise man once said that no one should call himself "Dr." unless he has delivered a child. Think about it, Dr. Jill, and forthwith drop the doc.

After all, Epstein went on to argue, the process of earning a Ph.D. is not as strenuous as it once was, therefore it is not deserving of the same prestige.

"The Ph.D. may once have held prestige, but that has been diminished by the erosion of seriousness and the relaxation of standards in university education generally, at any rate outside the sciences," Epstein wrote.

How did Northwestern respond?

Epstein's essay was circulated widely on Saturday, generating a tsunami of backlash, both against Epstein, who was accused of being sexist, and against the Wall Street Journal, which was criticized for publishing Epstein's opinion.

Northwestern also received criticism — likely because Epstein identified himself as having "taught at Northwestern University for 30 years" — and the university eventually responded.

In a statement, the Chicago-area university distanced itself from any associations with Epstein, calling his views "misogynistic."

"Joseph Epstein was never a tenured professor at Northwestern and has not been a lecturer here since 2002," the university said.

"While we firmly support academic freedom and freedom of expression, we do not agree with Mr. Epstein's opinion and believe the designation of doctor is well deserved by anyone who has earned a Ph.D., an Ed.D. or an M.D.," the statement continued. "Northwestern is firmly committed to equity, diversity and inclusion, and strongly disagrees with Mr. Epstein's misogynistic views."

Northwestern also removed Epstein's profile from its website. Earlier on Saturday, Epstein was identified as an "emeritus lecturer" at Northwestern.

It appears Northwestern University's English Department has removed Joseph Epstein's profile from its website. Ea… https://t.co/im4hXVSQNT
— David Gura (@David Gura)1607834363.0