Are Epstein's ‘blackmail videos’ being used for leverage RIGHT NOW?



To the disbelief of truth-seekers everywhere, the DOJ and FBI have determined in a two-page memo released this week that there was no proof Jeffrey Epstein had been working a vast blackmail operation and that there was no "client list.”

“This systematic review revealed no incriminating ‘client list,’” the memo reads. “There was also no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions. We did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.”

However, many Americans still question whether or not they’re being told the truth, especially considering that the amount of power one could gain from having possession of the list is astronomical.

-


“That is extraordinary power,” Blaze Media co-founder Glenn Beck tells ATF whistleblower John Dodson. “Any confidence that it’s not being used?”

“I have confidence that it’s not being used in that the fact that the people that it hurts the most are in control over it. Maybe that’s the case — why it’s not being used,” Dodson responds. “I would almost argue that it would be a better state of the world if a Hoover FBI had it, right, and leveraged it against everybody.”

“Would be better than the people that were directly involved having it,” he adds.

“So that implies that people in the government were involved in that,” Glenn says.

“I mean, I think so. That’s merely my opinion, but I don’t think that stuff happens with the names that have been floated around there without the government involved. And again, it’s the government. It is so huge and it is so powerful, and it has ultimately zero accountability,” Dodson says.

“American people think that there’s accountability. There is none,” he adds.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Was he a spy? Epstein and Maxwell's eerie intel agency connections



Author and investigative researcher Whitney Webb has been studying Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell for so long and so intensely that all her work has culminated in a 1,000-page book called “One Nation Under Blackmail: The Sordid Union Between Intelligence and Organized Crime That Gave Rise to Jeffrey Epstein.”

“It’s sort of like a meta scandal. You’re looking at someone who had, I guess, for lack of a better metaphor, had his hands in a lot of pies,” Webb tells Glenn Beck on “The Glenn Beck Podcast,” adding, “So he was sort of at the center of a lot of scandals, but not necessarily at the top,” she adds.

“Was he a spy?” Glenn asks, curious.


“I think he definitely had intelligence connections, and there’s a lot to suggest that was the case. I think one of the earliest hints we heard of that was having a secretary of labor, Alex Acosta, under Trump, say that one of the reasons he was pressured into giving Epstein a sweetheart deal during his first arrest in Florida was because he had been told by unspecified actors that Epstein belonged to intelligence,” Webb explains.

“But that’s kind of, you know, what exactly does that mean?” she asks herself. “Was he an asset? Was he on the payroll? Which intelligence agency? Multiple intelligence agencies? When you have his close association with someone like Ghislaine Maxwell in the mix, and her father had affiliations with numerous intelligence agencies, you know, it really is an open question.”

Despite Epstein’s name being well known in America, specifically after his apparent suicide, Webb remains one of the only, if not the only, researcher to have dug as deep as she has into who he really he was and what actually happened.

“The silence is very eerie about major aspects of the Epstein case,” Webb tells Glenn, noting that her book ended up being so long because as she was researching, she realized the American public had no idea the breadth of connections Epstein had.

“Banks like the Bank of Credit and Commerce International or BCCI, the scandal that involved, or even things like Iran-Contra. People may have heard the name but don’t really know what it involved,” she explains.

However, much has changed since the days of Epstein.

“Today, I think we’ve moved away from the type of model that Epstein used for sexual blackmail. It’s an era of electronic blackmail, and you don’t even have to do anything wrong. They can just plant it on your devices and play 'gotcha’ that way,” Webb explains, noting that intelligence agencies have gotten “totally out of control.”

“It was originally justified out of wartime necessity during World War and the Nazis. But it never stopped,” she adds.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Ron Paul EXPOSES how the Federal Reserve keeps up its scam



The Federal Reserve uses protecting the free market as one of the biggest reasons for its existence, but former Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) knows better.

“That’s the argument they use,” he tells Blaze Media co-founder Glenn Beck. “You know, bank runs and all this, and the Fed was established to stop all that.”

“And you can stop it, but it’s because they drifted away and they never fully obeyed the Constitution that nothing other than gold and silver would be used as legal tender, and that was a little too sloppy,” he continues.


“You wrote ‘End the Fed,'" Glenn responds. “What would you add to that today?”

“You put a rule in there that says that the Federal Reserve cannot buy government debt,” Paul answers. “That’s the whole thing. Then they get into manipulating and then they get into this astounding thing. They’re central economic planners by manipulating interest rates.”

“That’s where the real problem is, the economic planning that they have and the pretense that they know what is there,” he continues. “They talk as if what they’re saying is authentic, and it’s always, ‘What can we say to calm the people’s nerves?’”

While the Federal Reserve buys the government debt, American citizens are left to suffer if they fall into a money pit they can’t get out of.

“If you or I go overboard, and we spend $5 million and all of a sudden the banks won’t loan us any more money, we have to declare bankruptcy. We have to get another job or quit spending,” Paul says. “Governments don’t do that.”

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Scott Jennings To Debut Weekday Radio Show

'We’re going on offense'

Cattle rancher’s STARK warning: You'll only have meat 'as a treat'



American cattle rancher Shad Sullivan is sounding the alarm on the “war on beef” that the elites are waging against the American people, and Blaze media co-founder Glenn Beck is right there with him.

“This is all coming from elites,” Glenn tells Sullivan. “85% of elites and super elites — super elites are ones that went to Ivy League colleges and have a doctorate. Just the elite are making $150,000 a year, they’ve gone to college, have one postgraduate degree, and they’re involved in the companies or countries.”

“They just did a poll on those people. Eighty-plus percent say that Americans should not be allowed to eat beef or meat of any kind,” he continues.

“We have to remember what Klaus Schwab said in 2023 at Davos. He said, ‘You will enjoy meat as a treat, but not for sustenance,’” Sullivan agrees. “And we know beef is really the only animal that can provide total and 100% sustenance to human life.”


“These elite that you talk about, I hearken back to my dad. He’s gone now, but he was a self-made rancher. Started with nothing,” he continues. “I said, ‘Dad, what are we going to do?’ And he says, ‘Son, we’ll never change America until they sit in the dark, cold and hungry.’”

“And that’s the truth. And he came from a place of suffering, so he understood that,” he adds, noting that the elites will never understand the kind of suffering that makes them grow.

“I think about somebody on the side of the road with a flat tire. Those elites couldn’t even change a flat tire. They couldn’t do the most simple things that require real life, and here they are, demanding and dictating how we’re going to produce and consume, not only in America, but across the world,” Sullivan explains.

However, there is one thing that keeps the elites from all-out rule over the American people.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Michelle Obama Does Not Sound Well

That she squanders her time with personal complaints about having to buy food in the White House and public commentary about not wanting a son who would turn out like her husband suggests she is not well.

Does Michelle Obama Hate Her Husband?

'Because he would’ve been a Barack Obama'

Chris Murphy cops out on trans athletes: ‘I don’t have girls’



Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) recently appeared on New York Times columnist Ross Douthat’s “Interesting Times” podcast. The conversation touched on several big political topics, but one moment stood out — not for its insight, but for its sheer evasiveness.

Douthat asked Murphy whether he found it unfair for biological males to compete in girls’ sports. Murphy’s answer? “I don’t have girls.”

The facts are indisputable: Chris Murphy stands on the wrong side of one of the clearest-cut issues in American politics.

Instead of addressing a question that concerns millions of American families, the senator dismissed it based on the composition of his own household. When Douthat pressed him to show empathy for those who do have daughters, Murphy claimed that “lots of parents of girls” in Connecticut don’t see any problem with it.

Really, Senator? On an 80-20 issue, your go-to argument rests on anecdotal outliers who are fine with their daughters competing against biological males? As Joe Biden might say, c’mon, man!

Sure, such parents exist — but they’re rare. The overwhelming majority of moms and dads, whether they have daughters or not, understand that allowing males to compete in girls’ sports is fundamentally unfair.

You don’t need to have a daughter to see the injustice. Anyone paying attention can recognize a rigged contest when a biological male steps onto the field, court, or track. As a mother of three sons, I understand the biological differences firsthand — and I’ve seen just how dangerous it can be when girls are forced to compete against boys.

Murphy surely understands this too. He even mentioned that his sons play competitive travel sports. Every father of male athletes knows the advantage boys possess. The idea that Murphy genuinely believes girls can fairly compete against biological males stretches the bounds of credibility. More likely, partisan ideology has overridden his common sense.

Reserving girls’ sports for girls isn’t discrimination. Saying you’re a girl doesn’t make you one. Female athletes have no obligation to indulge a make-believe ideology that denies biological reality.

Since Congress passed Title IX in 1972, women and girls have had the legal right to fair competition, which includes female-only athletic events and locker rooms. That means girls shouldn’t be forced to change clothes next to males or be exposed to male genitalia in private spaces — yet Murphy supports exactly that, so long as those males claim to identify as female.

RELATED: USA Today obliterated online over bizarre claim about transgender athletes

  Photo by Kirby Lee/Getty Images

This is not a fringe position. It is now the standard view of the Democratic Party and most public school districts. And it has consequences.

When boys enter girls’ events, girls lose — podium spots, medals, school records, regional and national competition slots, even college scholarships. They lose their shot at excellence. They lose their privacy. And apparently, if you ask Senator Murphy, that’s just fine — because his kids aren’t affected.

After some prodding from Douthat, Murphy finally gave a definitive answer: “Yes, my conclusion is that I would support those athletes being able to participate in my community.”

But who are “those athletes”? He means males who identify as females. And yes, they absolutely should be allowed to participate — on boys’ teams.

Title IX applies in every zip code. It was written to protect girls. It still does — if we enforce it.

Whether Senator Murphy genuinely believes what he said or is simply toeing the Democratic Party line is a question only he and his conscience can answer. But the facts are indisputable: He stands on the wrong side of one of the clearest-cut issues in American politics. He may not have daughters, but that does not excuse him from standing up for those who do.

‘Huge Mistake’: JD Vance Speaks Out On Trump, Musk Feud
play icon

‘Huge Mistake’: JD Vance Speaks Out On Trump, Musk Feud

'Man I think it's a huge mistake for him to go after the president like that'

Joe Rogan isn't joking about going to church — and appears serious about finding a good fit



Rumors have swirled for weeks about comedian and podcasting giant Joe Rogan regularly attending church in an apparent turn to Christianity.

After theologist Wesley Huff appeared on Rogan's podcast in January, Huff revealed in May that Rogan had been communicating with him about faith while attending church as a "consistent thing."

Huff called Rogan a very inquisitive individual and said they had been having conversations about scripture. At the same time, however, Rogan had not spoken about it publicly until now.

'They're all just trying to be better people ...'

During episode 2333 of "The Joe Rogan Experience," Rogan finally revealed that he has been going to church, but explained his recent attendance in a comical manner alongside top-billing comedians Shane Gillis, Mark Normand, and Ari Shaffir.

First Normand asked if Rogan had been practicing sobriety, an interesting question at more than two hours into a podcast that typically has the group drinking heavily throughout.

Rogan revealed it had been three months without alcohol, and while the group hilariously talked about the possibility of getting gout, Normand asked if Rogan has been going to church, as well, since it had been rumored online.

"Wait, are you going to church, too, or is that bulls**t?" Normand inquired.

"I have been to church," Rogan replied. "Why? Have you ever been to church before?" he asked back.

"I've been," Normand revealed.

RELATED: The REAL REASON Joe Rogan shifted toward Christ

  

Rogan made sure to put a positive spin on his experience despite Normand's shock at the sober shift.

"It's actually very nice; they're all just trying to be better people," Rogan continued. "It's a good vibe."

Gillis, a Philadelphia native, asked Rogan about possibly attending a Catholic church, explaining he had recently attended St. Patrick's Cathedral in Manhattan, New York, and enjoyed the experience.

"I tried that; I did that," Rogan replied. It was unclear when and to what extent Rogan attended a Catholic Mass.

Normand, aggressively inquisitive, then asked, "If it's not Catholic, which one is it?

"It's just a Christian church," Rogan stated.

RELATED: Nate Silver: Young men's mental stability helps put them out of Democrats' reach

  Photo by Louis Grasse/PxImages/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images

Shaffir, who is Jewish, implied that Rogan has been attending a "non-denominational Christian church," which garnered no appeal from the host.

The group then joked that Rogan was actually attending the church of televangelist Joel Osteen and had gone broke through donations.

"Yeah, I'm just giving all my money to Osteen," Rogan laughed, before moving on to an article about gout.

"Rogan's confirmation that he is attending church is a testament to the witness of faithful Christians who have appeared on his show over the years," said Chris Enloe, faith editor at Blaze News. "His openness toward Christianity and church is evidence of the humility he has demonstrated in those conversations over the years."

Enloe added that he hopes Christians will pray for Rogan and that the comedian will continue in some form or another to share his journey with his audience.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!