White liberal denial meets black reality



I know what it’s like to live in the neighborhoods white liberals only mention when it suits them. I’ve lived on the South Side of Chicago. I’ve lived in Southeast D.C. I’ve seen crime with my own eyes, and I’ve experienced the fear that comes with it.

I’ve walked streets where parents teach their kids to drop at the sound of gunfire. I’ve seen drug corners where police barely bother to show up because they know the system won’t back them. And I’ve watched Democrats — who run these cities decade after decade — pretend nothing is wrong until an election season or a TV crew arrives.

The truth is out. Democrats have failed — in DC, in Chicago, in New York, and across the country.

Every four years, they roll in with cameras and promises. They shake hands, hug babies, stand in front of boarded-up storefronts, and pledge “change.” Then they disappear back to their safe neighborhoods, leaving residents with the same violence, the same fear, and the same hopelessness.

That isn’t leadership. It’s exploitation. I know because I’m a black man who worked as a Democratic staffer not so long ago. I’ve been in the rooms where campaign strategy is written. I’ve heard the cynical playbook: “Do a barbershop tour.” “Visit a black church on Sunday.” Deliver a few lines about “taking back the community” — then roll right back out. When the cameras leave, so do they.

Now, when President Trump does what Democrats refuse to do — when he sends in federal law enforcement and the National Guard to cities that won’t protect their own people — those same white liberals suddenly find their voice. They shriek about “authoritarianism.” They cry about “militarization.” They insist crime is “under control.”

It’s dishonest. It’s insulting. And it proves how little they care about the lives being lost. What they really care about is their four minutes on MSNBC.

Take Washington, D.C. Liberals wave charts claiming violent crime is down. But the city got caught manipulating the numbers. A police commander was placed on leave for allegedly altering stats to make the streets look safer. Whistleblowers confirmed what residents already knew: Violent crimes were downgraded or mislabeled so politicians could maintain the illusion of control. That’s no conspiracy theory. It’s now a federal investigation.

Yet, Democrats still claim Trump’s intervention wasn’t necessary. They say crime is “exaggerated.” They say the city is “safe.” Tell that to families who won’t let their kids walk home after dark. Tell it to small-business owners robbed so often they don’t bother reporting anymore. Tell it to mothers in Anacostia burying their sons while city officials massage the data for press conferences.

Chicago tells the same story. Democrats have ruled the city for generations, but whole neighborhoods on the South and West Sides remain plagued by violence and poverty. I lived there. I saw it. And here’s the truth: Polite white liberals from gentrified districts or leafy suburbs don’t want to see it. They want to protect the illusion that Democrats defend the poor, even as they use these communities as political props.

Chicagoans plead for help at City Council meetings every week, and Democratic aldermen ignore them. No wonder grassroots groups like Chicago Flips Red are gaining ground.

New York is no different. In Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s district, major crime has spiked 70% since she took office in 2019 — more than double the citywide average. Residents there say what residents in every Democrat-run city say: Our leaders don’t care. They show up for headlines, then vanish when the bullets start flying.

Donald Trump saw that reality. He campaigned on it. He walked into those neighborhoods and spoke plainly to people who had been ignored for decades. That’s why millions more black voters supported him in 2024 — a political earthquake. It’s a warning to Democrats: Their monopoly on minority voters is collapsing.

White liberals screaming on cable news about Trump’s law-and-order strategy don’t live in the neighborhoods where gunfire is commonplace. They don’t send their kids to the schools where gangs recruit. They don’t shop at the corner stores hit by weekly robberies. They don’t ride the buses or walk the sidewalks ordinary people in D.C., Chicago, and the Bronx walk every day.

They can afford to believe crime is “under control.” They can afford to believe more gun control will fix things, ignoring the obvious truth: Criminals don’t care about your new laws. They can afford denial because they can afford to live somewhere else.

But crime is not under control. It never has been. And until leaders — real leaders — admit it and act, people in these communities will keep suffering. Trump understands that. Democrats never have.

RELATED:Trump to DC: Public safety isn’t optional

Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images

So when white liberals lecture that Trump is wrong to send federal law enforcement into cities that can’t protect their residents, I have one question: Where were you? Where were you when crime stole futures and destroyed families? Where were you when Democrats cooked the books to protect their power? Where were you when Biden was in charge or when AOC’s district saw crime explode?

You weren’t there. You didn’t care. And that’s why the Democratic Party is collapsing.

The truth is out. Democrats have failed — in D.C., in Chicago, in New York, and across the country. They’ve failed black voters. They’ve failed working-class Americans. That’s why support for their party sits at record lows. That’s why more voters are walking away.

The future doesn’t belong to the party of denial and decay. It belongs to the people who demand safety, security, and accountability. It belongs to those ready for real change.

Donald Trump is delivering that change. Democrats never will.

Police drag away a man for saying he likes bacon near a sprawling mosque construction site



The State Department admonished the U.K. this week against continuing its clampdown on free speech and persecution of Christians, once again blasting the penalties handed out to those Britons who dare to engage in silent prayer near abortion facilities.

It turns out that British pork lovers may similarly be in need of such advocacy.

A Englishman in the northwest of the country was arrested on Aug. 16 for expressing an affinity for bacon — a food forbidden by the Quran but essential to a full English breakfast. Apparently, such an utterance now qualifies as "racial abuse."

Census data indicates that the number of people in England and Wales identifying as Christian dropped from 59.3% in 2011 to 46.2% in 2021. During the same 10-year stretch, the number of respondents identifying as Muslim rose from 4.9% to 6.5% — an increase of well over 1 million people.

To accommodate England and Wales' fast-growing Muslim population, there has in recent years been an explosion in the number of mosques across the isle. This expansion has made its way to the town of Dalton-in-Furness in the English county of Cumbria, which is set to get its first mosque.

The South Lakes Islamic Center, spearheaded by Muslim doctors at Barrow's Furness General Hospital, was greenlit for development in 2021, and construction began in earnest earlier this year. It is set for a grand opening next year.

'Enough with the inclusivity BS.'

Some of the townsfolk are less than pleased over the construction of a $3.35 million, 3,234-square-foot mosque just outside their town of under 8,000 souls.

RELATED: The Islamification of America is well under way

Photo by Finnbarr Webster/Getty Images

Some critics are concerned parents who are worried that the planned mosque's proximity to a Catholic elementary school will prove disruptive, affect the safety of the town's children, and increase traffic congestion. Other critics have suggested that the mosque would be a "sign of conquest and occupation."

The leader of the U.K. Independence Party, Nick Tenconi, noted in June that "Dalton-in-Furness has a population of 7,827 and there are 3 mosques already in Cumbria. Only 0.4% of people in Cumbria are Muslim. Mosques like this are being built to facilitate Operation Scatter."

Critics have referred to the Starmer goverment's campaign to move asylum-seekers and illegal aliens around the country and house them in empty homes or former student blocks instead of military bases and migrant hotels as "Operation Scatter."

"The takeover of the U.K. continues," Tenconi said in a video posted to social media.

"Enough with the inclusivity BS. That argument has been utterly lost by the woke left and proponents of the Islamist caliphate in Britain. People simply aren't buying it any more and are rightly outraged. There is absolutely no need to put a mosque here, and the sole reason is to artificially flood the area with Muslims as an extension of Operation Scatter."

According to the BBC, the Cumbria Police have increased patrols in the area, monitored online comments, and begun investigating potential thought crimes in response to criticism over the mosque.

On Saturday, hundreds of townsfolk protested at the construction site.

In anticipation of the demonstration, Cumbria Police pre-emptively issued a dispersal order, meaning police could "direct individuals who are causing or likely to cause harassment, alarm, or distress to leave the area and not return for a defined period."

Viral footage taken at the protest shows two police officers hauling away one of the peaceful protesters for simply saying, "We love bacon."

'We British do love it, and there is nothing wrong with saying so.'

When the young man asks why he is being handcuffed, one of the officers informs him that he is being arrested under Section 5 of the Public Order Act of 1986, which prohibits the use of "threatening or abusive words or behavior, or disorderly behavior" within "the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm, or distress thereby."

RELATED: Rubio’s warning to UK: Persecuting Christians for prayer is an ‘egregious violation’ of free speech, religious liberty

Muslim procession honoring the grandson of Mohammed in the English capital. Matthew Chattle/Future Publishing via Getty Images.

The officer suggests in the video that the expression "we love bacon" might be "perceived to be racially abusive."

"Okay, listen," said the arrestee. "A full English breakfast, yeah? What does that consist of?"

British journalist Isabel Oakeshott noted that bacon is a fundamental part of the full English breakfast, stressing that "it is part of our culinary culture — which is why there should be nothing remotely controversial about saying so."

"Nonetheless, a 23-year-old single father is currently facing the possibility of court action after stating this simple fact at a public protest," wrote Oakeshott. "Saying 'We love bacon' is simply a truism. We British do love it, and there is nothing wrong with saying so."

Cumbria Police confirmed to the NWE Mail that a 23-year-old man was arrested at the protest on suspicion of a public order offense but later released on police bail.

Blaze News has reached out to the Cumbria Police and to the South Lakes Islamic Center for comment.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Censorship Is Democrats’ Only Means Of Political Survival

Obama's embrace of censorship speaks to the desperation of a party that can't survive without uniform control of the information space.

The 10 craziest surveillance technologies being rolled out for the Paris Olympics



As the 2024 Paris Olympic Games begin today, hundreds of American Olympians will begin their quest for gold. For many, thousands of their practice hours will pay off.

But for this year’s Olympics, it's not just the athletes’ hard work and athletic prowess taking center stage. Over the past year, France has worked hard to prepare a massive surveillance state for the Olympics. From surveillance drones to the largest military camp in Paris since the Second World War, the French have built a vast network of technology to keep the Olympics “safe” and dystopian.

During the Olympic games, Parisians and visitors must show QR codes to police officers to get past barricades to enter restricted areas, reminiscent of the nanny-state COVID zones.

Here are the ten craziest examples of mass surveillance during the 2024 Paris Olympics.

  1. Artificial intelligence cameras

Tourists won’t be the only ones taking pictures of themselves in Paris. CCTV cameras will use AI-powered algorithms to record and identify potentially suspicious individuals and objects on streets and in large crowds. While French officials claim that there will be no facial recognition, “AI video monitoring … enables mass control,” digital rights activist Noémie Levain told BBC news.

  1. Surveillance drones
  2. Fighter jets
  3. Helicopters

If you’ve booked a vacation to Paris in August, don’t be shocked when you see bird-like machines flying above your head or catch a chopper in the background of your picture with the Eiffel Tower. “Rafale fighter jets, airspace-monitoring AWACS surveillance flights, Reaper surveillance drones, helicopters that can carry sharpshooters, and equipment to disable drones will police Paris skies, which will be closed during the opening ceremony by a no-fly zone extending for 150 kilometers (93 miles) around the capital,” AP News reported.

  1. Tracking geolocation data

In preparation for the Olympics, the French prime minister’s office has negotiated a secret provisional decree that will increase the state’s ability to track citizens’ and visitors' data, including geolocation. Essentially, the French government will be able to track people’s every move, whether that be going to the grocery store or school, worshipping at a church, or attending a political event.

Even though it’s only temporary, what’s to stop French officials from keeping the decree permanently? After all, governments love power. As President Reagan once joked, “No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth!”

  1. Wiretapping

Government officials won’t just be tracking people’s every move; they could also listen to everything people say over the phone. Under the same provisional decree, the French government would be allowed to secretly listen in on private citizens’ conversations over the phone, a move borrowed from the KGB playbook.

  1. QR codes

During the Olympic games, Parisians and visitors must show QR codes to police officers to get past barricades to enter restricted areas, reminiscent of the nanny-state COVID zones. Dubbed the “Belt of Steel,” a four-mile barricade surrounding Olympic venues will be in place, limiting access to Eiffel Tower viewpoints, the River Seine, and other famous attractions in Paris. Furthermore, these barricades may prove to be a hassle for locals just trying to get to work or go out to eat. An additional, larger no-entry zone will also be in place for automobile traffic.

  1. Background checks for residents

Once Parisians actually get into these high-security risk areas, they will still be subject to even more surveillance. Paris police chief Laurent Nunez told AP News that people who work and live in the buildings near the River Seine and the opening ceremony will be “cross-checked against security services’ databases, to see whether they have previously been flagged as suspected Islamist extremists or for other radicalism.”

What’s concerning is how French officials might define “radicalism.” Are supporters of Marine Le Pen’s National Rally “radical”? The Washington Post certainly thinks so. If French officials agree, will French nationalists just be banned from certain areas of the city?

  1. Houseguest registry

Not only does the French state want to know who’s walking around the streets of Paris, but officials also want to know whom Parisians are inviting over to their homes. According to Deutsche Welle, residents living in restricted areas must register visitors they invite to watch the Olympic games from their balconies, windows, rooftops, or houseboats.

  1. A military base

Perhaps the “least worst” example: French officials will set up a massive force of police officers as well as soldiers to shield the city against any potential terrorist threat. AP News reports that up to 45,000 police officers will guard the streets during the Games, in addition to 10,000 soldiers who have “set up the largest military camp in Paris since World War II. … Soldiers should be able to reach any of the city’s Olympic venues within 30 minutes.

Calling up soldiers to be on guard for an event of this grandeur wouldn’t be criticized too harshly if that was all French officials did. Terrorist attacks are still a valid concern in Western Europe. But a massive military base, in addition to fighter jets, drones, AI drones, wiretapping, and more certainly lends Paris a Soviet flavor.

How Woodrow Wilson normalized mass surveillance



Many terrible things happened in 1917, and one man caused most of them: Woodrow Wilson. Wilson laid the groundwork for today's Big Tech surveillance. He did it through centralization and bureaucracy, a collectivism that America had never seen before.

On April 2, 1917, Wilson urged Congress to declare war on Germany, saying, “The world must be made safe for democracy,” and, “We desire no conquest, no dominion.”

Woodrow Wilson transformed 'intellectuals' into militants of the state.

Wilson had a habit of manipulating people through fear. He won the 1916 election on a non-interventionist platform, insisting that Republicans would lead America to war if they won the election.

However, within a year, he had changed his mind. It became clear to him that America would need to enter the war. But he couldn’t let the country know that he’d changed his mind — no, that would be too straightforward. Instead, he would have to convince them that going to war was his own brilliant idea.

So, he did what any of us would have done (right?): He unleashed a vicious propaganda campaign.

It began with the creation of the Committee on Public Information, which is as 1984-esque as it sounds.

The Committee on Public Information was the first — and only — time that America had a ministry of propaganda, and it set the standard for modern-day propaganda. It had 47 divisions, including the Division of Pictorial Publicity, the Four Minute Men Division, the News Division, and the Censorship Board.

To manage the CPI, he would need a sneaky ally. That man was George Creel. Guess what he did for a living.

He was a journalist. Well, “journalist” is a bit of a stretch. Creel described the Committee on Public Information as a “vast enterprise in salesmanship.”

Wilson’s manipulation of the media is part of what made this new propaganda so powerful. Control the media, and you can control public opinion. Control public opinion, and you can control the minds — and the actions — of the people.

After all, anything the guard dogs and truth-tellers of society say must be true.

An army of snitches

This propaganda campaign was also very ... personal. It took place on the streets. Within a couple months, Creel had recruited 100,000 men. This squadron of bullies stormed movie theaters across the country, giving fiery speeches to captive moviegoers during the four minutes where projectionists changed the movie reel.

Creel used prominent members within the communities to spread this propaganda to every corner of America.

Specifically, they wanted to sway the opinion of Southerners, who saw no reason to enter a European war at the behest of a president they didn’t vote for.

Soon, the four-minute men delivered their heated rants anywhere there was a gathering of people, including churches, lodges, fraternal organizations, labor unions, and even logging camps.

Preachers, actors, lawyers, teachers, superintendents, athletes, magicians, aviators, titans of industry, and even a few KKK leaders, like DeForest Henry Perkins and the grand wizard — middle-aged men who were too old to fight — used their public speaking skills to spread fear and advertise war. They also used their public speaking skills to convince people to support progressive ideas, the draft, food rationing, and support for the Red Cross.

They gave speeches in many different languages. And historians estimate that, in New York City, these speeches reached 500,000 weekly. The trick was to make the speeches look like patriotic outbursts from passionate members of the community. In reality, every message was scripted by the state.

Creel once said that the speeches “were no haphazard talks by nondescripts, but the careful, studied, and rehearsed efforts of the best men in each community, each speech aimed as a rifle is aimed, and driving to its mark with the precision of a bullet.”

Several hundred thousand Americans volunteered for neighborhood watch. Americans betraying their fellow Americans, the people they shared their community with.

Hollywood played a crucial role, too. The most famous actors of the time, people like Charlie Chaplin and Mary Pickford, did the same thing the famous actors today do now: berate ordinary people into subservience to the elites.

Before long, it was impossible for anyone to speak out against the war.

His goal was to censor and crush anyone who tried to stop him by labeling them “seditious,” anti-American villains pushing for an insurrection.

Hm, sounds a bit like a more recent “insurrection” campaign, doesn’t it?

They claimed that Germany was engaged in "nothing less than war against the government and people of the United States." Wilson even offered “Fourteen Points” as a way to maintain his image as a peacemaker. But behind the scenes, he was just sneaking progressivism into a Trojan horse of foreign policy.

He transformed “intellectuals” into militants of the state.

In an editorial, Teddy Roosevelt wrote: "If the League of Nations is built on a document as high-sounding and as meaningless as the speech in which Mr. Wilson laid down his fourteen points, it will simply add one more scrap to the diplomatic waste paper basket. Most of these fourteen points ... would be interpreted ... to mean anything or nothing."

The Germans, likewise, saw it for what it was: propaganda.

Meanwhile, back home, the four-minute men continued this propaganda campaign until the war ended in 1918. By the end of the over year-and-a-half-long operation, the propaganda had reached every single American. It laid the groundwork for the Wilson war state, which marched four million Americans off to war, 116,708 of whom died in the fight.

Wilson destroyed an America that we’ll never know. He transformed it from a small town, quaint and local, to a global war machine that could be controlled by an all-powerful executive.

In June 1917, Wilson pushed the Espionage Act through Congress, and in May 1918, he pushed the Overman Act through, giving him total control. He even made it a crime to “willfully utter, print, write, or publish any disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language about the form of government of the United States.”

A few years later, in 1924, the FBI became the first federal police force in America.

Biden Regime Ratchets Up Its Authoritarianism With Arrest Of Blaze Investigative Reporter

The FBI arrested Blaze Media investigative reporter Steve Baker on Friday over his coverage of the Jan. 6, 2021 demonstrations.

Report: FBI Plans To Arrest Blaze Media Reporter Without Telling Him What Charges He’s Facing

The FBI is expected to arrest Blaze Media reporter Steve Baker on Friday without informing him of what charges he's facing.

Yes, Biden Has Worked Tirelessly To ‘Shame,’ ‘Silence,’ And ‘Demoralize’ Faithful Christians

'Ultimately, the radical left is coming after all of us, because they know that our allegiance is not to them — our allegiance is to our country and to our Creator.'

Dinesh D’Souza’s frightening ‘Police State’ needs to be seen



Promoting his latest release, Dinesh D’Souza said, “‘Police State’ is a movie that I never wanted to make, because I never wanted America to get to a point where a movie like this needed to be made.”

“Our police state is in camouflage,” the writer-director elaborated during a recent appearance on "The Glenn Beck Program." “It’s not open about its motives. It marches behind the banner of saving democracy.”

Released in cinemas early this week and online this weekend, “Police State” is a film of high production values worth seeing on the big screen. More importantly, it is a film that should be seen by more than just the right-wing choir. Most of us already know the lyrics to that songbook, but maybe this film will motivate us to sing more loudly.

Police State Trailer | New Dinesh D'Souza Movie www.youtube.com

“Police State” isn’t a conspiracy theory-laden warning of what is to come but rather a clarion call to wake up and recognize what’s already happening in America.

Moving from dramatic re-enactments of FBI operations and SWAT raids to documentary interviews of members of Congress, authors, journalists, and federal agency whistleblowers, the film opens with actor Nick Searcy (best known for portraying Chief Deputy U.S. Marshal Art Mullen on FX’s “Justified”)as a supervisory FBI field agent instructing his agents about an upcoming raid. The accuracy of this and other scenes led by Searcy comes from language scripted by real-life FBI whistleblowers Kyle Seraphin and Stephen Friend.

Narrated by D’Souza, “Police State” depicts the reality of government censorship, the targeting of political opponents, and unconstitutional spying by federal agencies on everyday Americans.

Dan Bongino, a former Secret Service agent turned political commentator who served as one of the film’s executive producers, says we’re already in the “slow death version” of a police state. We “just get used to the evaporating civil liberties.” And so Americans accept, consciously or not, “Oh, this is normal, being banned in the new public sphere.”

There are also the all-too-obvious comparisons between our government ignoring the crimes and subversive activities of those who advance progressive values and narratives but exercising tyranny on those deemed political enemies. These are shown through examples of our justice system overlooking and dismissing criminal cases against those who burned down neighborhoods in the Black Lives Matter riots of 2020 but aggressively pursuing and punishing those who engaged in the most placid act of accidental tourism through the U.S. Capitol Building on January 6, 2021.

From the spark of federal law enforcement agencies’ overreactions at Ruby Ridge and Waco 30 years ago, the film then asserts that our nation’s “flip” from a constitutional republic to a police state found its accelerant with the passage of the Patriot Act in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. “After 9/11, all of the barriers that were constructed between counterintelligence and criminal investigation were removed,” attorney John O’Connor says in the film.

From big tech’s COVID-narrative censorship — in cooperation with federal policing agencies — to the Department of Justice’s targeting of those who attend Latin mass and protest at school board meetings, few examples of our government’s overreach into average citizens' lives escape notice in “Police State.”

Then there is the border crisis and the horrifying specter of what’s happened to 85,000 missing children in only two years. An immigration system designed for “speed over safety” has facilitated the processing of thousands of innocents into the world of child labor and sex trafficking.

“Police State” also presents interviews with North Korean defector Yeonmi Park, Reps. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and Troy Nehls (R-Texas), Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.), investigative journalists Julie Kelly and Darren Beattie, and many others.

D’Souza himself says this is the “scariest” movie he’s ever made, but it is a film that needs to be seen by as many Americans as possible. Tickets and further information about how to share this with friends, family, and neighbors can be found at PoliceStateFilm.net.

Chris Christie Thinks Trump Being Targeted By The Deep State Is ‘Beneath The Office Of President’

Christie indicated that he thinks Donald Trump's conduct in challenging the 2020 election is a greater issue than the DOJ's targeting of him.