White House sets Rep. Nadler straight about his aide's detention during DHS rioter hunt
Democratic Rep. Jerrold Nadler (N.Y.) accused President Donald Trump and the Department of Homeland Security on Saturday of "sowing chaos" after footage emerged showing DHS officials handcuffing one of Nadler's aides during an apparent rioter hunt.
The White House and the DHS subsequently set the record straight, the White House telling Blaze News that Nadler's condemnation over law enforcement actions was "shameful."
Background
The DHS rescinded Biden administration guidelines last month that previously barred Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents from making arrests in courthouses.
Tricia McLaughlin, the DHS' assistant secretary for public affairs, noted at the time that "the ability of law enforcement to make arrests of criminal illegal aliens in courthouses is common sense," adding that it "conserves valuable law enforcement resources because they already know where a target will be."
Making good use of its newfound liberty, ICE arrested Dylan Josue Lopez Contreras, a 20-year-old illegal alien from Venezuela after his hearing in an immigration court in lower Manhattan on May 21.
The DHS noted that Contreras was an illegal alien who stole into the U.S. over a year ago and was cut loose by the Biden administration.
While characterized by the liberal media as a "Bronx high school student," Contreras — whom Democratic Rep. Ritchie Torres (N.Y.) said was "making good on the promise of the American dream" — actually finished high school in his home country and was taking college prep classes at the time of his arrest. He now faces expedited removal proceedings.
RELATED: Courthouse footage spells trouble for Wisconsin judge accused of helping illegal alien evade ICE
Photo by Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images
A week after Contreras' arrest, protesters descended on another immigration courthouse in the city — housed within the same federal facility as Nadler's Manhattan office — decrying the arrest of Contreras and other illegal aliens and clashing with police. According to the Gothamist, police arrested and charged five people and issued criminal summonses to 18 other radicals.
Incident in Nadler's office
While radicals raged against police outside, DHS Federal Protective Service officers entered the facility to ensure the safety of the federal employees on the premises, including in Nadler's office.
The DHS noted in a statement obtained by Blaze News that "upon arrival, officers were granted entry and encountered four individuals. Officers identified themselves and explained their intent to conduct a security check; however, one individual became verbally confrontational and physically blocked access to the office. The officers then detained the individual in the hallway for the purpose of completing the security check."
Footage obtained by Gothamist shows one officer handcuffing a congressional staffer, while another officer argues with someone off-camera about whether the detainee had shoved the arresting agent.
In conversation with another staffer blocking a doorway, an officer noted that he was checking to see whether Nadler's team was "harboring rioters in the office."
Nadler's team reportedly had immigrant rights activists in the office earlier for a meeting.
'I am alarmed by the aggressive and heavy-handed tactics DHS is employing in New York City.'
The DHS noted and Nadler confirmed that the staffers were released without further incident. The staffer who was handcuffed told the Gothamist that "everything resolved."
Nadler said in a statement that Trump and his agency "are sowing chaos in our communities, using intimidation tactics against both citizens and noncitizens in a reckless and dangerous manner."
"In the most recent and deeply troubling incident, DHS agents forcefully entered my congressional office and handcuffed a member of my staff," continued Nadler. "While no arrests were made and the situation was quickly de-escalated, I am alarmed by the aggressive and heavy-handed tactics DHS is employing in New York City and across the country."
"The decision to enter a congressional office and detain a staff member demonstrates a deeply troubling disregard for proper legal boundaries," continued Nadler. "If this can happen in a Member of Congress's office, it can happen to anyone — and it is happening."
Nadler told the New York Times, "They’re behaving like fascists."
RELATED: 'Gestapo-like behavior': Another Democrat compares ICE to Nazis who 'terrorize people' in the night
Photographer: Christopher Dilts/Bloomberg via Getty Images
The White House backed the DHS' account and slammed Nadler for his apparent spin.
White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson told Blaze News, "FPS officers were responding to information that protesters were present inside the congressman's office and were initially granted entry, but unfortunately an individual became confrontational and tried to physically block access for the officers completing a security check."
"It's shameful that Russia hoaxer and Trump derangement sufferer Jerry Nadler would choose to attack law enforcement officers for doing their job because he disagrees with President Trump's immigration policy," added Jackson.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Trump says he's serious about another term in office: 'Sort of a fourth term'
President Donald Trump said in a Sunday morning phone interview that he is serious about the possibility of serving a third term in office. When pressed later aboard Air Force One about his comments, the 78-year-old Republican suggested that supporters have raised the possibility of him ultimately serving a total of 12 years, citing their pleasure with the wins he has notched since retaking office.
"A lot of people want me to do it," Trump told NBC News' Kristen Welker. "But, I mean, I basically tell them we have a long way to go, you know, it's very early in the administration."
"I'm focused on the current," added Trump.
Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution set presidential terms at four years but did not originally set term limits. While presidents were long able to serve over two terms, George Washington set a precedent that all but one president, Democrat Franklin D. Roosevelt, followed.
In response to Roosevelt holding onto power from 1933 until 1945, the 22nd Amendment was ratified in 1951, limiting presidents to serving two terms.
The Congressional Research Service indicated that over the past seven decades, there have been scores of attempts to repeal the two-term limit as well as chatter among partisans about their favored president serving some overtime.
Just as there was some interest in the possibility of a third term for Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1960, there was a push in 1973 by Richard Nixon supporters — pleased with the Republican's successful first term — to eliminate the constitutional obstacle to another four years. Apparently, there was also serious interest among supporters of Bill Clinton and Barack Obama to ax the 22nd Amendment in the interest of keeping their favorites politically viable for more time in the Oval Office.
There has also been interest in clearing the way for a third Trump term.
Tennessee Rep. Andy Ogles (R) introduced a House joint resolution in January that would enable a president to serve three terms so long as he did not already serve two consecutive terms. Accordingly, Trump could serve a third term but Obama and Clinton would be unable.
'We have a long time to go.'
"[Trump] has proven himself to be the only figure in modern history capable of reversing our nation's decay and restoring America to greatness, and he must be given the time necessary to accomplish that goal," Ogles said in a statement. "To that end, I am proposing an amendment to the Constitution to revise the limitations imposed by the 22nd Amendment on presidential terms."
It is highly unlikely such a constitutional amendment would receive the required two-thirds vote in both houses of Congress as well as the required ratification of three-fourths of the state legislatures or state conventions.
"There are methods which you could do it," Trump told Welker when asked about whether he had seen plans detailing how he might pursue another term.
NBC News reportedly floated a possible scenario where Vice President JD Vance successfully won a presidential election then substituted Trump in. After all, the Constitution specifically prohibits reelection to a third term but does not explicitly prohibit a third term.
Legal scholars indicated in a Clinton-era paper published by the Minnesota Law Review that "a President nearing the end of his or her second term and determined to stay in office might run as Vice President with the idea that the President-elect would step aside, allowing the already twice-elected President (and Vice President-elect) to serve a third term without running afoul of the Twenty-Second Amendment's bar on reelection."
While "there would be inevitable conflict over its legality and wisdom," the paper noted that "the possibility of an already twice-elected President reassuming that Office also presents opportunities of potential benefit to the polity."
Trump, who would be nearing the age of 87 by the end of a third term, told NBC News the vice-presidential backdoor into a third term is one possibility, adding that "there are others too," without elaboration.
'I'm not joking.'
When asked about whether he would actually want another term, Trump told Welker, "I like working."
"I'm not joking," added Trump. "But I'm not — it is far too early to think about it."
When asked later in the day about his interest in a third term, Trump told reporters, "I'm not looking at that, but I'll tell you, I have had more people ask me to have a third term, which is, in a way, a fourth term because the other election, the 2020 election, was totally rigged. So it's actually sort of a fourth term in a certain way. I just don't want the credit for the second because Biden was so bad."
After claiming "some very important people" have complimented his second administration's accomplishments, Trump noted he doesn't want to talk about the possibility because "no matter how you look at it, we have a long time to go."
It is unclear if Trump is just trying to rile up his critics. While he has previously expressed interest in a third term, he told Time magazine last year he was not interested in repealing the 22nd Amendment and told House Republicans in November, "I suspect I won't be running again unless you say, 'He's so good we've got to figure something else out.'"
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!