The final ride? NYC horse carriage drivers sound alarm as Mamdani moves to eliminate historic industry



NEW YORK CITY — Horse-drawn carriages have clopped through Central Park for over 160 years. This Thursday, the New York City Council is scheduled to vote on a bill that would bring the long-standing tradition to an end.

The legislation, known as Romanch's Law, would ban horse-drawn carriage operations starting June 1, 2028. Both Democrat Mayor Zohran Mamdani and Democrat Council Speaker Julie Menin have publicly voiced their support for the phaseout.

'It’s going to be a disaster for me, for my family. I cannot pay my bills.'

"They're stealing my American dream from me," Atakan Aktay, a Turkish immigrant who has worked in the Central Park carriage industry for 13 years, told Blaze News.

The bill follows the June death of 18-year-old Romanch Mahajan, an Indian tourist vacationing in New York with his family. During a carriage ride through Central Park, the driver stepped away to snap a photo of the family when the horse suddenly bolted, throwing Mahajan's mother from the carriage. Mahajan jumped out after her, striking his head on the ground and suffering fatal injuries.

Supporters of the ban say eliminating the industry would protect both horses and the public. But for the drivers whose livelihoods depend on the carriages, the legislation threatens to dismantle everything they have spent decades building.

Aktay, who owns nine horses, two carriages, and multiple operating medallions, said he has invested his life savings in the business.

"It’s going to be a disaster for me, for my family. I cannot pay my bills,” he said. “You don't just wipe out the whole industry because of an accident. You regulate, you modernize.”

RELATED: Man shot by ICE in the Bronx — Mamdani demands Trump end all operations in NYC

Blaze News

The bill requires the city to develop a job transition program for displaced workers and consider compensating carriage owners but does not guarantee any financial payouts. Christina Hansen, a carriage driver of 20 years, said the help falls short.

"They want to put me to work at 22 bucks an hour doing something that I don't want to do, like I'm some sort of plug-and-play widget," she said.

Sam Uzun, a 27-year-old driver who also works as a data scientist, said he has another career to fall back on. Many of his colleagues do not.

"Some of the people are 60 years old, 65 years old. They like to do this job,” Uzun explained. “They are depending on this business, their family and their kids.”

Drivers also pushed back against allegations of animal cruelty. "We love our horses as much as a mother loves their kid," Uzun said.

Hansen raised another unanswered question: What happens to the horses?

"There's no funding set aside in the bill to pay for the long-term care of retiring carriage horses," she said. “They want my horse to be homeless, to be a charity case.”

The bill bars selling or transferring the animals for slaughter or for use in another carriage business, but it does not require owners to give them up.

RELATED: Videos capture Palestinian activists screaming at Mamdani: 'Opportunist piece of s**t!'

Spencer Platt/Getty Images

Some New Yorkers see room for a middle path. Mickey Krisburg, an Upper East Side resident, described the carriages as "a great part of the culture of New York" and called for better oversight to ensure the horses are "well maintained, well cared for."

Another resident, Jennifer Federer, suggested that replacing horse-drawn carriages with electric alternatives could preserve drivers' jobs while addressing animal welfare concerns.

“I don't want humans to have their jobs taken away from them and have to change their entire life," she said. "That would be my compromise."

For tourists, the allure of this quintessential Big Apple experience remains very much alive.

"We came to New York for my 13th birthday to see 'Wicked' and go on a horse and buggy ride,” said a 13-year-old girl from Michigan as she stepped off a carriage with her parents.

“The New York dream, right?” her mother added.

But with the city council vote just days away, that New York dream may soon become a thing of the past.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Elon Musk makes huge promise to the children of America



Elon Musk has just made a big promise to the children of America — and they can expect it as soon as next year.

On Monday, Musk, the founder and CEO of SpaceX, announced that he will be giving away shares of his company to kids in the United States.

'You are an American treasure.'

"Next year, I will give one of my SpaceX shares to every kid in America," Musk wrote on X.

Musk also hinted that this was only the beginning of his generosity, though he did not provide many more details. "This will be the first of many," he added in the same post.

CNBC reported that Elon Musk currently owns 4.8 billion SpaceX shares, citing August SEC filings.

RELATED: Can you hear him now? Elon Musk is on the brink of revolutionizing yet another global industry

Kent NISHIMURA/AFP/Getty Images

There are approximately 72 million children in the United States, according to July 2025 census data.

If he holds to his promise, Musk would be giving away an estimated $10.7 billion, accounting for SpaceX's opening stock price of $149.25 on Monday.

At the time of writing, Musk's post reached 11.2 million views on X, with thousands of positive comments flooding in.

"You are an American treasure," wrote Kari Lake of the U.S. Agency for Global Media.

Others urged Musk to extend this offer only to American children, rather than those of illegal aliens and "anchor babies."

Blaze News reached out to SpaceX for more information but did not immediately receive a response.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Macron watched France burn — then blamed the 'French people.' Trump: 'The migrants have taken over.'



France, which is currently on its fifth republic since 1792, is no stranger to revolt. It is, however, increasingly faced with revolts staged by strangers.

For instance, the race riots of June 2023 — which left 2,508 buildings and 12,031 vehicles smoldering, two dead and thousands wounded — started in migrant communities and often featured young men of Arab and African descent.

'This is the future congressional Democrats seek for your country.'

The riots that swept France in May and left hundreds of police officers injured were, according to National Rally party president Jordan Bardella, largely the work of thugs who are "physically in France, but whose spirit and heart is elsewhere."

In the company of domestic radicals, violent strangers waving foreign flags have once again taken over French streets, launched vicious assaults on police, gutted thousands of businesses, and destroyed historic sites such as Limoges' iconic 143-year-old town hall.

French President Emmanuel Macron claimed in a speech on Sunday that the "French people" are to blame for the latest escalation in the rioting. Not all are convinced, however, that the Western European nation's current problems are homegrown.

President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and some European officials have argued instead that France is reaping the consequences of unchecked third-world immigration and failed assimilation.

Escalation

The riots underway grew out of mid-September "protests" in migrant-heavy suburbs, reportedly over the quality of the nation's public high school education. In the weeks since, the rioters have added to their list of grievances and to their list of victims.

French conservative activist Thaïs d'Escufon told Blaze News that "what started as student protests, mainly led by the far left, has turned into ethnic riots that are spiraling out of control. Immigrants have become the street-level enforcers of the far left, spreading chaos, looting, vandalizing, stealing, and setting things on fire. It is an unholy alliance."

D'Escufon noted further that the French are "no longer able to contain the consequences of 50 years of disastrous immigration policies. I believe that many immigrants and their descendants have not only failed to integrate, but that some seize every opportunity to express their hostility toward France."

There was significant escalation in the violence on Saturday — an escalation that proved too much for police to handle in numerous cities.

RELATED: They'll build a fire with your lovely oak door

According to the French Ministry of the Interior, around 550,000 people "demonstrated" across France on Saturday, and over 500 police officers, paramedics, and firefighters were injured in the riots.

"On the sidelines of these marches, vandals chose violence," continued the ministry. "Across the entire territory, they targeted public buildings that serve citizens, such as town halls or prefectures, but also numerous businesses: They were attacked, ransacked, looted, and some even set on fire. Nothing justifies these acts!"

Alexandre Bompard, the head of the retail federation FCD, estimated that around 1,500 stores were "looted and ransacked across France."

The mayor of Paris, Emmanuel Gregoire, said that the looting committed on Saturday was "intolerable" but also added that the public should not lose sight of the aspirations of the "very large majority of those who mobilize peacefully."

While 60,000 cops and security personnel were mobilized across France on Saturday, Interior Minister Laurent Nunez admitted that they were unable to restore order in "certain cities," reported Reuters.

RELATED: UK admits rape almost guaranteed among inbound asylum-seekers — then cops lock down town to allow another shipload

Guillaume Saligot/AFP/Getty Images

Nunez submitted his resignation, stating that he was "responsible for everything that is happening."

Macron did not accept Nunez's resignation, though the president's office has tasked the minister with figuring out a way to "put an end to the barricades and lootings," as well as with ensuring "transparency regarding the failures in foresight and intelligence that led to the violence."

Around 1,800 radicals were reportedly arrested on Saturday.

France's 'French' problem

Macron addressed the wanton destruction on Sunday, stating, "Seditionists from far-left fringe groups, joined by many criminals, engaged in unbridled violence in our cities. Shops were looted. Public buildings, stores, and town halls were attacked, and some were destroyed. Several hundred police officers and gendarmes were injured," according to a translation.

The president suggested that the antagonists were domestic, wondering, "How can French people do this to France? Why burn down the town hall in Limoges, the tourist office in Lyon, storm the town hall in Marseille, or attack the prefect’s residence in Bordeaux? How could they come to this?"

President Donald Trump has repeatedly insisted that the "French people" are not doing this to France.

Earlier this month, the American president concluded that "what's happening in France is nothing less than out of control mass migration."

On Sunday, Trump wrote, "France is burning! The immigration of people from an entirely different world, people with hatred in their hearts, has shattered that once great country. Close your Borders and take control, before it is too late!"

"The migrants have taken over France," added Trump.

'They hate everything France represents.'

After radicals set the town hall of Limoges aflame, Vice President JD Vance tweeted, "Western liberals imported the third world into France and other countries in the name of diversity and compassion. They ignored fundamental questions of assimilation and compatibility. They were told it would lead to this and they didn't listen."

"I pray that France, a beautiful country of amazing people, will stop this madness before more of its landmarks burn," continued Vance. "And I hope Americans are paying attention. This is the future congressional Democrats seek for your country."

D'Escufon told Blaze News that Trump "is obviously right. You only have to look at the footage to see who the rioters are."

"Of course, there are a few native French people who have been indoctrinated, who have undergone a sort of reverse assimilation," continued d'Escufon. "But the overwhelming majority fit the same profile. You can hear it in their chants, you can see it when they spare Muslim-owned businesses. And you can see it in their graffiti, like at the Blanche metro station in Paris, where someone spray-painted: 'France is not only white.' We are used to these riots in France, although this time they have taken on a much larger scale, and the entire world is watching."

As for Macron's speech, d'Escufon noted, "The reality is precisely that these rioters are not French, and that is exactly why they behave this way. I believe they are driven by a desire for post-colonial revenge against us."

"They hate everything France represents, including its institutions. That is why they attack the police. That is why they even attack firefighters, whose very purpose is to protect and save lives," added d'Escufon. "Meanwhile, the media have continued to describe these events as student riots."

Neither Macron's office nor the National Rally immediately responded to Blaze News' request for comment.

Some European officials have similarly acknowledged that the riots underway are the consequence, at least in part, of unchecked immigration.

Marine Le Pen, the deputy of the French National Assembly, told the Financial Times that France is "paying the price" for "decades of uncontrolled immigration."

Hungarian Prime Minister Péter Magyar wrote, "In the face of this senseless destruction and unjustified violence, perhaps it is now clear to everyone why Hungary advocates the strictest possible approach to migration, and why we will not weaken our border protection or immigration policy under any pressure."

"I am glad that the current EU summit has made it clear that the overwhelming majority of European countries have woken up and want to break with the permissive policies of the past," added Magyar.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Book claiming white paint is racist is up for National Book Foundation award — yes, you read that correctly



Since 1950, the National Book Awards — now overseen by the National Book Foundation — has recognized the best in American literary talent, honoring the likes of Ralph Ellison, William Faulkner, Flannery O'Connor, and J.D. Salinger.

In recent years, however, the foundation's judges appear to have prized politics over quality, at least in the category of nonfiction.

'The National Book Award has become a DEI checklist.'

In 2023, for example, the award went to an Indian activist's "retelling of U.S. history." In 2024, the prize went to a book that the foundation said "holds the U.S. to account for its cruelty." Last year, the foundation's handpicked judges gave the nonfiction award to an Egyptian-born critic for his long-winded attack on the West.

Among the titles longlisted for this year's award in the category of nonfiction is a work of agitprop about the supposed evils of white paint — a book which Steven Tucker, writing for the Federalist, noted was ironically printed on white paper.

Book publisher Simon & Schuster says in its description of "A Dead White: An Argument Against White Paint" by Columbia University associate professor Wendy Walters:

As the default color of our built environment, [white paint] asks us to believe that it’s neutral — that it has no signifiers or, perhaps more troublingly, that what it does signify, whether it be calmness, cleanliness, blankness, or purity, is unassailable and value-free. In this expansive, impassioned examination, cultural critic Wendy S. Walters interrogates all that we have taken for granted about the substance that colors, or fails to color, the structures and objects that surround us."

The race-obsessed author said in a 2021 video for Creative Capital — the outfit that gave her a grant to write the book — that her anti-white project "comes from a genuine and visceral dislike of white paint, a feeling that is at times overwhelming for me, and according to the estimations of others I know, a reaction that is possibly irrational."

When probing her "possibly irrational" dislike of the color white and use of white paint, Walters supposedly "discovered numerous examples of the way that it figured into systems of erasure, exclusion, violence, and the masking of power in the social and natural world."

RELATED: Three straight white guys walk into a poetry reading ...

Derek Davis/Portland Portland Press Herald via Getty Images

Walters complained about an instance where white paint was allegedly used by supremacists to deface Houston's Rothko Chapel and another instance where a rainbow crosswalk in Canada was painted over in white.

Ex-Washington Post book critic Ron Charles noted in his review of Walters' book, "At times, it feels as though Walters selected the entire world and typed Command-F 'white.'"

"Early on, she claims, 'This is a book about white paint, not about whiteness,'" Charles continued. "But that’s like claiming Moby-Dick is about whales, not about obsession."

Walters has a son with her white husband, author Dan Charnas, but she still managed to crowd around 350 white pages with justification for her hatred of white paint.

While this lengthy justification was panned in a New York Times book review on Thursday, it may ultimately be awarded next month by National Book Foundation judges.

Walters' placement on the National Book Awards' 2026 longlist is par for the course.

New York Times columnist Bret Stephens wrote in late September, "By my count, in the past decade, nine of the 10 winners of the National Book Award for fiction belonged to a minority group. In the nonfiction category, 10 of 10. Bluntly, the National Book Award has become a DEI checklist: Only authors with preferred identities, preferred topics, and preferred politics stand any realistic chance of winning."

Blaze News did not immediately receive a response from Walters or her publisher.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Pray for the country. Then do your part.



A friend from an Amish and Mennonite background who lives among those communities in Ohio told me she is frustrated by the reluctance of some people she knows to vote. When she asks why, she hears a familiar answer: “If it’s God’s will ...”

Meaning: God will determine the outcome. Apparently, that settles their part.

If we are tired of politics, let’s say so. But invoking God’s sovereignty to excuse our own passivity drags His name into a decision we made.

The reluctance she described reaches well beyond Amish and Mennonite communities. Too many Christians sit out elections while maintaining a vigorous schedule of complaining about the results.

But the “God will handle it” explanation puzzles me because we do not apply that reasoning to the rest of life. Gracie would have a few questions.

I pray for Gracie before every operation. I still drive her to the hospital. After 40 years of caregiving, I have had plenty of occasions to trust God with things I could not control. I have also filled prescriptions, asked uncomfortable questions, and challenged decisions. In all of Gracie’s 98 operations, not one surgeon has said, “You prayed for God’s will? Good. I won’t need to scrub in.”

We understand responsibility quite well when something matters to us. Why does it become so mysterious when the subject is voting?

If you have a biblical conviction against casting a particular vote, that deserves a hearing. But “God will determine the outcome” explains why we can trust Him. It does not explain why we can excuse ourselves.

Jesus told us to love our neighbors as ourselves. Those neighbors live under the officials we choose. Sheriffs, school boards, county commissioners, and legislators make decisions that reach into their homes and wallets. A widow reporting fraud needs officials who take her seriously. A family caring for a disabled child needs more than a sympathetic nod.

We can argue about which candidates will serve them best. But God’s sovereignty does not explain why loving our neighbor requires nothing from us.

Jeremiah 29:7 gives us an even less comfortable instruction. God told His people to seek the welfare of the city where He had sent them into exile and to pray for it.

The city was Babylon.

They had been carried away from home. If anyone had grounds to say, “This government is somebody else’s problem,” they did. God still assigned them work where they lived: Pray for the city. Seek its welfare.

We live here. Our children are growing up here. And unlike the exiles in Babylon, we have a voice in choosing our leaders. What exactly is our excuse?

Galatians 6:10 tells us, “as we have opportunity, let us do good to everyone.” Voting gives us an opportunity to influence who exercises power over our neighbors. That makes a ballot something to use thoughtfully, not something to dismiss with a religious phrase.

Scripture does not contain instructions for an American polling place. It does contain instructions for people who have neighbors and opportunities.

RELATED: Billy Crystal no longer trusts God. Christians should listen.

Theo Wargo/Getty Images

No candidate is going to usher in the kingdom of God. I would settle for one who understands the job, tells the truth, and remembers whose money he is spending. Expecting perfection is another convenient way to avoid making a choice.

Think about our brothers and sisters in countries where free elections are restricted or denied. Then imagine explaining to them that we leave our ballots unused because we trust God.

Passive citizens are ripe to become captive citizens.

Officials do not lose their authority because we lose interest. They continue making decisions, spending money, and exercising power. Our absence simply leaves the choosing to somebody else.

We are free to stay home. We should at least be honest about why. If we are indifferent, let’s call it indifference. If we are tired of politics, let’s say so. But invoking God’s sovereignty to excuse our own passivity drags His name into a decision we made.

I pray for Gracie. I still drive her to the hospital.

Pray for your country. Then do your part.

Who’s Afraid of Fusionism?

"It's not easy to be on the vanguard of a new Republican Party or a new conservative movement," then-Ohio Senate candidate J.D. Vance told the "Restoring a Nation" conference in October 2022. "There is a risk that it gets folded into Fusionism 2.0," Vance warned.

The post Who’s Afraid of Fusionism? appeared first on .