Man conceived through rape EXPOSES Planned Parenthood's RACIST roots



Ryan and Bethany Bomberger co-founded the Radiance Foundation to fight to show the world the value and purpose of every life — but it has not been without resistance.

“I remember being told to my face in a debate at Harvard that basically, I should have been aborted,” Ryan tells Allie Beth Stuckey.

Ryan’s mother conceived him through rape, yet he was given a chance to live. “I am that fringe case. I’m the 1% that’s used 100% of the time to justify abortion, and I thank God for a courageous birth mom who not only gave me the gift of life but gave me the gift of adoption.”

Their fight to show mothers that there are options other than abortion took an interesting turn when the Radiance Foundation was sued by the NAACP.

The foundation was the first organization to launch public ad campaigns targeting the disproportionate impact of abortion in the black community. The campaigns featured 60 billboards across San Francisco that read “Black and Beautiful. TooManyAborted.com.”

The ad campaign was not only meant to illuminate just how tragic abortion has been for the black community but to call out Planned Parenthood’s eugenic past and unaltered and elitist DNA.

“We were just bashed,” Ryan tells Stuckey. “We were denounced by a group that I grew up revering: NAACP. They called our campaign horribly racist and that it gave the false impression that Planned Parenthood kills black babies.”

“That was the first moment when I realized civil rights had gone wrong,” he adds.

This is when Ryan decided to write an article titled “The National Association for the Abortion of Colored People” — and when the NAACP decided to sue.

Ryan “never thought it would even go to court, because hello, brown guy exercising, you know, civil rights, free speech.”

However, what’s obvious to Ryan and Bethany isn’t so obvious to everyone else — especially other activists.

“I mean, they say on one hand ‘Black Lives Matter,’ but then they are standing in solidarity with the leading killer of black lives,” Ryan says, adding, “We’ve been calling that out for years. We’ve been extolling the truth that black lives matter, that every single life created in the image of God — which is all of us — matters.”

Not only do these activists seem unaware of the blatant hypocrisy that is essentially the foundation of their ideology, but the very foundation of Planned Parenthood has extremely racist roots.

“Let’s look at the history of Planned Parenthood, let’s look at the history of Margaret Sanger. Let’s look at how specifically anti-black eugenics was tied into the very foundation, the very fabric of Planned Parenthood,” Stuckey says.

While Margaret Sanger was an admitted white supremacist, Ryan notes that Planned Parenthood has gotten worse than it was when it was run by her.

“It’s interesting,” he adds, “because you hear people make the argument, ‘Well, Planned Parenthood’s not the same today as it was during Margaret Sanger’s days.’ And I’m like, actually it wasn’t as evil. It wasn’t quite as evil. It’s worse now because they’re actually killing millions of human beings.”


Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

The left has been coming for your children for nearly a century



Although the phrase “we’re coming for your children” went viral during this year’s Pride Month, the concept is not new.

In fact, Liz Wheeler, author of “Hide Your Children: Exposing the Marxists Behind the Attack on America's Kids,” says that “the left has been trying to re-engineer our society” for a very long time – “nearly a century.”

“Unfortunately, they’ve been quite successful,” she tells Allie Beth Stuckey.

“They have captured … four out of the five major foundational cultural institutions,” including the media, the education system, several religious institutions, the law, “and they’ve just about destroyed the nuclear family as well,” Liz laments.

“There is one element of the nuclear family left standing, [and] that's children,” she says, “which probably explains why the left has set their target on our children.”

“Why the children?” asks Allie.

“Communists and marxists have focused on trying to destroy the nuclear family for a long time” because “the nuclear family has always been the bulwark against evil; it's always been the institution around which society was properly engineered,” Liz explains.

In order to deconstruct the nuclear family, each pillar must fall – those pillars being man, woman, marriage, sex, and children.

When you consider how the left has villainized masculinity, fanned the flames of toxic feminism, succeeded in radically decreasing marriage rates, encouraged recreational sex, and is now indoctrinating children, you can clearly see the calculated attack on the nuclear family.

“Marxists understand that if they can radically alienate children from parents, if they can destroy parental rights, if they can cause children to willingly turn against their parents, then what is the purpose of a nuclear family?” asks Liz.

So how do we stop this? How do we protect our kids from a society that seeks to destroy them?

Although many look to conservative leaders to fix this issue, Liz says the answer is not to be found in the Republican Party. To hear her full analysis, watch the video below.


Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Rape cover-ups, missing people, and forced abortions: The dark truth of Scientology



For those who don’t know what exactly Scientology is, you’re not alone. When you break it down, you’ll find that it’s an incredibly complex system. Part religion, part business, part cult, Scientology was invented by a man named L. Ron Hubbard in 1954.

The origins of the religious movement are quite shady as well. Before the Church of Scientology was founded, Hubbard first developed a set of therapeutic principles he called Dianetics, but the organization he created to promote these ideas went bankrupt. Many believe that Hubbard then founded the Church of Scientology as a way to recharacterize Dianetics as a religion in order to avoid paying taxes. From the get-go, Scientology was intended to be a lucrative endeavor.

But where there is worship of money, there, too, you find darkness and depravity. Allie Beth Stuckey invites Jeremiah Roberts and Andrew Soncrant, hosts of the podcast "Cultish," to the show to “peel back the layers” of Scientology and evaluate what’s really going on beneath the surface.

“Around 1967 after L. Ron Hubbard had established the Church of Scientology, the IRS … revoked its tax-exempt status” after it became clear that Hubbard “wanted to utilize a religion as a way to obtain wealth.”

This sparked a cycle of revenge that involved “5,000 members of the Church of Scientology … actively involved on multiple different fronts in the government, not just the Internal Revenue Service ... trying to obtain documents, trying to forge documents” in order to “get their tax-exempt status back.”

“It’s a pretty wild story of infiltration,” says Roberts.

To hear the bizarre story of how a cult amalgamated with the federal government and resulted in kidnappings, forced abortions, and rape cover-ups, among other horrors, watch the video below.


Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

LGBTQ activists are attempting to redefine infertility so that same-sex couples get medical coverage for surrogacy and IVF



They’ve already deconstructed gender, villainized motherhood, and made up some fun new pronouns, so why not go ahead and add “redefine infertility” to the list?

Allie Beth Stuckey and guest Katy Faust, founder and director of Them Before Us, discuss exactly what the Alphabet Mafia is doing to undermine and redefine infertility.

“California and other blue states are trying to redefine infertility to include gay couples that cannot have a child biologically so that insurance companies would then be forced to cover things like surrogacy for two men who want a child,” says Allie.

“The medical definition of infertility is unprotected heterosexual sex for 12 months that doesn't result in a pregnancy or live birth,” Katy explains, “and now what they're saying is … no matter how much unprotected sex the same-sex couple has, they are never going to be able to produce a child” and “what biology cannot accomplish, the law needs to provide.”

The indisputable truth is that same-sex couples “will never medically be able to be diagnosed as infertile because they're not participating in the activity that would lead doctors to conclude that infertility is the problem, and yet they want the same kind of access, and they want the same insurance coverage,” Katy tells Allie.

According to the feelings > logic state of California, “it's discriminatory for heterosexual couples to be able to be designated as infertile and then receive coverage from their insurance companies,” so in the name of DEI, they intend to “redefine what infertility means.”

“So now the California bill and similar other bills across the country are seeking to define infertility as not a medical status but really a relational status,” says Katy, so people can be deemed infertile because of “the relationship [they’re in] or…because [they’re] not in a relationship at all.”

“What are some of the repercussions of green-lighting a bill like this?” asks Allie.

“The California bill specifically said insurance companies can't discontinue services and there is in essence unlimited supply of IVF transfers,” says Katy, “and we already have a situation in this country where we've got one million frozen embryos in storage right now, and oftentimes the only thing that keeps that in check is cost.”

However, with “insurance funded IVF transfers … why limit the number of embryos that you're going to create?”

“It is only going to increase the amount of children who are suffering indefinitely in a freezer or who are going to perish in the gauntlet that children have to undergo between freezer and implantation and then ultimately birth,” says Katy.

Further, “it is going to massively increase the number of children that are screened for sex or for … potential genetic markers that don't seem as desirable to the adults; in essence, it is going to contribute to the increased commodification of children where they are thawed and discarded, donated to research, or spend their life forever in a freezer,” she explains.

To hear their full conversation, watch the video below.


Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.