Ocasio-Cortez denies scrubbing her profile pronouns over the election and offers bizarre excuse



Critics of Democratic socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York called her out for scrubbing her preferred pronouns from her profile, but she is denying any political motivation for the decision.

Among those who pointed out the change was the popular Libs of TikTok account, which posted a screenshot of her account with the "she/her" designation and a later screenshot without them.

'The whole "story" of removing pronouns after the election is fake.'

Some took it to mean that Ocasio-Cortez was quietly pulling back from supporting the extremist LGBTQ+ agenda after the disastrous election results. Others mocked her for appearing to betray the cause.

On Saturday, she denied the allegations in a post on social media and offered another explanation.

"The whole 'story' of removing pronouns after the election is fake. It happened a long time ago after the SCOTUS Twitter ruling meant I had to add the 'personal acct' disclosure," Ocasio-Cortez wrote.

"There weren’t enough chars so I had to swap the end. You can run the timeline to see for yourself," she added.

The controversy only further highlighted recent criticism from the left that Ocasio-Cortez was slowly moving away from the far left and trying to join the centrist establishment of the party in order to seek more power and influence. In October, the Democratic Socialists of America said they were planning to vote on censuring her because she hadn't been sufficiently anti-Israel in her congressional voting record.

Some have also blamed the spectacular loss for the Democrats in the election on transgender issues that peeled away support from moderate and centrist voters.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Former teacher to collect life-changing settlement after Virginia district fired him for refusing to use preferred pronouns



A former high school teacher in Virginia will soon collect a settlement of nearly $600,000 after he was fired for refusing to refer to a female student using male pronouns.

For nearly seven years, Peter Vlaming taught French in West Point, Virginia, a city of about 3,400 residents about 40 miles east of Richmond. In the fall of 2018, a female student Vlaming already knew enrolled in his French II course.

In their previous interactions, the girl, referred to in court documents as "John Doe," had apparently accepted the use of a female French name and female pronouns, but by the time she arrived for French II, Vlaming had learned that she "desired to be called by a more culturally masculine name," court documents said.

Vlaming — whose religious beliefs uphold that "sex is fixed in each person, and that it cannot be changed, regardless of our feelings or desires" — tried to accommodate the student by avoiding pronouns in reference to her altogether and instead calling her by either her masculine English or French name.

This alternative was apparently unacceptable to the student's parent and school administrators.

The parent told Vlaming he "should leave his principles and beliefs out of this and refer to [Doe] as a male," the documents said.

Assistant Principal Suzanne Aunspach then informed Vlaming that his "personal religious beliefs end at the school door" whenever they conflict with school policy, and Principal Jonathan Hochman later recommended that Vlaming be placed on administrative leave after he accidentally slipped up and referred to Doe as "her" during class but did not apologize in a manner that satisfied Hochman.

In subsequent conversations with then-Superintendent Laura Abel, Vlaming insisted that he could not in good conscience use masculine pronouns in reference to Doe but would be willing to continue using her chosen masculine names.

Abel then sent him a letter in which she explicitly directed him to use masculine pronouns for Doe. When he still refused, she recommended he be terminated on the grounds that he violated district policy regarding "harassment or retaliation against students and others on the basis of gender identity."

The West Point School Board complied with her recommendation, voting to terminate Vlaming for refusing to use the preferred pronouns and for insubordination.

'Peter wasn’t fired for something he said; he was fired for something he couldn’t say. The school board violated his First Amendment rights under the Virginia Constitution and commonwealth law.'

In September 2019, Vlaming sued the district, claiming that it had breached his contract and violated his rights to free speech, free exercise, and due process. With the help of Alliance Defending Freedom, a religious liberties legal group, Vlaming's case made its way through the Virginia legal system.

Vlaming endured a setback when a lower court dismissed his suit, but last December, the commonwealth supreme court reinstated it, ruling that the Virginia Constitution "seeks to protect diversity of thought, diversity of speech, diversity of religion, and diversity of opinion."

On Monday, Alliance Defending Freedom announced that Vlaming and the district had reached a settlement. The district will pay Vlaming $575,000 in damages and attorney fees and wipe the termination from his record.

Current Superintendent Larry Frazier confirmed the settlement to the Washington Times. "We are pleased to be able to reach a resolution that will not have a negative impact on the students, staff or school community of West Point," Frazier wrote in an email.

So far, Vlaming appears pleased with the hard-fought result.

"I was wrongfully fired from my teaching job because my religious beliefs put me on a collision course with school administrators who mandated that teachers ascribe to only one perspective on gender identity—their preferred view," Vlaming said in a statement, according to ADF. "I loved teaching French and gracefully tried to accommodate every student in my class, but I couldn’t say something that directly violated my conscience.

"I’m very grateful for the work of my attorneys at Alliance Defending Freedom to bring my case to victory, and hope it helps protect every other teacher and professor’s fundamental First Amendment rights."

ADF senior counsel Tyson Langhofer likewise cheered the court's ruling and the settlement.

"Peter wasn’t fired for something he said; he was fired for something he couldn’t say. The school board violated his First Amendment rights under the Virginia Constitution and commonwealth law," Langhofer said in a statement.

"[Vlaming] couldn’t in good conscience speak messages that he knew were untrue, and no school board or government official can punish someone for that reason," Langhofer's statement added. "We’re pleased to favorably settle this case on behalf of Peter and hope other government and school officials will take note of the high cost involved in failing to respect an American’s constitutionally protected freedoms."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

WATCH: Megyn Kelly has BLISTERING response to Biden’s Title IX revisions



Joe Biden has failed women once again with new Title IX amendments that largely overhaul Trump-era rules. Title IX, which was intended to protect women in athletics, will now pave the way for female athletes to continue being overpowered by trans competitors, as Biden’s new rules stipulate more protections for LGBTQ+ students. The rules state that students cannot be discriminated against for sexual orientation or “gender identity,” although a mandate on whether trans athletes can be barred from competing in the division opposite of their biological sex remains undecided.

The changes also target the way sexual harassment and sexual assault are defined and how due process is conducted. Per Biden’s revisions, the definitions of sexual harrassment and sexual assault will be expanded, and alleged victims will no longer be required to attend live hearings or cross examinations where they would otherwise have to face the accused.

Megyn Kelly, who Dave Rubin says is “loud and proud and hear me roar” in all the right ways, had something to say about Biden’s revisions as well as her voting history.

“I voted for Donald Trump to prevent things like this,” she said. “What Joe Biden just did to women's rights and Title IX and due process for young men on college campuses and free speech — I was horrified.”

“I’m ashamed of him! I’m disgusted at you, Miguel Cardona. Shame on you,” she spat. “Your daughter ... will now have to go into [a] college bathroom, [a] college locker room and be faced with men posing as women — many of whom are only there because they get off on wearing women's clothing ... and there's not a damn thing you can do about it.”

“It’s direct, and it’s true,” says Dave.

Even though “Donald Trump has gone after [Megyn] personally,” she is still “endorsing [him] for 2024” as she did in 2020.

“It wasn't about me,” she said. “It was about my concern for this country and my children and what was happening in particular in [the transgender] culture lane but in other lanes as well.”

To hear Kelly’s full analysis on Biden’s new rules and her explanation regarding her voting choices, watch the clip below.


Want more from Dave Rubin?

To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

State Dept. offers free therapy to personnel 'triggered' by glitch that 'misgendered' employees with wrong pronouns



The State Department is offering free counseling to agency employees devastated by a new IT feature that accidentally "misgendered" some employees.

Last week, the State Department was asked about pronouns appearing in the "from" line of employee emails who did not manually add them because, in many cases, the pronouns were incorrect. As it turns out, the agency had been testing a new program that allows employees to add their "preferred pronouns" to their agency profile, but the program inadvertently went live before it was ready.

In the mix-up, the "from" line of emails randomly displayed incorrect pronouns — or at least not the ones employees chose for themselves, according to the Washington Free Beacon.

State Department sources who spoke to the Free Beacon said agency employees were "shocked and confused" by the glitch. One employee said, "A lot of people here have been triggered today."

On Friday, State Department CIO Kelly Fletcher sent a department-wide email apologizing for the mishap.

In that email, she said that "any employee who feels hurt or upset as a result of this unfortunate mistake" should contact the agency's employee consultation service to "speak to a professional counselor."

"I want to stress that the intent behind making this feature available is to make our systems more inclusive and provide employees with options—not to make decisions for them," Fletcher wrote in the email.

"I recognize that this error had the opposite effect, and again, I am very sorry," she added.

Fletcher explained that any profile that had been misgendered would be corrected in the IT system by Saturday. When the new pronoun system officially launches, she said employees would be given ample notice to add their "preferred pronouns" to prevent future misgendering.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Former Kansas teacher to receive $95,000 from district that disciplined her for refusing to use preferred pronouns, lie to parents



A former Kansas middle school math teacher will soon receive a settlement of nearly $100,000 after a school district attempted to force her to violate her religious beliefs and call students by their preferred names and pronouns — and then withhold those same preferred names and pronouns from parents.

Pamela Ricard, 58, sued Geary School District, located about an hour west of Topeka, after she was disciplined in March 2021 for refusing to use male pronouns to refer to a biologically female student.

Ricard is a practicing Christian who believes that God creates human beings as either male or female and that gender is a fixed characteristic determined at conception, the lawsuit argued. Therefore, asking her to address the female student as a male "actively violated her religious beliefs."

As an alternative, Ricard began addressing the student in question as "Miss (last name)" to avoid using the student's preferred male first name. However, the district suspended Ricard for three days under the district's bullying and diversity and inclusion policies. The district also threatened to discipline Ricard further if she continued to misgender students.

Despite the insistence that Ricard and other teachers abide by so-called "preferred pronouns" and new first names, the district also demanded that teachers use a student's legal name and biological pronouns during parent-teacher conferences, if the student so wished. The district refused to grant Ricard the policy exemption she repeatedly requested, a fact that apparently did not sit well with the court.

"The Geary County School District unsuccessfully tried to convince a federal court that a teacher should completely avoid using a child’s name during a parent-teacher conference in order to hide new names and genders being used by the school for a child in a classroom," said attorney Joshua Ney of Alliance Defending Freedom, the group that provided Ricard with legal counsel.

In May, the court denounced the district policy, which attempted to compel teachers to conceal from parents the names and pronouns that their students used in school. The district has since abandoned that policy, though it is unclear whether the district has a policy regarding preferred pronouns in general.

Ultimately, Ricard and GCSD settled their differences out of court. GCSD agreed to pay Ricard $95,000 in compensation and release a public statement that she retired from the district in May in good standing with no disciplinary infractions. The district has not commented on the settlement.

"I’m glad the case clarifies the financial stakes for school boards if they attempt to force teachers to lie to parents about their students," Ney added.

Ricard, who began teaching at Fort Riley Middle School in 2005, has since moved to Oklahoma to teach and be closer to family.

Pronoun Police Are Playing An Unfunny Game Of ‘Hu’s On First?’

The mental gymnastics of following someone's 'declared pronouns' disrupts communication by undermining the very purpose of pronouns.