Supreme Court gives Trump massive victory on restricting mail-in voting



The U.S. Supreme Court sided Monday with President Donald Trump against a collection of Democrat-controlled states who sued to oppose his executive order restricting mail-in ballots.

The highest court of the land found in a partisan 5-3 ruling that the states did not have standing to sue against the president's order and overturned a lower court order to block the restrictions in 23 states.

'Only Democrat politicians and operatives would be upset about lawful efforts to secure American elections.'

"This internal directive does not regulate the States' voter registration processes," read the order from the Supreme Court. "Nor does it impinge on the States' authority 'to create and enforce a legal code' for elections."

However, the majority ruling warned that not all measures taken by the executive to implement the order will be necessarily lawful.

"On that score, time will tell," the majority said.

The court's three liberal justices dissented from the ruling.

The executive order from March directed the Department of Homeland Security to tabulate a list of citizens eligible to vote. It then called on the U.S. Postal Service to only accept ballots from people on the list.

U.S. attorneys general from several Democrat states sued to stop the order on the basis that it would disenfranchise some voters who could vote lawfully.

"Only Democrat politicians and operatives would be upset about lawful efforts to secure American elections and ensure only eligible American citizens are casting ballots," read a statement from White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson in April.

In her dissent Monday, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson accused the president of seeking to "foment chaos ahead of the November elections."

Justice Sonya Sotomayor said the ruling only "postpones" the adjudication of the president's order.

"Today's decision does not address whether the President's attempts to interfere with States' administration of the November 2026 elections are lawful," wrote Sotomayor in a dissent joined by Justice Elena Kagan.

RELATED: Appeals court unanimous in pivotal ruling on undated or misdated mail-in ballots

"Nor does it suggest that the Executive Branch has any constitutional or statutory authority to implement the President's directives," they added.

New York Attorney General Letitia James agreed with Sotomayor in her own statement on the ruling.

"This decision is a painful setback, but it will not be the final word," she wrote. "The right to vote is sacred, and no administration should be allowed to put that right in jeopardy by making it harder for eligible voters to cast their ballots."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Trump team slams 'disgusting and inhumane' question from 'disgraceful' CNN reporter



The president's online rapid response team absolutely lambasted a CNN reporter who insinuated that President Donald Trump was having a romantic relationship with a younger staffer.

Senior White House correspondent Kristen Holmes asked the president about the suggestion made by Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.) on Monday.

'These scumbags are the lowest of the low.'

"Jon Ossoff said you'd rather travel with your aide Natalie Harp than build the ballroom and do your job as president; what is your response?" Holmes asked.

"You mean Pee-wee Herman? Pee-wee Herman look-alike?" he responded about Ossoff.

"No, I would much rather do other things," Trump added. "We're building a great facility here. We're fixing a White House that hasn't been taken care of."

The Trump team responded more fully on social media to Holmes.

"[Kristen Holmes] is a disgraceful, humiliating embarrassment to her alleged profession. @POTUS hosts a hero lifeguard in the Oval Office and she uses it as an opportunity to take a cheap shot about one of President Trump's staffers. These scumbags are the lowest of the low," read the message."

40 minutes later, the team added a second insult.

"Someday, your children will come across your disgusting and inhumane question," the statement read. "They will be sickened and embarrassed to have a parent be so callous and vindictive. It’s quite troubling."

Alayna Treene, a fellow White House correspondent for CNN, defended her colleague.

"What a horrible to thing to say. Kristen is an incredible reporter, person and, above all, mother. I don't understand such a reaction to a journalist asking the president for his response to something a Democratic senator has leveled against him," she wrote.

Harp is the president's personal assistant.

RELATED: VIDEO: Trump says he will declare new US territory 'pretty soon' in the Middle East

Steven Cheung, the White House director of communications, also jumped into the fray.

"Jon Jackoff has to be the biggest cuck loser in politics," he posted on social media. "Instead of denigrating hard working people serving their country, Jon should look deep into his soul and ask himself why he's a miserable person who hates this country. It's because he's a radical, extremist Dumocrat."

CNN released a statement defending Holmes.

"Kristen Holmes is one of the most respected and accomplished journalists covering the White House. This afternoon, she did her job and asked the president of the United States a tough, relevant, and newsworthy question on behalf of the American people," read the CNN statement.

"Public officials are free to challenge reporting they disagree with, but personal attacks on journalists for asking questions are beneath the office and inconsistent with the principles of a free press," the channel added. "We stand firmly behind Kristen and reject these attacks in the strongest possible terms."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

VIDEO: Trump says he will declare new US territory  'pretty soon' in the Middle East



President Donald Trump told an enthusiastic group of supporters that he would declare another U.S. territory in the Middle East after the military operation in Iran is completed.

The fate of the Strait of Hormuz is still in limbo, 167 days after the U.S. and Israel began a joint military operation to strike at Iran's nuclear capabilities and leadership.

'We have the blockade. No ships get through unless we want them to ...'

Trump appeared confident at a rally as he touted the many victories of his administration before making the astonishing promise to seize control of the Strait of Hormuz.

"We're bringing the prices way down; look at what's happening! Coming way down," said the president. "And after we finish defeating Iran, which is being very badly defeated, pretty soon I'll be declaring the Hormuz Strait a territory of the United States."

The president laughed and got thunderous applause from those in attendance at the Nassau County Police Academy Center for Training and Intelligence in Garden City.

"Essentially that's what — we have the blockade. No ships get through unless we want them to," he added. "And how about Venezuela? Venezuela was a one-day war, and now we work great with them."

Video of the president's comments was posted to social media.

CBS News notes that the strait is traditionally treated as a open waterway despite it being split between Iran and Oman at its narrowest point.

RELATED: That time Marco Rubio warned the Iranian regime against 'suicidal' closing of the Strait of Hormuz

Control of the strait has become a contentious issue between Iran and the president, as they both seek a peace deal to end the military operation.

The president has insisted that any nuclear capabilities be ruled out for Iran, while the Islamic regime has demanded that the country be allowed to charge a toll on the many tankers and other ships that cross through the key trade route.

If the Trump administration agrees to such a toll, it could mean tens or hundreds of billions of dollars going to the Iranian regime.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Mamdani gets pie in the face from judge against pied-à-terre tax — and then Trump piles on



The mayor of New York City faced two major roadblocks for his far-left plan to hit certain rentals in the city with a pied-à-terre tax.

The tax scheme from Mayor Zohran Mamdani was temporarily blocked by a Staten Island judge on Monday who sided with a group of homeowners suing against the tax.

'It is pure Amateur Hour, and it’s hard, as President of the United States of America, to sit back and watch it happen, especially to a place I once loved.'

Then President Donald Trump piled on and said he would seek to use the powers of the federal government to oppose the "dangerous" policy in his hometown.

"This dangerous political 'experiment' in New York will destroy what was once a great City and State," the president wrote on Truth Social. "It is pure Amateur Hour, and it’s hard, as President of the United States of America, to sit back and watch it happen, especially to a place I once loved. Financial, and then Social, RUIN, is a 100% certainty."

The tax would impose a penalty for non-primary residences rented out in the city and worth more than $5 million. Mamdani said it would hit larger landlords and help pay for his socialist schemes in the city.

The president went on to say he would seek to oppose the tax himself in order to save the city from certain ruin.

"I am looking to see if the Federal Government has any legal right to avert this disaster, before it is too late," he added, "for the millions of people who cherish New York and want to see it thrive, as opposed to becoming a filthy, crime ridden, decrepit place of mockery and scorn."

The Mamdani administration said i would file an appeal in order to allow the tax to continue.

"The City will continue with the pied-à-terre’s implementation," said Matt Rauschenbach, a spokesperson for Mamdani.

"We disagree with today’s ruling, but we are confident in both the pied-à-terre surcharge and the City’s ability to implement it fairly and effectively," he added.

RELATED: Prominent professor supported Mamdani's socialist scheme — until he became a target

One of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit said he supported the tax but was shocked when he got a notice in the mail demanding he pay it. He says it was a mistake.

"Hopefully they can take a bit of time, take a step back, and say, well, let’s approach this in a more thoughtful way, do a little bit more diligence before we start sending out letters," said Simon Hedley.

The tax would also apply to non-primary co-ops or condominiums worth over $1 million.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

'He's full of s**t': Trump RIPS INTO Abdul El-Sayed after his narrow victory in Democratic primary



President Donald Trump lit into the far-left victor of the Democratic primary for the U.S. Senate in Michigan after the highly anticipated contest.

Abdul El-Sayed, 41, was able to defeat establishment candidate Haley Stevens despite polling showing that she had the advantage over the Republican candidate.

'He doesn't love Israel; he doesn't love Jewish people. He hates them. He hates them with a passion that burns in his heart.'

"The polls were wrong again last night when they thought it would be a landslide victory for a hater of Jews and a hater of Israel," the president said during an event in Las Vegas on Wednesday.

"This guy hates Jews," he continued. "Somebody said, 'Oh, that's a little strong.' No, he hates Jews, and hates Israel."

"Abdul El-Sayed, can you believe this? This could only happen to me. Abdul El-Sayed, lovely gentleman. He's a man of hate, and now he's going around saying, 'Oh, I love everybody.' He doesn't love everybody. Put him in office, and you're going to find out what he loves!" Trump said.

El-Sayed has been criticized widely for his far-left progressive values, and his narrow victory is seen as another defeat for the establishment wing of the party trying to keep control away from the extremist fringe.

"He doesn't love Israel; he doesn't love Jewish people. He hates them. He hates them with a passion that burns in his heart, and there's not a frickin' thing he can do about it," the president continued.

"When I watch Abdul, he's full of s**t!" he added to laughter and applause.

El-Sayed will face 63-year-old Republican Rep. Mike Rogers of Michigan, who ran unopposed for the Republican nomination.

RELATED: Far-left Democrat promised driver's licenses for illegal aliens in video unearthed from his past

Speaking to his supporters on Wednesday, El-Sayed invoked his Muslim religion when asked how he would beat Rogers.

"I want you to remind them that if we come through this, when we come through this — inshallah — that we'll have taken $70 million on the chin and kept fighting back," he said.

Inshallah means "God willing" in Arabic.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here

Pets of Springfield, rejoice! DHS is coming for suspended-status Haitians after Biden judge takes 'the L'



Owing to their nation's Temporary Protected Status, hundreds of thousands of Haitian migrants have avoided deportation despite greatly adding to the strain on American resources in places such as the blue-collar city of Springfield, Ohio, where they were accused by then-presidential candidate Donald Trump of "eating the pets of the people that live there."

After a protracted legal battle that went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, the activist judge who initially held up the process has finally conceded that the Trump administration can start giving Haitian migrants the boot.

How it started

The Trump administration announced last summer that Haiti's TPS was, after 16 years, finally coming to an end, having determined that the Caribbean nation no longer meets the conditions for special status, owing largely to significant improvements in domestic safety and stability.

'You don't have status inside this country any more.'

The revocation was, however, held up in the courts.

In Washington, D.C., U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes — a foreign-born, Biden-appointed, lesbian judge who previously worked as a lawyer to fight the first Trump administration's immigration policy and helped the U.N. secure asylum for so-called refugees — gave her fellow immigration activists cause to hope on Feb. 2, blocking the revocation of Haiti's TPS.

Reyes, originally from Uruguay, claimed that former DHS Secretary Kristi Noem not only violated the Administrative Procedure Act and the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause when terminating the TPS designation for Haiti but had likely done so "because of hostility to non-white immigrants."

RELATED: Trump-hating Republican governors conspire with Democrats to smuggle in even more migrants

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

After the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia declined in March to block Reyes' ruling and kept Haiti's special status in place, the government kicked the matter up to the nation's highest court.

In late June, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered the Trump administration a huge victory, overturning the lower court's ruling.

In the majority opinion, Justice Samuel Alito rejected the suggestion that race was a motivating factor behind the TPS revocation and emphasized that the "TPS statute plainly bars consideration of respondents' non-constitutional claims."

How it's going

In the wake of the Supreme Court making mincemeat out of her ruling, Reyes issued an order on Wednesday acknowledging the reversal of her judgment and what it necessarily entails.

The foreign-born judge, who previously had a great deal to say about the matter, kept her admission of defeat brief, noting that her stay of termination "is no longer in effect."

Despite Reyes' insinuation that the government was waiting on her say-so, James Percival, general counsel of the Department of Homeland Security, noted, "Haiti TPS ended when the Supreme Court mandate issued on July 27. I will give Judge Reyes kudos though for taking the L with grace and not doing something bonkers like many of her colleagues."

DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin issued a message to Haitians with suspended special statuses: "We're going after them right now. We are giving them an opportunity to either leave on their own, and we'll help you, or we'll arrest you and send you back."

"Either way, you don't have status inside this country any more," continued Mullin. "That has been litigated. The courts spoke very clearly. We knew that we were going to win this because in its name itself it says, 'Temporary Protected Status.'"

Steve Foster, the immigration policy coordinator for the Institute for Justice and Democracy in Haiti, told ABC News, "Haitians with TPS, regardless of whether they have a pending asylum claim, have gotten a 'DHS Call-In Letter' to appear at ICE offices in person."

Foster said that some Haitians have reportedly been assigned future court dates and given ankle monitors.

These efforts are reportedly under way in Springfield — an Ohio city that has in recent years heard allegations of Haitians eating pets and wildlife and seen a significant spike in Haitian-caused traffic accidents.

In 2024, Springfield Mayor Rob Rue admitted that the tens of thousands of Haitians who had recently poured into his city — a city that had a population of just over 58,000 in 2020 — "taxed" the "infrastructure of the city, our safety forces, our hospitals, our schools." According to the city, there were more than 15,000 migrants presently residing in Clark County alone.

Viles Dorsainvil, the head of a Haitian support group in Springfield, confirmed the government's efforts to get the ball rolling on Haitian migrants' ouster.

"We are just helping these folks to go to this appointment, and when they get there, they interview them and eventually put [an] ankle monitor on them," said Dorsainvil.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Trump takes another BIG swing at birthright citizenship and birth tourism



President Donald Trump issued two executive orders on Thursday intended to end birth tourism to the U.S. and narrow birthright citizenship.

The president signed the orders with his top aide, Stephen Miller, at his side at the White House in front of reporters.

'What that means is that no one in the world is anymore allowed to obtain a visa for this fraudulent purpose.'

Miller explained that the first order would "expand the definitions of people who were ineligible for birthright citizenship" in response to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that kept the policy active.

Those who are newly excluded from birthright citizenship include "alien enemies of the United States, members of foreign terrorist organizations, and large categories of people who lobby and act on behalf of foreign governments."

He went on to explain the second order.

"The second action that he's taking, which is especially historic, is for the first time ever in American history to ban birth tourism," Miller said.

"The idea that people come here pretending to be a tourist, pretending to be a visitor, saying they want to go to Disneyland, they want to go visit a monument or go to a national park," he added.

"But the real reason they're here is to have a child, to make that child an automatic citizen," Miller said, "to leave our country, and then have a U.S. citizen child that gives them access under this broken system to welfare benefits, ultimately to the voting booth, and all the other rights and privileges that belong solely to Americans."

Miller touted all of the president's actions to safeguard American citizenship and listed this order as one of the top three decisions.

"So that practice of birth tourism is, as of the signing of this order, hereby banned," he continued. "And what that means is that no one in the world is anymore allowed to obtain a visa for this fraudulent purpose."

Trump also criticized the Supreme Court ruling on birthright citizenship.

"I thought we were going to win it at the Supreme Court," he said. "Unfortunately we had a bad decision, very unfair decision. Our country suffers because of it. And we’re ending it a different way."

RELATED: Texas AG Paxton sues Chinese 'birth tourism' center for allegedly orchestrating abuse of birthright citizenship

Aaron Reichlin-Melnick of the American Immigration Council immediately criticized the orders.

"This new order is far less sweeping than the original, but like the first order, seemingly violates the Constitution," he said on social media.

"As an initial matter, the new EO aims to deny citizenship to children born to two noncitizen parents where ONE parent (not both) falls within one of the EO's new categories," he added. "This alone may well be a violation of the 14th Amendment, which cares about the status of both parents."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Trump is reportedly FURIOUS at Jeanine Pirro — and may fire her



The failure of U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro to prosecute a former Olympian for allegedly damaging the resurfaced reflection pool at the Lincoln Monument may lead to her termination.

President Donald Trump is furious at Pirro after she dropped the charges against 67-year-old David Hearn on Saturday, according to two sources who spoke to CNN.

'Really disappointed with Jeanine Pirro. She folded like an umbrella.'

Hearn pleaded not guilty to the felony charge of destruction of property after National Park Service employees allegedly saw him willfully and "violently" damage a section of the lining of the pool.

Trump is reportedly thinking about firing Pirro after she admitted that the damage to the lining was more likely to be the result of flawed installation rather than vandalism.

One of the sources said the president "fumed" over the situation throughout the weekend, and the source concluded that it's "highly likely she's removed from her job."

The other source said Trump was "blindsided" by the decision to drop the charge.

"The president did not know beforehand that she was going to do that," the source said.

The White House directed CNN to the president's comments to reporters.

"Frankly, I think she choked because the judge was really vicious. Instead of going after the people that did it, the judge went after her and went after her department, and I guess she choked," the president said on Monday at the Oval Office.

"I was disappointed with Jeanine Pirro. Really disappointed with Jeanine Pirro. She folded like an umbrella," Trump added.

One of the CNN sources said the president and Pirro had a phone conversation on Saturday about the issue and described the interaction as not "pretty."

The president also blasted Pirro in a post on social media Saturday.

"I disagree 100% with Jeanine Pirro, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, on the Reflecting Pool. I don't know what she was thinking? To me, it was a pure case of VANDALISM," Trump wrote.

Hearn had been facing 10 years in prison over the charge.

RELATED: Trump greets crew that restored Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool in visit to the White House

Pirro blamed the Dept. of the Interior in the filing.

"Had DOI been forthcoming with the information clearly in its possession, the government would not have sought a grand jury indictment," she wrote.

"Given all of this newly discovered information, it is difficult to attribute the widespread damage to the Reflecting Pool to vandalism, let alone to establish that fact beyond a reasonable doubt," she added.

CNN noted that Hearn has some legal options available to him that would include suing the administration and referring prosecutors to disciplinary action.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Brewery owner who offered free beer when Trump dies says his alcohol permit has been REVOKED



A progressive owner of a Wisconsin brewery says he will fight "tooth and nail" after his alcohol permit was revoked.

Kirk Bangstad says the state's Department of Revenue is revoking the permit for Minocqua Brewing Co. to operate at its two locations.

'They'll have to pry me out of my taprooms before I stop selling beer to thirsty progressives who come to visit us.'

Bangstad's brewery has made headlines for its anti-Trump posts that included a promotion offering free beer whenever President Donald Trump dies.

"As you can imagine, I’m not taking this lying down," the business owner wrote in a Substack post Sunday. "We're going to fight the state of Wisconsin tooth and nail, and once again, they'll have to pry me out of my taprooms before I stop selling beer to thirsty progressives who come to visit us."

He went on to ask for donations to the brewery's legal defense fund.

"As usual, fighting to keep my business alive means I have to pay lawyers, and that's never cheap," he added. "Every time this [happens], I rack up $100K in legal bills before we even see a judge. If you can help chip in to the Minocqua Company's legal defense fund, I'd really appreciate it."

The beer license revocations for the two locations in Madison and Minocqua will go into effect on Aug. 4.

A spokesperson for the Wisconsin Department of Revenue told Fox News Digital the brewery could file an appeal.

"We can confirm that the Department of Revenue has issued notice of a Brewer's permit revocation for two Minocqua Brewing Company locations and notice of an Alcohol Beverage Warehouse permit revocation for one location," the spokesperson said.

RELATED: Anti-ICE brewer's death wish: Leftist promises free beer when Trump dies 'in a few months' — and the Secret Service takes notice

"The business has until August 4th to appeal and can operate during the appeal process," the spokesperson continued. "Should the business decide to appeal, the next step would be to appeal to the Secretary of the Department of Revenue, who will assign the appeal to a Department of Revenue hearing examiner for their recommendations as to proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law."

Fox News Digital said Bangstad declined to comment directly about the report but made jokes about the death of Trump and Mitch McConnell and insulted Fox.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

New Audio Shows Biden’s Senility Started Long Before He Became President

The recordings come compliments of the Oversight Project, a government watchdog that fought for more than two years to bring them to the public.