KJP goes viral for all the wrong reasons after calling fallen soldiers 'military folks' in barely coherent interview



White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre went viral on Monday for all of the wrong reasons.

Over the weekend, three American servicemen were killed and more than 40 others were injured in a drone attack. They were stationed at a U.S. outpost in northeast Jordan. The U.S. government said Iran-supported militants were responsible for the attack.

During an interview on MSNBC, Jean-Pierre spoke about the fallen soldiers — but appeared nearly unable to piece together a coherent statement.

What I will say, our deepest, uh, obviously, our deepest condolences go out and our heartfelt condolences go out to the families, uh, who lost, uh, three, three brave, uh, three brave, uh, three brave — three folks who are military folks who are brave, who are always fighting, who are fighting on behalf of this administration, of the American people, obviously, more so, more importantly.

Uh, we lost those souls as the president said yesterday when he was in South Carolina. Our hearts go out to their families and friends. And let's not forget: there are wounded, also wounded soldier, military forces as well, and our hearts go out to them, and so I want to make sure that we offer up those deep, uh, deep thoughtful condolences to them.
— (@)

The interview drew sharp rebuke, not only for being a rambling mess, but because Jean-Pierre described fallen soldiers as "military folks" who fought for the Biden administration.

  • "Our service members swear an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States. They are not fighting 'on behalf of' the Biden team. This is incredibly disrespectful," Rep. Pat Fallon (R-Texas) responded.
  • "Now we know why they keep rolling out Kirby," Rep. Mike Waltz (R-Fla.) said.
  • "Note to the Press Secretary @PressSec:These are not 'folks'. They are service members who gave their lives NOT for this administration, but for the Country they serve! They are our best and deserve better than this," former Rep. Doug Collins (R), who is an Air Force colonel, said.
  • "We don't fight for any administration @PressSec, only the Constitution, which yours doesn't even follow dip****," retired Air Force Col. Rob Maness said.
  • "Folks, this is what she's like during every single White House press briefing. She frequently gets tenses wrong, makes things plural or singular when they shouldn't be, and uses wrong words. It's impressive how bad she is," journalist Curtis Houck said.
  • "It truly is amazing to see that after almost two years on the job [how] it's possible that Karine Jean-Pierre is only get[ting] worse at her job..." media reporter Joe Concha reacted.
  • "KJP confirms everyone’s greatest fears about this administration: that it’s run by stupid, incompetent people with no patriotism and no grasp at all of any problem our nation is facing," Allie Beth Stuckey noted.

President Joe Biden has vowed to respond to the attack, but top U.S. officials say the U.S. will not go to war with Iran.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

KJP goes on power trip, abruptly ends press briefing when African reporter calls her out for refusing to let him ask question



White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre abruptly ended Thursday's press briefing when a reporter protested her refusal to call on him.

For the first part of the briefing, reporters peppered National Security Council spokesman John Kirby with questions about issues of national security. Toward the end of his Q&A period, a reporter asked him about Angola, a pertinent topic because President Joe Biden met with Angola President João Lourenço on Thursday.

After Kirby answered the questions, Today News Africa correspondent Simon Ateba, who is African, attempted to ask a follow-up question three separate times. But each time Jean-Pierre ignored Ateba and called on a different reporter.

Eventually, Ateba had enough of Jean-Pierre's disregard.

"It's so surprising that you don’t take a — you are receiving an African leader, and you can’t take a question from an African journalist," Ateba said.

"We can end this briefing right now if you’re not going to be respectful," Jean-Pierre fired back.

"It's not about ending the briefing. I want to ask an African question because you’re receiving an African leader," Ateba responded.

As other reporters in the roomed jeered at Ateba, he tried to respond to Jean-Pierre's threat. It was at that moment that Jean-Pierre urged Kirby to leave the briefing room. And when Ateba made his case for why he deserved the opportunity to ask a question, Jean-Pierre ended the briefing.

"We can end this briefing if it's not going to be respectful here," she said.

"You’re not doing the right thing. That’s what I’m saying. You are receiving an African leader, and you don’t take questions," Ateba protested.

"OK. Thanks, everybody. Thanks, everybody. All right. Thank you," Jean-Pierre said as she walked away from the lectern and left the briefing room.

BREAKING NEWS: KJP Bolts Press Briefing, Answers No Questions Due To Finding Reporter Disrespectful www.youtube.com

In a statement after the incident, Ateba accused the White House of discriminating against him.

"It's a shame that @WhiteHouse@PressSec Karine Jean-Pierre decided to abruptly end the press briefing rather than take a question from me after a year. Even when President Biden is hosting an African leader like the President of Angola today, the White House does not take a question from the African journalist in the room," he said.

"I am highly disappointed and even heartbroken that in the citadel of democracy, and in the most powerful house in the world, I'm being discriminated against for a year for trying to do my job while journalist colleagues remain silent," he added.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Whoops! 'When I ran for president' post reportedly shared, then deleted from White House press secretary's X account



A post, which was reportedly shared to but later deleted from White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre's X account, @PressSec, appears to have mistakenly omitted attribution of the comments to President Joe Biden. X is the social media platform previously known as Twitter.

"Investing in America means investing in ALL of America," the post on the press secretary's account read, according to screenshots. "When I ran for President, I made a promise that I would leave no part of the country behind."

— (@)

The language closely reflects comments Biden made during a speech on Tuesday, but the post on the press secretary's account had not been attributed to the president.

Jean-Pierre, who identifies as gay, has been serving as Biden's press secretary for more than a year, taking over the role from Jen Psaki, who had previously served in the post.

Biden is aiming to clinch the Democratic presidential nomination again, and polling indicates that he is on track to easily do so. He is already the oldest president in U.S. history and would be 86 years old by the end of a second term.

Polling indicates that former President Donald Trump holds a decisive lead over all of the other GOP primary competitors. So it appears that Americans could see another Trump vs. Biden election matchup during the 2024 presidential contest.

Biden has been continuing to beat the drum for gun control.

"I AM DETERMINED TO BAN ASSAULT WEAPONS. I DID IT ONCE BEFORE, AND I'LL DO IT AGAIN," a Biden post on X declared. "It is within our power to once again ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, to require safe storage of guns, to end gun manufacturers' immunity from liability, and to enact universal background checks," the president's post also claimed.

— (@)

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Karine Jean-Pierre slammed for 'making a mockery of the First Amendment,' discriminating against reporters during White House briefing



A White House press briefing this week erupted into a shouting match between reporters after press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre was slammed for "making a mockery of the First Amendment."

The press secretary was accused of discriminating against certain reporters during a briefing Monday with actors Jason Sudeikis and Hannah Waddingham, cast members of the show "Ted Lasso."

The actors, who attended the briefing to discuss mental health, awkwardly stood behind Jean-Pierre as Simon Ateba, Today News Africa chief White House correspondent, claimed that the press secretary had not allowed him to ask a question in seven months. He alleged that Jean-Pierre discriminated against him and other reporters.

"This is not China. This is not Russia. What you are doing, you're making a mockery of the First Amendment," Ateba said.

At one point, Jean-Pierre turned around to address the "Ted Lasso" cast members and stated, "Fun times, welcome, guys." She then asked Ateba if he was "going to behave."

After the "Ted Lasso" actors left the room, Ateba continued to press Jean-Pierre and claimed reporters toward the front of the room were offered more opportunities to ask questions than those seated in the back.

Other press corps members off camera urged Ateba to quiet down. One member said he was "tired of dealing" with his attitude, and another stated, "It's not just about you, Simon."

Another reporter spoke up over the chaos and said, "Don't make assumptions about what the rest of us do, mind your manners when you're in here, and if you have a problem, you bring it up afterward, but you are impinging on everybody in here who's only trying to do their job."

After the clash between reporters quieted down, Jean-Pierre addressed the incident stating, "As you know, this is the White House press briefing room. A historic room. A room that should have decorum. A room where folks should respect their colleagues and respect the guests that are here. And I understand that there's going to be give and take. That's the way the press briefing has gone for decades before me."

Associated Press reporter Zeke Miller later used a "point of personal privilege" to apologize on behalf of Ateba.

"I just wanted to express our apologies to the press corps, to the folks watching at home for the display you saw earlier. Our responsibility to them, we're here to ask questions on their behalf, to hold their government accountable, but they can't all be here. This isn't about us," Miller said.

Ateba fired back at Miller on Twitter, writing, "This @WhiteHouse Correspondent @ZekeJMiller for @AP is a disgrace to the First Amendment and journalism. He believes he's better than me. But he's not. He apologized to @PressSec Karine Jean-Pierre today for discriminating against me for seven months. In the past 7 months, as I sat behind him, I watched him him ask those questions at every press briefing, he became entitled, believing that he's better than those who get no questions. This is insane!"

According to Ateba, the press secretary has refused to meet with him until 2024, and he believes she is attempting to avoid his challenging questions.

Ateba and Jean-Pierre squabbled in November when he defended Daily Caller White House correspondent Diana Glebova for attempting to ask Dr. Anthony Fauci a "good question" about the origins of COVID.

Jean-Pierre scolded Glebova for shouting her question, stating, "I'm not calling out on people who yell."

Ateba intervened and told Jean-Pierre she needed to "call [on] people across the room."

"Simon, I'm done with you right now," Jean-Pierre replied.

In May 2022, Ateba similarly accused former press secretary Jen Psaki of failing to call on reporters in the back of the room.

"Why don't you take questions from across the room? Because that's not what you've done for the past 15 months," Ateba told Psaki.

None
— (@)

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

WH press sec ignores Peter Doocy — then he reveals doozy of a question he was going to ask: 'A potential crime scene'



White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre snubbed Fox News' Peter Doocy at the White House press briefing on Friday.

The decision not to call on Doocy was unusual because Jean-Pierre almost always calls on him to ask questions. After all, Fox News occupies the No. 2 seat in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room, situated between NBC News and ABC News.

But Friday's briefing ended with Doocy's hand raised as he attempted to ask his question.

\u201cWhite House Press Sec. Karine Jean-Pierre exits the briefing room without calling on Fox News\u2019 Peter Doocy once today.\n\nWatch him keep his hand in the air as she walks out.\u201d
— The Recount (@The Recount) 1673636478

Later on Friday, Doocy revealed the question he was going to asked Jean-Pierre — and it was a doozy.

"If I would've had an opportunity to ask a question, the first one I have on my sheet was: Why is President Biden going to Wilmington today? Isn't that a potential crime scene?" Doocy explained.

"We are not getting a ton of new information today about the president’s knowledge of this probe, about his thoughts on the probe," he added, explaining the flow of information is being tightly controlled by the White House. "I think we can call it a scandal at this point. And so it's unclear ... how much more new information we're gonna get from this White House about any of this other than they 'take it seriously' and that they're 'gonna cooperate.'"

\u201cWatch: Fox\u2019s Peter Doocy reveals question he would have asked @PressSec if she hadn't frozen him out at White House briefing:\n\n\u201cWhy is President Biden going to Wilmington today, isn\u2019t that a potential crime scene?\u201d\u201d
— TV News Now (@TV News Now) 1673655923

Indeed, Biden departed Washington on Friday to spend the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday weekend at his Wilmington, Delaware, home.

The problem, as Doocy observed, is that there have been multiple discoveries of classified documents at Biden's private residence. Last week, the White House admitted to a discovery several days before Christmas. Then, on Saturday, the White House disclosed that there had been yet another discovery in the middle of last week.

That means classified documents have been discovered in three locations: Biden's private office in Washington, his residential garage, and inside his residence itself.

White House lawyer Richard Sauber said on Saturday the White House legal team does not anticipate releasing any more details about the discoveries, the New York Times reported.

Attorney General Merrick Garland has appointed former U.S. Attorney Robert Hur as special counsel to investigate Biden's improper retention of classified documents.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Joe Biden wants to spend $22 billion of taxpayer money on pandemic he declared is 'over'



President Joe Biden recently declared the COVID-19 pandemic is "over."

But that has not stopped his administration from asking Congress to approve more than $20 billion in new pandemic-related funding.

What are the details?

The White House is asking Congress to approve $22.4 billion "to meet immediate short-term domestic needs" that are allegedly connected to the pandemic.

That money will go toward testing, accelerating "research and development of next-generation vaccines and therapeutics," helping the U.S. prepare for future COVID-19 variants, and to support the global pandemic response. It's not clear how, with the exception of testing, any of those stated needs are, in the words of the White House, "immediate short-term domestic" priorities.

"[O]ur COVID-19 response efforts continue to require additional funding," the White House said in a release.

"In March, we requested that Congress provide supplemental COVID-19 funding and repeatedly warned that without congressional action, we would be forced to make difficult trade-offs and pull existing funding from critical efforts to meet the most pressing needs," the release continued. "That is precisely what has happened."

The request comes as lawmakers in Washington negotiate a stopgap spending bill that would prevent a partial government shutdown when the fiscal year ends on Sept. 30.

As the Washington Post highlighted, Republicans are understandably seizing on the apparent double standard and pointing out that Biden's rhetoric contradicts his policies.

For example, the legal justification for canceling $10,000 of student loan debt per borrower is the alleged national emergency stemming from the pandemic. Meanwhile, Biden officials have argued that migrants should no longer be expelled from the U.S. under Title 42 because the pandemic is a relic of the past.

What does the WH say?

Administration officials were called in for clean-up duty this week after Biden's "60 Minutes" interview.

An official, for instance, told CNN the official policy of the U.S. government has not changed, and that a declaration of national emergency over the pandemic will be extended in October.

On Wednesday, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre muddied the waters further with confusing remarks when asked about Biden's declaration.

"Just to step back for a second," she said. "When he made those comments, he was walking through the Detroit car show, the halls of the Detroit car show, and he was looking around. We have to remember the last time that they had held that event was 3 years ago.

"We are in a different time. He’s been very consistent about that," she went on to say, attributing Biden's work as president for the improving pandemic.

\u201cWH @PressSec says Biden didn't actually mean the Covid pandemic is over despite saying it: "Just to step back for a second, when he made those comments, he was walking through the Detroit car show, the halls of the Detroit car show, he was looking around."\u201d
— Tom Elliott (@Tom Elliott) 1663764433

Psaki responds to Elon Musk buying Twitter by floating 'reforms' to combat 'misinformation'



White House press secretary Jen Psaki responded to Elon Musk's acquisition of Twitter on Monday by reiterating President Biden's continued support for "fundamental reforms" aimed at combating the spread of "misinformation" on social media platforms.

The remarks appeared to foreshadow a potential future fight between the Biden administration and Twitter over content censorship practices.

Musk — a tech billionaire and free speech advocate — finalized a buyout of the platform on Monday following weeks of negotiations. He immediately emphasized that his goal in purchasing the company is to return it to free speech principles and end the blatant ideological censorship that has become prevalent on the platform.

Though Psaki refused to respond specifically to Musk's acquisition of Twitter, her overarching comments made the administration's feelings clear; that is, officials are not at all happy at the notion that Twitter will be run in an unbiased way.

"What I can tell you as a general matter, no matter who owns or runs Twitter, the president has long been concerned about the power of large social media platforms, what they ... the power they have over our everyday lives, has long argued that tech platforms must be held accountable for the harms they cause," Psaki said during Monday's press briefing.

"He has been a strong supporter of fundamental reforms to achieve that goal, including reforms to Section 230, enacting antitrust reforms, requiring more transparency, and more, and he’s encouraged that there’s bipartisan interest in Congress," she continued. "In terms of what hypothetical policies might happen, I’m just not going to speak to that at this point in time."

.@PressSec on @elonmusk purchasing @twitter: "The president has long been concerned about the power of large social media platforms, the power they have over our everyday lives, has long argued that tech platforms must be held accountable for the harms they cause."pic.twitter.com/uWRizqqET4
— CSPAN (@CSPAN) 1650915297

Later, when pressed again on the White House's reaction to the acquisition, Psaki lent credence to concerns that "misinformation" will now run rampant on the platform and once again expressed that President Biden is open to making changes.

"I would say that our concerns are not new," Psaki said. "We’ve long talked about, and the president has long talked about, his concerns about the power of social platforms — including Twitter and others — to spread misinformation, disinformation, the need for these platforms be held accountable."

Psaki on Musk buying Twitter: "[O]ur concerns are not new. We've long talked about and the President has long talked about his concerns about the power of social platforms, including Twitter...to spread misinformation, disinformation, the need for [them] to be held accountable."pic.twitter.com/clfzPEWcWA
— Curtis Houck (@Curtis Houck) 1650916343

News of Musk's purchase of Twitter caused a widespread meltdown among liberals in the U.S., many of whom vowed to leave the platform as a result.

Twitter employees, too, went "absolutely insane" over the news, according to a report, as internal channels ran amok with outrage and panic.

"I feel like I'm going to throw up ... I [really] don’t wanna work for a company that is owned by Elon Musk," one Twitter employee reportedly told a New York Times reporter.

In a statement after his purchase, Musk said, "Free speech is the bedrock of a functioning democracy, and Twitter is the digital town square where matters vital to the future of humanity are debated."

"I also want to make Twitter better than ever by enhancing the product with new features, making the algorithms open source to increase trust, defeating the spam bots, and authenticating all humans," he added. "Twitter has tremendous potential – I look forward to working with the company and the community of users to unlock it."

Yesss!!! pic.twitter.com/0T9HzUHuh6
— Elon Musk (@Elon Musk) 1650915802

Jen Psaki says Fox News' Peter Doocy 'sounds like a stupid son of a b****' because of Fox News



White House press secretary Jen Psaki said that Peter Doocy — Fox News' White House correspondent — sometimes sounds like a "stupid son of a b****" because of his network.

In January, President Joe Biden was caught on a hot mic calling Doocy a "stupid son of a b****" after Doocy asked the president if inflation could be a "political liability" when it came time for midterm elections.

What are the details?

During a Tuesday appearance on popular podcast "Pod Save America," podcast co-host Dan Pfeiffer asked Psaki whether she believes Doocy is, indeed, a "stupid son of a b***" or if she thinks he just plays one on TV.

"He works for a network that provides people with questions that, nothing personal to any individual including Peter Doocy, but might make anyone sound like a stupid son of a b****," Psaki responded.

She later added, however, that Doocy responded to Biden's gaffe with class when discussing it with Fox News' Sean Hannity in January.

"Sean Hannity asked him about the, you know, what the president had said, and what he said back — and he could have been like, 'He's a son of a b****,' or 'I'm standing up for whatever,' — he could have said anything," Psaki said. "And instead he said, 'You know, he called me. We had a really nice conversation. I'm just asking my questions. He's doing his job.' So I will say that was a moment of grace. You don't have to like everything Peter Doocy says or does, but that is certainly a moment of grace by Peter Doocy."

Fox News anchor — and former White House correspondent — John Roberts spoke out in defense of Doocy later on Friday.

“Note to @PressSec . @pdoocy makes the decisions on what topics he wants to quiz you on, and develops the questions himself,” Roberts tweeted. “His philosophy is a basic tenet of journalism. Comfort the afflicted, and afflict the comfortable. If that makes all of us ‘stupid s.o.b.s’, so be it.”

A Fox News spokesperson defended Doocy in a statement provided to the Washington Post.

“In his role as White House correspondent, Peter Doocy’s job is to elicit truth from power for the American public,” the spokesperson told the Post. “His questions are his own, he is a terrific reporter, and we are extremely proud of his work.”

Psaki is expected to leave her position as the Biden White House press secretary in the coming weeks in order to take on a new role at MSNBC.

Biden calls Putin a 'war criminal.' Psaki tries to walk back the announcement, says it was because of what the president saw on TV.



Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy addressed the U.S. Congress on Wednesday, imploring the American government to help his country and exposing Russian atrocities committed against his people.

The world has witnessed Russian President Vladimir Putin's slaughtering of innocent Ukrainians in his desire to exert Moscow's control over Eastern Europe and regain some of the lost "glory" of the former U.S.S.R.

Shortly after Zelenskyy's speech, a reporter asked President Joe Biden whether Putin is a war criminal.

Biden initially replied, "No." Then, after wandering off, he went back to the reporter and offered the opposite take.

After asking the reporter for clarification about whether she was asking if he would call Putin a war criminal, the president said, "Oh, I think he is a war criminal."

Naturally, the Kremlin was more than a little put off by Biden's declaration. The government's spokesman called the remarks "unacceptable and unforgivable rhetoric," MSN reported, citing Russia's state-run TASS news agency.

So, why did Biden say what he did about Putin?

Was it because of info shared in the presidential daily briefings, as HotAir's Ed Morrissey asked? Was it because of secret intel Biden has been privy to? Was it because of powerful Pentagon surveillance footage?

Apparently not.

According to White House press secretary Jen Psaki, it was because of what Biden saw on TV — just like everybody else.

A reporter pressed Psaki about the president's seemingly premature decision to label Putin "war criminal," which is a significant designation.

"The Russian actions in Ukraine are under close scrutiny for potential war crimes, but today President Biden directly labeled Putin today a 'war criminal.' Has something changed in the administration's assessment?" the reporter asked. "What brought this new remark from the president?"

Psaki replied, "The president's remarks speak for themselves. He was speaking from his heart and speaking from what he's seen on television — which is barbaric actions by a brutal dictator."

.@PressSec Jen Psaki on President Biden calling Putin a war criminal: "He was speaking from his heart."pic.twitter.com/kLX9MgnGiB
— CSPAN (@CSPAN) 1647459216

Another reporter later noted, "This war has now been going on three weeks. So far, the president has declined to use this label. As you note, there is an ongoing sort of formal process before you can use this term. So, something must have changed for the president to feel like he could take this additional step today."

Psaki answered, "The president was answering a direct question that was asked and responding to what he has seen on television. We have all seen it. Barbaric acts, horrific acts by a foreign dictator in a country that is threatening and taking the lives of civilians, impacting hospitals, women who are pregnant, journalists — others."

What caused this walk back? Morrissey has a theory: Biden doesn't want to tick off Russia when he needs them to get back into the Iran nuclear deal.

Moreover, with Biden having established that designation after fumbling it initially, this official walk-back at the White House of it being just Biden’s personal view looks like a retreat in the face of Russian complaints. And that might be precisely what it is, because Biden’s still relying on Russia to accommodate Biden’s desperate ambition to re-enter the Iran deal. Biden has put regional and American security into Putin’s hands in regard to a renegotiated JCPOA while calling him a “war criminal,” and at the same time warning that Putin might use WMDs in Ukraine such as chemical weapons and tactical nukes.

Rather than recognize the insanity of that foreign policy, Biden and his White House have decided that it makes more sense to accommodate Putin and walk back the obvious. That may be many things, but leadership it ain’t.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki says she is 'not sure what American ... is concerned about the debt limit'



Congress is expected to raise the country's debt limit, but when White House press secretary Jen Psaki was asked what she would say to those who believe that the nation's legislature is once again kicking the can, she said that she is not aware of Americans who are concerned about the debt limit.

"I'm not sure what American person is saying that or is concerned about the debt limit, but maybe there is somebody you've met on the street, I don't know," Psaki said.

The Senate voted 50-49 to increase the debt limit by $2.5 trillion, sending the issue to the House — no Republicans voted in favor of the measure, according to the New York Times. If the move is approved and signed by the president, it will prevent a U.S. default for awhile, until the debt begins approaching the new limit at some point in the future.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) had said that the measure would push the issue into 2023.

"The debt limit is the total amount of money that the United States government is authorized to borrow to meet its existing legal obligations, including Social Security and Medicare benefits, military salaries, interest on the national debt, tax refunds, and other payments," according to the U.S. Department of the Treasury.

While the measure passed in the Senate without any GOP support, the AP noted that Republicans had a role in putting Democrats in the position of being able to approve the debt limit increase without GOP votes.

The outlet reported that "an amendment was made to an unrelated Medicare bill that passed last week with Republican votes. It created a one-time, fast-track process for raising the debt limit that allowed Democrats to do so with a simple majority, bypassing the 60 vote threshold to avoid a GOP filibuster."

The AP reported that GOP Sen. Mike Lee of Utah "said the process was intended to make the Republican votes last week 'appear as something other than helping Democrats raise the debt ceiling,' which he said Republican leadership 'committed, in writing no less, not to do.'"

In response to Psaki's comment, Republican Rep. Byron Donalds of Florida noted that many Americans are quite concerned about the debt limit.

"I encourage @PressSec to leave her ivory tower and speak with everyday Americans who are, in fact, VERY concerned with the debt limit and the reckless agenda of Biden and Democrats in power on Capitol Hill. Feel free to start in SW Florida; they will have A LOT to say about it," Donalds tweeted.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki holds news conference (FULL - 12/14) youtu.be