Heartland states reject left's culture of death by voting down abortion



Voters in South Dakota, Nebraska, and Florida decisively chose to protect the lives of the unborn, voting against abortion measures, according to the latest election results.

This election cycle, so-called abortion "rights" were on the ballot in seven other states, including Maryland, Colorado, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, Arizona, and New York.

'Being pro-life is NOT a losing issue.'

South Dakota voters defeated Amendment G, which, if passed, would have legalized abortions in all situations in the first trimester of pregnancy. It, too, would have allowed the state to determine when to permit abortions during the second trimester but "only in ways that are reasonably related to the physical health of the pregnant woman." Abortions in the third trimester could have been legalized as well when "necessary, in the medical judgment of the woman's physician, to preserve the life and health of the pregnant woman."

After the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, South Dakota banned abortion except in situations in which it is necessary to preserve the mother's life.

Pro-life voters won in a landslide, rejecting Amendment G with a 19-point margin. All but four South Dakota counties voted against the measure.

This election cycle, Nebraska had two abortion-related measures on the ballot, including the "Right to Abortion Initiative" and the "Protect Women and Children" initiative.

The first measure, Measure 439, aimed to amend the state's constitution, enshrining the right to infanticide until viability or when deemed necessary to protect the mother's health. The second measure intended to amend the state's constitution to ban abortions after the first trimester, with exceptions for medical emergencies, sexual assault, and incest.

Nebraska voters rejected Measure 439, which sought to expand the legalization of abortion, and instead supported Measure 434, an initiative that enshrines the state's existing 12-week abortion ban.

According to the Associated Press' election results reporting, just over 51% of voters cast their ballots against the measure.

In Florida, voters defeated Amendment 4, which would have effectively legalized late-term abortions by amending the state's constitution, Blaze News previously reported. The measure required 60% approval to pass but received just 57.1% of the vote.

BlazeTV’s Liz Wheeler stated, “Amendment 4 in Florida which would’ve legalized abortion til the moment of birth has FAILED.”

“Praise the Lord,” she continued. “This is in [sic] incredible victory ... and also an incredible lesson for Republicans. Being pro-life is NOT a losing issue.”

President-elect Donald Trump secured victories in all three states where abortion measures were shot down.

While the pro-life movement had a few wins on Election Day, abortion amendments passed in several other states, including Arizona, Colorado, Maryland, Montana, and Nevada.

In Missouri, voters passed Amendment 3, which will create a constitutional right to abortion. However, it also will allow the legislature to regulate access to abortion past the first trimester.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Vampires, werewolves, and the very real evil stalking our souls



Since the dawn of October, I’ve found myself thinking often about two iconic monsters — the bloodthirsty vampire and the shapeshifting werewolf.

Perhaps it’s the Halloween decorations everywhere, the pop-up costume shops on every corner, or the horror films Netflix keeps recommending to me.

The vampiric spirit of bloodlust is easy enough to see in the widespread demand for unfettered abortion.

It could also be my recent discovery of “Haunted Cosmos” — a podcast for the highly curious that examines myth, legend, and the paranormal through the lens of Christian doctrine.

The creators of the series, Ben Garrett and Brian Sauve, make the case that much of what Christians dismiss as superstition is either true, partially true, or, at bare minimum, inspired by something true.

They take seriously the notion of aliens, dragons, Bigfoot, faeries, monsters, and the like. Using scripture as their decoder, they ask: Does the Bible offer support for the existence of these creatures?

Mask off

Whether or not stories about vampires and werewolves refer to actual creatures in the world (Garrett and Sauve have devoted fantastic episodes to this topic), one thing seems undeniably true to me.

The evil depicted by these legends is real — as real as the ground beneath our feet.

I’ve also been connecting the dots between this primordial evil and two of the most alarming modern issues contributing to the decline of the West. While these concepts may seem worlds apart, I sense a sinister connection between them.

The vampire and werewolf must be regarded in earnest because they pervade history. Every culture across time has some version of these evil entities. And when a thread of thought weaves through time and place, surely it hides a deeper truth. But what?

As a Christian, my answer to that question is that supernatural forces that crave human blood and revel in the idea of shapeshifting exist. They are demonic in nature and very powerful.

The anti-gospel

A vampire is a being who lives by taking the life force (the blood) of others. Is that not the antithesis of the gospel message? The vampire says, "Your blood for my life," whereas Jesus gave his blood so that we might live.

Vampirism is an anti-gospel. It expresses the rebellion of the original fallen angel — that great foil to Yahweh, Satan. That’s not to say vampires with fangs who sleep in coffins exist but rather that the entity that gave birth to such a myth exists.

The same goes for the spirit or entity that inspired the werewolf archetype. A werewolf is a man who, infected by evil, is forced to reject his nature and become a grotesque version of who he was intended to be. Again, we see an obvious perversion of God’s design. The rejection of our own nature is a rejection of our creator, who made us in his own image. This is also an anti-gospel.

Perhaps it’s a stretch to say that the same demonic entities that inspired vampires and werewolves are currently terrorizing the West, but I don’t think so. Not when I look closely at two of the biggest evils facing us today — evils directly caused by the rejection of our Judeo-Christian heritage.

What are abortion and transgenderism, after all, but the return of those iconic creatures of death, the vampire and the werewolf.

Shout Your Abortion

The vampiric spirit of bloodlust is easy enough to see in the widespread demand for unfettered abortion — especially on the furthest flank of the left, which openly relishes the slaughter of the unborn. One particular attendee at a pro-choice rally comes to mind. On her rotund, third-trimester belly were painted the words “NOT A BABY.” The image still haunts me.

There’s also the Shout Your Abortion organization, which quite literally encourages women to celebrate their abortions and share their “success stories.” SYA’s mission statement outlines its intentions to create a society where “abortion is free, de-stigmatized, and accessible in every community across the country.” In other words, these people really love the idea of boundless bloodshed.

Consider the murderous zeal of Minnesota governor — and Kamala Harris' running mate — Tim Walz, who signed a statute repealing the law that required babies who survive botched abortions to receive life-saving care. Even those whose lives have been miraculously spared cannot escape doom under the Walz regime.

Father of lies

However, not everyone is so candid about their desire to facilitate a genocide against the unborn. There are vampires who employ seduction to achieve their twisted desires. Like the serpent who used language to ensnare Eve in the garden, these cunning bloodsuckers deceive their victims with poetic discourse.

In Bram Stoker’s “Dracula,” the titular count tells his quarry, “Mina, to walk with me you must die to your breathing life and be reborn to mine.” That’s a very polite way of expressing your intentions to gorge on someone’s blood and turn them into a fellow wraith.

Pro-choicers of this kind speak in euphemisms. They make abortion — the bloody disruption of the holy process during which God knits a soul into being — sound practical, moral, even benevolent: Women’s health care, reproductive rights, life-saving interventions.

Having been wooed and deceived, the vampire’s victim walks willingly to her — and it’s almost always a her — death. Similarly, young women are seduced by euphemistic pro-choice language and agree to not their own death but something even worse — the death of their innocent child. We see the common thread: Young women, deceived by language, make a decision that results in a bloody death.

Unleashing the beast within

As for the demonic entity that inspired the shapeshifting werewolf, I see its handiwork primarily in the transgender movement. An ideology that is capable of subverting language, butchering healthy bodies, removing children from loving homes, and obliterating the guardrails that have long protected women is a demonic ideology.

At its root is Satan’s original sin: He thought he was better than God. Transgenderism shares the same core belief — the same pride-filled ideation that we supersede the King of kings.

A man who believes he is a woman and attempts to reshape himself in accordance with this belief sins in three ways: He rejects himself, thereby rejecting the one in whose image he was created; he rejects God, purporting to know better than his own creator; and he imitates the deceiver, who is also a shapeshifter. The same goes for a woman who attempts to shed her God-given form and become a man.

Like the werewolf who is both destroyed and inflicts destruction, so, too, the transgender individual destroys his or her own body and/or psyche and perpetuates a destructive, demonic creed.

The darkness remains

I do not believe that the millions of people foaming at the mouth demanding abortion access for all just have a different perspective than me. I do not think that the doctors sterilizing children and cutting off their healthy body parts merely grew up differently than I did. That’s an oversimplification of the problem at hand.

Of course, we need to speak out and fight back against the organizations pushing these causes, the politicians working to enshrine them in law, the billionaires funding them, and the protesters storming the streets chanting for abortion access and trans rights.

At the same time, however, we need to look beyond these flesh-and-blood adversaries in order to see the true author of these evils. It is not man.

“For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms” (Ephesians 6:12).

As Halloween approaches, my neighbors are quite literally pulling skeletons out of their closets, adorning their porches and lawns with all varieties of dark paraphernalia.

Two doors down from me, one couple has turned their entire front yard into a haunted graveyard featuring every monstrous creature imaginable, including — you guessed it — a vampire and a werewolf.

Although I find myself averting my eyes when I walk by, their celebration of darkness has set me down a path of considering how society at large celebrates darkness — the abortion and trans issues being just two on the long list of ideologies poisoning the West.

When October passes and the plastic monsters and tombstones are banished to dusty attics until next year, the darkness they represent will remain, and it will continue to erode society.

I wonder if the evil associated with Halloween, which many Christians rightfully avoid, might actually present an opportunity for us to consider how darkness — vampires and bloodlust, werewolves and shapeshifting — doesn’t ever go away. It merely puts on a new mask.

‘I Believe In Individual Freedom’: Melania Trump Defends Abortion Rights Stance

'They're calling that it's a scam and it's a lie'

‘The first red flag’: Ob-gyn busts myths on the tragic Amber Thurman case



Dr. Christina Francis is the CEO of the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists — and she’s exposing the truth about media misinformation surrounding abortions and miscarriages.

One tragic example of this is the recent story of Amber Thurman, which made headlines when Democrats began wielding it as a weapon to push the pro-choice agenda. They claimed that the late mother lost her life to Georgia’s pro-life laws that left them refusing to perform an abortion for her.

What really happened is even more heart-wrenching.

Thurman was mother to a six-year-old boy and decided to get an abortion after learning she was pregnant with twins. She made the trip to North Carolina from Georgia for the procedure, as she was too far along to legally be given the abortion in Georgia.

After arriving back home in Georgia and taking the abortion pills, she fell ill and rushed to the ER with heavy bleeding and signs of an infection. While the doctors did give her antibiotics and performed a D&C, the procedure was not done in time to save her life.

“She ended up dying, which is tragic all around,” Allie Beth Stuckey of “Relatable” tells Dr. Francis, who agrees that it’s a tragic situation “that could have been avoided.”

“I think that we can actually draw different, very different, conclusions than what the media and politicians are drawing from that,” Dr. Francis says. “As she said, she was pregnant with twins, which would increase her risk some of complications from abortion drugs.”

“Because she got delayed by traffic, it said that the abortion facility could not hold her appointment for longer than 15 minutes. And so instead, a clinic employee offered her the abortion drugs. To me, that was the first red flag,” she continues, asking, “Where was the physician?”

“Where was the person who could truly give her informed consent about the risks of those drugs?” she asks, noting that it wasn’t just the abortion clinic that failed her.

The Georgia hospital that treated Thurman should have known immediately that she was showing signs of sepsis, which would require “immediate initiation of IV antibiotics and a D&C procedure.”

“That’s the only way that you can get an infection like this under control, you cannot control it with antibiotics alone,” Dr. Francis explains, adding, “Every competent ob-gyn should know that.”

While the media and politicians are claiming that this was due to Georgia’s pro-life laws, the doctors who took care of her aren’t even blaming Georgia’s pro-life laws.

“Georgia’s law would not have applied to Amber Thurman for two reasons,” Dr. Francis explains. “Her babies were not alive when she presented to the emergency room, and Georgia’s law clearly states that it does not apply in situations where a fetal demise or the babies have already passed.”

“Second of all,” she continues, “Georgia’s law has clear medical exceptions when women are facing life-threatening complications, that the doctors could have intervened immediately. So we need to be pointing fingers at the right things. We need to be pointing fingers at these abortion drugs.”

Dr. Francis also notes that these infections are known to be caused by abortion drugs, and “over 30 women have died in the U.S. now, that we know of, since taking these drugs.”


Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

‘SPIRITUAL WAR’: Trump softened his pro-life stance — but you should vote for him anyways



Former President Donald Trump may have softened his pro-life stance, but Americans can’t let that deter them from stopping Kamala Harris in her tracks.

Rusty Reno, the editor for First Things, believes this wholeheartedly, as this is a spiritual war that we have to win.

“There’s kind of a referendum about what kind of country we’re going to have going forward, or even the future of Western civilization,” Reno tells Jill Savage and Matthew Peterson of “Blaze News Tonight.”

“Rapid demographic change, declines in fertility — we’re undergoing some pretty dramatic cultural changes, and I think that I go into the election thinking that it’s not just a decision about policy, it’s really a kind of spiritual-cultural decision about what kind of country, what kind of civilization we’re going to have,” he explains.

“So the stakes are high indeed,” Peterson comments.

According to Reno, the world appears to be split between “two fundamentally different worldviews” and that it’s “almost as if we’re living in separate realities.”

While the extreme progressives and conservatives have been discussing civil war, he doesn’t believe it will come to that.

“I think that’s overblown, precisely because the middle 60% is not engaged in the same passionate way that the two sides are,” he explains. “But by the end of the decade, I think we will be going either one direction or the other as a country.”

And for the sake of our country, that direction should be right.

“There are two things to keep in mind. One is we’re going to vote in early November, and we have a choice, and we may not like Donald Trump’s retreat from a strong pro-life stance, but the alternative is a radical, pro-abortion Democratic party,” Reno says.

“So I have no question, I have no qualms of conscience in voting for Donald Trump on the grounds that his administration is more likely to defend life than would a Democratic Party administration,” he continues.

“The second thing is that we can work at the state level, at the local level, to continue to support pro-life politicians, bring them up through the system,” he adds.


Want more from 'Blaze News Tonight'?

To enjoy more provocative opinions, expert analysis, and breaking stories you won’t see anywhere else, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Opinion: Stop hoping for a federal abortion ban; change hearts and minds instead



June 24 marked the second anniversary of the Dobbs decision, which functionally abolished federal-level abortion protections protected by Roe v. Wade for nearly half a century.

The occasion was met with the expected media fanfare, with hundreds of articles lamenting the negative effects of reduced access in 14 banned states and 27 partially banned.

Only a deep, spiritual revival can convince millions to change their minds on the importance of life in the womb. This hasn’t happened through legislation, so it must happen through the heart.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez blasted the alleged corruption of the Supreme Court and called for a Democratic majority in Congress to restore federal abortion protections. Human Rights Watch declared Dobbs an “egregious regression of women’s rights” and cited cases of rapes and medically dangerous infants being carried to term at women’s expense.

And with the court’s recent Chevron deference and limited immunity decisions, the two-year attempt to delegitimize the judicial branch continues at pace, with AOC calling for court justices to be impeached.

Mostly legal

Abortion continues to be legal in the majority of U.S. states, and vast apparatuses have emerged to help provide women with travel out of state through corporate-sponsored or charity-sponsored travel efforts, which has been called “abortion trafficking.”

The issue arose in June’s infamous debate between President Trump and President Biden. Naturally, Trump is ultimately responsible for Roe v. Wade’s overturning and was asked to defend the decision. He instead affirmed that states should have the right to decide for themselves, signaling that a second Trump administration largely wouldn’t touch the issue.

“Fifty-one years ago, we had Roe v. Wade, and everybody wanted to get it back to the states, without exception. Democrats and Republicans. Liberals and conservatives. Religious leaders. Everybody wanted it back. And what I did was put three great Supreme Court justices on the court, and they happened to vote in favor of killing Roe v. Wade and moving it back to the states. ... The states control it. The vote of the people.”

Trump has spent the past year distancing himself from the pro-life movement, which has been widely received as an insult by his conservative supporters and pro-life activists. Back in April, he directly blamed pro-life voters for the failures in the 2022 midterms, leading many of his religious supporters to feel insulted and betrayed, particularly concerning his backing away from one of his most historic accomplishments.

As Trump posted on August 23 on Truth Social, “My Administration will be great for women and their reproductive rights.”

Changing the subject

The party at large reflects this distancing. VP candidate JD Vance (R-Ohio) has repeatedly appeared in adversarial interviews with the press, defending Trump’s lukewarm pro-life stance. He told NBC’s "Meet the Press" that abortion pills should be legal and that policy should be determined at the state level. He affirmed this position again on Sunday, telling "Meet the Press" that Trump would veto any federal-level anti-abortion legislation.

Senator Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) has also appeared on CNN’s "State of the Union" affirming Trump’s position that “voters and individual states get to decide on restrictions” while still claiming Trump is the only pro-life candidate in the race. Elon Musk subsequently accused Vice President Kamala Harris of lying when she claimed that Trump would institute a total abortion ban, which itself was immediately debunked by a community note. The Republican National Convention even went so far as to walk back some of its abortion stances in the party’s official platform.

Conservatives on X have declared this shift a betrayal, with thousands of pro-life activists threatening to abstain from voting unless Trump reaffirms his commitment. His stance can’t help but feel like cowardice in the face of public pressure. And it is. The Republican Party doesn’t feel like it can make progress on the issue, and so it’s giving up.

A losing issue?

Unfortunately, Trump, Vance, and Rubio’s acquiescence on the issue is likely the best that the pro-life movement can expect at the moment. The only party in this election with an affirmative anti-abortion stance is the progressive third-party American Solidarity Party. Republicans have picked up that it is a losing issue and are doing everything in their power to avoid it.

However, in some ways, the modern Republican Party has reached the end of its capabilities at the present moment. Despite five decades of activism, the pro-life side is mostly losing in the public square. Americans overwhelmingly support moderated forms of abortion rights. Recent Pew Research data shows that only 36% of Americans support a partial or total abortion ban. Social scientist Ryan Burge also notes that Republican support for a total abortion ban has decreased from 30% to 25% in the past three years.

Thankfully, the grassroots pro-life movement remains strong. Many within the movement feared that its momentum would entirely dry up after Dobbs, that money and support for women’s care centers and crisis pregnancy centers would dry up — proving leftists right that we only care about babies in the womb and not outside. This did not occur.

A beacon of 'Hope'

My friend Kailey Cornett is the CEO of the pro-life Hope Center for Women in Nashville, Tennessee. Her clinic was nearly vandalized with a Molotov cocktail in July 2022, shortly after Dobbs. As she writes, "In the years since the Dobbs decision, here in Tennessee, we have seen a variety of responses. There are some champions who know us, love us, and understand the need is still great for our services. They have continued to support Hope Clinic, as have new donors who have learned about us in the last two years.”

Despite attempts to slander these clinics as inaccurate, unregulated, anti-abortion extremists, they’ve continued to maintain a strong momentum across the country, with many finding greater volunteer support, private donations, and federal funding in the past two years. This is despite pressure from left-wing activists, including subsequent vandalism attempts such as the one that happened near the Democratic National Convention in Chicago last month.

Encouraging as this is, it still speaks to a fundamental disconnect on the issue of abortion. The pro-life movement may be fully correct in its view and desire for a total ban on the practice, but it will not happen any time soon. Any federal attempt to impose laws against it will be met with the full force and deep pockets of the pro-choice lobby. It would almost certainly be immediately overturned. In a worst-case scenario, a Democratic supermajority could codify abortion protections in federal law and make them much stickier to undo. The cycle would start again.

Fifty-one years after Roe v. Wade, the hopes and prayers of the pro-life movement were fulfilled in Dobbs, and it has done a serviceable job moving forward despite a lack of clear leadership and direction. However, it has reached the edge of its capabilities in its current form.

A redirected effort is necessary for the future of this movement, and it cannot be won in Congress or the courts but can in the hearts and minds of Americans. We cannot simply enforce a full abortion ban on the American people if they do not want one.

Only a deep, spiritual revival can convince millions to change their minds on the importance of life in the womb. This hasn’t happened through legislation, so it must happen through the heart. This and many of America’s other problems will only go away when the hearts of the multitudes seek faith and find a greater sense of meaning and purpose through a religious ideology that teaches the importance of life.

Until such a time, there is little that can be permanently accomplished. Hopefully, the perseverance that carried the pro-life movement through half a century of doubt and uncertainty will be used to assist in that mission. If the Republican Party won’t stand for pro-life values, it falls into the movement’s hands to do the hard work.

Trump calls 6-week abortion ban 'too short'



During an NBC News interview on Thursday, Republican presidential nominee and former President Donald Trump was asked about his position on Florida's Amendment 4, called the "Right to Abortion Initiative."

The state's legislature passed the Heartbeat Protection Act in 2023, which banned abortions at six weeks. That ban went into effect in May.

'He simply reiterated that he believes six weeks is too short.'

A vote in support of Amendment 4 on the upcoming November ballot would add language to the Florida Constitution's Declaration of Rights that states, "No law shall prohibit, penalize, delay, or restrict abortion before viability or when necessary to protect the patient's health, as determined by the patient's healthcare provider."

On Thursday, an NBC News reporter asked Trump, "In Florida, the state that you are a resident of, there's an abortion-related amendment on the ballot to overturn the six-week ban in Florida. How are you going to vote on that?"

Trump responded, "Well, I think the six week is too short. It has to be more time. And I've told them that I want more weeks."

"So, you'll vote in favor of the amendment?" the reporter asked.

"I am going to be voting that we need more than six weeks. Look, just so you understand, everybody wanted Roe v. Wade terminated for years, 52 years. I got it done. They wanted it to go back to the states. Exceptions are very important for me, for Ronald Reagan, for others that have navigated this very, very interesting and difficult path."

Trump has previously referred to Florida Governor Ron DeSantis' six-week abortion ban as a "terrible mistake."

After Trump's most recent comments, his campaign released a statement attempting to clarify his position in the wake of pushback from pro-life voters.

In a Thursday press release, Trump campaign national press secretary Karoline Leavitt wrote, "President Trump has not yet said how he will vote on the ballot initiative in Florida, he simply reiterated that he believes six weeks is too short."

Trump also recently stated that he would support in-vitro fertilization and having the costs associated with the fertility treatment covered by insurance.

"Under the Trump administration, we are going to be paying for that treatment," he declared. "We're going to be mandating that the insurance company pay."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

The DNC is offering free abortions and vasectomies in the name of ‘freedom’ — yes, really



The Democrat Party may be running on a platform of “freedom” — but the Democrats' definition is a far cry from the one conservatives ascribe to the word.

“When they talk about ‘freedom,’ what they’re talking about is sexual libertinism and the right to kill your baby,” Allie Beth Stuckey of “Relatable” explains, noting that the Democratic nominee for president, Kamala Harris, has a background of covering up the most immoral “freedoms.”

When Harris was attorney general of California, she not only pushed the FACT Act, which would have forced pro-life pregnancy centers to promote abortion in a blatant violation of the First Amendment, but she went after David Daleiden.

Daleiden is the pro-life journalist who uncovered Planned Parenthood employees saying they were interested in a pay-for-play scheme, where the employees would get paid for offering the body parts of unborn children. Instead of investigating, Harris sent state authorities to invade Daleiden’s apartment and seize the evidence.

Harris’ running mate, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, is the same story. During the pandemic, Walz told churches they had to cap their attendance at just ten people, while abortion facilities were allowed to continue to operate at full scale.

Which is why it’s no surprise that at the 2024 Democratic National Convention, Planned Parenthood showed up to offer free vasectomies, free Plan B, and free medical abortions from its “mobile health clinic.”

According to the chief medical officer of Planned Parenthood Great Rivers, Dr. Colleen McNicholas, “there are going to be people traveling to Chicago from all over the country, and I think we should be doing what we can as health care providers to show what the impact of good policy and bad policy is.”

“What other kind of health care purposely kills a child? Purposely kills a person? It’s not health care,” Stuckey comments, disturbed by the euphemism.

The DNC has also already been swarmed with pro-abortion protesters, some of whom have dressed up as abortion pills, saying, “F*** the courts, f*** the state, you can’t make us procreate.”

“No one’s making you procreate,” Stuckey says. “We’re just saying, after you’ve done the procreation, if you could not kill your child. And unless a woman was raped, you made the choice to have sex. Consent to sex is consent to pregnancy.”


Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Massachusetts State Government Rolls Out Misleading Anti-Pregnancy Center Campaign

The 'public education campaign' warns women to avoid centers that offer 'hope' and feature 'pictures of babies and children.'

Chrissy Teigen cries tears of joy over abortion; says it gives women ‘hope’ and ‘a future’



When Chrissy Teigen announced that she had suffered a miscarriage at 20 weeks pregnant, people around the world rallied in support.

However, Teigen then claimed that the miscarriage was actually an abortion.

“I told you all we had a miscarriage because I thought that’s what it was, but it was an abortion. We were heartbroken and grateful all at once. It just took me over a year to realize it,” Teigen wrote in a post on X.

Now, Teigen has doubled down on her abortion activism — and was even invited to the White House by Vice President Kamala Harris to be a part of an event on “abortion rights.”

“Hearing stories from your clinic, hearing that so many women come in there, and it’s not place of sadness all the time, it’s not a place where people are feeling at their darkest points or anything like the world wants you to think. People go in there with so much hope and so much —,” Teigen said, sitting down with Harris before beginning to cry.

“Sorry,” she continued through tears, “and so much excitement because they know that they have a future.”

Allie Beth Stuckey is horrified.

“You know what I thought about while she was talking? I thought about Jeremiah 29:11, when God says, ‘for I know the plans I have for you, plans to give you a hope and a future,'” Stuckey says.

“It is so like Satan to take the word of God and then to pervert it, to give it the exact opposite meaning. Here she is talking about the slaughter of innocent children as she is saying that murder gives these women a hope and a future,” she continues.

“First of all, what about the hope and the future of the babies that are about to be poisoned or dismembered?”


Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.