Pro-life activists face PRISON at hands of Biden's corrupt DOJ



Six pro-life protesters now face up to 10.5 years in prison and fines worth $260,000 for violating the controversial FACE Act — simply by praying and singing near an abortion facility.

The protesters were Chad Gallagher of Tennessee, Coleman Boyd of Mississippi, Heather Idoni of Michigan, Calvin Zastrow of Michigan, Paul Vaughn of Tennessee, and Dennis Green of Virginia.

The FACE Act that these men and women supposedly violated is a federal law that criminalizes the use of force or threats of force that prevent someone from entering into an abortion facility.

“There were no threats, and there was no force,” Glenn Beck says. “They were standing on the side of the hallway praying.”

After the six were convicted, they reportedly remained in good spirits and proceeded to sing and pray outside of the Fred Thompson Courthouse immediately after the verdict was announced.

“These are the kind of people that will bring blessings from heaven. These are the kinds of people that when all is said and done, the next generation goes, ‘That person was a hero,’” Glenn says.

Despite the harsh guilty verdicts, one of the protesters said, “This is just normal Christianity. We love Jesus, we take the hits, and then we win.”


Want more from Dave Rubin?

To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

The FBI Has Indicted 22 Pro-Life Protesters And Zero Pregnancy Center Firebombers

A Federalist review of DOJ press releases in 2022 revealed not a single announcement of the arrest or indictment of a pregnancy center arsonist.

AP issues DIRE warning of pro-lifers wielding 'lawn chairs and a cooler' — ignores pro-choice attacks



The Associated Press has issued a dire warning for abortion providers ahead of the Supreme Court's decision on Roe v. Wade.

According to an article titled "'Heightened alert’: Abortion providers brace for ruling," abortion clinics nationwide are expecting an increase in "protests, harassment, and other violence ... in states where abortion remains legal" if Roe v. Wade is overturned — as a draft opinion leaked in May suggested is likely to happen.

"On the night of last winter’s arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court in a case that could end the nationwide right to abortion, people gathered outside a clinic in New Jersey with lawn chairs, a cooler and a flaming torch — a sight that brought to mind lynchings and other horrors of the country’s racist past," the AP article began.

The article did go on to cite two incidents of extreme anti-abortion violence — "the 1993 killing of Dr. David Gunn outside a Florida abortion clinic [and] the 2015 fatal shooting of three people inside a Colorado Planned Parenthood." But there was almost no mention of the ongoing attacks on pregnancy crisis centers by pro-choice activists, including the violent group that calls itself "Jane’s Revenge."

On the radio program, Glenn Beck noted that the closest the current administration has come to calling out Jane’s Revenge was when the Department of Homeland Security published a terror advisory warning of crime on both sides of the Roe v. Wade debate earlier this month. But when was the last time you heard about violent attacks on pro-life centers in the corporate media? There have been several instances of violence by pro-choice proponents, and the Biden administration remains silent.

Watch the video below to hear more from Glenn Beck. Can't watch? Download the podcast here.


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Pro-life activists claim they were arrested, charged with trespassing for protesting on a public sidewalk



Pro-life activists in San Francisco say they are being unlawfully silenced for speaking out about a local research university's use of aborted babies for publicly funded research.

What are the details?

The group of activists were reportedly arrested and charged for trespassing despite peacefully demonstrating on a public sidewalk outside the University of California San Francisco's Zuckerberg Hospital last month, the Federalist reported.

Video footage from the event posted on YouTube by Pro-Life San Francisco appears to show the protesters being arrested by police before they ever stepped foot off public property. Only after being detained and physically moved by officers did the protesters cross onto hospital grounds.

Pro-Lifers Arrested Outside UCSF's Fetal Harvesting Facility youtu.be

"Our position is that this is an unlawful arrest, as the pro-lifers were engaged in constitutionally protected speech on a public sidewalk," Alexandra Snyder, executive director of Life Legal Defense Foundation, the organization representing the protesters, said in a statement to the Federalist.

Martin Cannon, senior counsel for the Thomas More Society, who is representing one of the activists, Terrisa Bukovinac, argued his client was "arrested ... on a sidewalk, basically just for showing up."

"She did not have a megaphone, she wasn't calling out at all. She didn't even have a sign. They arrested her for being within an area that the hospital arbitrarily declared was too close to the entrance," Cannon added of Bukovinac, who serves as the executive director if Pro-Life San Francisco.

"The problem here is that they got arrested, when they made no noise. They got arrested for showing up because the cops are thinking they might make some noise," Cannon said. "They got arrested anticipatorily."

What else?

The attorneys representing the activists argue that the actions taken against their clients unlawfully injured their free speech and point to a double standard among law enforcement.

"This appears to be an attempt to suppress the dissemination of information in order to protect UCSF," Snyder said.

Cannon added, "The same people that will let the protesters bash windows and burn buildings and steal everybody's inventory and call it 'lawful protest — we can't do anything,' will respond where there's half a dozen pro-lifers on the sidewalk and start building constraints against them."

The pro-life activists were protesting against the research hospital's use of aborted fetuses for publicly funded experimental studies, according to the Federalist. The hospital reportedly has a long history of using the tissue of aborted babies for research studies, "including some in which fetal intestines and reproductive tracts were transplanted into rodents," the outlet added.

In September 2018, the Health and Human Services department even canceled a contract between UCSF and the National Institutes of Health that provided researchers with two fetuses a month for six years.

TheBlaze reached out to the the San Francisco Sheriff's Department and the UCSF Zuckerberg Hospital for comment, but did not receive a reply in time for publication.