In Calling For Axing The Electoral College, Tim Walz Tells Swing State Voters To Get Lost
Democrats loathe the Electoral College because it deprives them of the unbridled power to silence their opposition.
Democrats and their media friends are spreading the narrative that the Trump-Vance union is “weird,” but one look at Kamala Harris and Tim Walz’s wildly progressive agenda, and it’s crystal clear who the real weirdos are.
At a rally in Philadelphia, the radical left duo presented their plans for the White House, and it’s enough to make your stomach turn.
Pat Gray plays the highlights from the rally:
- YouTubewww.youtube.com
The first head-scratching moment actually occurs when Kamala steps up to the microphone to kick off the event. With a giant, open-mouthed grin, she says “good evening” five times.
“Almost 20 seconds of ‘good evenings,’” laughs Jeffy.
Pat adds, “There is nobody weirder in public life than Kamala Harris.”
In the next highlight, Kamala broadly states, “We’re not going back!” before chants of “We’re not going back!” erupt from the audience. Harris and Walz both joined in the chants as well.
Keith Malinak assumes that the statement means “we’re not going back to the Trump days” when we had “cheap gas and groceries.”
“And somebody who cares about the border,” adds Pat, noting that we also had “lower taxes” under Trump.
Then Harris’ audience proceeded to chant “Lock him up!” Walz gleefully clapped along to the crazed cries for the continued political persecution of Donald Trump as Harris smiled.
The next clip captures Harris’ husband, Douglas Emhoff (who’s currently being lambasted for an alleged affair he had), and Walz’s wife, Gwen Walz, as they join their spouses on stage.
In an incredibly WEIRD exchange, Tim tries to shake his wife’s hand before she awkwardly pulls him into a hug.
“It’s just weird,” says Pat.
But the biggest cringe moment by far was when Walz stepped up to the microphone and delivered the following idiocracy:
“Some of us in here are old enough to remember – I see you down there; I see those old white guys,” he bellowed, pointing to a section of the audience.
“Some of us are old enough to remember when it was Republicans who were talking about freedom. It turns out now what they meant was that the government should be free to invade your doctor’s office. In Minnesota we respect our neighbors and their personal choices that they make,” he prattled, referring to abortion.
“We still believe in freedom,” Pat corrects. “We believe in the baby’s freedom too.”
“Here's a person who's had five born-alives from failed abortions” that he allowed to “lay there and die,” Pat condemns, referring to Minnesota’s lack of born-alive protections. “And then they’re going to lecture us on freedom?”
To hear more, watch the clip above.
To enjoy more of Pat's biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
Radical leftism is linked to both psychopathic tendencies and narcissism, according to a new study out of Switzerland.
"Individuals with dark personalities – such as high narcissistic and psychopathic traits – are attracted to certain ideologies and forms of political activism," said the researchers, citing the 2020 BLM riots as one example.
Those whose authoritarian reflex predisposes them to leftist causes reportedly tend not to care about social justice or equality, contrary to whatever rhetoric they deal in; rather, they gladly partake in coercion, censorship, and violence to satisfy their own "ego-focused needs."
Researchers Ann Krispenz and Alex Bertrams from the University of Bern noted that past research into authoritarianism and the corresponding mindsets has focused almost entirely on rightist political formations.
Past attempts to investigate left-wing authoritarianism have, on the other hand, been downplayed or met with skepticism in the leftist-dominated academy, "even though some empirical studies found evidence for the existence of authoritarianism also on the left side of the political spectrum."
It appears social scientists chose to gloss over the evidence of LWA piled up like cordwood during Vladimir Lenin's Red Terror, Joseph Stalin's Great Purge, Pol Pot's Year Zero, Mao Zedong's Great Leap Forward, and Fidel Castro's various bloodlettings.
Krispenz and Bertrams turned their attention to LWA after the ruinous 2020 BLM riots, during which leftists championed by Democratic politicians torched American courthouses, police stations, and entire city blocks, incurring nearly $2 billion in damage; killed between 6 and 20 people; killed one police officer and assaulted or injured 2,037 more; and engaged in at least 574 violent acts in over 140 cities.
The researchers defined LWA to be a "tripartite construct comprising of three correlated dimensions: (1) anticonventionalism, (2) top-down censorship, and (3) antihierarchical aggression."
Anticonventionalism is characterized "by the absolute endorsement of progressive moral values," such that leftist authoritarians are not only intolerant of differing points of view but keen on imposing their own values on others.
Top-down censorship amounts to leftists' desire to wield governmental and/or institutional authority to "deal with opposition and ... suppress any speech that is considered as offensive and intolerant."
Antihierarchical aggression, as seen in the use of violence "to fight for social justice," entails "the motivation to forcefully overthrow the established hierarchy and punish those in power."
The researchers noted that the censorious, coercive, and punitive leftist authoritarian simultaneously expresses hostility "towards the present social and moral authorities while feeling morally superior and endorsing the use of violence to reach one’s own political goals."
Krispenz and Bertrams conducted two studies with 391 American participants in the first and 377 in the second.
The first study indicated there was a strong association between LWA and neurotic narcissism, defined as "individuals who strongly care about what others might think about them, who experience high levels of shame, and have a strong need for admiration."
To the researchers' surprise, they also found that there was no evidence of a relationship between LWA and altruism.
When variables such as age and sex were controlled, the researchers discovered that instead of a neurotic narcissistic link, there was instead a "robust relationship" between LWA and antihierarchical aggression and antagonistic narcissism. "The results of Study 1 suggest that this motivation can be more likely found in individuals who exploit others for their own interests, lack empathy, have a sense of entitlement, are arrogant and manipulative, demonstrate reactive anger and distrust others while at the same time seeking thrill."
The researchers' chief takeaway from the first study appears to have been that "a strong ideological view, according to which a violent revolution against existing societal structures is legitimate is ... endorsed by individuals with ego-focused motives."
The second study showed that "LWA antihierarchical aggression was predicted by psychopathy again above and beyond individuals’ prosocial dispositions (i.e., social justice commitment)."
On the basis of both studies, Krispenz and Bertrams claimed that "individuals with dark personalities – such as high narcissistic and psychopathic traits – are attracted to certain ideologies and forms of political activism" on both the right and left.
Accordingly, certain individuals' engagements in violent political theater serve only to boost their ego and emotional needs.
"For example, a highly narcissistic/psychopathic person may participate in a pro-BLM protest pretending to fight against racism while actually using such protesting activities to meet their own aggressive motives and thrills," they wrote.
The radical left is not just populated with narcissistic psychopaths.
TheBlaze previously detailed a Columbia University study that found that liberals tend to be far more depressed and mentally unwell than their conservative counterparts.
The study, entitled, "The politics of depression: Diverging trends in internalizing symptoms among US adolescents by political beliefs," was published in the journal Social Science & Medicine – Mental Health in December. It revealed "conservatives reported lower average depressive affect, self-derogation, and loneliness scores and higher self-esteem scores than all other groups."
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!