Cornyn wants to succeed McConnell as Senate GOP leader; RFK Jr. names who he thinks 'would be an incredible successor'



GOP Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, who has been in office for more than two decades, has thrown his hat into the ring to serve as the next Senate Republican leader.

"I am asking my Republican colleagues to give me the opportunity to succeed Leader McConnell," Cornyn said in a statement. "We will restore the important role of Senate committees and reestablish the regular appropriations process, rather than lurch from one crisis to another. And we will return power back to our members; there will be no more backroom deals or forced votes on bills without adequate time for review, debate, and amendment. I am ready to get to work and look forward to continuing to engage with my colleagues."

— (@)

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky announced on Wednesday that his current term as Senate GOP leader post will be his last, though he indicated that he plans to continue serving in the Senate as a lawmaker.

"Our friend from Kentucky is a rare example of what a public servant should be: pragmatic, knowledgeable, humble, and effective. He has led the Senate through difficult periods, and I am grateful for his dedicated service to our country and this institution," Cornyn said in a post on X.

Like McConnell, Cornyn was one of the Senate Republicans who earlier this month voted in favor of a measure that would, in part, provide for additional U.S. assistance to Ukraine. "This legislation replenishes our military stockpiles and addresses the biggest national security threats we face, from Hamas' horrific attacks on Israel to China's aggression in the Indo-Pacific to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine," Cornyn said in a statement.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who mounted a bid for the Democratic presidential nomination last year before later switching to run as an independent, has suggested that Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky would be a good pick to fill the Senate GOP leader role.

"It's time to promote leaders in Washington, DC who won't kowtow to the military contractors or push us deeper into foreign conflicts," Kennedy tweeted. "We need representation who will prioritize American wellness over all else. I believe @RandPaul would be an incredible successor. He's shown great judgment and has the grit to put hardworking Americans first."

— (@)

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Trump-backed Kari Lake scores endorsements from Rand Paul and others as she seeks US Senate seat



Kari Lake, who is running in a U.S. Senate primary in Arizona, has received the endorsements of GOP Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida, and National Republican Senatorial Committee chairman Sen. Steve Daines, a Republican from Montana.

"Kari Lake will go to DC to shake things up, and that's exactly the kind of leadership that Arizona needs in the United States Senate. I am proud to endorse Kari Lake for the United States Senate because she has the policies, the drive, and desire to defeat the Washington War Machine and restore American liberties," Paul noted, according to the Daily Caller.

"Kari Lake is MAGA to her core and cannot be bought by the establishment. I am proud to endorse her for the United States Senate in Arizona. I am very much look forward to watching her shake up the halls of power," Gaetz noted, according to the outlet.

Daines described Lake as "one of the most talented candidates in the country."

— (@)

Former President Donald Trump endorsed Lake for U.S. Senate last year.

Lake lost Arizona's 2022 gubernatorial election, but has claimed that she actually won that contest. Trump also endorsed Lake for governor, backing her well ahead of the Republican gubernatorial primary in the state

"I am so thankful to have the endorsement of America First warriors Senator @RandPaul and Rep. @mattgaetz. They are champions for fiscal responsibility, liberty, and fighting against the Washington War machine. I look forward to working with them to implement President Trump's agenda!" Lake tweeted on Monday.

Pinal County Sheriff Mark Lamb is also running in the 2024 GOP U.S. Senate primary in Arizona.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

'#NeverNikki': Rand Paul slaps Nikki Haley with anti-endorsement



Some Republicans have endorsed presidential primary candidates, but GOP Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky has declared what could be characterized as an anti-endorsement, announcing that he is "#NeverNikki" while expressing his strong opposition to Nikki Haley's candidacy.

In a video, Paul said that "there's a lot to like" about former President Donald Trump. The senator also said he is a "big fan of ... the fiscal conservatism of Ron DeSantis." The lawmaker then described Vivek Ramaswamy as an "important voice."

But he declared that he "cannot support" Haley. "I don't think any informed or knowledgeable libertarian or conservative should support Nikki Haley," he declared.

— (@)

Paul is directing people to visit nevernikki.net. The site, which has a form where people can provide their name, email address, phone number, and zip code, indicates that it is "PAID FOR BY RAND PAUL FOR US SENATE."

The senator recently met with Democrat-turned-independent presidential hopeful Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who tweeted on Wednesday, "Had a wonderful talk with @RandPaul this morning about issues we share in common — restoring free speech and ending forever wars, chronic disease epidemics, agency capture, and government waste."

Trump remains the clear frontrunner in the GOP presidential primary, according to polls, but Haley may prove to be competitive in New Hampshire.

A Saint Anselm College Survey Center poll found that among New Hampshire Republican presidential primary likely voters, 45% indicated they would be most likely to back Trump in the primary, while 31% supported Haley. While 9% supported Chris Christie, the former New Jersey governor recently announced the end of his presidential bid, which means other candidates could snag the votes of his supporters.

"I do like a lot of the aspects of at least three people on the Republican side as well as Bobby Kennedy," Paul said, according to Politico. "I'm absolutely dead certain Nikki Haley would be wrong for our country," he noted. "And I do have some voice. I want to make sure my voice is heard."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Joni Ernst says Rand Paul saved her from choking during a Republican lunch by using the Heimlich maneuver



Republican Sen. Joni Ernst of Iowa confirmed Thursday that Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky used the Heimlich maneuver to save her from choking at a Republican luncheon.

Ernst posted about the incident on her social media account where she used the occasion to mock Democrats.

"Can’t help but choke on the woke policies Dems are forcing down our throats. Thanks, Dr. @RandPaul!" she wrote.

Ironically, she had choked on food from Iowa as the Republicans were practicing a tradition where one senator brings food traditionally from their state.

“It was Iowa day, lots of big pork chops and beef sandwiches,” said Republican Senate Minority Whip John Thune of South Dakota, who added that he had not seen Paul perform the maneuver on his colleague.

Others said they were thankful that Paul, who is an eye doctor, had been there to help Ernst.

“It’s a good thing he did. God bless Rand Paul. I never thought I’d say that," joked Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina.

“It was great that Rand was there," replied Republican Sen. Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming.

Lummis went on to say that the two senators stood up and spoke to the group about the importance of being trained to help people who are choking.

“We talked about how you can get Heimlich training here, and other people talked about incidents that they’ve been involved in where someone required the Heimlich,” Lummis added.

Ernst is 53 years old and in her second term at the U.S. Senate.

She is not the first senator to have needed help from a colleague over choking.

In 2018, Democrat Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia used the Heimlich maneuver to help his colleague Clare McCaskill, who was a senator representing Missouri at the time. He broke one of her ribs during that incident.

Here's more about the choking incident:

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

‘Abused from the beginning’: Rand Paul calls for repeal of Espionage Act



According to a search warrant that the FBI used to seize materials from Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence, the Justice Department is investigating the former president for potentially violating the Espionage Act.

The Espionage Act of 1917 has been used to prosecute the most notorious spies in U.S. history, including Robert Hanssen and Aldrich Ames, who are both serving life sentences for spying for Soviet and Russian intelligence services while they were working for the FBI and CIA.

The Espionage Act has long received criticism for its perceived over-aggressiveness — particularly towards journalists and whistleblowers. In an interview with Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting, journalist Chip Gibbons remarked that it was "almost impossible, if not impossible, to mount a defense" against charges under the Espionage Act.

Now, a sitting senator has called for repealing the Espionage Act altogether. In a tweet Saturday evening, Sen. Rand Paul stated, “The espionage act was abused from the beginning to jail dissenters of WWI. It is long past time to repeal this egregious affront to the 1st Amendment.”


The espionage act was abused from the beginning to jail dissenters of WWI. It is long past time to repeal this egregious affront to the 1st Amendment.

Repeal the Espionage Act – The Future of Freedom Foundation https://t.co/3KCgujpS9z
— Rand Paul (@RandPaul) August 13, 2022

Paul included a link to a 2019 article by Jacob Hornberger, a former Libertarian Party presidential candidate and founder of the Future of Freedom Foundation. The article called the Espionage Act a "tyrannical law." Hornberger wrote about appealing the Espionage Act in response to the criminal indictment of Julian Assange.

Paul initially opposed Trump during the 2016 Republican primaries, and questioned several of Trump’s moves as President — in response to the U.S.’s April 2017 missile strike in Syria, Paul stated, "While we all condemn the atrocities in Syria, the United States was not attacked." However, Paul also was a vocal supporter of President Trump against Trump’s loudest critics.

Paul was also one of the leading proponents of prosecuting Hillary Clinton for her handling of classified information during her tenure as Secretary of State. In July 2016, Paul noted, “The FBI showed clearly that Clinton violated classified procedures and carelessly, recklessly endangered national security—and did so repeatedly, over 100 times.”

Paul has yet to formally introduce legislation repealing the Espionage Act. If he does propose such a bill, it is not expected to garner the votes necessary to pass Congress.

The provision of the Espionage Act for which Trump is under investigation carries a maximum 10-year prison sentence.

Decrying Big Tech censorship, Sen. Rand Paul announces that he will stop posting videos on YouTube, with limited exceptions



Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky has announced that he will largely stop posting content on YouTube in a step toward his ultimate goal to eventually ditch Big Tech completely.

The lawmaker explained that he will still post some videos on YouTube, but only material that criticizes the platform or announces that people can view his content on another platform called Rumble.

"So today, I announce that I will begin an exodus from Big Tech. I will no longer post videos on YouTube unless it is to criticize them or announce that viewers can see my content on rumble.com," the senator noted in a recent opinion piece. "Why begin with YouTube? Because they’re the worst censors."

Paul is speaking out against censorship on Big Tech platforms and saying that other people should drop the platforms as well.

"But just because private censorship of speech is allowable under the law, that doesn’t make that censorship any less despicable or illiberal. Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and Instagram are the new town square, and opposing viewpoints are being silenced by the BigTech gatekeepers," he noted.

"Those of us who believe that truth comes from disputation and that the marketplace of ideas is a prerequisite for innovation should shun the close-minded censors of Big Tech and take our ideas elsewhere," he declared. "About half of the public leans right. If we all took our messaging to outlets of free exchange, we could cripple Big Tech in a heartbeat. So, today I take my first step toward denying my content to Big Tech. Hopefully, other liberty lovers will follow."

"My goal is to eventually quit Big Tech entirely. I’ve created a news aggregator site, libertytree.com that brings together writers and news in defense of small government and expansive personal liberty," Paul said in the piece. "Competition is the answer. So, to complainers about Big Tech censorship, just quit!"

Paul has served in the U.S. Senate since 2011 and is seeking re-election during the 2022 contest.

Sure, I can get millions of views. But why should I allow anonymous \u201cfact-checkers\u201d to censor my fully sourced, fact-based content? They don\u2019t want to challenge or debate me with opposing views, they just want my silence, write @RandPaul.https://washex.am/3mOxB0Y
— Washington Examiner (@Washington Examiner) 1641220233

Eric Swalwell hit with abrupt lesson after using devastating tornados to attack Sen. Rand Paul



Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) used the devastating tornado outbreak that struck parts of Kentucky, Missouri, Tennessee, and Arkansas overnight on Friday to take a political shot at Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul (R).

What are the details?

As daybreak exposed the enormous destruction across parts of America, Paul immediately took action to help his constituents. Paul wrote President Joe Biden early Saturday asking that he expedite requests for federal assistance.

Paul, in fact, spent much of his Saturday working to help Kentuckians impacted by the devastating storms. He worked with FEMA to help coordinate the federal response, and compiled a list of resources for those who need help.

Here are some resources for those affected by the devastating storms in Kentucky and for those who want to help.https://relief.randpaul.com/
— Senator Rand Paul (@Senator Rand Paul) 1639263752

Swalwell, however, couldn't pass up the opportunity to bash Paul.

The California Democrat responded to a message from Paul about the storms by urging Americans not to forget that Paul "has voted against helping most Americans most times they're in need."

"We should do all we can to help our Kentucky neighbors. God be with them — they are hurting. But do not for one second forget that @RandPaul has voted against helping most Americans most times they’re in need," Swalwell said.

We should do all we can to help our Kentucky neighbors. God be with them \u2014 they are hurting. But do not for one second forget that @RandPaul has voted against helping most Americans most times they\u2019re in need.https://twitter.com/randpaul/status/1469651645814480899\u00a0\u2026
— Rep. Eric Swalwell (@Rep. Eric Swalwell) 1639268444

But is that true?

As one person promptly pointed out to Swalwell, Paul has "never questioned the need" for disaster relief, but "[he has] only opposed how we fund it."

In fact, while Paul's voting record may show that he has voted against some disaster relief funding, he never questioned the need for it. Every time the issue surfaces, Paul raises issues of how disaster relief is funded, and whether monies should be reallocated from other government programs, such as foreign aid, to address domestic crises.

For example, after voting against a bill that would have provided recovery funds to areas hit by Hurricane Sandy in 2012, Paul explained that he supported disaster relief funds, but not new government spending.

"I would have given them 9 billion and I would've taken the 9 billion from somewhere else," he said. "I would have taken it from foreign aid and said you know what, we don't have money for Egypt or Pakistan this year because we have to help the Northeast."

In fact, Paul made those comments as he opposed a second Hurricane Sandy-related relief bill. The first bill provided $9 billion in relief funds, while the second amounted to $51 billion, which Paul said was filled with pork.

Meanwhile, while opposing legislation that triggered more government spending in response to Hurricane Harvey in 2017, Paul explained once again that he opposed such spending, and urged Congress to reallocate money earmarked to go oversees to fund disaster relief.

"Instead of continuing [sending money overseas], let’s take a portion of that money and spend it here to help the victims of this great disaster," Paul wrote in essay for The Hill.

"They say we are out of money to pay for hurricane relief. So instead of finding that money somewhere else in the budget, they simply want to raise the limit on our credit card," he added. "This has to stop. We spend too much. We owe too much. We cannot keep spending money we do not have."

Anything else?

In addition to Swalwell learning that Paul does not oppose helping Americans, but rather opposes wasteful government spending, the California Democrat's comments generated backlash against his character.

Swalwell was peppered with thousands of responses. His comments were characterized as "genuinely disgusting" and "[t]he very worst of Congress. Right here. In broad daylight."

Republicans are united behind effort to overturn OSHA vaccine mandate: Rand Paul



Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said Wednesday that Republicans in the Senate are universally opposed to President Joe Biden's federal vaccine mandate, predicting that a resolution to nullify the mandate will pass the Senate with Democratic support.

Senators are expected to vote at around 5:30 p.m. ET Wednesday on SJRes29, a bill that would overturn the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's COVID-19 vaccine mandate on large private companies via the Congressional Review Act. The resolution has the full support of the House Republican conference and, Paul told Newsmax, every Republican senator.

"This is a special situation, what we call a privileged motion. It is a real bill and it would be a law but it has to be signed by the president. We can do this any time that there's a regulation or a rule put out," Paul explained Wednesday.

.@RandPaul: "The Republican Party is entirely united against mandating or firing people who choose not to get vaccinated." \n\n@HeatherChilders @BobSellersTVpic.twitter.com/CwoCAd4oHt
— Newsmax (@Newsmax) 1638992624

"This resolution, which we're going to pass today, all 50 Republicans will vote for it and the word is that Sen. [Joe] Manchin will join us. So we will end up winning this vote," Paul said.

At least two Senate Democrats have publicly stated they will vote for the resolution. Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) said last week he will join Republicans to vote for the bill.

“I do not support any government vaccine mandate on private businesses. That’s why I have cosponsored and will strongly support a bill to overturn the federal government vaccine mandate for private businesses,” Manchin said in a statement.

He was joined by Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.) on Tuesday, who told The Hill via a spokesman he is "inclined to vote for the CRA resolution" put forward by the Republicans.

Manchin and Tester's support would give a united Republican conference 52 votes to pass the resolution and send it to the House of Representatives for a vote.

Paul was less optimistic that the resolution will pass in the House, where he said Democrats will "march lockstep" to support Biden's vaccine mandate, but he held out hope that some moderates may vote with Republicans.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has no plans to bring the resolution to a floor vote. However, if a majority of the House signs a discharge petition filed by Republicans, they can force Pelosi to hold a vote.

Rep. Fred Keller (R-Pa.), the sponsor of the House's version of the resolution, confirmed Tuesday that all 212 members of the GOP conference had co-sponsored the bill.

All 212 members of @HouseGOP have cosponsored my Congressional Review Act resolution to nullify President Biden\u2019s vaccine mandate on private employers with more than 100 employees.\n\nI urge my House Democratic colleagues to stand with us against this blatant gov\u2019t overreach.pic.twitter.com/YX9ivKXJPD
— Congressman Fred Keller (@Congressman Fred Keller) 1638899358

Paul also cautioned that even if the House surprised and passed the resolution, Biden will almost certainly veto any attempt by Congress to reverse his vaccination order. He also admitted that there aren't enough Democrats opposed to the mandate in either the House or the Senate to overturn a veto.

"There is some symbolism to this," Paul acknowledged. "But it shows you that the Republican Party is entirely united against mandating or firing people who choose not to get vaccinated."

Regardless of what actions Congress takes, Biden's OSHA mandate has temporarily been suspended pending further litigation after multiple lawsuits were filed challenging the president's authority to mandate COVID-19 vaccinations.

An attempt by some conservative lawmakers to shut down the government to defund the mandate was unsuccessful, as many GOP senators stated their preference for using the Congressional Review Act to show where lawmakers stood on the issue.

Rand Paul confronts Fauci on NIH funding for risky virus research: 'You appear to have learned nothing from this pandemic'



Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) once again confronted Dr. Anthony Fauci Thursday over National Institutes of Health funding for risky virus research in China and said it was time the White House's top COVID-19 adviser resign.

Fauci, the director of the NIH's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, testified before the Senate on the Biden administration's pandemic response.

When it was time for Paul to ask questions, the Kentucky lawmaker began grilling Fauci over recent revelations that the NIH gave a grant award to the nonprofit group EcoHealth Alliance that then sub-awarded federal funding to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where at least one gain-of-function research experiment was conducted in violation of the NIH grant's terms.

Gain-of-function research involves artificially engineering viruses to give them new attributes. The federal government restricts such research if it results in a virus becoming more transmissible or deadlier among humans. Previously, both Fauci and NIH Director Francis Collins have denied that the NIH ever funded research in China that made a virus deadlier to humans.

But documents reported by the Intercept last month revealed that using the NIH grant, EcoHealth Alliance funded gain-of-function experiments at the Wuhan lab that resulted in new chimeric viruses. One experiment made a chimera from the deadly MERS virus. Another combined two SARS-like bat coronavirus and infected genetically engineered mice with the altered viruses.

"I don't expect you today to admit that you approved NIH funding for gain-of-function research in Wuhan, but your repeated denials have worn thin and a majority of Americans, frankly, don't believe you," Paul said in his opening remarks.

"The facts are clear. The NIH did fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan despite your protestations," he stated.

WATCH: Complete exchange between Sen. @RandPaul and Dr. Anthony Fauci. \n\nFAUCI: "It makes me very uncomfortable to have to say something, but he is egregiously incorrect in what he says. Thank you."\n\nPAUL: "History will figure that out on its own."pic.twitter.com/5R7Auaylzv

— CSPAN (@cspan) 1636039693

Scientists have raised concerns that the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which caused the COVID-19 pandemic, was possibly engineered in the Wuhan lab and leaked from there. This theory, and the theory that the virus occurred naturally in animals and leaped to human beings, are the two dominant explanations for the origins of the virus, though there is no conclusive scientific evidence leaning toward either explanation.

Paul takes the side of the lab-leak theory, and during his time to speak, he said Fauci's repeated denials of funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan present a "clear and present danger to the country and to the world."

He accused Fauci of refusing to take responsibility for the coronavirus pandemic and of misleading the public by deflecting criticism of gain-of-function research and denying its possible role in the origins of COVID-19.

"You continue to support NIH money going to Wuhan. You continue to say you trust the Chinese scientist. You appear to have learned nothing from this pandemic," Paul said. "Will you today take some responsibility for funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan?"

"Senator, with all due respect, I disagree with so many of the things that you've said," Fauci replied.

He once again quibbled over the precise definition of "gain-of-function research," arguing that the Health and Human Services Department's framework for reviewing gain-of-function research proposals did not flag the EcoHealth Alliance project with the Wuhan Institute of Virology as a problematic gain-of-function experiment.

But Paul interrupted him and directly asked whether the NIH-funded experiment conducted by Chinese scientists — which involved combining the SHC014 bat coronavirus with the WIV1 SARS-like coronavirus into a new chimeric virus that made humanized mice sicker than the naturally occurring WIV1 virus — qualified as gain-of-function research.

Fauci began to respond by quoting the HHS framework and guidelines, but Paul interrupted again, accusing Fauci and the NIH of "defining away gain-of-function" by changing the NIH website's definition of that research so that Fauci's sworn testimony would not contradict the facts.

"This is terrible and you're completely trying to escape the idea that we should do something about trying to prevent a pandemic from leaking from a lab. The preponderance of evidence now points towards [COVID-19] coming from the [Wuhan] lab, and what you've done is change the definition on your website to try to cover your ass, basically," Paul charged.

"Until you accept responsibility, we're not going to get anywhere close to trying to prevent another lab leak of this dangerous sort of experiment. You won't admit that it's dangerous, and for that lack of judgement I think it's time that you resign," he finished.

Given some time to respond, Fauci said Paul's statements were an "egregious misrepresentation" and that he would not have time "to refute all of them."

But he did say, "I have no responsibility for the current pandemic." He also said most "card-carrying viral phylogeneticists and molecular virologists" would disagree with Paul's assertion that most scientific evidence supports the lab-leak theory. He also denied that the NIH continues to fund research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

"It makes me very uncomfortable to have to say something, but he is egregiously incorrect in what he says," said Fauci.

"History will figure that out on its own," Paul replied.

Sen. Rand Paul blasts Dr. Fauci over damning NIH letter, says Biden should 'absolutely' fire Fauci



Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) blasted Dr. Anthony Fauci Sunday, responding directly to a National Institutes of Health letter that seemingly admits to risky gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

What is the background?

Throughout the pandemic, Fauci has denied the NIH funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan bio lab. But the NIH letter, released last week, seemed to indicate that the NIH did, in fact, fund risky research.

At the very least, the NIH letter suggested Fauci has been less than forthcoming about what exactly happened with NIH funds given to EcoHealth Alliance.

Vanity Fair explained the significance of the letter:

[T]he NIH letter—coming after months of congressional demands for more information—seemed to underscore that America's premier science institute has been less than forthcoming about risky research it has funded and failed to properly monitor. Instead of helping to lead a search for COVID-19's origins, with the pandemic now firmly in its 19th month, the NIH has circled the wagons, defending its grant system and scientific judgment against a rising tide of questions.

What did Paul say?

Paul responded to the NIH letter revelations in an interview with Axios, saying Fauci should "absolutely" be fired.

"The thing is, is just for a lack of judgement, if nothing else," Paul explained. "You know, he's probably never going to admit that he lied. He's going to continue to dissemble and try to work around the truth and massage the truth."

And if President Joe Biden does not fire Fauci, which seems highly unlikely, Paul said Congress should take action to hold Fauci accountable for his apparent lack of candor.

"We're calling for an investigation and hearings on this. We've been calling for that for months," Paul said. "But you're right. There's been a great deal of resistance on the Democrat side, but would we not want to know the origin of the virus, and to know if it came from a lab, particularly since this research still goes on?"

.@RandPaul says Biden should fire Fauci over U.S.-funded research in Wuhan "just for lack of judgment, if nothing e… https://t.co/udoLKDI8NE

— Axios (@axios) 1635114133.0

How did Fauci respond?

Fauci was asked about Paul's comments over the weekend during an interview on ABC's "This Week." Fauci, however, toed his narrative line, saying Paul is wrong and that he has been completely honest about NIH funding of Wuhan research projects.

"Well, I obviously totally disagree with Sen. Paul. He's absolutely incorrect. Neither I nor Dr. Francis Collins, the director of the NIH, lied or misled about what we've done," Fauci said.