Trump announces new White House press secretary after Karoline Leavitt's departure



President Donald Trump announced on Friday the appointment of a media analyst and attorney to be the next White House press secretary.

The New York Times had first reported that Katie Zacharia had been tapped for the role, and sources confirmed the offer to Politico.

'She has an unblemished record of support, and has been a loyal and brilliant supporter, right from the beginning. She is, likewise, a devoted fan and member of MAGA!'

Zacharia, 42, is a graduate of Pepperdine who worked briefly at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and is currently the senior communications adviser for the Trump Media and Technology Group, which owns the Truth Social online platform.

"She was previously involved in my Campaigns, assisting in key Swing States, where we won 7 out of 7," said the president on Truth Social. "She has an unblemished record of support, and has been a loyal and brilliant supporter, right from the beginning. She is, likewise, a devoted fan and member of MAGA!"

She has been a frequent commentator on political issues at Fox News, Newsmax, CNN, and OANN.

The press secretary role has been open at the White House since Karoline Leavitt left at the end of August after giving birth to her second child.

Leavitt was the youngest press secretary in White House history. She turned 29 years old at the end of August. On Monday, Fox News announced that Leavitt was joining the network as a political commentator.

Zacharia has also worked as general counsel for a conservative advocacy nonprofit named Fix California, founded by Trump special envoy Richard Grenell.

RELATED: 3 moments that will make you miss Karoline Leavitt

She has been married to film producer Tyler Zacharia for 15 years and is a mother to four children.

Zacharia will also be the seventh woman in a row to be White House press secretary. The last male to hold the position was Sean Spicer in the first Trump administration.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

J6 committee's star witness Cassidy Hutchinson may soon reap the whirlwind



The Jan. 6 Select Committee's star witness who milked her time in the limelight for a book deal may soon be visited by consequence for casting shade on President Donald Trump with seemingly tall tales.

Cassidy Hutchinson, the former assistant to previous Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows, was reportedly referred by House Republicans earlier this year to the Justice Department for criminal charges.

'On information and belief, the Justice Department assigned its Civil Rights division to investigate Ms. Hutchinson for potential prosecution and has convened a grand jury.'

Sources told Punchbowl News' Laura Weiss this week that the DOJ is now pursuing a federal criminal indictment against Hutchinson.

Hutchinson, whom the president apparently suspected of being "a total phony and 'leaker,'" was accused in a December 2024 congressional report of committing "perjury when she lied under oath to the Select Committee" and of "secretly communicating" with the former vice chair of the J6 committee, ex-Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wy.), with regard to her testimony.

In 2022, Meadows' former staffer sat for six transcribed interviews and one publicized hearing with the J6 committee. Hutchinson evidently provided the committee with something in her fourth closed-door interview that they wanted to put on full blast.

RELATED: DOJ report details Biden admin's apparent conspiracy against parents who dared to defend their kids

Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post/Getty Images

Just days later, Hutchinson was put on the stand to tell the sensational tale of how Trump got into a scuffle with a Secret Service agent and attempted to wrest control of the presidential limousine after his Jan. 6, 2021, speech at the Ellipse.

She did not witness the alleged incident firsthand but claimed to have heard about it from Tony Ornato, Trump's former White House deputy chief of staff — a claim Ornato has denied.

Not only did the J6 committee entertain what even former special counsel Jack Smith regarded as "secondhand hearsay." They had Hutchinson testify without bothering to first interview other witnesses who may have provided contradictory testimony, including the two Secret Service agents featured in her story who weren't interviewed until months later, according to a March 2024 report from the House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight.

The March 2024 report noted that the testimony of four White House employees that was redacted and suppressed "directly contradicts claims made by Cassidy Hutchinson and by the Select Committee in the Final Report."

The December 2024 congressional report, prepared at the direction of Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-Ga.), asserted that "Hutchinson’s willingness to testify under oath to these demonstrably false claims proves her unreliability as a witness."

The Trump administration has not forgotten about Hutchinson.

Hutchinson's attorneys noted in an August court filing, "Prosecution (and further persecution) for her past testimony is not merely speculative. It is a present looming threat. On information and belief, the Justice Department assigned its Civil Rights division to investigate Ms. Hutchinson for potential prosecution and has convened a grand jury targeting Ms. Hutchinson for criminal indictment."

A federal grand jury was empaneled earlier this week to hear evidence about Hutchinson's testimony to Congress, sources familiar with the DOJ's probe told the New York Post.

The White House referred Blaze News to the DOJ for comment. Neither the DOJ nor Hutchinson's legal representatives immediately responded to Blaze News' requests for comment.

News of movement on a potential criminal indictment comes weeks after a federal judge dismissed the defamation lawsuit brought by former Hutchinson lawyer Stefan Passantino against a law professor who accused him of coaching Hutchinson "to lie" during her depositions before the J6 committee.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Paxton hammers Talarico for going 'missing' from campaign trail — and Trump chimes in hilariously



Ken Paxton is mocking his Democrat opponent for seemingly going missing from the campaign trail as Election Day looms.

James Talarico, who is competing against Ken Paxton for a U.S. Senate seat in Texas, recently stopped appearing in person at campaign events and released a statement saying he had contracted the flu from shaking so many hands.

'No one has seen him for an extended period of time. Where is he? What is wrong with him? Bad rumors are coming out.'

On Wednesday, Texas Attorney General Paxton (R) had his supporters chant, "Where is Talarico?" at a Trump rally in San Antonio to ridicule the Democrat in the pivotal last weeks of the campaign.

CNN reported Thursday that Talarico’s last public appearance in Texas was a press conference on September 26.

Talarico's campaign issued a statement about his ongoing absence.

"After holding more than 100 public events and shaking tens of thousands of hands, James came down with the flu but will be back on the trail this weekend," said a statement from campaign spokesperson J.T. Ennis, according to CNN and Brooke Taylor of Fox News.

"Ken Paxton has been ignoring Texans this entire campaign, and his priorities are clear: He doesn’t answer to the people of this state — he answers to his billionaire megadonors and special interests," the statement added.

President Donald Trump issued a scathing post laughing at Talarico for his unusual campaign absence.

"Ladies and Gentlemen, upon information and belief, James TalaFREAKo, who is running for the United States Senate in Texas, is MISSING IN ACTION!" the president wrote on social media Wednesday.

"No one has seen him for an extended period of time. Where is he? What is wrong with him?" he chided. "Bad rumors are coming out."

RELATED: Talarico’s black and Hispanic outreach stalls just weeks before early voting

Paxton posted images to social media of posters jokingly calling Talarico a missing person.

"Missing posters are popping up across Texas as the search continues," he wrote. "LAST SEEN: 12 days ago. Texans everywhere are asking: where is James Talarico?"

Democrats are looking to flip the Texas seat in hopes of seizing control of the U.S. Senate from Republicans in order to thwart the president's agenda in the last half of his final term.

Those hopes might be dashed, as blacks and Hispanics question more and more whether Talarico's campaign has done enough to reach out to those constituencies.

You can check out the latest polling average between Paxton and Talarico, plus race trends and other helpful data, at Blaze News' Poll Watch.

Texas Senate polls 2026: Talarico vs. Paxton

Texas Senate polls 2026: Talarico vs. Paxtonpollwatch.theblaze.com

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Trump blames violent rioting in France on Islam, ‘out of control mass migration’ — and a French official has responded



A French official has responded to President Donald Trump blaming Islam and mass migration for the violent riots in France.

Nearly 500 people were arrested in just one day in connection with massive riots that French officials claim are about the conditions in schools. Education Minister Édouard Geffray reported that at least 24 schools were ransacked or set on fire.

The Ministry of Justice said more than 5,000 people had been arrested in the rioting and that 87% of the arrestees were minors.

While many news reports characterize the rioting as a result of French citizens expressing their outrage against education conditions, Trump tied it to Islam and mass immigration.

"What’s happening in France is nothing less than out of control mass migration. This isn’t about schools, this is about Islam wanting to take over a once great Country!" he wrote Tuesday on Truth Social.

The post captured a lot of attention and led to a tepid response from Jean-Noel Barrot, the French foreign minister.

"If we do not write our own story, others will write it for us," said Barrot.

He went on to accuse France's "rivals, adversaries, and partners" of attempting to interpret the rioting in a self-serving manner.

Organizers claim as many as 450,000 people are participating in the massive protest and rioting, reportedly to oppose the educational system offered in France. The French Ministry of the Interior said 488 people were just arrested on Tuesday and 43 law enforcement officers had been injured, AA reported.

In one startling case, a 15-year-old had his hand reportedly blown off by a police stun grenade that detonated.

Another individual lost teeth, and others reportedly suffered eye injuries, according to The Hill.

Some have tied the rioting to increased immigration enforcement ordered by the European Union in June. The new policies included increasing deportations and constructing detention centers abroad.

U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Mike Waltz also blamed immigration for the rioting in a statement to Fox News Digital. "I think we would always condemn lawlessness, condemn the violence that we're seeing in Paris," Waltz responded.

RELATED: Italy to BAN burqas in schools and limit number of foreign students, says PM Giorgia Meloni

"But I think we also have to recognize that when you have open borders, when you [have] this pro-migration, unchecked immigration kind of policy, coupled with policies over the years that deny people basic energy, that overspend on all kinds of other government programs, that you see a level of frustration boiling to the surface," he added.

In a letter dated Monday, the Ministry of Justice said more than 5,000 people had been arrested in the rioting and that 87% of the arrestees were minors. Only about a third of them are being prosecuted.

At least 900 high schools were expected to be blockaded or closed on Tuesday.

"The French are notorious for strikes, labor stoppages, and street demonstrations. It’s a core part of the Fifth Republic’s civic culture," said Theo Wold, a former Trump official, to Fox News Digital. "What’s new is the violence, lawlessness, and rioting. This is a consequence of mass immigration."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Trump calls for New York Times and other outlets to be 'arrested' over reports on rally attendance



The president vehemently denied reports in the New York Times and other outlets that the Ohio Arena was not full for his rally on Saturday.

President Donald Trump said in a post on Truth Social that reporters should be arrested for relaying what he called fake news.

'The New York Times, and many other Artificial Media Outlets, should be arrested for their dishonesty and disservice to our Country.'

"The Ohio Arena was already full to the brim — And yet these people were still trying to get in," he wrote Monday.

"The New York Times said, 'There were empty seats' when, in fact, there were none, and thousands of people had to be turned away. The New York Times, and many other Artificial Media Outlets, should be arrested for their dishonesty and disservice to our Country," he added.

"When Bernie Sanders has 500 to 1,000 people, they make it sound like it's the biggest event that ever took place," Trump concluded. "When PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP has 50,000 people, they make it sound like nobody showed up!"

He continued in a second post to explain that some of the upper seats were empty because of the migration effect, whereupon people move down to the main floor.

"In actuality, thousands of people were unable to get in. The Arena was totally MAXED OUT, including all upper sections," he said in the second post.

RELATED: Trump slams 'sick, treasonous, and demented' journalists after berating CNN's Kaitlan Collins

"The 'migration' process always happens! The Times knows this, and so does everyone else. I never have empty seats — Never have, and never will!" Trump added.

The White House has been engaged in a feud with various news outlets after they sued to have their access restored. Fox News Media, ABC News, CBS News, CNN, and NBC News released a joint statement saying they would forgo all pool reporting duties unless the outlets were allowed back.

Trump added that he was going to Nebraska for a rally in Grand Island on the first day of early in-person voting.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Libertarian think tank pearl-clutches about reduced Islamic migration — but it's music to MAGA ears



America's most prominent libertarian think tank released a report on Monday concern-mongering over the drastic drop in legal immigration from third-world Muslim nations under President Donald Trump.

The Cato Institute — admittedly a big supporter of immigration and longtime opponent of the president's border wall — is fretting over an apparent 96% drop in immigrant visa issuances and refugee admissions from majority-Muslim countries such as Afghanistan, Algeria, Iran, Libya, Pakistan, and Somalia.

'We’ve come so far on these issues.'

Meanwhile, prominent voices in the MAGA movement are celebrating the news from Cato.

The White House's rapid response account even shared a Cato Institute graph showing the decline in migration from Muslim countries.

In response to the graph, Turning Point USA spokesman Andrew Kolvet wrote, "I couldn't love this stat and this graphic any more. This is actually exactly what I voted for."

Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin said, "Coming to America means committing to America: our Constitution, our laws, our freedoms. Tougher vetting under POTUS Trump has cut admissions from high-risk countries by 96%. We owe Americans nothing less than knowing exactly who we let in."

Texas Rep. Brandon Gill (R) noted, "Absolutely incredible victory for the American people, thanks to POTUS."

RELATED: Alabama: The anti-caliphate

Aaron Schwartz/AFP/Getty Images

The libertarian think tank underscored that Trump and his administration are directly responsible for the drop in admissions of refugees and migrants from nations, highlighting:

  • Trump's Jan. 20, 2025, proclamation that the U.S. "admit only those refugees who can fully and appropriately assimilate into the United States," "ensure that the United States preserves taxpayer resources for its citizens," and suspend the entry of refugees into the U.S. under the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program;
  • Trump's Sept. 30, 2025, determination allocating refugee admissions for fiscal year 2026 primarily to Afrikaners from South Africa;
  • Trump's Dec. 16, 2025, proclamation restricting the entry of foreign nationals into the U.S. from scores of third-world countries including Afghanistan, Mali, South Sudan, and Yemen;
  • the State Department's pause on immigrant visa processing from 75 countries "whose migrants take welfare from the American people at unacceptable rates";
  • U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services' Jan. 1, 2026, memo applying Trump's 40-country entry ban; and
  • the State Department's recent immigrant visa interview freeze.

Many of the administration's actions have been challenged and in some cases blocked in the courts. The State Department's pause on visa processing from 75 countries, for instance, is no longer in effect as of Aug. 21, owing to a court order.

Nevertheless, these actions have proven impactful.

The libertarian think tank's analysis of State Department data shows incredible drops in migration from various Muslim terrorist hot spots.

Whereas, for example, 5,563 immigrants and refugees from Afghanistan were admitted by the U.S. in former President Joe Biden's final month in office, there were only nine in February 2026 — a decline of 99.8%. Whereas 3,026 Pakistani refugees and migrants were admitted in December 2024, only 63 were admitted in February 2026. Similarly dramatic declines were observed among admissions from various other Muslim nations.

"If the current pace continues, the fiscal year 2026 (which started in October) would see the fewest immigrants and refugees from majority-Muslim countries in at least 30 years," said the Cato Institute report.

'Of course, there are immigrants who don’t work and commit crimes.'

The report noted further that if these levels continue for the rest of this fiscal year, "then only about 40,000 immigrants and refugees from these countries will have immigrated that year. This would be down nearly 80 percent from 2024 and even about 30 percent lower than 2020, when the first Trump administration used the pandemic as an excuse to cut off legal immigration."

The libertarian outfit also questioned the administration's justification for the 40-country entry ban on the basis of security, claiming that "only two of the ten majority Muslim countries on that list have ever carried out a deadly terrorist attack in the United States."

The Cato Institute further characterized immigrants from Muslim nations as hard workers who have a positive effect on government budgets and as "much more highly educated than the US-born."

RELATED: Diversity is our strength? Britain has to remind migrants: Don't rape kids

Afghan migrants attempting to cross US border near Sasabe, Arizona, in January 2025. John Moore/Getty Images

Minnesota is among the states that has had a different experience on the ground with some of these supposed scholarly and industrious imports.

The Center for Immigration Studies reported in December that approximately 54% of Somali-headed households in Minnesota received food stamps and 73% of Somali households had at least one member on Medicaid. By way of comparison, the figures for native households were 7% and 18%, respectively. The CIS also noted that 58.2% of working-age Somalis do not speak English very well and 39% have no high school diploma.

Trump shared a graph on Jan. 4 titled "Immigrant Welfare Recipient Rates by Country of Origin," which showed that the percentages of immigrant households on assistance from Afghanistan, Algeria, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Pakistan, South Sudan, and Yemen were all over 40% and went as high as 75%.

The Cato Institute's report claimed, "Of course, there are immigrants who don’t work and commit crimes. But they are the minority. The vast majority of immigrants — including those from majority-Muslim countries — want to contribute to the United States, and they have contributed to it."

The libertarian think tank implored Congress to "go further to protect Americans’ right to associate freely with people born in other countries, regardless of their countries of origin."

William Wolfe, the executive director of the Center for Baptist Leadership, tweeted, "To see an official White House account celebrating a decrease in 1) legal immigration and from 2) explicitly Muslim-Majority countries is truly amazing. We’ve come so far on these issues. Some of the young guys don’t know that, but it did not used to be like this."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Will Trump save college sports? The NCAA thinks so — but these changes are big



The NCAA got one step closer to achieving its President Trump-aligned rule changes this week.

For months, the president has been pushing sweeping adjustments to college athletics that would limit transfers, payments, and eligibility for athletes.

'It will not only save college sports, it will save the colleges themselves.'

On Monday, the Senate passed the Protect College Sports Act of 2026 in a 77-22 vote, with the bill sponsored by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas).

The vote came months after Trump's executive order that urged national action on the issue in April and received support from legendary college coaches.

While the legislation does favor the historic college institutions in some regards, it also benefits student-athletes.

The bill prohibits schools, conferences, and the like from restricting student-athletes from entering into name, image, and likeness agreements; students must report any NIL compensation to their school that is greater than $600.

Other big changes come in the form of limiting player and personnel movement. Student-athletes are allowed only one transfer during their eligibility, or they otherwise face having to sit out for a year.

The five-year eligibility window would also change, effectively upending the redshirt system and replacing it with a fixed eligibility window. Under the bill, five calendar years of eligibility would be initiated at the start of the academic year after the athlete has turned 19 or the day the athlete first enrolls full-time in college, whichever comes first.

For coaches, football personnel cannot become the head football coach at a different institution during the same season.

The bill still faces a battle in the House in order to become law and will likely have to wait until after the midterm elections. However, the president still called the Senate vote "a really big deal."

"It will not only save college sports, it will save the colleges themselves," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "Congratulations to Randy Levine, President of the New York Yankees, and all of those who worked with him, on a job well done!"

RELATED: ESPN's Pat McAfee gets death threats over Trump comments. There's just one problem — he didn't say them.

Other changes in the bill would prohibit Division 1 conferences from "reducing the number of varsity or Olympic sports teams that a member institution must sponsor," with schools that make $80 million in athletics revenue prevented from reducing the number of roster spots for sports that they provided in 2024-2025.

Student-athletes also get a 10-year window after eligibility to come back and finish their degree, and schools must provide the same grant-in-aid amount as when they were student-athletes.

As well, agent endorsement contract fees are capped at 5% under the bill, and school spending on athletes is capped at $50 million annually.

RELATED: NY Giants quarterback labeled 'insane' over pregame comments — almost no one knew he was quoting the Bible

Johnnie Izquierdo/Getty Images

The NCAA has boasted about the Protect College Sports Act on its website, insisting it will "level the playing field" nationwide.

The NCAA says it supports "sustainable, fair revenue sharing," protecting women's and Olympic sports, and "reasonable" transfer limitations.

The Big Ten Conference also issued a statement Monday: "We look forward to the next steps to passage as we continue to support the act as passed by the Senate."

The Hill reported the bill as granting the NCAA sweeping federal antitrust protection that would shield it from lawsuits, with Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) claiming it will only perpetuate exploitation.

"What this bill does, at its core, is protect a system of exploitation," Murphy said, per CNN. "This bill protects the billions of dollars that coaches and executives are making by suppressing compensation for some of the most highly valued athletes in the world."

Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) said the bill seeks to serve "the large, wealthy interests that have been controlling college sports for a long time."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Trump judge delivers 'FAKE NEWS' temporary win in battle with president



A federal judge has delivered a trio of liberal media outlets a win in their battle with the president over access to the White House grounds.

While the networks and their lawyer appear excited over the outcome, President Donald Trump has made clear this is but a battle in a war he means to win.

'Plaintiffs have engaged in a number of reporting incidents that have threatened national security.'

How it started

Trump announced Friday that he was barring CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House "as a result of their constant 'reporting' FAKE NEWS," stressing that "Media Outlets shouldn’t be able to constantly write or report FICTION and LIES when they’re covering the President of the United States, the Trump Administration, or the United States of America."

Following the president's proclamation, White House television pool members — including Fox News — circled the wagons and agreed to end pooled coverage in protest.

Meanwhile, the three banned networks sued Trump, two of Trump's staffers, and U.S. Secret Service Director Sean Curran, claiming that "this ban could not be a more direct assault on the First Amendment nor a more blatant violation of our most fundamental constitutional principles."

Alleging that the ban violated the First Amendment and the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment, the media networks asked for the restoration of their White House hard passes and access as well as for a declaration that the ban was unconstitutional.

RELATED: Trump picked the wrong way to fight fake news

Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

The White House argued that:

  • the government has a "compelling interest in awarding hard passes to journalists satisfying minimum standards" and that the three networks did not meet those standards;
  • the "Plaintiffs have engaged in a number of reporting incidents that have threatened national security"; and
  • the networks are mistaken in their conclusion "that there is a special property or legal interest in access to the White House."

How it's going

U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly did not buy what the White House was selling.

Early on Thursday, the Trump-appointed judge granted the liberal networks a 14-day restraining order and ordered the White House to reinstate White House hard pass press credentials to employees of CNN, MS NOW, and Politico.

Kelly said in his order that the plaintiffs had "shown a likelihood of success, at least on their Fifth Amendment procedural due process claim."

The judge noted further that "none of Defendants' arguments convince the Court that Plaintiffs are not likely to succeed on their due process claim."

Kelly rejected the White House's argument that the ban was motivated by national security concerns, writing, "Certainly, that is not what President Trump said when he announced that he was 'banning' Plaintiffs from the White House — instead, he focused on the alleged lack of truthfulness and negativity of Plaintiffs' reporting."

"Defendants offer no declarations or other support — classified or unclassified — explaining how any of the reporting they identified in their letters to Plaintiffs damaged the national security."

Trump, apparently anticipating this turn of events, noted on Monday, "As usual, we’ll go for appeal because Fake News people and publications that only write negatively, and who violate our National Security by writing false and defamatory stories with unknown 'sources,' shouldn’t be allowed access to the most important Office anywhere in the World."

Ted Boutrous, the lawyer representing the liberal outlets, said in a statement, "This is a strong ruling vindicating freedom of the press, due process, and the rule of law. We greatly appreciate the court’s swift action."

The White House did not immediately respond to Blaze News' request for comment.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Trump slams 'sick, treasonous, and demented' journalists after berating CNN's Kaitlan Collins



The president continued his rhetorical attacks on the mainstream media after issuing a controversial ban on several outlets from the White House.

CNN, MS NOW, and Politico have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration to regain access, while other news outlets have boycotted the press pool as a form of protest.

'She’s got a ''TRUMP'' addiction, and so does CNN and MSDNC. They’re all sick, treasonous, and demented!'

President Donald Trump fired back in a post on the Truth Social platform.

"All of the SLEAZEBAGS, like Third Rate 'Reporter,' Kaitlan Collins, of Fake News CNN, a truly unhappy person, said they weren’t going to be covering me," he wrote.

The president was referring to an episode in which Collins asked him when the Iran war would end during his visit to the United Nations General Assembly.

"Then why were they ranting and raving like Lunatics, in the Press Area, at the United Nations?" he added. "Why was she there? She’s got a 'TRUMP' addiction, and so does CNN and MSDNC. They’re all sick, treasonous, and demented! The 'good news' is that they have a great, for them, and totally disloyal Judge."

Collins later said that she was credentialed by the United Nations and denied that CNN had said the network was never going to cover the president.

"We will continue to cover the president and his speech and as he meets with world leaders today, just not with a TV camera from one of the five major networks in the room," she said.

U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly is presiding over the case and was appointed by Trump in his first term as president.

Collins also faced restrictions from the White House in 2018. Fox News defended her at time and called on the administration to back off.

RELATED: 'By accident': CNN panelist apologizes after accusing Trump of involvement in Epstein sex-trafficking ring

CNN host Jake Tapper defended Collins in a post Wednesday.

"Not going to dignify the president’s juvenile social media post about our brilliant @kaitlancollins except to say she and we are going to keep doing our jobs," he wrote, "which is to ask and cover the questions voters care about — like those about the war in Iran and the economy."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

The ‘AI will kill us all’ crowd is fighting the wrong war



Debates around artificial intelligence continue to rage. Many plead for halting development, fearing it’s only a matter of time before AI eradicates humanity.

To illustrate the fear and panic this camp feels, BlazeTV host Sara Gonzales points to the Anthropic researcher who resigned earlier this month, warning in a viral post that developers are pushing onward despite knowing AI “could kill us all by the end of the decade.”

Others, including President Trump, however, claim the AI doomsaying is rooted in conspiracy theories that benefit only China — America’s archrival in the AI race.

But there’s another critical factor in the debate Sara claims people are neglecting: chips.

“It's not necessarily the technology itself that we need to be discussing. It's more what's driving it, which are the chips,” she says.

To illustrate, she highlights a recent Fox News article titled “America and China are fighting for the future of AI — chips are the battlefield,” which claims that “China’s tech giant says demand for its AI computing equipment already exceeds supply as it accelerates new chip generations.”

The war for controlling the chip supply, says Sara, is a bigger concern than the capabilities of the AI models themselves.

“It's more about who controls the chips, computing infrastructure, the technology ecosystem underneath it. And China, to be real, has had an advantage on this for years now,” she says.

President Trump, she explains, has been trying to move chip manufacturing to the United States.

“Remember, up until 2024, Taiwan actually held a 68% market share of all global chip production, which, you want to war-game this out, that's kind of a problem, because we are constantly on the brink of China invading and retaking Taiwan,” says Sara. “When and if that happens, what's to stop them from cutting us off from the chips? And then what happens to us and our technology?”

Militarily, the United States would suffer, she explains.

“America has remained the global leader in advanced AI technology and semiconductor design. And for years, the United States has used export controls to restrict China's access to advanced semiconductors and semiconductor manufacturing technology, particularly technologies with potential military applications,” says Sara.

“But if we allow them to get chip supremacy, like, America could be looking at no longer being the biggest military superpower in the world.”

For this reason, Sara is in support of continuing AI development.

“I'm so tired of living in this world where so many people just are burying their heads in the sand and not realizing … we're essentially in a cold war with China on every single platform,” she says.

“We don't want them getting the upper hand with AI. America wants a world running on American chips, American software, American standards.”

To hear more, watch the episode above.

Want more from Sara Gonzales?

To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred takes on news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.