8 steps to secure the 2024 election + one red flag to be aware of



On a recent episode of Glenn Beck’s Wednesday Night Special, he took a close look at the upcoming 2024 presidential election. Tensions are high, as people on all sides of the political spectrum are skeptical about the integrity of America’s elections.

According to an ABC poll, confidence in our election system is at an abysmal 20%. How do we improve America’s dangerously low confidence? Glenn has some answers.

But before he got into the details of how to secure the 2024 election, he wanted to make one thing abundantly clear: “As we’re talking about the election, I am not talking about 2016, which the left said was stolen, 2020, which the right said was stolen, [or] 2022.”

“The only time I’m going to mention those elections … is in the form of this question: Do you feel like the election is more secure this year [2024] than it was in 2022 or 2020?” he said.

Because of the controversies and Big Tech censorship surrounding questions about those past elections, a significant portion of this episode is only available on BlazeTV. Glenn wanted to make sure everyone was able to access the episode, so BlazeTV is making it free until 9:00 p.m. ET on April 25, 2024. Go to BlazeTV.com/Glenn to watch the episode. You can also sign up to help Glenn and BlazeTV bring more of this programming to you and get $30 off your first year of BlazeTV+ with code SECURE24.

With that out of the way, here’s what Glenn discussed:

Glenn started by asking: “What has your state done to make this year’s election more secure?”

For example, according to a recent Washington Post article, “Voting in Michigan will be easier for many people this fall.”

Why will it be easier? “Because they have written laws extending early voting, making it easier for mail-in voting, and they’ve added enough ballot drop boxes,” Glenn explained, adding, “Isn’t that the problem that made people skeptical?”

The article then contrasted these “easier” Michigan voting protocols with states like North Carolina. “North Carolina will see changes in the opposite direction,” it claimed.

North Carolina, Glenn explained, has “required voters to show voter ID” — a policy that has “80% approval with all sides” — “required absentee ballot return deadlines,” and “[scaled] back the locations of early voting.”

“What they did in North Carolina, I think, is secure the election, but that's not the framing the Post is giving,” he explains. According to the article, “The two states illustrate how voting has changed since the last presidential election. But whether Americans will have an easier or harder time casting a ballot than they did in 2020 will depend on where they live and, often, whether Democrats or Republicans have been in charge.”

However, “easier,” according to Glenn, isn’t always better. Often, a more difficult path is what enhances security.

“Deadlines are hard; securing something is hard,” he says. “If something doesn’t require something that is hard, it’s almost meaningless.”

Regardless of who wins the election, “'Will either side believe it?”

“I don’t think so,” says Glenn, especially if we continue to choose “easier” over what’s best.

So as Election Day draws ever nearer, how do we ensure security? According to Glenn, there are eight things you can do and one red flag you should be on the lookout for. That red flag is what is revealed in the full episode, available only on BlazeTV.

So to hear Glenn’s advice, head over to BlazeTV.com/Glenn to watch the episode for FREE. Complimentary access to the full episode is only available until 9:00 p.m. ET on April 25, 2024! Sign up for BlazeTV+ and gain unlimited access to thoughtful, original, and, most importantly, unfiltered commentary from a range of conservative voices. Your subscription will also grant you access to exclusive Blaze news as well as invite-only live chats with all of your favorite BlazeTV hosts. Use code SECURE2024 to save $30 on your first year of BlazeTV+ at BlazeTV.com/Glenn.


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

No, Biden’s Push For Red-Flag Laws Won’t Keep Anyone Safer

Red-flag laws do nothing but put innocent people at risk and make it easier to disarm opponents for political purposes.

Horowitz: Gun violence, the real red flags that no one talks about



Democrats love guns. They have a policy of leaving no gun felon behind. So long as you actually assault someone with the gun or possess it after having committed a violent crime, you are a protected class in need of “criminal justice reform.” God help you, though, if you are caught carrying a gun to protect yourself from one of those carjackers roaming the streets of cities like Chicago.

Biden is calling on us to do “something” about guns and to pass red flag laws. Well, the biggest red flag is someone who with full due process has already been convicted of multiple violent crimes. That person shouldn’t own a gun, right? Well, what happens when he is caught illegally possessing one? Liberal prosecutors, politicians, and judges don’t want to lock him up because it would add to the prison numbers, which is an anathema to Biden’s de-incarceration goals. If you would only lock up the gun felons in this country – those who do harm to other people with guns or possess guns after having done harm to others – most violent crime would be deterred.

Last Wednesday, a female Chicago cop was seriously injured after a suspect shot her from his car during a traffic stop on a city street. Mayor Lori Lightfoot released a statement saying she will “be praying for the injured officer and the entire department as they grapple with yet another heinous and deliberate assault on our officers’ lives.” But these same leftists always lambast conservatives for offering prayers rather than “doing something” about gun violence. And in this case, as is the case with most city shootings, there was a lot that could have been done.

According to CWBChicago, the suspect in the shooting, a convicted robber, was arrested in October 2020 during a drunk driving incident for possessing a loaded handgun in the car as a convicted violent felon. Court records show the man was released on just $500 bail at the time, and then prosecutors completely dropped the charges just four months later. After all, they believe felony possession is just a technical “nonviolent, low level” offense.

Nearly all the shootings in cities like Chicago are committed by criminals that fit this profile. How about we call Biden’s bluff and have each state create stiff mandatory minimums for felony possession and for committing violent crimes with firearms, while ensuring that prosecutors cannot drop these cases and that judges cannot release them on low bail?

Gun control doesn’t work, but criminal control does.



What is particularly egregious is that Democrats essentially do not believe in prison time for juvenile gun felons, even though an increasingly large share of gun crimes, especially armed carjackings, are being committed by those under 18. The same leftists who demand we raise the age for the legal purchase of firearms to 21 have no problems letting those under 18 off the hook after they assault someone with a firearm and then are caught multiple times while in felony possession of a firearm. Again, most of the murders and carjackings are committed by people who fit this criminal profile. You might call carjacking laws the ultimate red flag laws, except they are never enforced.

Take the case of Isaac Corona who was just charged with the murder of Justin Gamino in Chicago. According to prosecutors, Corona was charged with illegally possessing a firearm as a juvenile but was given probation. Then, in 2016, a grand jury indicted Corona on charges of attempted murder, aggravated discharge of a firearm, and aggravated assault by discharge of a firearm after he went up to a victim and fired three shots. Luck would have it that he missed and then the gun jammed, but that was as close to attempted murder as it gets. However, thanks to a plea deal he reached with the prosecutor, Corona was sentenced to only three years, much of which was served while on home electronic monitoring, and the sentence was also cut in half for “good behavior.”

Seven months after his parole ended in January 2021, Corona ran from cops during a traffic stop, and you can guess what police allegedly found in his jacket pockets. Yup, a loaded handgun in one pocket and a magazine in the other. I doubt he had much regard for the capacity of the magazine either. By this point, any sane person would say he should be held without bail and be sentenced to mandatory 25 years. Instead, he was given low bail, and later in October, officers found Corona at the scene of a shooting unlawfully possessing ammunition and resisting police.

Three days later, Corona succeeded in striking a plea deal and was sentenced to just two years in prison. Of course, the sentence was reduced by 50%, and he received credit for time served mainly on home electronic monitoring. Consequently, he was out less than two months later in early January 2022, and that is how he was on the street to allegedly kill Justin Gamino, a father of a 2-year-old girl who was about to complete his high school degree.

Now, guess who was Corona’s alleged accomplice in the car that day? According to court records, Antonio Gonzalez was one of four people in the car with Corona but got away from police and later allegedly ran over a Chicago cop with a stolen car. What was his history? According to CWBChicago, about a year ago, Gonzalez was arrested during a traffic stop for illegally possessing a handgun. According to court records, he posted a $500 bond deposit then failed to show up in court twice. Despite his failures to appear, the judge never issued a warrant for his arrest. Then several months later, he was arrested again for involvement in a carjacking, but despite the pending gun charges and failure to show, he was released on a $1,000 deposit. Not surprisingly, he is now accused of being involved in, you guessed it, another carjacking and murder case involving a gun.

How about the recent case of Darrell Frazier in Chicago? After having shot a handgun into an occupied car, he pleaded down to just a three-year sentence, which of course was truncated due to state law. Then in November 2020, he was charged with shooting his own son in the leg. The judge did the right thing and held him on $1 million bail, but three months later, he slashed his bail to just $50,000, and Frazier went home on electronic monitoring and GPS by posting a $5,000 deposit. Despite violating the terms of his release, he was actually absolved of electronic monitoring after paying an additional $2,000 deposit. Talk about a red flag! Fast-forward to May 27, and police arrested him for tossing a loaded handgun wrapped in a hoodie on the ground in a residential neighborhood.

These are essentially the stories of every major American city thanks to the “criminal justice reform” agenda, which mollycoddles gun felons so long as they are violent, have a criminal record, and have a proclivity to harm people with guns. You might even call them red flags.

Every GOP governor would be wise to immediately call for mandatory 25-year sentencing with no good time credits or parole for anyone caught to be in felony possession after having been convicted as a violent felon or someone illegally possessing a gun in furtherance of a crime. Most cities are plagued by juvenile carjackers who assault people with guns multiple times in the same year and don’t go to prison. Biden and his ilk believe the age for carrying a gun should be 12 so long as that individual is assaulting people with it rather than defending themself from the assaulters.

If Democrats want gun control, it’s time to give it to them in spades.

Could Biden's red flag plan lead to a 'Minority Report'-style violation of human rights?



President Joe Biden outlined his plan for gun control last week that would make it easier for police or family members to remove firearms from an individual they deemed a danger to public safety.

Crowder believes that Biden's plan could potentially lead to a "Minority Report"-style violation of human rights. Watch the clip for more from Crowder.

Can't watch? Download the podcast here.



Want more from Steven Crowder?

To enjoy more of Steven's uncensored late-night comedy that's actually funny, join Mug Club — the only place for all of Crowder uncensored and on demand.