CNN brings 'Reliable Sources' host Brian Stelter out of exile. Here are his top 3 unreliable moments.



Billionaire John Malone, now a Warner Bros. Discovery shareholder with major sway, told CNBC several months ahead of Discovery's 2022 merger with WarnerMedia, "I would like to see CNN evolve back to the kind of journalism that it started with, and actually have journalists, which would be unique and refreshing."

During his brief stint as CEO at CNN, Chris Licht appeared keen to realize this dream. The company announced in August 2022 that it was canceling "Reliable Sources with Brian Stelter" and canning its host.

After spending some time soul-searching and concern-mongering about so-called disinformation behind the scenes at Apple, at the World Economic Forum's annual meeting in Davos, and in guest spots on other cable news shows, Stelter will return to CNN just in time for the election.

Stelter announced Tuesday on X, "I'm returning to @CNN in a brand new role as Chief Media Analyst. I'll be appearing on TV, developing digital content, and once again helming the Reliable Sources newsletter."

While various personalities in the news media ecosystem have celebrated Stelter's return, some critics have alternatively issued reminders about his track record for less-than-reliable reporting.

Here are three instances in which Stelter prioritized narrative over facts.

Hunter Biden laptop story

Less than a month ahead of the 2020 election, the New York Post reported about the damning contents of Hunter Biden's laptop and raised various questions about then-candidate Joe Biden, especially about his shady ties to Ukraine.

Elements of the intelligence community hostile to President Donald Trump — including active CIA contractors — swooped in to shield Biden in the final weeks before the election, releasing a public letter on Oct. 19, 2020, asserting that the Hunter Biden laptop story had "all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation" intended to hurt the Democrat's candidacy.

Facebook under Mark Zuckerberg censored the corresponding post online.

Stelter dutifully did his part, insinuating that the accurate report published in the paper founded by Alexander Hamilton, censored by Big Tech, and maligned by a cabal of spies was "fake."

"So let's take a look at how a storyline is manufactured," Stelter said at the time. "In this case, a loudly anti-Biden storyline, redounding to Trump's benefit. First, it helps to really view this as story-telling — not so much as news coverage but as political entertainment."

'That's misinformation that you're spreading on my program.'

Writing off the Post's censored story as political entertainment, Stelter reassured his viewers that Hunter Biden "has already apologized — well, he's already admitted to poor judgment" and that Joe Biden "has said it would not happen again."

After alluding to a previous CNN report that suggested the published emails might be "tied to [a] Russian disinformation effort targeting Biden," Stelter characterized as outlandish the possibility Hunter Biden might have left an incriminating laptop at a Delaware computer shop.

Stelter said:

The Post claimed that the emails were found on a laptop computer that was brought to a computer shop in Delaware in the spring of 2019; that a shop employee saw the emails and then was worried about getting in trouble or getting in danger, and he made copies of them. There is a lot about this story that does not add up.

"For all we know, these emails are made up," said the then-CNN host. "But we do know that this is a classic example of the right-wing media machine."

Steele dossier

Jerry Dunleavy, a former senior investigator for House Republicans on the Foreign Affairs Committee, recently highlighted an instance in 2017 in which Stelter accused then-White House senior advisor Kellyanne Conway of spreading "misinformation" on his show after she criticized CNN's obsession with the Steele dossier.

Blaze News previously reported that the Steele dossier was paid for by Democratic operatives who hired research firm Fusion GPS, which then retained former British spy Christopher Steele, who in turn curated the documents of uncorroborated claims about Trump.

"We've got multiple investigations through [special counsel Robert] Mueller, through congressional and Senate committees, and CNN itself has been so hot on Russia, Russia, Russia — on the dossier," said Conway. "CNN's been obsessed with this dossier over a year now. And now that we know the DNC and Clinton campaign paid the same firm for said dossier, which is completely unverified, we can't get you excited."

Stelter pounced on Conway, saying, "That's misinformation that you're spreading on my program, and I don't appreciate it."

"Pieces of the dossier have been verified, and when you say it's unverified, you actually mislead the American people," said Stelter.

Stelter had a similar encounter with conservative radio show host Hugh Hewitt detailed by the Washington Examiner in September 2020

"The primary subsource of the dossier was revealed last week to be a Russian agent investigated by the Obama Department of Justice in 2009 and '10. The dossier is discredited. There was no collusion. These are factual matters. That's my problem with 'Hoax,'" Hewitt told Stelter, referencing the CNN host's book.

"I'm reflecting, I'm a media reporter, and I’m not a Steele dossier reporter," said Stelter. "What I know is that when you use the word 'hoax' over and over again the way the president has, it's dangerous and poisonous because it makes people think there's nothing real and nothing true anymore. And that's what I think the problem is."

Vaccine skepticism

Like countless other talking heads on cable news, Brian Stelter would not tolerate criticism of experimental COVID-19 vaccines during and after the pandemic.

'He's clearly not responsible enough to have a show that purports or pretends to be news.'

In a May 2021 monologue, Stelter said, "I've heard Tucker Carlson repeatedly say that many Americans are dying after getting the [COVID] shot. And he says it with the implication that the shots are to blame with no evidence at all. He's scaring his audience so recklessly."

Stelter ran a clip showing Carlson criticize mandatory vaccinations and coercive medicine.

"Carlson acts like he knows some secret truth that's been covered up by some shadowy enterprise," said Stelter, around the same time the Biden-Harris administration was pressuring social media companies to censor vaccine criticism — censorship Stelter appears to have defended on another occasion.

"Maybe you should be writing some junk movie of the week for Netflix or Tubi. Maybe you should go write horror novels for a living, because he's clearly not responsible enough to have a show that purports or pretends to be news."

Stelter's comments have aged poorly. After all, at least one vaccine company has admitted its product can cause deadly blood clots. The vaccines Stelter appeared desperate to defend from criticism have also been linked to various ailments, including heart disease, blood clots, hemorrhages, gut issues, thromboses, myocarditis, pericarditis, and autoimmune diseases

Dutch researchers noted in a recent peer-reviewed study in BMJ Public Health about how vaccines and containment protocols likely boosted excess mortality that: "Both medical professionals and citizens have reported serious injuries and deaths following vaccination to various official databases in the Western World, such as VAERS in the USA, EudraVigilance in the European Union and Yellow Card Scheme in the UK."

Months after Stelter suggested that Carlson was not booking the right people or seeking the right answers, he ran a segment with a censor from a Biden-allied narrative curation outfit discussing "how 'do your own research' leads to misinformation."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Leftist Rachel Maddow 'worried' Trump will put her in one of the 'massive camps he's planning' if he's elected president



CNN's "Reliable Sources" newsletter Monday featured an interview with MSNBC host Rachel Maddow in which she expressed concern that former President Donald Trump will put her — and others of her left-wing ilk — in one of the "massive camps he's planning" should he win back the presidency in November.

Prefacing Maddow's rather jaw-dropping take was a "Reliable Sources" observation that "Trump and his allies are openly talking about weaponizing the government to seek revenge against critics in media and politics, with some of his extremist allies even talking about jailing their fellow Americans. You're one of his most notable critics on television. Are you worried that you could be a target?"

'What convinces you that these massive camps he’s planning are only for migrants?'

Maddow replied, "I'm worried about the country broadly if we put someone in power who is openly avowing that he plans to build camps to hold millions of people and to 'root out' what he’s described in subhuman terms as his 'enemy from within.' Again, history is helpful here. He’s not joking when he says this stuff, and we’ve seen what happens when people take power proclaiming that kind of agenda."

She warned "Reliable Sources" about "head-in-the-sand complacency that Trump only intends to go after individual people he has already singled out. Do you really think he plans to stop at well-known liberals?"

Maddow also wondered, "When Trump invokes the Insurrection Act to deploy the U.S. military against civilians on his first day in office, do you think he then rescinds the order on day two?"

She also asked, "For that matter, what convinces you that these massive camps he’s planning are only for migrants?" before concluding, "So, yes, I’m worried about me — but only as much as I’m worried about all of us."

More of the same

Maddow's concerns reflect a Trump mantra the left is fond of parroting.

Late last month actor Robert De Niro spoke on behalf of the Biden administration outside the Manhattan courthouse where Trump was on trial and sounded similar alarms, saying "Trump wants to destroy not only the city but the country, and eventually he could destroy the world."

De Niro also said that "if Trump returns to the White House, you can kiss these freedoms goodbye that we all take for granted. And elections? Forget about it. That’s over, that’s done. If he gets in, I can tell you right now, he will never leave. He will never leave. You know that. He will never leave."

In April, left-wing MSNBC talking head Nicolle Wallace suggested that if Trump wins back the presidency in November, he may take her off the air: "Depending what happens in November, seven months from right now, this time next year I might not be sitting here," she said, adding that a "free press" may disappear, too.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Brian Stelter out at CNN; struggling network cancels his 'Reliable Sources' show



Brian Stelter — who has been long criticized for bias against conservatives, Fox News, and former President Donald Trumptold National Public Radio he's leaving CNN, as the cable network is canceling "Reliable Sources," his Sunday show focused on the media.

What are the details?

Stelter, CNN's chief media correspondent, told NPR in a statement that he's grateful for the show and his team's examination of "the media, truth and the stories that shape our world."

"It was a rare privilege to lead a weekly show focused on the press at a time when it has never been more consequential," he said to the outlet, adding that more would be said on the final episode of "Reliable Sources" this Sunday.

CNN chief Chris Licht told Stelter of the decision Wednesday, NPR said, adding that Licht has been making cuts at the network as part of Warner Bros. Discovery's takeover of the old Time Warner company.

The outlet said Stelter often touted the ratings of "Reliable Sources" on Twitter.

NPR added that investor John Malone — a major financial stakeholder in the new Warner Discovery conglomerate — was among those who has criticized CNN for having become more politicized in the Trump years.

In fact, the outlet said that Stelter in February referred to Malone more than a dozen times amid coverage of the Discovery deal and expressed concern about Malone's influence on CNN.

NPR said Stelter got his start blogging about cable news as a student and later become a media reporter for the New York Times.

How bad has it been?

It's no secret that CNN has been struggling for a while now. Besides the scandalous departures of former head Jeff Zucker and anchor Chris Cuomo and the embarrassingly fast demise of CNN+, the cable network hasn't exactly been a ratings juggernaut.

Things were bad for Stelter, too, in that department. While it was pointed out in May 2021 that "Reliable Sources" had suffered its lowest ratings of the year, the show actually had better ratings when Stelter wasn't hosting it.

Critics have often labeled Stelter a "hall monitor" for the media, and attacks against him — particularly for biased reporting — seemed to grow louder and more frequent over time.

But it didn't seem to faze him.

In February Stelter ran some P.R. for CNN at the end of a "Reliable Sources" show, defending it from critics who said the cable network was "lacking journalism" and dealt in "opinions all the time." Instead, Stelter opined of critics that "they're not watching CNN."