Woman celebrates her ‘abor-bor,’ claims her pit bull always ‘wins’ over a baby



The left’s side of the abortion debate is evil enough as it is, but a woman on TikTok decided to take it a step further and add her pit bull — a breed well known to attack children — into the mix.

“As many of you saw, I had an abor-bor earlier this year, not only because I don’t want children right now, but you want to know the real reason? I already have a baby, it’s this one right here,” the woman said proudly as she panned her camera to the pit bull behind her.

“He cost me a lot of time and energy and money, and if I had to choose between a human baby’s needs and this one, I’m choosing this one every time,” she continued.


“That’s why this fall, there’s only one candidate protecting our reproductive freedoms, and if she doesn’t win — don’t make me choose between a human baby and this one — because this one wins every freaking time,” she added.

“My political ideology is whatever makes that illegal,” BlazeTV host Allie Beth Stuckey comments. “Every part of that, actually. There’s so many things in that clip that I think should be illegal; having an abortion and owning a pit bull.”

“This really just goes to show disordered priorities and disordered desires just put your whole life out of whack,” she says. “That’s really what’s happening here. When you worship the creature rather than the creator, who is blessed forever, amen, as Romans 1 tells us, then everything gets distorted and disordered.”

“Like, if you cannot see how absolutely depraved and backwards and dark that is, this is, like, a spiritual issue, a demonic problem here, then you need to be reading your Bible and praying a lot more,” she adds.

Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Michelle Obama makes bizarre pro-abortion argument: The 'least' of what the female body does 'is produce life'



Former first lady Michelle Obama appealed to pro-abortion Americans by claiming a woman's reproductive system is not primarily intended for bearing children.

On her podcast, "IMO," Mrs. Obama and her guests discussed an alleged bias against women among lawmakers and the pharmaceutical industry, leading to a discussion in support of abortion on demand.

'So many men have no idea about what women go through. Right? We haven't been researched. We haven't been considered.'

Co-host Craig Robinson kicked off the festivities by asking guest Dr. Sharon Malone, an ob-gyn, where women should go to get "proper information" regarding reproductive care, in vitro fertilization, menopause, and more. This related to Obama, as she suffered a miscarriage in the late 1990s and later used IVF to conceive her daughters, Malia and Sasha.

Without answering the question, the doctor immediately shifted to accusing the pharmaceutical industry of not advancing products for women out of bias, "because there's no money to be made" there.

This set Obama off on a tangent about abortions, during which she claimed a lack of investment has led to difficult decisions for pregnant women.

RELATED: Obama judge blocks Trump — gives Harvard, foreign nationals what they want at America's expense

"So many men have no idea about what women go through. Right? We haven't been researched," Obama claimed.

"We haven't been considered, and it still affects the way a lot of male lawmakers, a lot of male politicians, a lot of male religious leaders think about the issue of choice, as if it's just about the fetus, the baby. But women's reproductive health is about our life."

The explanation fell short of a compelling argument, however, with Obama saying that producing children is actually the "least" important function of a woman's reproductive system.

"It's about this whole complicated reproductive system that does — the least of what it does is produce life. It's a very important thing that it does, but you only produce life if the machine that's producing it — if you wanna, you know, whittle us down to a machine — is functioning in a healthy, streamlined kind of way."

She added, "But there is no discussion or apparent connection between the two."

RELATED: David Hogg spills the beans to undercover reporter about who really controlled the Biden White House

US President Barack Obama, first lady Michelle Obama, and daughters Malia and Sasha walk to board Air Force One at Cape Cod Air Force Station in Massachusetts on August 21, 2016. NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP via Getty Images

Blaze News spoke to Emily Erin Davis, VP of communications for Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, who said hearing Obama's comments was "heartbreaking."

"It's sad to see someone who once represented our country speak about women and children this way," Davis said. "Comments like these don't just devalue motherhood — they devalue womanhood itself."

Similarly, Blaze News' Rebeka Zeljko described Obama's remarks as "absurd" and "damaging to women."

"Many women regard motherhood as their greatest, most fulfilling accomplishment. The only people who 'whittle us down to a machine' are those who dehumanize unborn children and equate an abortion with taking a Tylenol."

After Obama's obscure explanation about women's bodies, Dr. Malone asserted that a woman must "have control over her body, when and if to have a baby, and to decide how that pregnancy should continue."

The doctor insisted she was not referring to abortion, however, and said she was referring only to a miscarriage or when the mother's life is in danger.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

The truth about Project 2025: Will Trump take your birth control away?



Donald Trump has officially been sworn in as the 47th president of the United States of America — and Allie Beth Stuckey of “Relatable” couldn’t be more thrilled.

“Trump is going to overhaul America’s most corrupt institutions and turn them back into institutions that serve the American people. Truly, hopefully, by the grace of God, making America great again,” Stuckey says.

President of the Heritage Foundation, Kevin Roberts, is hopeful as well, and excited that elements of his foundation’s Project 2025 will be coming to fruition — despite the left-wing fearmongering surrounding the set of policy proposals.

“I was not surprised that the radical left overreacted, because that’s what they do, you know, their performance theater about anything that conservatives do that might actually be conservative is guaranteed,” Roberts says.


“What did surprise me, to be completely candid with you Allie, is the scale and scope of their overreaction. And clearly, they thought, particularly at one point in the summer, that this was going to be the Achilles heel for President Trump,” he continues.

And the left is still shaking in their boots.

“They believe that what is in Project 2025 is that you personally are going to go to their house, open their drawer, steal their birth control, and run away. That seems to be like this crazy fear that has been stirred up in a lot of people on the left,” Stuckey says.

While most conservatives aren’t a fan of the left's obsession with sex, abortion, and pregnancy prevention, Robert’s can put their delusional fears to rest.

“Project 2025 is this election cycle’s version of something that Heritage has done since 1980 for President Reagan, and it is just a menu of conservative policies. It’s actually on one level, Allie, really boring. It’s what think tanks and public policy organizations do,” Roberts explains.

“So the advice that I would give, and I really do intend this to be friendly for people who are in the political center or maybe on the political left, is that whatever you’ve heard about Project 2025 is unlikely to be true,” he adds.

Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

‘Souls on ice’: The dark world of reproductive eugenics



Over a million “little, tiny image-bearers of God” are frozen on ice in the United States through IVF — some of which may never see the light of day.

“As pro-lifers, we believe that those are human beings made in the image of God. We know that those are human beings made in the image of God,” Allie Beth Stuckey of “Relatable” tells the founder of Them Before Us, Katy Faust.

Faust agrees wholeheartedly and is disturbed by the treatment of these embryos.

“The American Society for Reproductive Medicine has some recommendations for what you do with those surplus embryos. The first option is to thaw and discard,” Faust explains. “The dehumanizing language is already just crazy.”

“The second option is to donate them to research. Destroy those little lives so that we can better figure out how to increase our fertility rate successes in the future. The third suggestion that they have is donate the baby to another couple,” she continues. “None of those three options honors children’s right to life and right to be known and loved by their mother and father.”


Of the embryos on ice, Faust explains, 20%-40% of them have been “functionally abandoned,” and some “have been on ice for 30 years or more.”

One option, Faust explains, is for couples to adopt the abandoned embryos. However, that does not come without a price.

“When we are properly understanding embryo adoption, not embryo donation, that is adults doing hard things on behalf of children. Those couples need to go in with the mindset of, ‘I am here to shepherd you through what is going to be the kind of questions that children in our species have never had to ask before,” Faust says.

“‘Why is it that I am genetically older than my own mother?’ You’re going to have to answer those questions to your kids. ‘Why is it that I was born and my parents had already died by the time that I was born?’ We are going to have some incredible struggles parenting those kids,” she continues.

However, some IVF-born children are now actively speaking out against embryo adoption.

“They are concerned that both on a public level, but also in terms of the industry, that it won’t do anything to stem the tide of the mass creation of surplus embryos. If there’s a perception that, ‘Oh, no problem, the surplus embryos are just going to get adopted,’ then there’s really no stop. There’s no reason for either the public to say, ‘That doesn’t seem right,’ or for the fertility industry to say, ‘Maybe we shouldn’t do this very often,’” Faust adds.

Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Allie Beth Stuckey called out actress Sophia Bush on Instagram



Last night, pro-life warrior Allie Beth Stuckey faced off with actress Sophia Bush on Instagram over the subject of abortion.

Bush pushed the typical leftist talking point that abortion bans in certain states prevent women from getting life-saving care when they’re experiencing a miscarriage or an ectopic pregnancy.

Like so many pro-choice women, what Bush gets wrong is the difference between how insurance companies code procedures (often the word abortion is used) and what is actually illegal.

“A D&C IS AN ABORTION. It is THE SAME PROCEDURE,” Bush wrote on Instagram.

“Despite what the pro-forced birth folks want to tell you, these laws prevent doctors from giving care,” she ranted in a reel, before accusing Allie and other pro-lifers of having “blood on [their] hands.”

Of course, that’s far from correct.

“An abortion is the purposeful termination of the life of an unborn child, and that is exactly how it is defined in every pro-life law that has been passed since Dobbs, which means that there is no law in any state that is restricting or prohibiting miscarriage care or the removal of an ectopic pregnancy,” Allie explained in the following Instagram reel.

Bush referenced Nevaeh Crain and Josseli Barnica, two Texas women whose stories have become leftist propaganda, as they both died because doctors claim they were fearful of prosecution due to the Heartbeat Law.

Once again, this is false information. Allie explains that in both of these cases, neither woman sought an abortion and actually died due to medical negligence.

“They take these stories, they stoke fear, and they tell women that if you are pro-life, then you are for killing women,” Allie told Live Action founder and president Lila Rose on a recent episode of “Relatable.”

“There's not a single pro-life law in the country that prohibits emergency medical care to a mother that might involve an early delivery if it's an emergency or that prohibits miscarriage care or that prohibits care for an ectopic pregnancy,” Rose reiterated.

To hear more of the conversation, watch the episode above.

- YouTubeyoutu.be

Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

WATCH: Gavin Newsom's new pro-abortion ad is so bad, it’s funny



While abortion is no laughing matter, Gavin Newsom’s latest pro-abortion – or in his words “reproductive care” – ad has Sara Gonzales in stitches.

The commercial comes in unison with Newsom’s latest proposal that aims to pave the way for women in Arizona to seek abortions in California because the “mean red states … are making it harder for them to kill their babies,” mocks Sara.

Newsom’s ad, despite what you might think, “isn’t a parody … [or] SNL.”

“This is an actual ad released unironically from Gavin Newsom on abortion,” Sara prefaces.

While we don’t want to give away too many spoilers, know that the commercial features a pair of young girls being literally hunted down by a cop with a thick Southern accent, armed with both handcuffs and a pregnancy test?

It also includes the following statement: “Trump Republicans want to criminalize young Alabama women who travel for reproductive care.”

Blaze contributor Matthew Marsden is flabbergasted.

“What are you thinking, you colossal bunch of morons?” he asks.

To see Newsom’s commercial, watch the clip below.


Want more from Sara Gonzales?

To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred take to news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Why single women don't vote Republican (and probably never will)



While many Republicans blame Donald Trump for the lack of female support in their party, women’s blue voting patterns began far before his reign.

And Steve Deace has the receipts.

As early as 2004, John Kerry polled at 18+ points more with unmarried women than George Bush, who polled at 10+ points more with married women.

The trend continued with each election up until 2020, with the only exception being Hillary Clinton polling at 2+ points more than Trump with married women and 29+ points more with unmarried women.

“This is the spiritual condition of unmarried women because this is driven all by one particular issue: unmarried women just want to be able to kill their children whenever they want,” Deace explains, adding, “It’s not any more complicated than that.”

And he’s not hopeful it will change.

“There’s really not even much we can do to bridge this gap, frankly. Because what’s the number one most loyal issue voting base in the Republican Party?” Deace asks, “the pro-life base.”

“The more married you are, the more you tend to vote Republican, and the less married you are, the more you tend to vote Democratic,” he continues.

“It’s really the number one dividing line of voting patterns in America.”


Want more from Steve Deace?

To enjoy more of Steve's take on national politics, Christian worldview, and principled conservatism with a snarky twist, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

CNBC Declares Top Destination States For American Movers The ‘Worst’ Places To Live And Work

A quick glance at where Americans moved in 2022 contradict CNBC's rankings for the 'best' and 'worst' states to live.

President Biden's CANDID admission about abortion: A surprising twist in the debate



President Biden, who has championed a woman's right to choose throughout his presidency, seems to have just done a complete 180.
During a speech in Maryland, Biden revealed that he does not personally support abortion and is especially uncomfortable with them taking place late in a pregnancy.

The president began his rant saying, “I happen to be a practicing Catholic. I’m not big on abortion.” However, he didn’t skip a beat before championing Roe v. Wade, claiming the initial ruling pleased “a vast majority of religions.”

Then, in classic Biden fashion, he began to make less and less sense: “Historically, the first three months or thereabouts, in all major religions, was: That’s between a woman and her doctor. The next three months is between — I mean, just a woman and her family. Next three months is between a woman and her doctor. The last three months have to be negotiated, because you can’t — unless you are in a position where your physical health is at stake — you can’t do it.”

Sara Gonzales is shocked, saying this was “in complete contrast to earlier this week when he promised that he would veto any bill that came to his desk that would outlaw abortion.”

“I did not know you to not be big on abortion,” Gonzales says, laughing, “and apparently all what — the vast majority of religions have reached agreement that it’s between a woman and her doctor.”
Pat Gray, is surprised as well — but not surprised by the disorienting rashness of Biden’s statement.

“I love it when he pulls these facts right out of his rectal cavity, because that — that’s nonsense, and everybody knows it.”

“I don’t know any major religion that says abortion for the first three months, that’s between a woman and her doctor,” Gray continues, “that’s garbage. That’s a complete lie.”


Want more from The News & Why It Matters?

To enjoy more roundtable rundowns of the top stories of the day, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Allie Beth Stuckey: Demi Lovato needs Jesus



If Demi Lovato releasing a song celebrating abortion was on your bingo card for 2023, you can cross it off now.

Lovato’s new song “Swine” protests the one-year anniversary of the overturning of Roe v. Wade and features vulgar lyrics like, “God forbid, I wanna suck whatever the f**k I wanna / God forbid, I wanna f**k whoever the f**k I wanna.”

Lovato has also recently changed her pronouns back to she/her, as she claims it was too exhausting having to correct people as a “they.” Allie Beth Stuckey thinks Lovato desperately needs to find Jesus.

In a tweet, Lovato explained that “Swine” was meant to “empower not only the birthing people of this country, but everyone who stands up for equality, to embrace their agency and fight for a world where every person’s right to make decisions about their own body is honored.”

“I want to empower you right now, Demi Lovato,” Stuckey responds, “you do not have to have unprotected sex. That is a choice that you can make.”

In cases of rape, which many abortion activists cling to as why abortion is necessary, Stuckey believes that “we should give the death penalty to the rapist and not the child.”

However, Lovato doesn’t quite make that argument in her song. Rather, her lyrics show a much more vain reason for not wanting to give the child a life.

Toward the end of the song, she sings, “We gotta’ grow and we gotta’ raise them / We gotta’ feed and bathe them / And if you won’t they call you a witch to burn at the stake in Salem.”

“It’s just completely – not just morally bankrupt – but intellectually bankrupt, like she doesn’t know what she’s talking about,” Stuckey says.

“In all 50 states, abortion is legal to a certain extent. In a lot of states it is legal through all nine months with very few stipulations,” she continues, “so, like, what exactly is she talking about here?”

Stuckey answers that question herself.

Lovato isn’t quite talking about any issues that she’s particularly knowledgeable on, but rather “glorifying selfishness” and a “crass, promiscuous lifestyle.”

“I think that there’s something very deep that she’s fighting, very demonic that she’s fighting,” Stuckey reasons.

While Stuckey believes the song is abhorrent, she isn’t concerned.

“It's not going to change anyone’s mind; it’s not going to turn anyone from pro-life to being pro-choice. I don’t even think it’s going to encourage anyone to, you know, abort their child. It’s just adding to the noise, and it really kind of makes me sad for her.”

“I just pray that Demi Lovato, that God works on her heart,” she adds.


Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.