MSNBC's Joy Reid defends leftist theology of Sen. Rafael Warnock, who said Easter is 'more transcendent than the resurrection of Jesus Christ'



Far-left U.S. Sen. Rafael Warnock (D) of Georgia set off a theological bomb Sunday when he tweeted that "the meaning of Easter is more transcendent than the resurrection of Jesus Christ."

Warnock — who's also senior pastor of iconic Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta, which Martin Luther King Jr. once led — also said in his now-deleted tweet that "whether you are Christian or not, through a commitment to helping others we are able to save ourselves."

Naturally many Twitter users took issue with the good reverend's jaw-dropping point of view, calling it "heresy" and "literally the opposite of what the Gospel says," among numerous other critiques.

Among Warnock's detractors was Jenna Ellis, who recently served as senior legal counsel and attorney for former President Donald Trump, and she called Warnock a "false teacher."

Joy Reid fires back

MSNBC's Joy Reid caught an eyeful of Ellis' response to Warnock and launched a defense on his behalf, saying she will side with Warnock since he's "a pastor and a scholar on the Word":

This lady is literally calling the pastor of Ebenezer Baptist Church -- The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s churc… https://t.co/uUyItJPlyy
— Joy-Ann Pro-Democracy & Masks Reid 😷 (@Joy-Ann Pro-Democracy & Masks Reid 😷)1617576456.0

Ellis replied mistakenly that Reid deleted her tweet — Reid did not delete it — and told the MSNBC host to "read your Bible, and you'd have known this was heresy and a false gospel."

Reid, of course, didn't like that one bit — and added a zinger directed at Trump and his supporters:

Nope. Deleted nothing. And I have read the Bible, dear - cover to cover; including the parts about idolatry and wor… https://t.co/9PcQTfU7vS
— Joy-Ann Pro-Democracy & Masks Reid 😷 (@Joy-Ann Pro-Democracy & Masks Reid 😷)1617595655.0

"I have read the Bible, dear — cover to cover; including the parts about idolatry and worshiping false Gods," she wrote. "And to repeat: I will take @ReverendWarnock over you, who defended the right's literal golden calf, as an expert on the Gospel any day."

Reid also questioned Ellis' "credentials" to "debate theology" with Warnock — an "actual pastor." And Ellis replied with a zinger of her own:

I’m an actual Christian. https://t.co/cEz4559n6G
— Jenna Ellis (@Jenna Ellis)1617594624.0

Ellis posted other tweets about the issue:

Trying to make this about race simply because he’s black is shameful. What matters is his heresy, not the color of… https://t.co/oaCqu7OKu6
— Jenna Ellis (@Jenna Ellis)1617580656.0

"Trying to make this about race simply because he's black is shameful," she later noted. "What matters is his heresy, not the color of his skin."

This is also why it’s VERY important for Christians not to just defend anything and everything a Republican says or… https://t.co/algI7yhTKU
— Jenna Ellis (@Jenna Ellis)1617598516.0
Let’s not forget that the “Reverend” Warnock is pro-choice, which is also against the Bible and moral truth. Warn… https://t.co/8GMkLp3Rx4
— Jenna Ellis (@Jenna Ellis)1617593091.0
Warnock deleted his heretical tweet.He should delete Reverend in front of his name too. https://t.co/6FYNG6LFZ1
— Jenna Ellis (@Jenna Ellis)1617583515.0

Anything else?

Warnock and fellow Democratic U.S. Sen. Jon Ossoff won a bitterly contested Georgia runoff election in January that resulted in a 50-50 count in the Senate between Democrats and Republicans, effectively giving Democrats control since Vice President Kamala Harris holds the deciding vote.

But Warnock was met with plenty of opposition along the way, including from black pastors who criticized his outspoken support of abortion.

"We implore you to uphold the Biblical defense of life and to fight against the systemic racism of abortion," the letter from 25 pastors read.

Former NFL coach Tony Dungy also called out Warnock for his pro-choice views, saying "Rev. Warner may be a pastor. My question would be, 'Is he a Christian?' That is, does he follow the teachings of Jesus, and does he believe that the Bible is the absolute word of God?"

Susan Sarandon warns Democrats could lose in 2022 and 2024, blasts Biden: 'Where are the $2K checks you promised?'



Actress Susan Sarandon called out President Joe Biden over his promise of $2,000 COVID-19 stimulus checks. The Hollywood activist also warned the Democrats that they could lose elections in 2022 and 2024 if they attempt to do a "bait and switch" with the coronavirus relief package.

With Americans struggling financially because of the coronavirus lockdowns, Sarandon took to Twitter to take Democrats to task.

"Where are the $2K checks you promised @JoeBiden @KamalaHarris @ReverendWarnock @ossoff? At a time when only 39% of Americans could afford a $1,000 emergency & over 15 million have lost employer-sponsored health insurance, the diff between $1,400 & $2K is a matter of survival," Sarandon tweeted.

The progressive activist tagged President Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, as well as newly elected senators from Georgia Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff. All four of the Democrats promised $2,000 coronavirus stimulus checks, and promoted the funds heavily during the campaign for Ossoff and Warnock.

In January, Sarandon told Ossoff and Warnock to "please fight for the $2,000 check" that the politicians had promised.

Sarandon, 74, included a video compilation of Democrats saying they will provide Americans with $2,000 stimulus checks.

Currently, the government is expected to issue $1,400 stimulus checks as part of the $1.9 trillion emergency aid package that was passed by the Democratic-controlled Congress early Friday morning. A Politico report said Biden "remained firm on the size of the $1,400 payment."

The upcoming stimulus checks are expected to be more targeted, and "upper-income taxpayers" will likely be barred from receiving payment or the total amount will be diminished for high earners.

If voters feel like Dems are pulling a bait and switch, don't be surprised when they don't show up in 2022 or 2024.
— Susan Sarandon (@Susan Sarandon)1612450106.0

Sarandon, who is an ardent supporter of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), warned that if Democrats don't issue $2,000 coronavirus stimulus checks then they could be voted out in the 2022 midterms and the 2024 general election.

"If voters feel like Dems are pulling a bait and switch, don't be surprised when they don't show up in 2022 or 2024," she wrote.

Commenters noted that the $600 stimulus check that was issued in December and the anticipated $1,400 check adds up to $2,000.

The Oscar-winning actress asked, "Even if Dems meant $1,400 the entire time, the fact is that voters heard and were expecting $2,000 'IMMEDIATELY,' not maybe $1,400 some time in late spring. Is it really worth it to lose Dem voters in 2022 and 2024 over $600?"

The Daily Wire reported that some Democrats attacked Sarandon for demanding the Biden administration keep its promise of $2,000 checks.

One Twitter user blasted Sarandon, "God, here we go... The Dems will lose votes when hardcore leftist ideologues like yourself tweet nonsense like this out."

The actress replied, "Got it. So if Dems lose in 2022 and 2024 it's because I Tweeted and not because voters who desperately need $2,000 think they lied."

Got it. So if Dems lose in 2022 and 2024 it’s because I Tweeted and not because voters who desperately need $2,000… https://t.co/Z0W2rKnM9c
— Susan Sarandon (@Susan Sarandon)1612452143.0

Last week, President Biden and the Democratic Party were ripped by their own supporters over the amount of the COVID-19 stimulus checks. Democratic voters voiced their displeasure online and demanded $2,000 stimulus checks that they were promised. One person even threatened, "Never voting D again."

Leftists want folks to move to Georgia to increase Democratic votes for US Senate runoffs — but tactic could be a felony



All eyes will be on Georgia Jan. 5 when a pair of runoff elections will determine the fate of the state's two U.S. Senate seats presently held by Republicans.

In short, if the Democratic candidates flip the seats, the Senate's 100 seats will be evenly split between the GOP and Democrats with the deciding vote going to the vice president — and that would be Democrat Kamala Harris assuming Joe Biden takes the presidential oath of office.

With the makeup of the Senate on the line — as well as future U.S. policies — the notion of people actually moving to Georgia so they can vote in the runoff and influence its outcome has become a discussion point on the left.

What are the details?

"I hope everybody moves to Georgia, you know, in the next month or two, registers to vote, and votes for these two Democratic senators," New York Times columnist Thomas L. Friedman told CNN on Monday night, according to Fox News.

"These run-offs will decide which party controls the Senate, and thus, whether we'll have any hope of a large stimulus/climate bill. If you have the means and fervor to make a temporary move to GA, [I] believe anyone who registers by Dec 7 can vote in these elections," Eric Levitz of New York Magazine's Intelligencer wrote in a "mostly in jest" now-deleted tweet captured by Washington Examiner reporter Jerry Dunleavy:

“mostly in jest” https://t.co/a71Xy0grOV
— JERRY DUNLEAVY (@JERRY DUNLEAVY)1604594968.0

And former Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang announced on Twitter that he and his wife are moving to Georgia to campaign for the Democratic candidates Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock who are facing off against incumbent Republicans David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler, the Wall Street Journal reported.

Great news #yanggang - Evelyn and I are moving to Georgia to help @ossoff and @ReverendWarnock win! This is our onl… https://t.co/KxIk38BWcz
— Andrew Yang🧢🇺🇸 (@Andrew Yang🧢🇺🇸)1604798863.0

Yang didn't indicate if he plans to register to vote in Georgia, the paper said.

Republican U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida has taken notice of the move-to-Georgia trend: "My understanding, I learned last night, is they're even inviting people to move here to come vote," he said at an event for Loeffler in Georgia on Wednesday, Fox News said, which incited boos from the crowd.

But is it legal?

Sure, anybody can move to Georgia in the next few weeks, establish residency, and register to vote by Dec. 7 — but is it legal?

That depends.

The Journal said those who use this tactic need to stay in the state for a while or risk getting into trouble.

A spokesman for the Georgia Secretary of State's Office cited state law saying it's a felony to vote in the state's elections if one is residing in the state briefly with the intention just to vote and then move away, the paper noted.

"These are sensitive issues, and election officials are going to pay attention to what is happening," Enrijeta Shino, a University of North Florida political science professor who has researched voting issues in Georgia, told the Journal. "People should be very careful about doing that."

Shino told the paper that folks can move to Georgia briefly to work on campaigns and canvass for candidates, but voting in the state without the intention of staying would be considered fraud.

Legal residents of Georgia who turn 18 between now and Dec. 7 would be eligible to register in the runoff, Shino also told the Journal.

More from the paper:

One of the main ways to establish proof of residency is to provide a valid Georgia driver's license. People must bring proof of identification, Social Security number and a Georgia primary residence (such as a utility bill). The state Department of Driver Services sends information on new residents obtaining driver's licenses to the Georgia Secretary of State's Office for voter registration, unless the new driver specifically asks the department not to do so, said department spokeswoman Shevondah Leslie.

If drivers meet the state's requirements, the county board of elections automatically registers new residents to vote. How soon that would take place is not clear.

A sudden influx of new residents could have some impact on what are expected to be close Senate runoff elections.

Eddie Zipperer, assistant professor of political science at Georgia Military College, told Fox News that he's "seen people saying they'll move to Georgia, but it's a lot more difficult than they think. It would be very dangerous and, ultimately, I presume, not worth it."

Liberal activist Andrew Lang's comments raise suspicions that Democrats could exploit Georgia law to win critical runoff elections



As the nation sets its sights on Georgia, where two runoff elections will determine which political party controls the U.S. Senate for the next two years, former Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang announced last week that he is moving to the Peach State to aid Democratic efforts there, WAGA-TV reported.

On Twitter, Yang said that "everyone who campaigned for Joe should get ready to head to Georgia."

By Saturday, Yang confirmed he was moving his family to Georgia.

"Great news #yanggang - Evelyn and I are moving to Georgia to help @ossoff and @ReverendWarnock win! This is our only chance to clear Mitch out of the way and help Joe and Kamala get things done in the next 4 years. More details to come but let's go!!!" Yang announced.

Great news #yanggang - Evelyn and I are moving to Georgia to help @ossoff and @ReverendWarnock win! This is our onl… https://t.co/KxIk38BWcz
— Andrew Yang🧢🇺🇸 (@Andrew Yang🧢🇺🇸)1604798863.0

Yang's comments immediately generated questions of whether Democratic voters are looking to exploit Georgia's lenient election laws to give Democrats the edge in both runoff elections.

Specifically, Georgia does not specify a minimum residency requirement for voting, meaning any legal permanent resident of Georgia would be able to participate in the runoff election so long as they register to vote by Dec. 7. Georgia also requires voters to show ID before voting — but state law does not require the identification to be issued by Georgia.

According to the Wall Street Journal, moving to Georgia to participate in the runoff elections is technically legal — but suggested any new residents should stay a while to avoid legal backlash.

Enrijeta Shino, a professor at the University of North Florida, told the Journal that moving to Georgia only to participate in the elections without intentions of staying would constitute fraud.

"People should be very careful about doing that," Shino warned. "These are sensitive issues, and election officials are going to pay attention to what is happening."

More from the Journal:

A spokesman for the Georgia Secretary of State's Office, which oversees voter registrations, declined to comment on how quickly someone could establish legal residency in Georgia, but cited state law that it is a felony to vote in Georgia elections if you are not a legal resident or if you are residing in the state briefly with the intention just to vote and then move away.

As of Wednesday afternoon, Sen. David Purdue (R-Ga.) led his Democratic challenger, Jon Ossoff, by nearly 90,000 votes, or about 1.7 percentage points. Although Purdue won more votes than Ossoff, Georgia law requires a runoff election because neither candidate broke the 50% threshold.

Meanwhile, the other Senate run-off, in which Sen. Kelly Loeffler (R) is the incumbent, was a special election, and more than a dozen candidates ran. No candidate reached the 50% threshold in that race, and the top two finishers — Loeffler and Democrat Raphael Warnock — were sent to the runoff.

Both runoff elections will be held on Jan. 5. Early voting for the runoff will begin Dec. 14.