'Not medicine — it's malpractice': Trump HHS buries child sex-change regime with damning report



The Department of Health and Human Services delivered what could prove to be a lethal blow this week to the profitable and predatory child sex-change industry that has been on the defensive since President Donald Trump's Jan. 28 executive order directing all federal agencies to ensure that medical institutions receiving federal funding "end the chemical and surgical mutilation of children."

HHS published an exhaustive peer-reviewed report on Wednesday that should make abundantly clear to those still clinging to LGBT activists' preferred narrative about so-called "gender-affirming care" that "the harms from sex-rejecting procedures — including puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgical operations — are significant, long term, and too often ignored or inadequately tracked."

"This is a new day in the Department of Health and Human Services. It's a new day in the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, a new day for the country," Admiral Brian Christine, assistant secretary for HHS, told Blaze News. "It is because of President Trump and Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. that this information has come out."

'The HHS report should put an end to the scourge of child mutilation masquerading as health care.'

The 410-page report, titled "Treatment for Pediatric Gender Dysphoria: Review of Evidence and Best Practices," reads as the weightier American counterpart to Britain's damning Cass Review, detailing:

  • the often glossed-over risks and medical uncertainties involved with puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and sex-change genital mutilations;
  • the unscientific nature and strategic omissions of fact in the World Professional Association of Transgender Health guidelines;
  • the manipulation of medical definitions undertaken in service of gender ideologues' medical agendas;
  • ethical concerns regarding consent for sex-change procedures as well as the regret often experienced by victims of such procedures; and
  • the "international retreat" from the "gender-affirming" model of care.

The report — which National Institutes of Health Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya indicated "marks a turning point for American medicine" — notes that the overall quality of evidence concerning the effects of sex-change medical interventions on long-term health, psychological outcomes, quality of life, and regret was found to be "very low."

Accordingly, the beneficial effects alleged in the literature and often cited by gender ideologues are likely to differ substantially from the actual effects of the sex-change procedures.

'It's literally a billion-dollar industry. It creates lifelong customers.'

What's more, the report noted that while the risks of child sex changes are many and unmistakable — including infertility, sexual dysfunction, impaired bone density accrual, surgical complications, and heart, metabolic, and psychiatric disorders — publication bias, a failure of existing studies to adequately track and report harms, and other factors may have obfuscated the true fallout of so-called "gender-affirming care."

The report minces no words in its conclusion, stating:

Many U.S. medical professionals and associations have fallen short of their duty to prioritize the health interests of young patients. First, there was a rapid expansion and implementation of a clinical protocol that lacked sufficient scientific and ethical justification. Second, when confronted with compelling evidence that this protocol did not deliver the health benefits it promised, and that other countries were changing their policies appropriately, U.S. medical professionals and associations failed to reconsider the "gender-affirming" approach. Third, conflicting evidence — evidence that challenged the foundational assumptions of the protocol and the professional standing of its advocates — was mischaracterized or insufficiently acknowledged. Finally, dissenting perspectives were marginalized, and those who voiced them were disparaged.

"The American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics peddled the lie that chemical and surgical sex-rejecting procedures could be good for children," HHS Secretary Kennedy said in a statement.

"They betrayed their oath to first do no harm, and their so-called ‘gender-affirming care’ has inflicted lasting physical and psychological damage on vulnerable young people," continued Kennedy. "That is not medicine — it’s malpractice."

RELATED: Sacrificing body parts and informed consent to the sex-change regime

Photo by Bob Riha Jr./Getty Images

When other Western nations, Britain in particular, began to re-evaluate their barbaric medical approaches to gender dysphoria, the Biden administration and the U.S. medical establishment dug in their heels and pushed the child sex-change regime to new extremes.

For instance, Biden's transvestic Assistant Secretary of Health and Human Services Rachel Levine, formerly Richard Levine, successfully pressured WPATH to drop its recommended minimum age requirements for sex-change mutilations. His reasoning for lowering the recommended age minimums — 17 for genital mutilations, 15 for healthy breast removals, 16 for breast implants, and 14 for hormone treatments — was apparently not based on scientific evidence but on politics.

Levine's successor, Trump HHS Assistant Secretary Brian Christine, told Blaze News, "There was absolutely an effort by the prior administration and, very specifically, an absolute effort by the individual who was the prior assistant secretary for health, Rachel Levine," to continue politicizing children's health.

He added that both ideology and profit prompted medical professionals and associations to similarly dig in their heels.

"It's literally a billion-dollar industry. It creates lifelong customers," said Christine. "You bring a little boy or a little girl in and you have them either get hormones or they get a mutilating surgery — you've created a lifelong customer. You've created someone who's going to come back again and again and again because of surgical complications or other things going on."

Gender dysphoria is an "emotional and mental condition," he explained. "There's no question about that. These individuals who truly have gender dysphoria, they suffer terribly. They deserve compassion. They deserve mental health care. What they don't need are sex-rejecting surgeries."

Christine said that treating gender dysphoria as a mental health condition is especially important with kids. "You should treat them with mental health care because we know that if you do, the majority of these kids, by the time they're in their late teens, are very comfortable in their own skin," he said.

Neeraja Deshpande, policy analyst for the Independent Women's Forum, said that the report, "in addition to creating a more transparent system, confirms once and for all what never should have been up for debate to begin with: that so-called surgical and chemical body alteration in the name of ‘gender transition’ is a medical danger to children."

Terry Schilling, president of the American Principles Project, said in a statement to Blaze News, "The HHS report should put an end to the scourge of child mutilation masquerading as health care."

RELATED: 'They'll create second sets of genitals': WPATH Files author tells Glenn Beck about 'gender-affirming care' mutilations

Luis Soto/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

"The peer-reviewed study only confirms what the American Principles Project and anyone with common sense has known all along: The gender industrial complex relies on bad faith, bad science, and a radical ideology that places the financial interest of drug companies over those of children," said Schilling.

Schilling suggested to Blaze News that elements within the child sex-change regime are now more likely to reap the whirlwind in court.

"This is, at a minimum, some type of consumer fraud. I do think that because of how horrific the harm that they did was that it does cross into serious criminal areas."

While Schilling noted that the industry presently enjoys robust protection from trial attorneys and left-wing institutions, once major legal actions break through, prompting big payouts, "then you'll have blood in the water, and the sharks will start circling."

Schilling alluded to Chloe Cole's lawsuit as one such potential breakthrough action.

Cole, a detransitioner who has raised awareness across the country about the horrors and fallout of sex-change medical interventions, has sued Kaiser Permanente for alleged medical negligence in connection with the sex-rejecting procedures the health system performed on her as a minor.

Schilling commended the numerous experts who put their names to the report — including doctors and scientists from the Baylor College of Medicine, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Duke University — stating, "They're very courageous for doing this. This is a very powerful and embedded industry that's been doing really big and terrible things in the country ... and for these guys to put their names behind it is a very big deal."

When asked whether this report ultimately amounts to a lethal blow against the sex-change regime, HHS Assistant Secretary Christine told Blaze News, "Yeah, we certainly hope so. We certainly believe it will be. Listen, our job in the administration is to protect our children, protect our citizens. Our job is to produce gold-standard science. That's exactly what we have done. It's exactly what we're doing."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

'You know what really p**ses people off?' Vance identifies what's at heart of 'populist resentment' in Appalachia



Vice President JD Vance joined Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. at the Make America Healthy Again summit on Wednesday in discussing the Trump administration's revolution against the unworkable state of affairs and orthodoxies that have left so many Americans sick, censored, poor, and behind.

After the duo discussed President Donald Trump's penchant for taking "a bulldozer to Overton windows," Kennedy raised the matter of the dire health and social conditions in Appalachia, noting that Vance's incredible success serves as a "tragic reminder of the lost potential of almost everybody else in Appalachia."

'Their loved ones are dying much sooner than everybody else.'

"It's got the worst health data of any region in the country — the highest cardiac disease, the highest obesity, the highest diabetes, the highest stroke rates — but also addiction, alcoholism, and suicide," said Kennedy.

Although dubbed a "golden child of Appalachia" by the HHS secretary, Vance emphasized his firsthand familiarity with the bleak conditions experienced by so many in the region, noting that he was hard-pressed to identify a single important male family figure who lived past the age of 70.

"You want to talk about, like, 'populism'? And you want to talk about people being pissed off? Well, yeah, people are pissed off when they don't have good jobs; and people are pissed off when things disappear and move overseas; and people are pissed off when they feel like, you know, other countries are being prioritized over the United States of America," said Vance. "All of that is part of the populist resentment of the past 20 or 30 years in American politics."

RELATED: Vance identifies the perfect mascot for the Democrats — then outlines what America actually needs

Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images

"But you know what really pisses people off?" continued the vice president. "When they realize that their loved ones are dying much sooner than everybody else."

Life expectancy has long been lower and infant mortality higher in Appalachia than in the rest of the country.

Vance noted that while on the one hand, he feels guilty that so many of his fellow Appalachians have not enjoyed the opportunities for economic and familial stability that he has enjoyed, he also feels "a great sense of anger because we never should have gotten to the point that we are today, and the reason that we have is because of failed leadership — and it's failed leadership over generations."

The vice president stressed that one of the reasons he strongly supports Kennedy's health initiatives is because therein lies a major opportunity to do right by Appalachian residents who have been "left behind by this country's leadership."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

JFK's grandson launches congressional bid to replace Jerry Nadler



Another member of the Kennedy political dynasty is launching a high-profile campaign, and this time it's for Congress.

Jack Schlossberg, former President John F. Kennedy's 32-year-old grandson, announced his congressional campaign to replace retiring Democratic Rep. Jerry Nadler of New York. Schlossberg originally rose to political stardom on TikTok, where, like many of his relatives, he would criticize and mock Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

'With control of Congress, there's nothing we can't do.'

Schlossberg will be entering a crowded primary race alongside state Assemblyman Micah Lasher and nonprofit CEO Liam Elkind. These candidates are looking to represent New York's 12th congressional district, which is one of the most Democratic districts in the state and boasts one of the highest incomes per capita in the country.

On his campaign website, the Kennedy heir said he launched his congressional bid because "the best part of the greatest city on earth needs to be heard loud and clear in Washington and deserves a representative who won't back down."

RELATED: 'Pathetic' Senate Democrats cave, advancing key shutdown vote and prompting intraparty uproar: 'It’s a surrender'

Disney/Randy Holmes

In his campaign announcement, Schlossberg also emphasized his ambition for Democrats to take back control of the House. Republicans currently hold a historically narrow advantage in the House, partially due to two Democratic vacancies following the deaths of Reps. Sylvester Turner of Texas and Raul Grijalva of Arizona.

"We deserve better, and we can do better," Schlossberg said. "And it starts with the Democratic Party winning back control of the House of Representatives."

Notably, Schlossberg is running to replace a Democrat in a deep-blue district, meaning the partisan split in the House will be unaffected by his candidacy.

RELATED: JFK's grandson trashes RFK Jr. and says he's 'excited' about voting for Biden

Bonnie Cash/UPI/Bloomberg via Getty Images

"With control of Congress, there's nothing we can't do," Schlossberg said. "Without it, we're helpless to a third term."

"My name is Jack Schlossberg, and I'm running for Congress to represent my home: New York's 12th congressional district, where I was born and raised."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Trump strikes major deal with pharma giants Lilly and Novo over obesity drugs, Medicare



Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is working on identifying and tackling the root causes of America's obesity epidemic. In the meantime, the Trump administration wants to make sure that Americans have access to affordable diabetes and weight-loss drugs, specifically glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, better known as GLP-1 drugs.

To this end and as part of his months-long campaign to bring most-favored-nation prescription drug pricing to Americans, President Donald Trump has struck a deal with pharmaceutical giants Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk, the manufacturer of Ozempic, to cut prices on their weight-loss drugs in exchange for Medicare coverage.

A senior administration official indicated on Thursday that since Trump issued his most-favored-nation pricing executive order in May, GLP-1 drugs "have been top of mind" — not just because of the pharmaceuticals' apparent cardiometabolic benefits "but also because this is, again, an issue of fairness."

RELATED: How MAHA can really save American lives

IM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images

Per the terms of Trump's deal with the two companies, "starting oral doses of GLP-1s will cost just $149 for everyone on Medicare, Medicaid, or Trump Rx," said an official. "That's roughly 1/9th of today's list price."

For Medicare, the manufacturers have reportedly agreed to reduce prices on GLP-1 drugs that are currently used for diabetes and other covered conditions to $245 per month across all other doses, added the official.

Savings generated by these price reductions will apparently be used to provide new coverage for GLP-1 drugs to patients struggling with obesity who face high metabolic or cardiovascular risk at the same monthly cost of $245.

As of 2020, over 100 million American adults were obese, and more than 22 million adults suffered from severe obesity, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

While the adult obesity rate reportedly declined from 39.9% in 2022 to 37% this year — representing roughly 7.6 million fewer obese adults — Gallup recently indicated that diagnoses of diabetes have reached an all-time high of 13.8%.

Amid the glut of diabetes cases, there has been a significant increase in the number of U.S. adults who report taking GLP-1 drugs — from 5.8% in February 2024 to 12.4% in the latest quarter of 2025. The three-year decline in obesity among most age groups appears to correspond with the embrace of the weight-loss drugs.

When asked roughly how many patients on Medicare and Medicaid would be impacted by these changes, another administration official noted that in Medicare, around 10% of the population will be eligible for the standard access. While the drugs are approved for a much broader population, access has been constrained for "patients that will benefit clinically from it."

There will reportedly be three tiers of patients in Medicare who will have access to these drugs for the purposes of addressing obesity and driving "cardiometabolic improvement": those with a body mass index greater than 27 kg/m² suffering from pre-diabetes or established cardiovascular disease; patients with a BMI greater than 30 who have uncontrolled hypertension, kidney disease, and/or heart failure; and individuals with a BMI exceeding 35.

'We do not believe that GLP-1s or drugs alone are somehow some silver bullet.'

"This is about making America healthy again," said the second official. "This is about preventing strokes, this is about preventing heart attacks, and this is about preventing end-stage renal disease."

The officials acknowledged, however, that cheaper drugs do not amount to a long-term solution to the problem of obesity.

"Make no mistake: We're in a war against obesity. We do not believe that GLP-1s or drugs alone are somehow some silver bullet to make the ... country healthy again," said one official. "They are an important jump-start."

In exchange for their cooperation, the pharma giants are gaining additional access to beneficiaries who wouldn't otherwise be covered by Medicare for obesity indications, certainty from the Trump administration on its approach to drug pricing moving forward, and a commitment to invest in American manufacturing.

One Trump administration official told reporters that this initiative is expected to ultimately be cost neutral, stating, "This is really a win-win on all sides — for taxpayers, for Medicare beneficiaries, as well as for the companies."

Last month, Trump announced an agreement with AstraZeneca that would guarantee every state Medicaid program across the country most-favored-nation drug prices on the pharma giant's products. The previous month, he announced a similar deal with Pfizer.

"In case after case, our citizens pay massively higher prices than other nations pay for the same exact pill, from the same factory, effectively subsidizing socialism [abroad] with skyrocketing prices at home," Trump said in a statement. "So we would spend tremendous amounts of money in order to provide inexpensive drugs to another country. And when I say the price is different, you can see some examples where the price is beyond anything — four times, five times different."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

The FDA Has A Chemical Abortion Pill Problem

If we want to Make America Healthy Again, we must reevaluate deadly chemical abortion pills, not approve even more of them.

Public Health Destroyed Its Own Credibility Long Before RFK Jr. Arrived

The American medical establishment ignored the science on Covid, abortion, and transgenderism. They have no credibility to criticize RFK Jr.

'TrumpRx' website to offer discounted drugs as part of landmark Big Pharma deal



President Donald Trump unveiled a new deal to drastically reform the pharmaceutical industry and reduce drug prices for consumers.

Trump announced that Pfizer would be heavily discounting some of its "most popular medications" and that all new medications introduced in the U.S. markets would be sold at the "reduced Most Favored Nation cost." Trump also revealed that these discounted drugs will be available for purchase on a federally operated "TrumpRx" direct-to-consumer website.

'The big winner of this deal clearly will be the American patient.'

"It's going to have a huge impact on bringing Medicaid costs down, like nothing else. ... Especially, low-income Americans will be helped so greatly," Trump said in the Oval Office Tuesday.

"This is a consequential moment for our country," press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a post on X. "Drug prices WILL be lower for everyday Americans, thanks to the negotiating prowess and determination of President Donald J. Trump. Democrats have been wanting to do this for decades. The Trump Administration has delivered."

RELATED: Health organizations attacking Trump's Tylenol-autism claims are cozied up with Big Pharma

pic.twitter.com/WGVNZLGsZS
— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) September 30, 2025

Trump initially issued an executive order in May that directed drug companies to offer the "most-favored-nation" price for American patients. If they failed to do so, the Department of Health and Human Services would make a rule to implement the policy, and the Food and Drug Administration would revoke approvals for drugs that may be "unsafe, ineffective, or improperly marketed."

Trump also wrote to over a dozen major pharmaceutical CEOs in July demanding that the manufacturers voluntarily extend the "most-favored-nation" pricing to all medicines provided to Medicaid recipients. Trump gave these companies until Monday to formally respond.

"If you refuse to step up, we will deploy every tool in our arsenal to protect American families from continued abusive drug pricing practices," Trump wrote.

So far, Eli Lilly pledged to raise prices in Europe in order to lower costs in the United States. Bristol-Myers Squibb similarly plans to charge the same list price for a new schizophrenia treatment in both the United States and United Kingdom.

RELATED: Who is bankrolling the anti-MAHA movement?

Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images

"The big winner of this deal clearly will be the American patient. There's no doubt about it," Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said during the press conference. "They are the ones that will see significant impact in their ability to buy medicines."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Fact-check: Tylenol confirms 2017 pregnancy warning tweet is authentic



President Donald Trump and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced on Monday that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration will notify physicians that acetaminophen use by pregnant women may be associated with a "very increased risk" of neurological conditions like autism and ADHD in children.

This announcement prompted debate about the safety of acetaminophen, which is the active ingredient in Tylenol and the leading cause of acute livery injury in the United States.

'If pregnant or breast-feeding, ask a health professional before use.'

Amid efforts to downplay possible risks of Tylenol usage during pregnancy by medical professionals and by foreign health organizations, online sleuths uncovered old yet thematically relevant messages Tylenol apparently shared on social media. Two of those messages went viral this week.

The first tweet, which is dated June 17, 2019, states, "Congrats on your upcoming addition! SO exciting! It'd be great to touch base real quick since we haven't tested Tylenol to be used during pregnancy."

The second tweet, dated March 7, 2017, states, "We actually don't recommend using any of our products while pregnant. Thank you for taking the time to voice your concerns today."

The second tweet was reposted on X both by the White House, with an image of Trump holding a hat emblazoned with the message, "Trump was right about everything," and by the Department of Health and Human Services with the caption, "No caption needed."

— (@)

Some social media users expressed doubt that Tylenol was actually responsible for the original tweet; others seized on the tweet as validation of the president's recent warnings about taking acetaminophen; and a few claimed it was being grossly misinterpreted.

Fact: The tweet is authentic.

When asked about the tweet, a spokesperson for Kenvue, the maker of Tylenol, told Blaze News, "This post from 2017 is being taken out of context."

"We do not recommend pregnant women take any medication without talking to their doctor," continued the statement. "This is consistent with the regulations and product label for acetaminophen."

Screenshot of correspondence with Kenvue.

This messaging is consistent with what appeared on the drug's warning label as of 2019.

In addition to highlighting the risk of "severe skin reactions" and "severe liver damage" if taken in excess or in conjunction with certain other substances, the packaging states: "If pregnant or breast-feeding, ask a health professional before use."

RELATED: Trump administration claims link between autism and Tylenol, greenlights remedy

Photo Illustration by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Similar language appeared in a Feb. 13, 2017, tweet in which Tylenol wrote, "Just make sure to talk to your doctor before taking Tylenol while you're pregnant."

When asked whether Tylenol poses an elevated risk to pregnant women and/or their unborn children and why pregnant women need to consult their doctors prior to use, a spokesperson for Kenvue, formerly the consumer health care division of Johnson & Johnson, provided the following response to Blaze News:

"The post did not address the full guidance — which has not changed:

  • "Acetaminophen is the safest pain reliever option for pregnant women as needed throughout their entire pregnancy.
  • "Our products are safe and effective when used as directed on the product label.
  • "We recommend pregnant women do not take any over-the-counter medication, including acetaminophen, without talking to their doctor first."

Tylenol's updated frequently asked questions webpage has a section on acetaminophen and autism, which states: "Our best advice? Talk to your healthcare professional before taking or administering acetaminophen."

The FAQ also states: "Please know that there is no credible science that shows taking acetaminophen causes autism."

'The majority of the studies reported positive associations of prenatal acetaminophen use with ADHD, ASD, or NDDs in offspring.'

There has long been evidence of an association between prenatal acetaminophen exposure and neurodevelopmental disorders including autism — an association the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and some of the other outfits now defending Tylenol once admitted.

For example:

  • A 2013 HHS-backed study published in the International Journal of Epidemiology concluded that "children exposed to long-term use of paracetamol during pregnancy had substantially adverse developmental outcomes at 3 years of age."
  • A 2017 study published in the Journal of International Medical Research said, "The bottom line is that hundreds of studies describing the epidemiology of autism and the numerous and varied risk factors for autism have a straightforward explanation: autism could be an acetaminophen-induced brain injury facilitated by oxidative stress and inflammation in newborns and young children."
  • A National Institutes of Health-funded 2019 study published in the journal JAMA Psychiatry indicated that "[umbilical] cord biomarkers of fetal exposure to acetaminophen were associated with significantly increased risk of childhood ADHD and ASD in a dose-response fashion."
  • A 2023 scientific review published in the Swiss journal Children concluded "without reasonable doubt and with no evidence to the contrary that exposure of susceptible babies and children to acetaminophen (paracetamol) induces many, if not most, cases of autism spectrum disorder."
  • A 2024 study published in the journal Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics noted that "careful examination reveals no valid objections to the conclusion that early exposure to acetaminophen causes neurodevelopmental injury in susceptible babies and children."
  • An NIH-supported systematic review published last month in the medical journal Environmental Health noted on the basis of an analysis of scores of studies regarding the relationship between neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and prenatal exposure to acetaminophen, that "overall, the majority of the studies reported positive associations of prenatal acetaminophen use with ADHD, ASD, or NDDs in offspring, with risk-of-bias and strength-of-evidence ratings informing the overall synthesis."
"Don't take Tylenol," Trump said on Monday. "Fight like hell not to take it."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Trump administration claims link between autism and Tylenol, greenlights remedy



President Donald Trump noted in his order establishing the Make America Healthy Again Commission that "autism spectrum disorder now affects 1 in 36 children in the United States — a staggering increase from rates of 1 to 4 out of 10,000 children identified with the condition during the 1980s."

The MAHA Commission's chairman, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., subsequently indicated that Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data show that the rate of autism among American children has gotten even worse.

"The autism epidemic is running rampant," Kennedy said. "One in 31 American children born in 2014 are disabled by autism. That's up significantly from two years earlier and nearly five times higher than when the CDC first started running autism surveys in children born in 1992. Prevalence for boys is an astounding 1 in 20, and in California it's 1 in 12.5."

'So taking Tylenol is not good.'

Kennedy promised during a Cabinet meeting in April that "by September, we will know what has caused the autism epidemic, and we'll be able to eliminate those exposures" — an ambition the Autism Society of America said was "harmful, misleading, and unrealistic."

Despite pre-emptive criticism by medical establishmentarians and the protest of the interim CEO of Tylenol maker Kenvue, Kennedy joined President Donald Trump and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Mehmet Oz on Monday in formally identifying one of the alleged drivers behind the rise in American autism: the use of acetaminophen, the active ingredient in Tylenol, during pregnancy.

Kennedy, who indicated that his agency is also looking closely at the potential link between vaccines and autism, noted, "The FDA is responding to clinical and laboratory studies that suggest a potential association between acetaminophen use during pregnancy and adverse neurological outcomes, including later diagnoses for ADHD and autism."

RELATED: Trump's health revolution: RFK Jr. takes aim at chemicals, junk food, and overmedication

IM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images

The health secretary indicated that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration kicked off the process on Monday for a label change for acetaminophen to indicate that the use of the drug by pregnant women may be associated with an increased risk of neurological conditions like autism and ADHD in children.

The Department of Health and Human Services will also launch a nationwide public information campaign to alert parents and families to the possible risks of taking Tylenol during pregnancy, Kennedy said.

"The safety of acetaminophen against the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in young children has never been validated," Kennedy said. "Prudent medicine therefore suggests caution in acetaminophen use by young children, especially since strong evidence also has associated it with liver toxicity. Some studies have also found the use of acetaminophen in children can potentially prolong viral illnesses."

"So taking Tylenol is not good," Trump said. "I'll say it: It's not good."

White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a statement to Blaze News, "President Trump pledged to address America's rising rate of autism, and to do so with gold-standard science. Today's announcement will make historic progress on both commitments."

Ahead of the announcement, a spokesperson for Kenvue — whose company stock price took a nosedive on Monday — told Blaze News, "We believe independent, sound science clearly shows that taking acetaminophen does not cause autism. We strongly disagree with any suggestion otherwise and are deeply concerned with the health risk this poses for expecting mothers."

The company spokesperson suggested further in the statement: "The facts are that over a decade of rigorous research, endorsed by leading medical professionals and global health regulators, confirms there is no credible evidence linking acetaminophen to autism."

Christopher Zahn, chief of clinical practice at the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, similarly suggested in a statement to Blaze News prior to the Trump administration's announcement regarding autism that "there is no clear evidence that proves a direct relationship between the prudent use of acetaminophen during pregnancy and fetal developmental issues."

'Failure to implement change in medical practice currently constitutes disregard for the ample evidence of harm.'

While Kenvue, the ACOG, and other outfits have suggested that there is no causal link between acetaminophen use and autism, there is at the very least an apparent association.

In a National Institutes of Health-funded 2019 study published in the journal JAMA Psychiatry, researchers led by Dr. Xiaobin Wang of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health collected umbilical cord blood from 996 births and measured the amount of acetaminophen and two of its byproducts in each sample.

The researchers found that "cord biomarkers of fetal exposure to acetaminophen were associated with significantly increased risk of childhood ADHD and ASD in a dose-response fashion."

Acetaminophen, often sold under the brand Tylenol in the United States and Canada, is the most common over-the-counter pain and fever medication used during pregnancy and is reportedly used by well over 50% of pregnant women worldwide.

A 2023 scientific review published in the Swiss peer-reviewed journal Children concluded "without reasonable doubt and with no evidence to the contrary that exposure of susceptible babies and children to acetaminophen (paracetamol) induces many, if not most, cases of autism spectrum disorder."

The review, led by Dr. William Parker, CEO of WPLab and visiting scholar at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, also concluded that "the very early postpartum period poses the greatest risk for acetaminophen-induced ASD, and that nearly ubiquitous use of acetaminophen during early development could conceivably be responsible for the induction in the vast majority, perhaps 90% or more, of all cases of ASD."

When asked about Kenvue's apparent denial of a causal link between acetaminophen and autism, Dr. Parker told Blaze News:

Technically, the company is correct. Acetaminophen alone absolutely does NOT cause autism. Susceptibility to injury is absolutely required for acetaminophen to induce autism. Without susceptibility, which is caused by a very complex mixture of genetics, epigenetics, and environment, acetaminophen cannot induce autism. Almost all scientists working in the field are aware to some extent of the complex mix of genetic and environmental factors involved in the induction of autism.

In his response, Dr. Parker also referenced a 2024 study that he worked on which was published in the journal Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics. The study noted that "careful examination reveals no valid objections to the conclusion that early exposure to acetaminophen causes neurodevelopmental injury in susceptible babies and children."

"Changes in medical practice should be implemented that effectively weigh the risks and benefits of neonatal and pediatric APAP use," the study reads. "Failure to implement change in medical practice currently constitutes disregard for the ample evidence of harm despite the absence of any valid rationale for the view that APAP might be safe for neurodevelopment."

On the matter of whether health officials should warn pregnant mothers about the increased risk of autism in their children associated with acetaminophen use, Dr. Parker noted that the "answer to this question is nuanced."

"Evidence indicates that heavy use of acetaminophen during pregnancy may lead to neurodevelopmental problems, including autism and ADHD," Dr. Parker said. "Heavy use is often associated with chronic pain management. Much less is known about the cost-to-benefit ratio of treating an occasional fever during pregnancy. Such treatments may have a net benefit for the fetus, although more work needs to be done to probe this topic."

Dr. Parker emphasized to Blaze News that "we are absolutely NOT blaming parents and physicians for this. It is not a mistake for us to do what we are told is best for our children. The science is all about preventing injury in the future, not blaming people who are blameless."

In an NIH-supported study published in August in the peer-reviewed medical journal Environmental Health, researchers from the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles' School of Public Health, and the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai systematically reviewed 46 "well-designed" studies incorporating data from over 100,000 participants regarding the relationship between neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and prenatal exposure to acetaminophen.

The researchers found that 27 of the studies reported "significant links" between acetaminophen exposure in the womb and NDDs and noted that "higher-quality studies were more likely to show positive associations."

"Overall, the majority of the studies reported positive associations of prenatal acetaminophen use with ADHD, ASD, or NDDs in offspring, with risk-of-bias and strength-of-evidence ratings informing the overall synthesis," the study reads.

When specifically evaluating the studies pertaining to Tylenol use and autism in children, the researchers found "strong evidence of a relationship between prenatal acetaminophen use and increased risk of ASD in children."

Dr. Andrea Baccarelli, a co-author of the study and a professor of environmental health at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, noted in a statement obtained by Blaze News that he believes "caution about acetaminophen use during pregnancy — especially heavy or prolonged use — is warranted."

Dr. Baccarelli and his colleagues recommended a "balanced approach" regarding acetaminophen use during pregnancy — a recommendation now echoed by the Trump administration: "Patients who need fever or pain reduction during pregnancy should take the lowest effective dose of acetaminophen, for the shortest possible duration, after consultation with their physician about their individual risk-benefit calculation."

Zahn of the ACOG was among those who railed against Baccarelli's systematic review.

RELATED: One for the ladies: Educate yourself about the risks of hormonal birth control

Photo by SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images

"Failing to treat medical conditions that warrant the use of acetaminophen is, at present, understood to be far more dangerous than theoretical concerns based on inconclusive reviews of conflicting science," Zahn said in a statement to Blaze News. "Maternal fever, diagnosis of severe pre-eclampsia, and appropriate pain control are all managed with the therapeutic use of acetaminophen and can create severe morbidity and mortality for maternal and child health if they are mismanaged based on improper clinical recommendations."

The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine also rushed to endorse Tylenol use during pregnancy following the publication of the damning review, noting that it "continues to advise physicians and patients that acetaminophen is an appropriate medication to treat pain and fever during pregnancy."

"Ideally, you don't take it at all," Trump said during the press conference on Monday. "If you can't tough it out or there's a problem, you're going to end up doing it."

In addition to calling out acetaminophen for its alleged role in the explosion of autism cases, Kennedy identified leucovorin, which is also known as folinic acid, as a viable autism treatment.

Leucovorin is already used to treat cerebral folate deficiency, which has been associated with autism.

The same year that a review in the Journal of Personalized Medicine noted that leucovorin "is associated with improvements in core and associated symptoms of ASD and appears safe and generally well-tolerated," a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was registered. The results of that trial, published last year in the European Journal of Pediatrics, were promising.

Researchers concluded that oral folinic acid supplementation "is effective and safe in improving ASD symptoms, with more pronounced benefits in children with high titers of folate receptor autoantibodies."

FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary indicated that his agency has initiated the approval of leucovorin calcium tablets for patients with cerebral folate deficiency.

"We have witnessed a tragic four-fold increase in autism over two decades," Makary said. "Children are suffering and deserve access to potential treatments that have shown promise. We are using gold standard science and common sense to deliver for the American people."

The biopharmaceutical company GSK promptly noted that it will submit a supplemental New Drug Application for leucovorin to update the label to reflect that it can be used to treat cerebral folate deficiency.

By addressing one of the alleged root causes of autism and mainstreaming a treatment might not only help American families tackle the disorder but spare them from what is, for many, a crushing burden.

Upwards of $60.9 billion are reportedly spent each year on children with ASD, and intensive behavioral interventions can cost anywhere from $40,000 to $60,000 per child annually.

Blaze News has reached out to the American Pediatric Society and to the HHS for comment.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!